比较 ICON (ICX) 与 Wanchain (WAN) Coin

比较公司

Introduction

Blockchain interoperability has become one of the most sought-after objectives in the crypto space, with several projects working to address this challenge in various ways. Two prominent players in this field are ICON (ICX) and Wanchain (WAN). Both projects aim to connect different blockchains and facilitate the seamless exchange of assets and data across platforms. In this article, we will compare ICON and Wanchain by exploring their background, technology, applications, and impact on the blockchain ecosystem. This comparison will help you determine which platform aligns best with your needs.


Background and Vision

ICON (ICX) was launched in 2017 by a South Korean technology company called ICONLOOP. Its vision is to "hyperconnect the world" by creating a large-scale blockchain network that links public blockchains, private business applications, and government institutions. ICON’s goal is to build a decentralized platform where various independent blockchains can communicate with one another using its protocol.

Wanchain (WAN) was also launched in 2017 by Jack Lu. Similar to ICON, Wanchain focuses on blockchain interoperability. Initially created as a fork of Ethereum, Wanchain evolved into its own Layer-1 protocol, capable of smart contract functionality. Its main focus is on cross-chain bridges for transferring digital currencies and enabling decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols.

While both projects focus on blockchain interoperability, ICON is more focused on integrating public and enterprise systems, while Wanchain places a stronger emphasis on cross-chain asset movement and DeFi applications.


Technical Architecture and Interoperability

ICON uses its own proprietary loopchain infrastructure, a performance-driven blockchain engine capable of supporting multiple use cases such as finance, healthcare, and education. ICON employs the Blockchain Transmission Protocol (BTP) to facilitate communications between heterogeneous blockchains. This protocol enables trustless, secure, and decentralized interoperability between chains.

Wanchain, on the other hand, uses secure multiparty computation (sMPC) and Shamir’s Secret Sharing to build decentralized bridges between blockchains. These bridges enable direct asset transfer between chains like Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Polkadot, among others. Wanchain also supports private transactions through ring signatures and one-time addresses.

While ICON focuses on protocol-level interoperability through BTP, Wanchain builds decentralized bridges for real-time asset transfer and cross-chain decentralized application (dApp) support.


Token Utility and Network Roles

ICON (ICX) serves multiple purposes within the ICON network. It is used for:

  • Paying transaction fees

  • Initiating smart contracts

  • Governance, where token holders vote for Public Representatives (P-Reps) in the network

ICON utilizes a Proof-of-Stake (PoS) system called Delegated Proof-of-Contribution (DPoC), allowing token holders to stake ICX and participate in governance.

Wanchain (WAN) also serves various functions within the Wanchain network, including:

  • Paying transaction fees and bridge fees for cross-chain transfers

  • Staking for consensus and validator node rewards

WAN operates under a PoS consensus model, where token holders can delegate their tokens to validators in exchange for staking rewards. WAN is also used to pay gas fees for deploying and interacting with Wanchain smart contracts.

Both tokens are multi-purpose, but ICX is more focused on governance and protocol-level interoperability, while WAN is geared towards enabling DeFi and asset transfer.


Applications in Real-World and Ecosystem Development

ICON has gained traction, particularly in South Korea, by partnering with local government agencies, universities, and businesses. Applications include blockchain ID platforms, education certificate verification, and payment settlement platforms. ICONLOOP’s "MyID" digital identification platform, which is built on the ICON blockchain, is a notable example. ICON also supports dApps like Balanced (a decentralized financial platform) and Omm (a money market protocol).

Wanchain has a stronger focus on DeFi applications, enabling cross-chain transfers of assets, lending, and staking. Wanchain supports wrapped tokens from other blockchains and facilitates cross-chain liquidity through decentralized bridges. Wanchain has also integrated with various Layer-1 chains such as Avalanche, Polygon, and XRP Ledger, enabling native-to-native interaction across chains.

If you are interested in government-integrated solutions, ICON offers a more institutional-focused ecosystem, while Wanchain is ideal for DeFi and cross-chain token management.


Developer Tools and Community Engagement

ICON supports developers with SDKs, Python-contract (SCORE) smart contracts, and comprehensive documentation. The ICONDAO and the ICON Foundation back the community, sponsoring development projects and offering learning resources and grants. ICON’s active GitHub and the continuous evolution of its network are key highlights.

Wanchain offers EVM compatibility, enabling developers to code in Solidity and deploy on the Wanchain network without learning a new language. Tools like MetaMask and Truffle are supported. Wanchain also has a developer portal and frequently releases technical updates, with rewards for bridge operators and stakers.

For Ethereum developers, Wanchain's EVM compatibility is appealing, while ICON provides native tools tailored to its platform.


Security and Network Design

ICON uses a delegated governance model that gives Public Representatives (P-Reps) significant responsibility in maintaining the network. While this makes ICON more scalable, it can lead to potential centralization risks if not well-balanced. The network has faced minor governance issues in the past but has improved with each update.

Wanchain uses a decentralized approach for cross-chain transfers with sMPC and multi-party coordination, ensuring that assets are securely transferred between chains. The bridge’s complexity can lead to some risks, especially regarding validator coordination and consensus delays. Despite this, Wanchain has not experienced any large-scale breaches and follows a security-conscious design.

Both networks are adequately secured, but ICON relies on elected representatives, while Wanchain targets decentralized coordination.


Advantages and Disadvantages

ICON (ICX)

Pros:

  • Strong institutional adoption in South Korea

  • BTP enables protocol-level interconnectivity

  • Delegated PoS with staking and decentralized governance

Cons:

  • Less focus on global DeFi integrations

  • Non-EVM-compatible

  • Smaller ecosystem outside South Korea

Wanchain (WAN)

Pros:

  • Decentralized bridges for large asset transfers

  • EVM-compatible smart contract platform

  • Active DeFi integrations and wrapped tokens

Cons:

  • Lower global awareness

  • Complex bridge design requires validator coordination

  • Limited usage outside DeFi and token transfers


Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Can I stake both ICX and WAN?

Yes. Both ICX and WAN tokens support staking, and rewards can be earned by delegating tokens to validators or participating in governance.

Is ICON EVM-compatible like Wanchain?

No. ICON uses its proprietary SCORE smart contract platform, while Wanchain is compatible with Ethereum’s EVM and Solidity.

Which coin is more practical for real-world use?

ICON has more real-world integrations in businesses and public services, while Wanchain is more focused on DeFi and cross-chain asset transfers.

Do these coins list on major exchanges?

Yes, both ICX and WAN are listed on major exchanges like Binance, KuCoin, and Gate.io.

公司

User rating

4.3 / 5 3 用户评论 4.7 / 5 3 用户评论

Cryptogeek rating

4.6 / 5 4.2 / 5
4.45 / 5 4.31 / 5

关于

ICON当前基于加密货币其他协议。您可以在我们合作伙伴的窗口小部件上查看ICON的市值和交易量。您也可以在Cryptogeek.info上看到最新的ICX价格。您可以在此处留下有关ICON加密货币的反馈和评论。
Wanchain当前基于加密货币EtHash协议。您可以在我们合作伙伴的窗口小部件上查看Wanchain的市值和交易量。您也可以在Cryptogeek.info上看到最新的WAN价格。您可以在此处留下有关Wanchain加密货币的反馈和评论。

类型

coin coin

成立日期

2018 2019

国家

International USA

语言

没有数据 没有数据

团队

Public Public

协议

没有数据 没有数据

当前价格(美元)

0.1439 0.1265

历史最高(美元)

12.6400 9.9200

价格变动(24小时)

-5.43 -1.05

交易量(24小时)

2854204.84615 5283405.27254

哈希值

没有数据 没有数据

最大供应量

800460000.00000 210000000.00000

总供应

没有数据 没有数据

循环供应

1084978260.49540 198573148.97871

交易速度/区块生成时间

8000 没有数据

手续费

没有数据 没有数据

挖矿盈利能力

没有数据 没有数据

算法

没有数据 没有数据

证明类型

没有数据 PoS

完全放心

没有数据 没有数据

智能合约地址

没有数据 没有数据

开采的硬币总数

没有数据 106152493.00000

正在交易

没有数据 yes

块奖励

没有数据 0.000000000000

封锁时间

没有数据 没有数据
公司
User rating User rating 4.3 / 5 3 用户评论 User rating 4.7 / 5 3 用户评论
Cryptogeek rating Cryptogeek rating 4.6 / 5 Cryptogeek rating 4.2 / 5
TrustScore 其如何运作 TrustScore 4.45 / 5 TrustScore 4.31 / 5
关于
ICON当前基于加密货币其他协议。您可以在我们合作伙伴的窗口小部件上查看ICON的市值和交易量。您也可以在Cryptogeek.info上看到最新的ICX价格。您可以在此处留下有关ICON加密货币的反馈和评论。
Wanchain当前基于加密货币EtHash协议。您可以在我们合作伙伴的窗口小部件上查看Wanchain的市值和交易量。您也可以在Cryptogeek.info上看到最新的WAN价格。您可以在此处留下有关Wanchain加密货币的反馈和评论。
类型 类型 coin 类型 coin
成立日期 成立日期 2018 成立日期 2019
国家 国家 International 国家 USA
语言 语言 没有数据 语言 没有数据
团队 团队 Public 团队 Public
协议 协议 没有数据 协议 没有数据
当前价格(美元) 当前价格(美元) 0.1439 当前价格(美元) 0.1265
历史最高(美元) 历史最高(美元) 12.6400 历史最高(美元) 9.9200
价格变动(24小时) 价格变动(24小时) -5.43 价格变动(24小时) -1.05
交易量(24小时) 交易量(24小时) 2854204.84615 交易量(24小时) 5283405.27254
哈希值 哈希值 没有数据 哈希值 没有数据
最大供应量 最大供应量 800460000.00000 最大供应量 210000000.00000
总供应 总供应 没有数据 总供应 没有数据
循环供应 循环供应 1084978260.49540 循环供应 198573148.97871
交易速度/区块生成时间 交易速度/区块生成时间 8000 交易速度/区块生成时间 没有数据
手续费 手续费 没有数据 手续费 没有数据
挖矿盈利能力 挖矿盈利能力 low 挖矿盈利能力 low
算法 算法 没有数据 算法 没有数据
证明类型 证明类型 没有数据 证明类型 PoS
完全放心 完全放心 没有数据 完全放心 没有数据
智能合约地址 智能合约地址 没有数据 智能合约地址 没有数据
开采的硬币总数 开采的硬币总数 没有数据 开采的硬币总数 106152493.00000
正在交易 正在交易 没有数据 正在交易 yes
块奖励 块奖励 没有数据 块奖励 0.000000000000
封锁时间 封锁时间 没有数据 封锁时间 没有数据

社交

网站

icon.foundation wanchain.org

Twitter

@helloiconworld @wanchain_org
网站 网站 icon.foundation 网站 wanchain.org
Twitter Twitter @helloiconworld Twitter @wanchain_org

优点

Interlinking Good Idea - Distributed Ledger and Smart Contract Virtual Machine; - Ecosystem token - Wancoin (WAN); - Consensus mechanism; - Transactions on the network; - Cross-chain integration; - Cross-chain transactions.

缺点

Young Not backed They used the word smart contract way too much. - English and Chinese localisations only

评分

User rating User rating 4.3 / 5 3 用户评论 User rating 4.7 / 5 3 用户评论
Cryptogeek rating Cryptogeek rating 4.6 / 5 Cryptogeek rating 4.2 / 5
优点 优点 Interlinking Good Idea 优点 - Distributed Ledger and Smart Contract Virtual Machine; - Ecosystem token - Wancoin (WAN); - Consensus mechanism; - Transactions on the network; - Cross-chain integration; - Cross-chain transactions.
缺点 缺点 Young Not backed They used the word smart contract way too much. 缺点 - English and Chinese localisations only

基于 3 条用户评论, ICON (ICX) 条用户评分为 4.3 条。 基于 3 位用户的评论, Wanchain (WAN) 位用户的评分是 4.7 位。

We also calculate the special Cryptogeek TrustScore based on the characteristics of each coin.

我们根据TrustScore评分选择获胜者 请记住,选择哪家公司仍然取决于您的选择! 我们如何计算信任分数?
TrustScore: 4.45 / 5 书写您的评论
选择其他公司

Conclusion

The comparison between ICON (ICX) and Wanchain (WAN) shows two distinct paths towards blockchain interconnectivity. ICON is a protocol-level platform designed for connecting public and private blockchains, targeting institutional adoption in South Korea. Wanchain, on the other hand, is focused on decentralized finance, creating bridges for asset transfers between blockchains. If you are interested in a platform with public-sector applications and unique identity models, ICON is the better option. For decentralized, cross-chain asset transfer in a DeFi context, Wanchain offers broader functionality. Both projects contribute to a more interconnected blockchain world, but from different perspectives.

Introduction

Blockchain interoperability has become one of the most sought-after objectives in the crypto space, with several projects working to address this challenge in various ways. Two prominent players in this field are ICON (ICX) and Wanchain (WAN). Both projects aim to connect different blockchains and facilitate the seamless exchange of assets and data across platforms. In this article, we will compare ICON and Wanchain by exploring their background, technology, applications, and impact on the blockchain ecosystem. This comparison will help you determine which platform aligns best with your needs.


Background and Vision

ICON (ICX) was launched in 2017 by a South Korean technology company called ICONLOOP. Its vision is to "hyperconnect the world" by creating a large-scale blockchain network that links public blockchains, private business applications, and government institutions. ICON’s goal is to build a decentralized platform where various independent blockchains can communicate with one another using its protocol.

Wanchain (WAN) was also launched in 2017 by Jack Lu. Similar to ICON, Wanchain focuses on blockchain interoperability. Initially created as a fork of Ethereum, Wanchain evolved into its own Layer-1 protocol, capable of smart contract functionality. Its main focus is on cross-chain bridges for transferring digital currencies and enabling decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols.

While both projects focus on blockchain interoperability, ICON is more focused on integrating public and enterprise systems, while Wanchain places a stronger emphasis on cross-chain asset movement and DeFi applications.


Technical Architecture and Interoperability

ICON uses its own proprietary loopchain infrastructure, a performance-driven blockchain engine capable of supporting multiple use cases such as finance, healthcare, and education. ICON employs the Blockchain Transmission Protocol (BTP) to facilitate communications between heterogeneous blockchains. This protocol enables trustless, secure, and decentralized interoperability between chains.

Wanchain, on the other hand, uses secure multiparty computation (sMPC) and Shamir’s Secret Sharing to build decentralized bridges between blockchains. These bridges enable direct asset transfer between chains like Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Polkadot, among others. Wanchain also supports private transactions through ring signatures and one-time addresses.

While ICON focuses on protocol-level interoperability through BTP, Wanchain builds decentralized bridges for real-time asset transfer and cross-chain decentralized application (dApp) support.


Token Utility and Network Roles

ICON (ICX) serves multiple purposes within the ICON network. It is used for:

  • Paying transaction fees

  • Initiating smart contracts

  • Governance, where token holders vote for Public Representatives (P-Reps) in the network

ICON utilizes a Proof-of-Stake (PoS) system called Delegated Proof-of-Contribution (DPoC), allowing token holders to stake ICX and participate in governance.

Wanchain (WAN) also serves various functions within the Wanchain network, including:

  • Paying transaction fees and bridge fees for cross-chain transfers

  • Staking for consensus and validator node rewards

WAN operates under a PoS consensus model, where token holders can delegate their tokens to validators in exchange for staking rewards. WAN is also used to pay gas fees for deploying and interacting with Wanchain smart contracts.

Both tokens are multi-purpose, but ICX is more focused on governance and protocol-level interoperability, while WAN is geared towards enabling DeFi and asset transfer.


Applications in Real-World and Ecosystem Development

ICON has gained traction, particularly in South Korea, by partnering with local government agencies, universities, and businesses. Applications include blockchain ID platforms, education certificate verification, and payment settlement platforms. ICONLOOP’s "MyID" digital identification platform, which is built on the ICON blockchain, is a notable example. ICON also supports dApps like Balanced (a decentralized financial platform) and Omm (a money market protocol).

Wanchain has a stronger focus on DeFi applications, enabling cross-chain transfers of assets, lending, and staking. Wanchain supports wrapped tokens from other blockchains and facilitates cross-chain liquidity through decentralized bridges. Wanchain has also integrated with various Layer-1 chains such as Avalanche, Polygon, and XRP Ledger, enabling native-to-native interaction across chains.

If you are interested in government-integrated solutions, ICON offers a more institutional-focused ecosystem, while Wanchain is ideal for DeFi and cross-chain token management.


Developer Tools and Community Engagement

ICON supports developers with SDKs, Python-contract (SCORE) smart contracts, and comprehensive documentation. The ICONDAO and the ICON Foundation back the community, sponsoring development projects and offering learning resources and grants. ICON’s active GitHub and the continuous evolution of its network are key highlights.

Wanchain offers EVM compatibility, enabling developers to code in Solidity and deploy on the Wanchain network without learning a new language. Tools like MetaMask and Truffle are supported. Wanchain also has a developer portal and frequently releases technical updates, with rewards for bridge operators and stakers.

For Ethereum developers, Wanchain's EVM compatibility is appealing, while ICON provides native tools tailored to its platform.


Security and Network Design

ICON uses a delegated governance model that gives Public Representatives (P-Reps) significant responsibility in maintaining the network. While this makes ICON more scalable, it can lead to potential centralization risks if not well-balanced. The network has faced minor governance issues in the past but has improved with each update.

Wanchain uses a decentralized approach for cross-chain transfers with sMPC and multi-party coordination, ensuring that assets are securely transferred between chains. The bridge’s complexity can lead to some risks, especially regarding validator coordination and consensus delays. Despite this, Wanchain has not experienced any large-scale breaches and follows a security-conscious design.

Both networks are adequately secured, but ICON relies on elected representatives, while Wanchain targets decentralized coordination.


Advantages and Disadvantages

ICON (ICX)

Pros:

  • Strong institutional adoption in South Korea

  • BTP enables protocol-level interconnectivity

  • Delegated PoS with staking and decentralized governance

Cons:

  • Less focus on global DeFi integrations

  • Non-EVM-compatible

  • Smaller ecosystem outside South Korea

Wanchain (WAN)

Pros:

  • Decentralized bridges for large asset transfers

  • EVM-compatible smart contract platform

  • Active DeFi integrations and wrapped tokens

Cons:

  • Lower global awareness

  • Complex bridge design requires validator coordination

  • Limited usage outside DeFi and token transfers


Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Can I stake both ICX and WAN?

Yes. Both ICX and WAN tokens support staking, and rewards can be earned by delegating tokens to validators or participating in governance.

Is ICON EVM-compatible like Wanchain?

No. ICON uses its proprietary SCORE smart contract platform, while Wanchain is compatible with Ethereum’s EVM and Solidity.

Which coin is more practical for real-world use?

ICON has more real-world integrations in businesses and public services, while Wanchain is more focused on DeFi and cross-chain asset transfers.

Do these coins list on major exchanges?

Yes, both ICX and WAN are listed on major exchanges like Binance, KuCoin, and Gate.io.