Lisk (LSK) vs NEO (NEO) Comparison
Lisk (LSK) and NEO (NEO) are two popular blockchain platforms that offer unique features to users. In this review, we will compare and contrast the two platforms to help you make an informed decision when choosing between them.
Overview:
Lisk is a blockchain platform that enables developers to create and deploy decentralized applications (DApps) using JavaScript. The platform uses a unique sidechain architecture that allows developers to create customized sidechains that are linked to the main blockchain. This allows for increased scalability and flexibility when developing DApps.
On the other hand, NEO is a blockchain platform that allows developers to create and deploy smart contracts and DApps. NEO uses a unique consensus mechanism called Delegated Byzantine Fault Tolerance (dBFT) that allows for fast transaction processing and improved scalability. Additionally, NEO allows for the creation of digital assets that can be traded on its platform.
Performance:
Lisk has a high performance rate, with a capacity of handling up to 100 transactions per second. The platform uses a Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS) consensus mechanism, which allows for faster transaction processing and improved scalability. Additionally, Lisk allows developers to create customized sidechains that can be used to handle specific functions, further improving the platform's performance.
On the other hand, NEO has a capacity of handling up to 1,000 transactions per second, which is higher than Lisk's performance rate. NEO uses a unique consensus mechanism called dBFT, which allows for fast transaction processing and improved scalability. However, NEO's platform can be slower than Lisk when it comes to deploying DApps due to the platform's complex smart contract language.
Security:
Lisk uses a DPoS consensus mechanism, which has been proven to be secure and reliable. Additionally, the platform uses advanced encryption techniques to secure user data and transactions. Lisk's customizable sidechains also offer additional security, as developers can create unique security protocols for each sidechain.
On the other hand, NEO's dBFT consensus mechanism also offers a high level of security, with a low risk of network attacks. Additionally, NEO uses advanced encryption techniques to secure user data and transactions. However, NEO's platform has faced some security issues in the past, with several high-profile hacks causing losses for users.
Tokenomics:
Lisk uses a utility token called LSK, which is used to pay for transaction fees and to access features on the platform. The maximum supply of LSK is 135 million tokens.
NEO, on the other hand, uses a utility token called GAS, which is used to pay for transaction fees and to access features on the platform. Additionally, NEO allows for the creation of digital assets that can be traded on its platform. The maximum supply of GAS is 100 million tokens.
Community:
Lisk has a strong and active community, with a large number of developers working on the platform. The platform's user-friendly development environment has attracted many developers to the platform, and Lisk has a large number of DApps already deployed on its network.
NEO also has a strong and active community, with a large number of developers working on the platform. Additionally, NEO has a large number of partnerships with companies and organizations around the world, which has helped to increase its visibility and popularity.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, both Lisk and NEO are strong blockchain platforms that offer unique features to users. Lisk's sidechain architecture and user-friendly development environment make it an excellent choice for developers, while NEO's fast transaction processing and digital asset creation capabilities make it a popular choice for traders and investors. Ultimately, the choice between the two platforms will depend on your specific needs and preferences.
User rating
Cryptogeek rating
Über
|
Lisk basiert derzeit auf dem DPoS-Protokoll für Kryptowährung. Sie können die Marktkapitalisierung und das Volumen von Lisk im Widget unseres Partners überprüfen. Außerdem können Sie den neuesten LSK-Preis auf Cryptogeek.info sehen. Hier können Sie Ihr Feedback und Ihre Bewertungen zur Kryptowährung von Lisk hinterlassen.
|
NEO basiert derzeit auf dem dBFT-Protokoll für Kryptowährung. Sie können die Marktkapitalisierung und das Volumen von NEO im Widget unseres Partners überprüfen. Den aktuellen NEO-Preis finden Sie auch auf Cryptogeek.info. Hier können Sie Ihr Feedback und Ihre Bewertungen zur NEO-Kryptowährung hinterlassen.
|
Art
Gründungsdatum
Land
|
International
|
Keine Daten
|
Sprachen
Team
Protokoll
|
Public blockchain
|
Keine Daten
|
Aktueller Preis (USD)
Allzeithoch (USD)
Preisänderung (24h)
Volumen (24h)
|
3255129.22262
|
15001683.44779
|
Hashrate
Max Versorgung
|
139891978.00000
|
100000000.00000
|
Gesamtangebot
Umlaufversorgung
|
144814976.67988
|
100000000.00000
|
Transaktionsgeschwindigkeit / Blockierungszeit
Transaktionsgebühr
Rentabilität des Bergbaus
Algorithmus
Proof-Typ
Voll prämiert
Intelligente Vertragsadresse
Insgesamt abgebaute Münzen
|
159918400.00000
|
100000000.00000
|
Ist Handel
Blockbelohnung
|
0.000000000000
|
0.000000000000
|
Zeit blockieren
Über |
Lisk basiert derzeit auf dem DPoS-Protokoll für Kryptowährung. Sie können die Marktkapitalisierung und das Volumen von Lisk im Widget unseres Partners überprüfen. Außerdem können Sie den neuesten LSK-Preis auf Cryptogeek.info sehen. Hier können Sie Ihr Feedback und Ihre Bewertungen zur Kryptowährung von Lisk hinterlassen.
|
NEO basiert derzeit auf dem dBFT-Protokoll für Kryptowährung. Sie können die Marktkapitalisierung und das Volumen von NEO im Widget unseres Partners überprüfen. Den aktuellen NEO-Preis finden Sie auch auf Cryptogeek.info. Hier können Sie Ihr Feedback und Ihre Bewertungen zur NEO-Kryptowährung hinterlassen.
|
Art |
Art
coin
|
Art
coin
|
Gründungsdatum |
Gründungsdatum
2016
|
Gründungsdatum
Keine Daten
|
Land |
Land
International
|
Land
Keine Daten
|
Sprachen |
Sprachen
Keine Daten
|
Sprachen
Keine Daten
|
Team |
Team
Public
|
Team
Public
|
Protokoll |
Protokoll
Public blockchain
|
Protokoll
Keine Daten
|
Aktueller Preis (USD) |
Aktueller Preis (USD)
0.8813
|
Aktueller Preis (USD)
10.9228
|
Allzeithoch (USD) |
Allzeithoch (USD)
39.3100
|
Allzeithoch (USD)
196.8500
|
Preisänderung (24h) |
Preisänderung (24h)
-5.85
|
Preisänderung (24h)
-5.92
|
Volumen (24h) |
Volumen (24h)
3255129.22262
|
Volumen (24h)
15001683.44779
|
Hashrate |
Hashrate
Keine Daten
|
Hashrate
Keine Daten
|
Max Versorgung |
Max Versorgung
139891978.00000
|
Max Versorgung
100000000.00000
|
Gesamtangebot |
Gesamtangebot
Keine Daten
|
Gesamtangebot
Keine Daten
|
Umlaufversorgung |
Umlaufversorgung
144814976.67988
|
Umlaufversorgung
100000000.00000
|
Transaktionsgeschwindigkeit / Blockierungszeit |
Transaktionsgeschwindigkeit / Blockierungszeit
25
|
Transaktionsgeschwindigkeit / Blockierungszeit
1000
|
Transaktionsgebühr |
Transaktionsgebühr
Keine Daten
|
Transaktionsgebühr
Keine Daten
|
Rentabilität des Bergbaus |
Rentabilität des Bergbaus
medium
|
Rentabilität des Bergbaus
Keine Daten
|
Algorithmus |
Algorithmus
DPoS
|
Algorithmus
Keine Daten
|
Proof-Typ |
Proof-Typ
DPoS
|
Proof-Typ
Keine Daten
|
Voll prämiert |
Voll prämiert
Keine Daten
|
Voll prämiert
Keine Daten
|
Intelligente Vertragsadresse |
Intelligente Vertragsadresse
Keine Daten
|
Intelligente Vertragsadresse
Keine Daten
|
Insgesamt abgebaute Münzen |
Insgesamt abgebaute Münzen
159918400.00000
|
Insgesamt abgebaute Münzen
100000000.00000
|
Ist Handel |
Ist Handel
yes
|
Ist Handel
yes
|
Blockbelohnung |
Blockbelohnung
0.000000000000
|
Blockbelohnung
0.000000000000
|
Zeit blockieren |
Zeit blockieren
10
|
Zeit blockieren
Keine Daten
|
Sozial
Webseite
Twitter
Vorteile
|
Lots of features like Ethereum
Kind of easy to use
|
-
|
Nachteile
|
Not enough projects
Overvalued
|
-
|
Bewertung
User rating |
User rating
4.3 / 5
3 Benutzerbewertungen
|
User rating
4 / 5
1 Benutzerbewertung
|
Cryptogeek rating |
Cryptogeek rating
3.8 / 5
|
Cryptogeek rating
0 / 5
|
Vorteile |
Vorteile
Lots of features like Ethereum
Kind of easy to use
|
Vorteile
-
|
Nachteile |
Nachteile
Not enough projects
Overvalued
|
Nachteile
-
|
Lisk (LSK) Benutzerbewertung ist 4.3, basierend auf 3 Benutzerbewertungen. NEO (NEO) Benutzerbewertung ist 4, basierend auf 1 Benutzerbewertungen.
We also calculate the special Cryptogeek TrustScore based on the characteristics of each coin.
Wählen Sie andere Unternehmen aus
Lisk (LSK) and NEO (NEO) are two popular blockchain platforms that offer unique features to users. In this review, we will compare and contrast the two platforms to help you make an informed decision when choosing between them.
Overview:
Lisk is a blockchain platform that enables developers to create and deploy decentralized applications (DApps) using JavaScript. The platform uses a unique sidechain architecture that allows developers to create customized sidechains that are linked to the main blockchain. This allows for increased scalability and flexibility when developing DApps.
On the other hand, NEO is a blockchain platform that allows developers to create and deploy smart contracts and DApps. NEO uses a unique consensus mechanism called Delegated Byzantine Fault Tolerance (dBFT) that allows for fast transaction processing and improved scalability. Additionally, NEO allows for the creation of digital assets that can be traded on its platform.
Performance:
Lisk has a high performance rate, with a capacity of handling up to 100 transactions per second. The platform uses a Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS) consensus mechanism, which allows for faster transaction processing and improved scalability. Additionally, Lisk allows developers to create customized sidechains that can be used to handle specific functions, further improving the platform's performance.
On the other hand, NEO has a capacity of handling up to 1,000 transactions per second, which is higher than Lisk's performance rate. NEO uses a unique consensus mechanism called dBFT, which allows for fast transaction processing and improved scalability. However, NEO's platform can be slower than Lisk when it comes to deploying DApps due to the platform's complex smart contract language.
Security:
Lisk uses a DPoS consensus mechanism, which has been proven to be secure and reliable. Additionally, the platform uses advanced encryption techniques to secure user data and transactions. Lisk's customizable sidechains also offer additional security, as developers can create unique security protocols for each sidechain.
On the other hand, NEO's dBFT consensus mechanism also offers a high level of security, with a low risk of network attacks. Additionally, NEO uses advanced encryption techniques to secure user data and transactions. However, NEO's platform has faced some security issues in the past, with several high-profile hacks causing losses for users.
Tokenomics:
Lisk uses a utility token called LSK, which is used to pay for transaction fees and to access features on the platform. The maximum supply of LSK is 135 million tokens.
NEO, on the other hand, uses a utility token called GAS, which is used to pay for transaction fees and to access features on the platform. Additionally, NEO allows for the creation of digital assets that can be traded on its platform. The maximum supply of GAS is 100 million tokens.
Community:
Lisk has a strong and active community, with a large number of developers working on the platform. The platform's user-friendly development environment has attracted many developers to the platform, and Lisk has a large number of DApps already deployed on its network.
NEO also has a strong and active community, with a large number of developers working on the platform. Additionally, NEO has a large number of partnerships with companies and organizations around the world, which has helped to increase its visibility and popularity.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, both Lisk and NEO are strong blockchain platforms that offer unique features to users. Lisk's sidechain architecture and user-friendly development environment make it an excellent choice for developers, while NEO's fast transaction processing and digital asset creation capabilities make it a popular choice for traders and investors. Ultimately, the choice between the two platforms will depend on your specific needs and preferences.