Crypto.com Wallet vs imToken Wallet Comparison
| Company |
|
|
| User rating |
User rating
5 / 5
1 user review
|
User rating
3.5 / 5
2 user reviews
|
| Cryptogeek rating |
Cryptogeek rating
4.4 / 5
|
Cryptogeek rating
5 / 5
|
| Trust Score
How it works
|
Trust Score
3.78 / 5
|
Trust Score
4.51 / 5
|
About
|
Crypto.com, the pioneering payments and cryptocurrency platform, seeks to accelerate the world’s transition to cryptocurrency. Crypto.com is headquartered in Hong Kong.
|
imToken is an Android and iOS wallet for ETH, BTC, EOS and ERC20 compatible tokens, it is centralized and lets users access the blockchain without locally storing it. It allows managing multiple-chain wallets with one Mnemonic passphrase. Just insert a password, save the 12-word passphrase and you're ready.
|
Founding Date
Country
Languages
|
English, Chinese
|
English, Japanese, Korean, Traditional Chinese, Simplified Chinese
|
Wallet type
|
Software wallet
|
Software wallet
|
Storage type
Private keys
Available coins
Security
|
Third Party Encrypted
|
Personal
|
Anonymity
Ease of use
Has attached card
Has trading facilities
Has vouchers and offers
Features
|
Hierarchical Deterministic, 2 Factor Authentication
|
Hierarchical Deterministic, Open Source
|
| About |
Crypto.com, the pioneering payments and cryptocurrency platform, seeks to accelerate the world’s transition to cryptocurrency. Crypto.com is headquartered in Hong Kong.
|
imToken is an Android and iOS wallet for ETH, BTC, EOS and ERC20 compatible tokens, it is centralized and lets users access the blockchain without locally storing it. It allows managing multiple-chain wallets with one Mnemonic passphrase. Just insert a password, save the 12-word passphrase and you're ready.
|
| Founding Date |
Founding Date
2017
|
Founding Date
2016
|
| Country |
Country
Hong Kong
|
Country
Singapore
|
| Languages |
Languages
English, Chinese
|
Languages
English, Japanese, Korean, Traditional Chinese, Simplified Chinese
|
| Wallet type |
Wallet type
Software wallet
|
Wallet type
Software wallet
|
| Storage type |
Storage type
Hot wallet
|
Storage type
Hot wallet
|
| Private keys |
Private keys
Not available
|
Private keys
Available
|
| Available coins |
Available coins
0
|
Available coins
0
|
| Security |
Security
Third Party Encrypted
|
Security
Personal
|
| Anonymity |
Anonymity
Medium
|
Anonymity
Medium
|
| Ease of use |
Ease of use
Average
|
Ease of use
Easy
|
| Has attached card |
Has attached card
no
|
Has attached card
no
|
| Has trading facilities |
Has trading facilities
No data
|
Has trading facilities
yes
|
| Has vouchers and offers |
Has vouchers and offers
No data
|
Has vouchers and offers
No data
|
| Features |
Features
Hierarchical Deterministic, 2 Factor Authentication
|
Features
Hierarchical Deterministic, Open Source
|
Social
Website
Twitter
Advantages
|
- Easy to use
- User-friendly
- Security
|
- Security
- Easy to use
- User-friendly
|
Disadvantages
|
- No Multisignature
- No Open Source
|
- Lack of Two-Factor Authentication
|
Rating
| User rating |
User rating
5 / 5
1 user review
|
User rating
3.5 / 5
2 user reviews
|
| Cryptogeek rating |
Cryptogeek rating
4.4 / 5
|
Cryptogeek rating
5 / 5
|
| Advantages |
Advantages
- Easy to use
- User-friendly
- Security
|
Advantages
- Security
- Easy to use
- User-friendly
|
| Disadvantages |
Disadvantages
- No Multisignature
- No Open Source
|
Disadvantages
- Lack of Two-Factor Authentication
|
Crypto.com Wallet user rating is 5, based on 1 user reviews. imToken Wallet user rating is 3.5, based on 2 user reviews.
We also calculate the special Cryptogeek TrustScore based on the characteristics of each wallet.
Choose other companies
Crypto.com Wallet vs imToken Wallet - Which Wallet Is Better in 2025?
This Crypto.com Wallet vs imToken Wallet comparison is based on the most recent data on both companies. We do our best to provide you with unbiased information about cryptocurrency companies.
Based on user reviews only, Crypto.com Wallet is rated 5 with 1 user reviews, while imToken Wallet is rated 3.5 with 2 user reviews.
Let's finally move to overall Trust Score:
