ClassicEtherWallet CX vs Hoo Wallet Comparison

Compare companies
Company
User rating User rating 4.5 / 5 2 user reviews User rating 4 / 5 1 user review
Cryptogeek rating Cryptogeek rating 4.2 / 5 Cryptogeek rating 4 / 5
Trust Score How it works Trust Score 3.01 / 5 Trust Score 4.26 / 5

About

ClassicEtherWallet CX has been a browser wallet for the holders of Ethereum Classic coins before the 51% attack on the Ethereum Classic blockchain took place in January 2019 resulting in a theft of over $11 mln.
Headquartered in Hong Kong, the Hoo Wallet is a multi-cryptocurrency hardware wallet. It provides users with blockchain assets management services.

Founding Date

No data 2018

Country

International Hong Kong

Languages

No data English, Japanese, Korean, Traditional Chinese, Simplified Chinese

Wallet type

No data Hardware wallet

Storage type

No data Cold wallet

Private keys

Not available Available

Available coins

0 0

Security

Personal Personal

Anonymity

High Medium

Ease of use

Easy Easy

Has attached card

no no

Has trading facilities

No data No data

Has vouchers and offers

No data No data

Features

Open Source Hierarchical Deterministic, Multi-Signature
About
ClassicEtherWallet CX has been a browser wallet for the holders of Ethereum Classic coins before the 51% attack on the Ethereum Classic blockchain took place in January 2019 resulting in a theft of over $11 mln.
Headquartered in Hong Kong, the Hoo Wallet is a multi-cryptocurrency hardware wallet. It provides users with blockchain assets management services.
Founding Date Founding Date No data Founding Date 2018
Country Country International Country Hong Kong
Languages Languages No data Languages English, Japanese, Korean, Traditional Chinese, Simplified Chinese
Wallet type Wallet type No data Wallet type Hardware wallet
Storage type Storage type No data Storage type Cold wallet
Private keys Private keys Not available Private keys Available
Available coins Available coins 0 Available coins 0
Security Security Personal Security Personal
Anonymity Anonymity High Anonymity Medium
Ease of use Ease of use Easy Ease of use Easy
Has attached card Has attached card no Has attached card no
Has trading facilities Has trading facilities No data Has trading facilities No data
Has vouchers and offers Has vouchers and offers No data Has vouchers and offers No data
Features Features Open Source Features Hierarchical Deterministic, Multi-Signature

Social

Website

ethereumclassic.org hoo.com

Twitter

@eth_classic @Hoo_exchange
Website Website ethereumclassic.org Website hoo.com
Twitter Twitter @eth_classic Twitter @Hoo_exchange

Advantages

- - Security - Easy to use

Disadvantages

- Currently not active. It is recommended to use MyEtherWallet. - Lack of Two-Factor Authentication - No Open Source

Rating

User rating User rating 4.5 / 5 2 user reviews User rating 4 / 5 1 user review
Cryptogeek rating Cryptogeek rating 4.2 / 5 Cryptogeek rating 4 / 5
Advantages Advantages - Advantages - Security - Easy to use
Disadvantages Disadvantages - Currently not active. It is recommended to use MyEtherWallet. Disadvantages - Lack of Two-Factor Authentication - No Open Source

ClassicEtherWallet CX user rating is 4.5, based on 2 user reviews. Hoo Wallet user rating is 4, based on 1 user reviews.

We also calculate the special Cryptogeek TrustScore based on the characteristics of each wallet.

We choose the winner based on our TrustScore Rating. Please remember, it’s still up to you which company to choose! How do we calculate Trust Score?
Trust Score: 3.01 / 5
Compare with:
Write review
logo-img
Trust Score: 4.26 / 5
Compare with:
Write review
Choose other companies

ClassicEtherWallet CX vs Hoo Wallet - Which Wallet Is Better in 2024?

This ClassicEtherWallet CX vs Hoo Wallet comparison is based on the most recent data on both companies. We do our best to provide you with unbiased information about cryptocurrency companies.

Based on user reviews only, ClassicEtherWallet CX is rated 4.5 with 2 user reviews, while Hoo Wallet is rated 4 with 1 user reviews.

Let's finally move to overall Trust Score: