Lisk (LSK) vs NEO (NEO) Comparison
Lisk (LSK) and NEO (NEO) are two popular blockchain platforms that offer unique features to users. In this review, we will compare and contrast the two platforms to help you make an informed decision when choosing between them.
Overview:
Lisk is a blockchain platform that enables developers to create and deploy decentralized applications (DApps) using JavaScript. The platform uses a unique sidechain architecture that allows developers to create customized sidechains that are linked to the main blockchain. This allows for increased scalability and flexibility when developing DApps.
On the other hand, NEO is a blockchain platform that allows developers to create and deploy smart contracts and DApps. NEO uses a unique consensus mechanism called Delegated Byzantine Fault Tolerance (dBFT) that allows for fast transaction processing and improved scalability. Additionally, NEO allows for the creation of digital assets that can be traded on its platform.
Performance:
Lisk has a high performance rate, with a capacity of handling up to 100 transactions per second. The platform uses a Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS) consensus mechanism, which allows for faster transaction processing and improved scalability. Additionally, Lisk allows developers to create customized sidechains that can be used to handle specific functions, further improving the platform's performance.
On the other hand, NEO has a capacity of handling up to 1,000 transactions per second, which is higher than Lisk's performance rate. NEO uses a unique consensus mechanism called dBFT, which allows for fast transaction processing and improved scalability. However, NEO's platform can be slower than Lisk when it comes to deploying DApps due to the platform's complex smart contract language.
Security:
Lisk uses a DPoS consensus mechanism, which has been proven to be secure and reliable. Additionally, the platform uses advanced encryption techniques to secure user data and transactions. Lisk's customizable sidechains also offer additional security, as developers can create unique security protocols for each sidechain.
On the other hand, NEO's dBFT consensus mechanism also offers a high level of security, with a low risk of network attacks. Additionally, NEO uses advanced encryption techniques to secure user data and transactions. However, NEO's platform has faced some security issues in the past, with several high-profile hacks causing losses for users.
Tokenomics:
Lisk uses a utility token called LSK, which is used to pay for transaction fees and to access features on the platform. The maximum supply of LSK is 135 million tokens.
NEO, on the other hand, uses a utility token called GAS, which is used to pay for transaction fees and to access features on the platform. Additionally, NEO allows for the creation of digital assets that can be traded on its platform. The maximum supply of GAS is 100 million tokens.
Community:
Lisk has a strong and active community, with a large number of developers working on the platform. The platform's user-friendly development environment has attracted many developers to the platform, and Lisk has a large number of DApps already deployed on its network.
NEO also has a strong and active community, with a large number of developers working on the platform. Additionally, NEO has a large number of partnerships with companies and organizations around the world, which has helped to increase its visibility and popularity.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, both Lisk and NEO are strong blockchain platforms that offer unique features to users. Lisk's sidechain architecture and user-friendly development environment make it an excellent choice for developers, while NEO's fast transaction processing and digital asset creation capabilities make it a popular choice for traders and investors. Ultimately, the choice between the two platforms will depend on your specific needs and preferences.
User rating
Cryptogeek rating
Pontuação de Confiança
Como funciona
Sobre
|
Atualmente, o Lisk é baseado no protocolo DPoS de criptomoeda. Você pode verificar o valor de mercado e o volume de Lisk no widget de nosso parceiro. Além disso, você pode ver o preço mais recente do LSK no Cryptogeek.info. Você pode deixar seus comentários e críticas sobre a criptomoeda Lisk aqui.
|
Atualmente, o NEO é baseado no protocolo dBFT de criptomoeda. Você pode verificar o valor de mercado e o volume da NEO no widget de nosso parceiro. Além disso, você pode ver o preço mais recente da NEO no Cryptogeek.info. Você pode deixar seus comentários e críticas sobre a criptomoeda NEO aqui.
|
Tipo
Data de fundação
País
Idiomas
Time
Protocolo
|
Public blockchain
|
Sem dados
|
Preço atual (USD)
Recorde histórico (USD)
Mudança de Preço (24h)
Volume (24h)
|
3255129.22262
|
15001683.44779
|
Hashrate
Estoque Máximo
|
139891978.00000
|
100000000.00000
|
Oferta total
Estoque em Circulação
|
144814976.67988
|
100000000.00000
|
Velocidade de transação/ Tempo de Bloco
Taxa de transação
Rentabilidade de mineiração
Algoritmo
Tipo de prova
Totalmente pré-definido
Endereço de contrato inteligente
Total de moedas extraídas
|
159918400.00000
|
100000000.00000
|
Está negociando
Recompensa de bloco
|
0.000000000000
|
0.000000000000
|
Hora do bloco
Sobre |
Atualmente, o Lisk é baseado no protocolo DPoS de criptomoeda. Você pode verificar o valor de mercado e o volume de Lisk no widget de nosso parceiro. Além disso, você pode ver o preço mais recente do LSK no Cryptogeek.info. Você pode deixar seus comentários e críticas sobre a criptomoeda Lisk aqui.
|
Atualmente, o NEO é baseado no protocolo dBFT de criptomoeda. Você pode verificar o valor de mercado e o volume da NEO no widget de nosso parceiro. Além disso, você pode ver o preço mais recente da NEO no Cryptogeek.info. Você pode deixar seus comentários e críticas sobre a criptomoeda NEO aqui.
|
Tipo |
Tipo
coin
|
Tipo
coin
|
Data de fundação |
Data de fundação
2016
|
Data de fundação
Sem dados
|
País |
País
International
|
País
Sem dados
|
Idiomas |
Idiomas
Sem dados
|
Idiomas
Sem dados
|
Time |
Time
Public
|
Time
Public
|
Protocolo |
Protocolo
Public blockchain
|
Protocolo
Sem dados
|
Preço atual (USD) |
Preço atual (USD)
0.8813
|
Preço atual (USD)
10.9228
|
Recorde histórico (USD) |
Recorde histórico (USD)
39.3100
|
Recorde histórico (USD)
196.8500
|
Mudança de Preço (24h) |
Mudança de Preço (24h)
-5.85
|
Mudança de Preço (24h)
-5.92
|
Volume (24h) |
Volume (24h)
3255129.22262
|
Volume (24h)
15001683.44779
|
Hashrate |
Hashrate
Sem dados
|
Hashrate
Sem dados
|
Estoque Máximo |
Estoque Máximo
139891978.00000
|
Estoque Máximo
100000000.00000
|
Oferta total |
Oferta total
Sem dados
|
Oferta total
Sem dados
|
Estoque em Circulação |
Estoque em Circulação
144814976.67988
|
Estoque em Circulação
100000000.00000
|
Velocidade de transação/ Tempo de Bloco |
Velocidade de transação/ Tempo de Bloco
25
|
Velocidade de transação/ Tempo de Bloco
1000
|
Taxa de transação |
Taxa de transação
Sem dados
|
Taxa de transação
Sem dados
|
Rentabilidade de mineiração |
Rentabilidade de mineiração
medium
|
Rentabilidade de mineiração
Sem dados
|
Algoritmo |
Algoritmo
DPoS
|
Algoritmo
Sem dados
|
Tipo de prova |
Tipo de prova
DPoS
|
Tipo de prova
Sem dados
|
Totalmente pré-definido |
Totalmente pré-definido
Sem dados
|
Totalmente pré-definido
Sem dados
|
Endereço de contrato inteligente |
Endereço de contrato inteligente
Sem dados
|
Endereço de contrato inteligente
Sem dados
|
Total de moedas extraídas |
Total de moedas extraídas
159918400.00000
|
Total de moedas extraídas
100000000.00000
|
Está negociando |
Está negociando
yes
|
Está negociando
yes
|
Recompensa de bloco |
Recompensa de bloco
0.000000000000
|
Recompensa de bloco
0.000000000000
|
Hora do bloco |
Hora do bloco
10
|
Hora do bloco
Sem dados
|
Social
Site
Twitter
Vantagens
|
Lots of features like Ethereum
Kind of easy to use
|
-
|
Desvantagens
|
Not enough projects
Overvalued
|
-
|
Avaliação
User rating |
User rating
4.3 / 5
3 avaliações do usuário
|
User rating
4 / 5
1 avaliação do usuário
|
Cryptogeek rating |
Cryptogeek rating
3.8 / 5
|
Cryptogeek rating
0 / 5
|
Vantagens |
Vantagens
Lots of features like Ethereum
Kind of easy to use
|
Vantagens
-
|
Desvantagens |
Desvantagens
Not enough projects
Overvalued
|
Desvantagens
-
|
A avaliação de Lisk (LSK) usuários é de 4.3, com base em 3 avaliações de usuários. A avaliação de NEO (NEO) usuários é de 4, com base em 1 avaliações de usuários.
We also calculate the special Cryptogeek TrustScore based on the characteristics of each coin.
Escolha outras empresas
Lisk (LSK) and NEO (NEO) are two popular blockchain platforms that offer unique features to users. In this review, we will compare and contrast the two platforms to help you make an informed decision when choosing between them.
Overview:
Lisk is a blockchain platform that enables developers to create and deploy decentralized applications (DApps) using JavaScript. The platform uses a unique sidechain architecture that allows developers to create customized sidechains that are linked to the main blockchain. This allows for increased scalability and flexibility when developing DApps.
On the other hand, NEO is a blockchain platform that allows developers to create and deploy smart contracts and DApps. NEO uses a unique consensus mechanism called Delegated Byzantine Fault Tolerance (dBFT) that allows for fast transaction processing and improved scalability. Additionally, NEO allows for the creation of digital assets that can be traded on its platform.
Performance:
Lisk has a high performance rate, with a capacity of handling up to 100 transactions per second. The platform uses a Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS) consensus mechanism, which allows for faster transaction processing and improved scalability. Additionally, Lisk allows developers to create customized sidechains that can be used to handle specific functions, further improving the platform's performance.
On the other hand, NEO has a capacity of handling up to 1,000 transactions per second, which is higher than Lisk's performance rate. NEO uses a unique consensus mechanism called dBFT, which allows for fast transaction processing and improved scalability. However, NEO's platform can be slower than Lisk when it comes to deploying DApps due to the platform's complex smart contract language.
Security:
Lisk uses a DPoS consensus mechanism, which has been proven to be secure and reliable. Additionally, the platform uses advanced encryption techniques to secure user data and transactions. Lisk's customizable sidechains also offer additional security, as developers can create unique security protocols for each sidechain.
On the other hand, NEO's dBFT consensus mechanism also offers a high level of security, with a low risk of network attacks. Additionally, NEO uses advanced encryption techniques to secure user data and transactions. However, NEO's platform has faced some security issues in the past, with several high-profile hacks causing losses for users.
Tokenomics:
Lisk uses a utility token called LSK, which is used to pay for transaction fees and to access features on the platform. The maximum supply of LSK is 135 million tokens.
NEO, on the other hand, uses a utility token called GAS, which is used to pay for transaction fees and to access features on the platform. Additionally, NEO allows for the creation of digital assets that can be traded on its platform. The maximum supply of GAS is 100 million tokens.
Community:
Lisk has a strong and active community, with a large number of developers working on the platform. The platform's user-friendly development environment has attracted many developers to the platform, and Lisk has a large number of DApps already deployed on its network.
NEO also has a strong and active community, with a large number of developers working on the platform. Additionally, NEO has a large number of partnerships with companies and organizations around the world, which has helped to increase its visibility and popularity.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, both Lisk and NEO are strong blockchain platforms that offer unique features to users. Lisk's sidechain architecture and user-friendly development environment make it an excellent choice for developers, while NEO's fast transaction processing and digital asset creation capabilities make it a popular choice for traders and investors. Ultimately, the choice between the two platforms will depend on your specific needs and preferences.