Atomic Wallet vs Cobo Wallet Comparison
| Company |
|
|
| User rating |
User rating
2.2 / 5
20 user reviews
|
User rating
5 / 5
2 user reviews
|
| Cryptogeek rating |
Cryptogeek rating
3.4 / 5
|
Cryptogeek rating
4 / 5
|
| Trust Score
How it works
|
Trust Score
3.72 / 5
|
Trust Score
3.69 / 5
|
About
|
Atomic is a decentralized multi-cryptocurrency wallet available for Windows, Mac OS and Linux. The wallet uses BitTorrent technology for distributed order book and atomic swap technology for cross-chain custody free exchange. Atomicwallet also features instant exchange options - Changelly and ShapeShift. Atomic supports more than 300 crypto-currencie.
|
Cobo Wallet is Cobo's flagship mobile wallet, built to make it easy for people to grow and secure their crypto. Cobo Wallet is the first in the world to support pooled staking, offers native staking for dozens of PoS projects, has an integrated dapp store, and supports more than 30 coins and 500 tokens.
|
Founding Date
Country
Languages
|
English
|
English, Traditional Chinese, Simplified Chinese
|
Wallet type
|
Software wallet
|
Software wallet
|
Storage type
|
Hot / Cold wallet
|
Hot wallet
|
Private keys
Available coins
Security
|
Personal
|
Third Party Encrypted
|
Anonymity
Ease of use
Has attached card
Has trading facilities
Has vouchers and offers
Features
|
Hierarchical Deterministic
|
Multi-Signature, 2 Factor Authentication, Hierarchical Deterministic
|
| About |
Atomic is a decentralized multi-cryptocurrency wallet available for Windows, Mac OS and Linux. The wallet uses BitTorrent technology for distributed order book and atomic swap technology for cross-chain custody free exchange. Atomicwallet also features instant exchange options - Changelly and ShapeShift. Atomic supports more than 300 crypto-currencie.
|
Cobo Wallet is Cobo's flagship mobile wallet, built to make it easy for people to grow and secure their crypto. Cobo Wallet is the first in the world to support pooled staking, offers native staking for dozens of PoS projects, has an integrated dapp store, and supports more than 30 coins and 500 tokens.
|
| Founding Date |
Founding Date
2018
|
Founding Date
2017
|
| Country |
Country
Estonia
|
Country
China
|
| Languages |
Languages
English
|
Languages
English, Traditional Chinese, Simplified Chinese
|
| Wallet type |
Wallet type
Software wallet
|
Wallet type
Software wallet
|
| Storage type |
Storage type
Hot / Cold wallet
|
Storage type
Hot wallet
|
| Private keys |
Private keys
Available
|
Private keys
Not available
|
| Available coins |
Available coins
0
|
Available coins
0
|
| Security |
Security
Personal
|
Security
Third Party Encrypted
|
| Anonymity |
Anonymity
High
|
Anonymity
Low
|
| Ease of use |
Ease of use
Easy
|
Ease of use
Easy
|
| Has attached card |
Has attached card
no
|
Has attached card
no
|
| Has trading facilities |
Has trading facilities
yes
|
Has trading facilities
No data
|
| Has vouchers and offers |
Has vouchers and offers
No data
|
Has vouchers and offers
No data
|
| Features |
Features
Hierarchical Deterministic
|
Features
Multi-Signature, 2 Factor Authentication, Hierarchical Deterministic
|
Social
Website
Twitter
Advantages
|
- Many currencies supported. Long gone are the days when different types of tokens had to be stored in separate wallets.
- Atomic swaps. A number of experts believe that this is a full-fledged replacement of platforms for trading currencies, moreover, it is completely safe.
- Too high-quality wallet production. It really meets high-quality standards, which is not typical for a scam. Half a million downloads confirm this. Of course, it is possible to steal such a large amount of currency, but still, the company is more likely focused on normal market work.
- Availability of additional functions. The possibility of staking, additional protection, careful attention to the privacy and anonymity of users - all this distinguishes a wallet from a scam.
|
- Security
- Easy to use
- User-friendly
|
Disadvantages
|
- Not as secure as a hardware wallet.
- Not an open-sourced.
- No biometrics or 2FA features, which makes Atomic wallet not entirely safe
|
- Few languages available
|
Rating
| User rating |
User rating
2.2 / 5
20 user reviews
|
User rating
5 / 5
2 user reviews
|
| Cryptogeek rating |
Cryptogeek rating
3.4 / 5
|
Cryptogeek rating
4 / 5
|
| Advantages |
Advantages
- Many currencies supported. Long gone are the days when different types of tokens had to be stored in separate wallets.
- Atomic swaps. A number of experts believe that this is a full-fledged replacement of platforms for trading currencies, moreover, it is completely safe.
- Too high-quality wallet production. It really meets high-quality standards, which is not typical for a scam. Half a million downloads confirm this. Of course, it is possible to steal such a large amount of currency, but still, the company is more likely focused on normal market work.
- Availability of additional functions. The possibility of staking, additional protection, careful attention to the privacy and anonymity of users - all this distinguishes a wallet from a scam.
|
Advantages
- Security
- Easy to use
- User-friendly
|
| Disadvantages |
Disadvantages
- Not as secure as a hardware wallet.
- Not an open-sourced.
- No biometrics or 2FA features, which makes Atomic wallet not entirely safe
|
Disadvantages
- Few languages available
|
Atomic Wallet user rating is 2.2, based on 20 user reviews. Cobo Wallet user rating is 5, based on 2 user reviews.
We also calculate the special Cryptogeek TrustScore based on the characteristics of each wallet.
Choose other companies
Atomic Wallet vs Cobo Wallet - Which Wallet Is Better in 2024?
This Atomic Wallet vs Cobo Wallet comparison is based on the most recent data on both companies. We do our best to provide you with unbiased information about cryptocurrency companies.
Based on user reviews only, Atomic Wallet is rated 2.2 with 20 user reviews, while Cobo Wallet is rated 5 with 2 user reviews.
Let's finally move to overall Trust Score:
