ArcBit wallet vs Atomic Wallet Comparison
| Company | ||
|---|---|---|
| User rating | 4 user reviews | 20 user reviews |
| Cryptogeek rating | ||
| Trust Score How it works |
About
|
The ArcBit wallet was launched in the 2017 year. Though its page remain on mobile app stores, the current website of the project focuses on developing of a different app, the Neironix analytical app.
ArcBit was a Bitcoin user controlled app. No registration was required to use the app.
|
Atomic is a decentralized multi-cryptocurrency wallet available for Windows, Mac OS and Linux. The wallet uses BitTorrent technology for distributed order book and atomic swap technology for cross-chain custody free exchange. Atomicwallet also features instant exchange options - Changelly and ShapeShift. Atomic supports more than 300 crypto-currencie.
|
Founding Date
| 2017 | 2018 |
Country
| USA | Estonia |
Languages
| No data | English |
Wallet type
| Software wallet | Software wallet |
Storage type
| Cold wallet | Hot / Cold wallet |
Private keys
| Available | Available |
Available coins
| 0 | 0 |
Security
| No data | Personal |
Anonymity
| No data | High |
Ease of use
| No data | Easy |
Has attached card
| No data | no |
Has trading facilities
| No data | yes |
Has vouchers and offers
| No data | No data |
Features
| No data | Hierarchical Deterministic |
| About |
The ArcBit wallet was launched in the 2017 year. Though its page remain on mobile app stores, the current website of the project focuses on developing of a different app, the Neironix analytical app.
ArcBit was a Bitcoin user controlled app. No registration was required to use the app.
|
Atomic is a decentralized multi-cryptocurrency wallet available for Windows, Mac OS and Linux. The wallet uses BitTorrent technology for distributed order book and atomic swap technology for cross-chain custody free exchange. Atomicwallet also features instant exchange options - Changelly and ShapeShift. Atomic supports more than 300 crypto-currencie.
|
|---|---|---|
| Founding Date | Founding Date 2017 | Founding Date 2018 |
| Country | Country USA | Country Estonia |
| Languages | Languages No data | Languages English |
| Wallet type | Wallet type Software wallet | Wallet type Software wallet |
| Storage type | Storage type Cold wallet | Storage type Hot / Cold wallet |
| Private keys | Private keys Available | Private keys Available |
| Available coins | Available coins 0 | Available coins 0 |
| Security | Security No data | Security Personal |
| Anonymity | Anonymity No data | Anonymity High |
| Ease of use | Ease of use No data | Ease of use Easy |
| Has attached card | Has attached card No data | Has attached card no |
| Has trading facilities | Has trading facilities No data | Has trading facilities yes |
| Has vouchers and offers | Has vouchers and offers No data | Has vouchers and offers No data |
| Features | Features No data | Features Hierarchical Deterministic |
Social
Website
| neironix.io | atomicwallet.io |
| @arc_bit | @atomicwallet |
| Website | Website neironix.io | Website atomicwallet.io |
|---|---|---|
| Twitter @arc_bit | Twitter @atomicwallet |
Advantages
| - Private Key Ownership - Hierarchical Deterministic - Open-Source Code - Security | - Many currencies supported. Long gone are the days when different types of tokens had to be stored in separate wallets. - Atomic swaps. A number of experts believe that this is a full-fledged replacement of platforms for trading currencies, moreover, it is completely safe. - Too high-quality wallet production. It really meets high-quality standards, which is not typical for a scam. Half a million downloads confirm this. Of course, it is possible to steal such a large amount of currency, but still, the company is more likely focused on normal market work. - Availability of additional functions. The possibility of staking, additional protection, careful attention to the privacy and anonymity of users - all this distinguishes a wallet from a scam. |
Disadvantages
| - | - Not as secure as a hardware wallet. - Not an open-sourced. - No biometrics or 2FA features, which makes Atomic wallet not entirely safe |
Rating
| User rating | User rating 4 user reviews | User rating 20 user reviews |
|---|---|---|
| Cryptogeek rating | Cryptogeek rating | Cryptogeek rating |
| Advantages | Advantages - Private Key Ownership - Hierarchical Deterministic - Open-Source Code - Security | Advantages - Many currencies supported. Long gone are the days when different types of tokens had to be stored in separate wallets. - Atomic swaps. A number of experts believe that this is a full-fledged replacement of platforms for trading currencies, moreover, it is completely safe. - Too high-quality wallet production. It really meets high-quality standards, which is not typical for a scam. Half a million downloads confirm this. Of course, it is possible to steal such a large amount of currency, but still, the company is more likely focused on normal market work. - Availability of additional functions. The possibility of staking, additional protection, careful attention to the privacy and anonymity of users - all this distinguishes a wallet from a scam. |
| Disadvantages | Disadvantages - | Disadvantages - Not as secure as a hardware wallet. - Not an open-sourced. - No biometrics or 2FA features, which makes Atomic wallet not entirely safe |
ArcBit wallet user rating is 5, based on 4 user reviews. Atomic Wallet user rating is 2.2, based on 20 user reviews.
We also calculate the special Cryptogeek TrustScore based on the characteristics of each wallet.
| We choose the winner based on our TrustScore Rating. Please remember, it’s still up to you which company to choose! How do we calculate Trust Score? |
ArcBit wallet vs Atomic Wallet - Which Wallet Is Better in 2025?
This ArcBit wallet vs Atomic Wallet comparison is based on the most recent data on both companies. We do our best to provide you with unbiased information about cryptocurrency companies.
Based on user reviews only, ArcBit wallet is rated 5 with 4 user reviews, while Atomic Wallet is rated 2.2 with 20 user reviews.
Let's finally move to overall Trust Score: