imToken Wallet vs MEET.ONE Comparison
| Company |
|
|
| User rating |
User rating
3.5 / 5
2 user reviews
|
User rating
3 / 5
1 user review
|
| Cryptogeek rating |
Cryptogeek rating
5 / 5
|
Cryptogeek rating
3.4 / 5
|
| Trust Score
How it works
|
Trust Score
4.51 / 5
|
Trust Score
3.35 / 5
|
About
|
imToken is an Android and iOS wallet for ETH, BTC, EOS and ERC20 compatible tokens, it is centralized and lets users access the blockchain without locally storing it. It allows managing multiple-chain wallets with one Mnemonic passphrase. Just insert a password, save the 12-word passphrase and you're ready.
|
Headquartered in Singapore, MEET.ONE is a mobile EOS wallet designed for Android and iOS. MEET.ONE is very active in EOS developer community. It has successfully launched the first automated BiOS BOOT process in the community test network.
|
Founding Date
Country
Languages
|
English, Japanese, Korean, Traditional Chinese, Simplified Chinese
|
English, Chinese
|
Wallet type
|
Software wallet
|
Software wallet
|
Storage type
Private keys
Available coins
Security
Anonymity
Ease of use
Has attached card
Has trading facilities
Has vouchers and offers
Features
|
Hierarchical Deterministic, Open Source
|
Open Source
|
| About |
imToken is an Android and iOS wallet for ETH, BTC, EOS and ERC20 compatible tokens, it is centralized and lets users access the blockchain without locally storing it. It allows managing multiple-chain wallets with one Mnemonic passphrase. Just insert a password, save the 12-word passphrase and you're ready.
|
Headquartered in Singapore, MEET.ONE is a mobile EOS wallet designed for Android and iOS. MEET.ONE is very active in EOS developer community. It has successfully launched the first automated BiOS BOOT process in the community test network.
|
| Founding Date |
Founding Date
2016
|
Founding Date
2018
|
| Country |
Country
Singapore
|
Country
Singapore
|
| Languages |
Languages
English, Japanese, Korean, Traditional Chinese, Simplified Chinese
|
Languages
English, Chinese
|
| Wallet type |
Wallet type
Software wallet
|
Wallet type
Software wallet
|
| Storage type |
Storage type
Hot wallet
|
Storage type
Hot wallet
|
| Private keys |
Private keys
Available
|
Private keys
Not available
|
| Available coins |
Available coins
0
|
Available coins
0
|
| Security |
Security
Personal
|
Security
Third Party
|
| Anonymity |
Anonymity
Medium
|
Anonymity
Medium
|
| Ease of use |
Ease of use
Easy
|
Ease of use
Easy
|
| Has attached card |
Has attached card
no
|
Has attached card
no
|
| Has trading facilities |
Has trading facilities
yes
|
Has trading facilities
No data
|
| Has vouchers and offers |
Has vouchers and offers
No data
|
Has vouchers and offers
No data
|
| Features |
Features
Hierarchical Deterministic, Open Source
|
Features
Open Source
|
Social
Website
Twitter
Advantages
|
- Security
- Easy to use
- User-friendly
|
- Easy to use
- Open-Source Code
|
Disadvantages
|
- Lack of Two-Factor Authentication
|
- Lack of Two-Factor Authentication
- No Multi-Signature
|
Rating
| User rating |
User rating
3.5 / 5
2 user reviews
|
User rating
3 / 5
1 user review
|
| Cryptogeek rating |
Cryptogeek rating
5 / 5
|
Cryptogeek rating
3.4 / 5
|
| Advantages |
Advantages
- Security
- Easy to use
- User-friendly
|
Advantages
- Easy to use
- Open-Source Code
|
| Disadvantages |
Disadvantages
- Lack of Two-Factor Authentication
|
Disadvantages
- Lack of Two-Factor Authentication
- No Multi-Signature
|
imToken Wallet user rating is 3.5, based on 2 user reviews. MEET.ONE user rating is 3, based on 1 user reviews.
We also calculate the special Cryptogeek TrustScore based on the characteristics of each wallet.
Choose other companies
imToken Wallet vs MEET.ONE - Which Wallet Is Better in 2025?
This imToken Wallet vs MEET.ONE comparison is based on the most recent data on both companies. We do our best to provide you with unbiased information about cryptocurrency companies.
Based on user reviews only, imToken Wallet is rated 3.5 with 2 user reviews, while MEET.ONE is rated 3 with 1 user reviews.
Let's finally move to overall Trust Score:
