BEPAL PRO S vs OPOLO Comparison
| Company | ||
|---|---|---|
| User rating | 1 user review | 1 user review |
| Cryptogeek rating | ||
| Trust Score How it works |
About
|
BEPAL PRO S is a hardware cryptocurrency wallet. It allows users to store their digital assets (BTC, ETH, EOS, LTC, and others) into an offline device.
|
OPOLO Cosmos is a hardware multi-cryptocurrency wallet that comes with a single wallet application, which can be installed on Windows, Linux, and Mac to access all integrated coins and tokens from one easy to use app. OPOLO wallet supports over 1500 cryptocurrencies.
|
Founding Date
| 2017 | 2018 |
Country
| China | Luxembourg |
Languages
| English, Chinese | English |
Wallet type
| Hardware wallet | Hardware wallet |
Storage type
| Cold wallet | Cold wallet |
Private keys
| Not available | Available |
Available coins
| 0 | 0 |
Security
| Third Party Encrypted | Personal |
Anonymity
| Medium | High |
Ease of use
| Easy | Easy |
Has attached card
| no | no |
Has trading facilities
| No data | yes |
Has vouchers and offers
| No data | No data |
Features
| Hierarchical Deterministic, 2 Factor Authentication, Multi-Signature | 2 Factor Authentication, Hierarchical Deterministic |
| About |
BEPAL PRO S is a hardware cryptocurrency wallet. It allows users to store their digital assets (BTC, ETH, EOS, LTC, and others) into an offline device.
|
OPOLO Cosmos is a hardware multi-cryptocurrency wallet that comes with a single wallet application, which can be installed on Windows, Linux, and Mac to access all integrated coins and tokens from one easy to use app. OPOLO wallet supports over 1500 cryptocurrencies.
|
|---|---|---|
| Founding Date | Founding Date 2017 | Founding Date 2018 |
| Country | Country China | Country Luxembourg |
| Languages | Languages English, Chinese | Languages English |
| Wallet type | Wallet type Hardware wallet | Wallet type Hardware wallet |
| Storage type | Storage type Cold wallet | Storage type Cold wallet |
| Private keys | Private keys Not available | Private keys Available |
| Available coins | Available coins 0 | Available coins 0 |
| Security | Security Third Party Encrypted | Security Personal |
| Anonymity | Anonymity Medium | Anonymity High |
| Ease of use | Ease of use Easy | Ease of use Easy |
| Has attached card | Has attached card no | Has attached card no |
| Has trading facilities | Has trading facilities No data | Has trading facilities yes |
| Has vouchers and offers | Has vouchers and offers No data | Has vouchers and offers No data |
| Features | Features Hierarchical Deterministic, 2 Factor Authentication, Multi-Signature | Features 2 Factor Authentication, Hierarchical Deterministic |
Social
Website
| bepal.pro | opolo.io |
| No data | @OpoloWallet |
| Website | Website bepal.pro | Website opolo.io |
|---|---|---|
| Twitter No data | Twitter @OpoloWallet |
Advantages
| - Security | - Security - Private Key Ownership |
Disadvantages
| - Not popular | - Paid product - Not so easy for beginners |
Rating
| User rating | User rating 1 user review | User rating 1 user review |
|---|---|---|
| Cryptogeek rating | Cryptogeek rating | Cryptogeek rating |
| Advantages | Advantages - Security | Advantages - Security - Private Key Ownership |
| Disadvantages | Disadvantages - Not popular | Disadvantages - Paid product - Not so easy for beginners |
BEPAL PRO S user rating is 4, based on 1 user reviews. OPOLO user rating is 4, based on 1 user reviews.
We also calculate the special Cryptogeek TrustScore based on the characteristics of each wallet.
| We choose the winner based on our TrustScore Rating. Please remember, it’s still up to you which company to choose! How do we calculate Trust Score? |
BEPAL PRO S vs OPOLO - Which Wallet Is Better in 2025?
This BEPAL PRO S vs OPOLO comparison is based on the most recent data on both companies. We do our best to provide you with unbiased information about cryptocurrency companies.
Based on user reviews only, BEPAL PRO S is rated 4 with 1 user reviews, while OPOLO is rated 4 with 1 user reviews.
Let's finally move to overall Trust Score: