Aave vs PlasmaPay Comparison
| Company |
|
|
| User rating |
User rating
3.7 / 5
3 user reviews
|
User rating
5 / 5
1 user review
|
| Cryptogeek rating |
Cryptogeek rating
3.6 / 5
|
Cryptogeek rating
3.6 / 5
|
| Trust Score
How it works
|
Trust Score
3.73 / 5
|
Trust Score
4.35 / 5
|
About
|
Aave is an open source non-custodial protocol on Ethereum for decentralized lending and borrowing.
|
PlasmaPay is a multi cryptocurrency digital wallet. It allows users to store, manage and monitor their digital assets by using the available Web version of the wallet. PlasmaPay supports the BTC, ETH, LTC, and DASH cryptocurrencies, it has trading facilities and the private key is personal, which means that the user is the one who keeps it.
|
Founding Date
Country
Languages
|
English, Japanese, Portuguese, French, Spanish, Italian, Korean, Chinese, Vietnamese, Turkish
|
English, Chinese
|
Wallet type
|
Software wallet
|
Software wallet
|
Storage type
Private keys
Available coins
|
10
- Bitcoin (BTC), Basic Attention Token (BAT), 0x (ZRX), Decentraland (MANA), Enjin Coin (ENJ), Ethereum (ETH), Tether (USDT), sUSD (SUSD), Binance USD (BUSD), TrueUSD (TUSD)
|
0
|
Security
Anonymity
Ease of use
Has attached card
Has trading facilities
Has vouchers and offers
Features
|
No data
|
2 Factor Authentication
|
| About |
Aave is an open source non-custodial protocol on Ethereum for decentralized lending and borrowing.
|
PlasmaPay is a multi cryptocurrency digital wallet. It allows users to store, manage and monitor their digital assets by using the available Web version of the wallet. PlasmaPay supports the BTC, ETH, LTC, and DASH cryptocurrencies, it has trading facilities and the private key is personal, which means that the user is the one who keeps it.
|
| Founding Date |
Founding Date
2017
|
Founding Date
2018
|
| Country |
Country
Eswatini
|
Country
International
|
| Languages |
Languages
English, Japanese, Portuguese, French, Spanish, Italian, Korean, Chinese, Vietnamese, Turkish
|
Languages
English, Chinese
|
| Wallet type |
Wallet type
Software wallet
|
Wallet type
Software wallet
|
| Storage type |
Storage type
Hot wallet
|
Storage type
Hot wallet
|
| Private keys |
Private keys
Not available
|
Private keys
Available
|
| Available coins |
Available coins
10
- Bitcoin (BTC), Basic Attention Token (BAT), 0x (ZRX), Decentraland (MANA), Enjin Coin (ENJ), Ethereum (ETH), Tether (USDT), sUSD (SUSD), Binance USD (BUSD), TrueUSD (TUSD)
|
Available coins
0
|
| Security |
Security
No data
|
Security
Personal
|
| Anonymity |
Anonymity
No data
|
Anonymity
Medium
|
| Ease of use |
Ease of use
No data
|
Ease of use
Average
|
| Has attached card |
Has attached card
No data
|
Has attached card
no
|
| Has trading facilities |
Has trading facilities
No data
|
Has trading facilities
yes
|
| Has vouchers and offers |
Has vouchers and offers
No data
|
Has vouchers and offers
No data
|
| Features |
Features
No data
|
Features
2 Factor Authentication
|
Social
Website
Twitter
Advantages
|
- Security
- Easy to use
|
- Two-Factor Authentication
- Easy to use
|
Disadvantages
|
- Low popularity
|
- No Open Source
- No Multi-Signature
|
Rating
| User rating |
User rating
3.7 / 5
3 user reviews
|
User rating
5 / 5
1 user review
|
| Cryptogeek rating |
Cryptogeek rating
3.6 / 5
|
Cryptogeek rating
3.6 / 5
|
| Advantages |
Advantages
- Security
- Easy to use
|
Advantages
- Two-Factor Authentication
- Easy to use
|
| Disadvantages |
Disadvantages
- Low popularity
|
Disadvantages
- No Open Source
- No Multi-Signature
|
Aave user rating is 3.7, based on 3 user reviews. PlasmaPay user rating is 5, based on 1 user reviews.
We also calculate the special Cryptogeek TrustScore based on the characteristics of each wallet.
Choose other companies
Aave vs PlasmaPay - Which Wallet Is Better in 2025?
This Aave vs PlasmaPay comparison is based on the most recent data on both companies. We do our best to provide you with unbiased information about cryptocurrency companies.
Based on user reviews only, Aave is rated 3.7 with 3 user reviews, while PlasmaPay is rated 5 with 1 user reviews.
Let's finally move to overall Trust Score:
