Litewallet vs ZCash Cockpit UI Wallet Comparison

Compare companies
Company
User rating User rating 5 / 5 1 user review User rating 3.5 / 5 2 user reviews
Cryptogeek rating Cryptogeek rating 4.8 / 5 Cryptogeek rating 1 / 5
Trust Score How it works Trust Score 4.66 / 5 Trust Score 2.19 / 5

About

Litewallet is a Litecoin wallet built for iOS and Android. It is available to download for free on the Apple App Store and Play Store.
ZCash Cockpit UI Wallet is no longer offered. ZCash Cockpit UI Wallet used to be a browser wallet for managing ZCash balance.

Founding Date

2011 No data

Country

International No data

Languages

English, Japanese, Portuguese, German, French, Spanish, Italian, Korean, Russian, Traditional Chinese, Simplified Chinese, Dutch, Indonesian, Danish, Swedish No data

Wallet type

Software wallet No data

Storage type

Cold wallet No data

Private keys

Available Not available

Available coins

0 0

Security

Third Party Encrypted Personal

Anonymity

Medium High

Ease of use

Average Average

Has attached card

no no

Has trading facilities

No data No data

Has vouchers and offers

No data No data

Features

Hierarchical Deterministic, Open Source Open Source
About
Litewallet is a Litecoin wallet built for iOS and Android. It is available to download for free on the Apple App Store and Play Store.
ZCash Cockpit UI Wallet is no longer offered. ZCash Cockpit UI Wallet used to be a browser wallet for managing ZCash balance.
Founding Date Founding Date 2011 Founding Date No data
Country Country International Country No data
Languages Languages English, Japanese, Portuguese, German, French, Spanish, Italian, Korean, Russian, Traditional Chinese, Simplified Chinese, Dutch, Indonesian, Danish, Swedish Languages No data
Wallet type Wallet type Software wallet Wallet type No data
Storage type Storage type Cold wallet Storage type No data
Private keys Private keys Available Private keys Not available
Available coins Available coins 0 Available coins 0
Security Security Third Party Encrypted Security Personal
Anonymity Anonymity Medium Anonymity High
Ease of use Ease of use Average Ease of use Average
Has attached card Has attached card no Has attached card no
Has trading facilities Has trading facilities No data Has trading facilities No data
Has vouchers and offers Has vouchers and offers No data Has vouchers and offers No data
Features Features Hierarchical Deterministic, Open Source Features Open Source

Social

Website

github.com github.com

Twitter

No data No data
Website Website github.com Website github.com
Twitter Twitter No data Twitter No data

Advantages

- Private keys never leave your device - No server to get hacked or go down -

Disadvantages

- The wallet is for one currency only - No longer available

Rating

User rating User rating 5 / 5 1 user review User rating 3.5 / 5 2 user reviews
Cryptogeek rating Cryptogeek rating 4.8 / 5 Cryptogeek rating 1 / 5
Advantages Advantages - Private keys never leave your device - No server to get hacked or go down Advantages -
Disadvantages Disadvantages - The wallet is for one currency only Disadvantages - No longer available

Litewallet user rating is 5, based on 1 user reviews. ZCash Cockpit UI Wallet user rating is 3.5, based on 2 user reviews.

We also calculate the special Cryptogeek TrustScore based on the characteristics of each wallet.

We choose the winner based on our TrustScore Rating. Please remember, it’s still up to you which company to choose! How do we calculate Trust Score?
logo-img
Trust Score: 4.66 / 5
Compare with:
Write review
Trust Score: 2.19 / 5
Compare with:
Write review
Choose other companies

Litewallet vs ZCash Cockpit UI Wallet - Which Wallet Is Better in 2025?

This Litewallet vs ZCash Cockpit UI Wallet comparison is based on the most recent data on both companies. We do our best to provide you with unbiased information about cryptocurrency companies.

Based on user reviews only, Litewallet is rated 5 with 1 user reviews, while ZCash Cockpit UI Wallet is rated 3.5 with 2 user reviews.

Let's finally move to overall Trust Score: