MT Wallet vs Quppy Wallet Comparison
Company |
|
|
User rating |
User rating
3 / 5
1 user review
|
User rating
4.9 / 5
26 user reviews
|
Cryptogeek rating |
Cryptogeek rating
3.2 / 5
|
Cryptogeek rating
3.6 / 5
|
Trust Score
How it works
|
Trust Score
3.5 / 5
|
Trust Score
4.33 / 5
|
About
|
The MT Wallet was developed by the ModulTrade project for the MTRc token. It is a web wallet that supports BTC, ETH, and MTRc, which MT Wallet users can trade (buy/sell). Additionally, the users are allowed to proceed payments to the smart-contract on ModulTrade trading platform (as an interface for MT blockchain).
|
Quppy Wallet is a multicurrency digital decentralized wallet with a system of crypto assets storage and exchange to euro. It allows users to make any transactions in cryptocurrencies as well as exchange them, buy and sell for euro.
|
Founding Date
Country
Languages
|
English, French, Italian, Korean, Russian, Vietnamese, Arabic
|
English, French, Spanish, Russian
|
Wallet type
|
Software wallet
|
Software wallet
|
Storage type
Private keys
Available coins
Security
|
Third Party Encrypted
|
Personal
|
Anonymity
Ease of use
Has attached card
Has trading facilities
Has vouchers and offers
Features
|
Open Source, 2 Factor Authentication
|
2 Factor Authentication
|
About |
The MT Wallet was developed by the ModulTrade project for the MTRc token. It is a web wallet that supports BTC, ETH, and MTRc, which MT Wallet users can trade (buy/sell). Additionally, the users are allowed to proceed payments to the smart-contract on ModulTrade trading platform (as an interface for MT blockchain).
|
Quppy Wallet is a multicurrency digital decentralized wallet with a system of crypto assets storage and exchange to euro. It allows users to make any transactions in cryptocurrencies as well as exchange them, buy and sell for euro.
|
Founding Date |
Founding Date
2016
|
Founding Date
2018
|
Country |
Country
Andorra
|
Country
Estonia
|
Languages |
Languages
English, French, Italian, Korean, Russian, Vietnamese, Arabic
|
Languages
English, French, Spanish, Russian
|
Wallet type |
Wallet type
Software wallet
|
Wallet type
Software wallet
|
Storage type |
Storage type
Hot wallet
|
Storage type
Hot wallet
|
Private keys |
Private keys
Not available
|
Private keys
Available
|
Available coins |
Available coins
0
|
Available coins
0
|
Security |
Security
Third Party Encrypted
|
Security
Personal
|
Anonymity |
Anonymity
Medium
|
Anonymity
High
|
Ease of use |
Ease of use
Easy
|
Ease of use
Average
|
Has attached card |
Has attached card
no
|
Has attached card
no
|
Has trading facilities |
Has trading facilities
yes
|
Has trading facilities
No data
|
Has vouchers and offers |
Has vouchers and offers
No data
|
Has vouchers and offers
No data
|
Features |
Features
Open Source, 2 Factor Authentication
|
Features
2 Factor Authentication
|
Social
Website
Twitter
Advantages
|
- Open-Source Code
- Two-Factor Authentication
|
- Two-Factor Authentication
- Private Key Ownership
|
Disadvantages
|
- No Multi-Signature
|
- No Multi-Signature
- No Open-Source
|
Rating
User rating |
User rating
3 / 5
1 user review
|
User rating
4.9 / 5
26 user reviews
|
Cryptogeek rating |
Cryptogeek rating
3.2 / 5
|
Cryptogeek rating
3.6 / 5
|
Advantages |
Advantages
- Open-Source Code
- Two-Factor Authentication
|
Advantages
- Two-Factor Authentication
- Private Key Ownership
|
Disadvantages |
Disadvantages
- No Multi-Signature
|
Disadvantages
- No Multi-Signature
- No Open-Source
|
MT Wallet user rating is 3, based on 1 user reviews. Quppy Wallet user rating is 4.9, based on 26 user reviews.
We also calculate the special Cryptogeek TrustScore based on the characteristics of each wallet.
Choose other companies
MT Wallet vs Quppy Wallet - Which Wallet Is Better in 2024?
This MT Wallet vs Quppy Wallet comparison is based on the most recent data on both companies. We do our best to provide you with unbiased information about cryptocurrency companies.
Based on user reviews only, MT Wallet is rated 3 with 1 user reviews, while Quppy Wallet is rated 4.9 with 26 user reviews.
Let's finally move to overall Trust Score: