OPOLO vs qPocket Comparison
| Company | ||
|---|---|---|
| User rating | 1 user review | 1 user review |
| Cryptogeek rating | ||
| Trust Score How it works |
About
|
OPOLO Cosmos is a hardware multi-cryptocurrency wallet that comes with a single wallet application, which can be installed on Windows, Linux, and Mac to access all integrated coins and tokens from one easy to use app. OPOLO wallet supports over 1500 cryptocurrencies.
|
qPocket is a mobile crypto wallet that supports QuarkChain, Ethereum, ERC20 tokens, TRON, and TRC10/20 tokens.
|
Founding Date
| 2018 | 2019 |
Country
| Luxembourg | International |
Languages
| English | English |
Wallet type
| Hardware wallet | Software wallet |
Storage type
| Cold wallet | Hot / Cold wallet |
Private keys
| Available | Not available |
Available coins
| 0 | 0 |
Security
| Personal | Third Party Encrypted |
Anonymity
| High | Medium |
Ease of use
| Easy | Easy |
Has attached card
| no | no |
Has trading facilities
| yes | No data |
Has vouchers and offers
| No data | No data |
Features
| 2 Factor Authentication, Hierarchical Deterministic | Hierarchical Deterministic, Open Source |
| About |
OPOLO Cosmos is a hardware multi-cryptocurrency wallet that comes with a single wallet application, which can be installed on Windows, Linux, and Mac to access all integrated coins and tokens from one easy to use app. OPOLO wallet supports over 1500 cryptocurrencies.
|
qPocket is a mobile crypto wallet that supports QuarkChain, Ethereum, ERC20 tokens, TRON, and TRC10/20 tokens.
|
|---|---|---|
| Founding Date | Founding Date 2018 | Founding Date 2019 |
| Country | Country Luxembourg | Country International |
| Languages | Languages English | Languages English |
| Wallet type | Wallet type Hardware wallet | Wallet type Software wallet |
| Storage type | Storage type Cold wallet | Storage type Hot / Cold wallet |
| Private keys | Private keys Available | Private keys Not available |
| Available coins | Available coins 0 | Available coins 0 |
| Security | Security Personal | Security Third Party Encrypted |
| Anonymity | Anonymity High | Anonymity Medium |
| Ease of use | Ease of use Easy | Ease of use Easy |
| Has attached card | Has attached card no | Has attached card no |
| Has trading facilities | Has trading facilities yes | Has trading facilities No data |
| Has vouchers and offers | Has vouchers and offers No data | Has vouchers and offers No data |
| Features | Features 2 Factor Authentication, Hierarchical Deterministic | Features Hierarchical Deterministic, Open Source |
Social
Website
| opolo.io | www.qpocket.io |
| @OpoloWallet | @QPocket_wallet |
| Website | Website opolo.io | Website www.qpocket.io |
|---|---|---|
| Twitter @OpoloWallet | Twitter @QPocket_wallet |
Advantages
| - Security - Private Key Ownership | - Hierarchical Deterministic - Open-Source |
Disadvantages
| - Paid product - Not so easy for beginners | - Lack of Two-Factor Authentication - No Multi-Signature |
Rating
| User rating | User rating 1 user review | User rating 1 user review |
|---|---|---|
| Cryptogeek rating | Cryptogeek rating | Cryptogeek rating |
| Advantages | Advantages - Security - Private Key Ownership | Advantages - Hierarchical Deterministic - Open-Source |
| Disadvantages | Disadvantages - Paid product - Not so easy for beginners | Disadvantages - Lack of Two-Factor Authentication - No Multi-Signature |
OPOLO user rating is 4, based on 1 user reviews. qPocket user rating is 4, based on 1 user reviews.
We also calculate the special Cryptogeek TrustScore based on the characteristics of each wallet.
| We choose the winner based on our TrustScore Rating. Please remember, it’s still up to you which company to choose! How do we calculate Trust Score? |
OPOLO vs qPocket - Which Wallet Is Better in 2025?
This OPOLO vs qPocket comparison is based on the most recent data on both companies. We do our best to provide you with unbiased information about cryptocurrency companies.
Based on user reviews only, OPOLO is rated 4 with 1 user reviews, while qPocket is rated 4 with 1 user reviews.
Let's finally move to overall Trust Score: