DAOWallet vs OPOLO Comparison
| Company |
|
|
| User rating |
User rating
3.7 / 5
3 user reviews
|
User rating
4 / 5
1 user review
|
| Cryptogeek rating |
Cryptogeek rating
4 / 5
|
Cryptogeek rating
4 / 5
|
| Trust Score
How it works
|
Trust Score
4.2 / 5
|
Trust Score
4.23 / 5
|
About
|
A safe and secure crypto wallet that helps to manage assets and provides the possibility for players to authorize on DAOPlatform, play games and receive real-time payouts. DAOWallet is the key to the DAOGroup ecosystem and acts as a payment gateway for game developers, operators, validators and affiliates.
|
OPOLO Cosmos is a hardware multi-cryptocurrency wallet that comes with a single wallet application, which can be installed on Windows, Linux, and Mac to access all integrated coins and tokens from one easy to use app. OPOLO wallet supports over 1500 cryptocurrencies.
|
Founding Date
Country
Languages
Wallet type
|
Software wallet
|
Hardware wallet
|
Storage type
Private keys
Available coins
|
6
- Bitcoin (BTC), USD Coin (USDC), EOS (EOS), Ethereum (ETH), Tether (USDT), TrueUSD (TUSD)
|
0
|
Security
Anonymity
Ease of use
Has attached card
Has trading facilities
Has vouchers and offers
Features
|
No data
|
2 Factor Authentication, Hierarchical Deterministic
|
| About |
A safe and secure crypto wallet that helps to manage assets and provides the possibility for players to authorize on DAOPlatform, play games and receive real-time payouts. DAOWallet is the key to the DAOGroup ecosystem and acts as a payment gateway for game developers, operators, validators and affiliates.
|
OPOLO Cosmos is a hardware multi-cryptocurrency wallet that comes with a single wallet application, which can be installed on Windows, Linux, and Mac to access all integrated coins and tokens from one easy to use app. OPOLO wallet supports over 1500 cryptocurrencies.
|
| Founding Date |
Founding Date
2017
|
Founding Date
2018
|
| Country |
Country
Estonia
|
Country
Luxembourg
|
| Languages |
Languages
English
|
Languages
English
|
| Wallet type |
Wallet type
Software wallet
|
Wallet type
Hardware wallet
|
| Storage type |
Storage type
Hot wallet
|
Storage type
Cold wallet
|
| Private keys |
Private keys
Available
|
Private keys
Available
|
| Available coins |
Available coins
6
- Bitcoin (BTC), USD Coin (USDC), EOS (EOS), Ethereum (ETH), Tether (USDT), TrueUSD (TUSD)
|
Available coins
0
|
| Security |
Security
No data
|
Security
Personal
|
| Anonymity |
Anonymity
No data
|
Anonymity
High
|
| Ease of use |
Ease of use
No data
|
Ease of use
Easy
|
| Has attached card |
Has attached card
No data
|
Has attached card
no
|
| Has trading facilities |
Has trading facilities
No data
|
Has trading facilities
yes
|
| Has vouchers and offers |
Has vouchers and offers
No data
|
Has vouchers and offers
No data
|
| Features |
Features
No data
|
Features
2 Factor Authentication, Hierarchical Deterministic
|
Social
Website
Twitter
Advantages
|
- Easy to use
- Decentralized
|
- Security
- Private Key Ownership
|
Disadvantages
|
- Not very popular
- User complaints
|
- Paid product
- Not so easy for beginners
|
Rating
| User rating |
User rating
3.7 / 5
3 user reviews
|
User rating
4 / 5
1 user review
|
| Cryptogeek rating |
Cryptogeek rating
4 / 5
|
Cryptogeek rating
4 / 5
|
| Advantages |
Advantages
- Easy to use
- Decentralized
|
Advantages
- Security
- Private Key Ownership
|
| Disadvantages |
Disadvantages
- Not very popular
- User complaints
|
Disadvantages
- Paid product
- Not so easy for beginners
|
DAOWallet user rating is 3.7, based on 3 user reviews. OPOLO user rating is 4, based on 1 user reviews.
We also calculate the special Cryptogeek TrustScore based on the characteristics of each wallet.
Choose other companies
DAOWallet vs OPOLO - Which Wallet Is Better in 2025?
This DAOWallet vs OPOLO comparison is based on the most recent data on both companies. We do our best to provide you with unbiased information about cryptocurrency companies.
Based on user reviews only, DAOWallet is rated 3.7 with 3 user reviews, while OPOLO is rated 4 with 1 user reviews.
Let's finally move to overall Trust Score:
