Atomic Wallet vs mSigna Wallet Comparison
| Company | ||
|---|---|---|
| User rating | 20 user reviews | 1 user review |
| Cryptogeek rating | ||
| Trust Score How it works |
About
|
Atomic is a decentralized multi-cryptocurrency wallet available for Windows, Mac OS and Linux. The wallet uses BitTorrent technology for distributed order book and atomic swap technology for cross-chain custody free exchange. Atomicwallet also features instant exchange options - Changelly and ShapeShift. Atomic supports more than 300 crypto-currencie.
|
mSigna Wallet is no longer offered. The wallet was designed by the software company Ciphrex in the time of crypto rush in 2017. The developer’s Twitter media had not published any updates since mid-2017.
|
Founding Date
| 2018 | 2017 |
Country
| Estonia | USA |
Languages
| English | No data |
Wallet type
| Software wallet | No data |
Storage type
| Hot / Cold wallet | No data |
Private keys
| Available | Not available |
Available coins
| 0 | 0 |
Security
| Personal | No data |
Anonymity
| High | No data |
Ease of use
| Easy | No data |
Has attached card
| no | No data |
Has trading facilities
| yes | No data |
Has vouchers and offers
| No data | No data |
Features
| Hierarchical Deterministic | No data |
| About |
Atomic is a decentralized multi-cryptocurrency wallet available for Windows, Mac OS and Linux. The wallet uses BitTorrent technology for distributed order book and atomic swap technology for cross-chain custody free exchange. Atomicwallet also features instant exchange options - Changelly and ShapeShift. Atomic supports more than 300 crypto-currencie.
|
mSigna Wallet is no longer offered. The wallet was designed by the software company Ciphrex in the time of crypto rush in 2017. The developer’s Twitter media had not published any updates since mid-2017.
|
|---|---|---|
| Founding Date | Founding Date 2018 | Founding Date 2017 |
| Country | Country Estonia | Country USA |
| Languages | Languages English | Languages No data |
| Wallet type | Wallet type Software wallet | Wallet type No data |
| Storage type | Storage type Hot / Cold wallet | Storage type No data |
| Private keys | Private keys Available | Private keys Not available |
| Available coins | Available coins 0 | Available coins 0 |
| Security | Security Personal | Security No data |
| Anonymity | Anonymity High | Anonymity No data |
| Ease of use | Ease of use Easy | Ease of use No data |
| Has attached card | Has attached card no | Has attached card No data |
| Has trading facilities | Has trading facilities yes | Has trading facilities No data |
| Has vouchers and offers | Has vouchers and offers No data | Has vouchers and offers No data |
| Features | Features Hierarchical Deterministic | Features No data |
Social
Website
| atomicwallet.io | github.com |
| @atomicwallet | @ciphrex |
| Website | Website atomicwallet.io | Website github.com |
|---|---|---|
| Twitter @atomicwallet | Twitter @ciphrex |
Advantages
| - Many currencies supported. Long gone are the days when different types of tokens had to be stored in separate wallets. - Atomic swaps. A number of experts believe that this is a full-fledged replacement of platforms for trading currencies, moreover, it is completely safe. - Too high-quality wallet production. It really meets high-quality standards, which is not typical for a scam. Half a million downloads confirm this. Of course, it is possible to steal such a large amount of currency, but still, the company is more likely focused on normal market work. - Availability of additional functions. The possibility of staking, additional protection, careful attention to the privacy and anonymity of users - all this distinguishes a wallet from a scam. | - |
Disadvantages
| - Not as secure as a hardware wallet. - Not an open-sourced. - No biometrics or 2FA features, which makes Atomic wallet not entirely safe | - No longer available |
Rating
| User rating | User rating 20 user reviews | User rating 1 user review |
|---|---|---|
| Cryptogeek rating | Cryptogeek rating | Cryptogeek rating |
| Advantages | Advantages - Many currencies supported. Long gone are the days when different types of tokens had to be stored in separate wallets. - Atomic swaps. A number of experts believe that this is a full-fledged replacement of platforms for trading currencies, moreover, it is completely safe. - Too high-quality wallet production. It really meets high-quality standards, which is not typical for a scam. Half a million downloads confirm this. Of course, it is possible to steal such a large amount of currency, but still, the company is more likely focused on normal market work. - Availability of additional functions. The possibility of staking, additional protection, careful attention to the privacy and anonymity of users - all this distinguishes a wallet from a scam. | Advantages - |
| Disadvantages | Disadvantages - Not as secure as a hardware wallet. - Not an open-sourced. - No biometrics or 2FA features, which makes Atomic wallet not entirely safe | Disadvantages - No longer available |
Atomic Wallet user rating is 2.2, based on 20 user reviews. mSigna Wallet user rating is 3, based on 1 user reviews.
We also calculate the special Cryptogeek TrustScore based on the characteristics of each wallet.
| We choose the winner based on our TrustScore Rating. Please remember, it’s still up to you which company to choose! How do we calculate Trust Score? |
Atomic Wallet vs mSigna Wallet - Which Wallet Is Better in 2025?
This Atomic Wallet vs mSigna Wallet comparison is based on the most recent data on both companies. We do our best to provide you with unbiased information about cryptocurrency companies.
Based on user reviews only, Atomic Wallet is rated 2.2 with 20 user reviews, while mSigna Wallet is rated 3 with 1 user reviews.
Let's finally move to overall Trust Score: