ICON (ICX) と Wanchain (WAN) を比較 Coin

企業を比較

Introduction

Blockchain interoperability has become one of the most sought-after objectives in the crypto space, with several projects working to address this challenge in various ways. Two prominent players in this field are ICON (ICX) and Wanchain (WAN). Both projects aim to connect different blockchains and facilitate the seamless exchange of assets and data across platforms. In this article, we will compare ICON and Wanchain by exploring their background, technology, applications, and impact on the blockchain ecosystem. This comparison will help you determine which platform aligns best with your needs.


Background and Vision

ICON (ICX) was launched in 2017 by a South Korean technology company called ICONLOOP. Its vision is to "hyperconnect the world" by creating a large-scale blockchain network that links public blockchains, private business applications, and government institutions. ICON’s goal is to build a decentralized platform where various independent blockchains can communicate with one another using its protocol.

Wanchain (WAN) was also launched in 2017 by Jack Lu. Similar to ICON, Wanchain focuses on blockchain interoperability. Initially created as a fork of Ethereum, Wanchain evolved into its own Layer-1 protocol, capable of smart contract functionality. Its main focus is on cross-chain bridges for transferring digital currencies and enabling decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols.

While both projects focus on blockchain interoperability, ICON is more focused on integrating public and enterprise systems, while Wanchain places a stronger emphasis on cross-chain asset movement and DeFi applications.


Technical Architecture and Interoperability

ICON uses its own proprietary loopchain infrastructure, a performance-driven blockchain engine capable of supporting multiple use cases such as finance, healthcare, and education. ICON employs the Blockchain Transmission Protocol (BTP) to facilitate communications between heterogeneous blockchains. This protocol enables trustless, secure, and decentralized interoperability between chains.

Wanchain, on the other hand, uses secure multiparty computation (sMPC) and Shamir’s Secret Sharing to build decentralized bridges between blockchains. These bridges enable direct asset transfer between chains like Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Polkadot, among others. Wanchain also supports private transactions through ring signatures and one-time addresses.

While ICON focuses on protocol-level interoperability through BTP, Wanchain builds decentralized bridges for real-time asset transfer and cross-chain decentralized application (dApp) support.


Token Utility and Network Roles

ICON (ICX) serves multiple purposes within the ICON network. It is used for:

  • Paying transaction fees

  • Initiating smart contracts

  • Governance, where token holders vote for Public Representatives (P-Reps) in the network

ICON utilizes a Proof-of-Stake (PoS) system called Delegated Proof-of-Contribution (DPoC), allowing token holders to stake ICX and participate in governance.

Wanchain (WAN) also serves various functions within the Wanchain network, including:

  • Paying transaction fees and bridge fees for cross-chain transfers

  • Staking for consensus and validator node rewards

WAN operates under a PoS consensus model, where token holders can delegate their tokens to validators in exchange for staking rewards. WAN is also used to pay gas fees for deploying and interacting with Wanchain smart contracts.

Both tokens are multi-purpose, but ICX is more focused on governance and protocol-level interoperability, while WAN is geared towards enabling DeFi and asset transfer.


Applications in Real-World and Ecosystem Development

ICON has gained traction, particularly in South Korea, by partnering with local government agencies, universities, and businesses. Applications include blockchain ID platforms, education certificate verification, and payment settlement platforms. ICONLOOP’s "MyID" digital identification platform, which is built on the ICON blockchain, is a notable example. ICON also supports dApps like Balanced (a decentralized financial platform) and Omm (a money market protocol).

Wanchain has a stronger focus on DeFi applications, enabling cross-chain transfers of assets, lending, and staking. Wanchain supports wrapped tokens from other blockchains and facilitates cross-chain liquidity through decentralized bridges. Wanchain has also integrated with various Layer-1 chains such as Avalanche, Polygon, and XRP Ledger, enabling native-to-native interaction across chains.

If you are interested in government-integrated solutions, ICON offers a more institutional-focused ecosystem, while Wanchain is ideal for DeFi and cross-chain token management.


Developer Tools and Community Engagement

ICON supports developers with SDKs, Python-contract (SCORE) smart contracts, and comprehensive documentation. The ICONDAO and the ICON Foundation back the community, sponsoring development projects and offering learning resources and grants. ICON’s active GitHub and the continuous evolution of its network are key highlights.

Wanchain offers EVM compatibility, enabling developers to code in Solidity and deploy on the Wanchain network without learning a new language. Tools like MetaMask and Truffle are supported. Wanchain also has a developer portal and frequently releases technical updates, with rewards for bridge operators and stakers.

For Ethereum developers, Wanchain's EVM compatibility is appealing, while ICON provides native tools tailored to its platform.


Security and Network Design

ICON uses a delegated governance model that gives Public Representatives (P-Reps) significant responsibility in maintaining the network. While this makes ICON more scalable, it can lead to potential centralization risks if not well-balanced. The network has faced minor governance issues in the past but has improved with each update.

Wanchain uses a decentralized approach for cross-chain transfers with sMPC and multi-party coordination, ensuring that assets are securely transferred between chains. The bridge’s complexity can lead to some risks, especially regarding validator coordination and consensus delays. Despite this, Wanchain has not experienced any large-scale breaches and follows a security-conscious design.

Both networks are adequately secured, but ICON relies on elected representatives, while Wanchain targets decentralized coordination.


Advantages and Disadvantages

ICON (ICX)

Pros:

  • Strong institutional adoption in South Korea

  • BTP enables protocol-level interconnectivity

  • Delegated PoS with staking and decentralized governance

Cons:

  • Less focus on global DeFi integrations

  • Non-EVM-compatible

  • Smaller ecosystem outside South Korea

Wanchain (WAN)

Pros:

  • Decentralized bridges for large asset transfers

  • EVM-compatible smart contract platform

  • Active DeFi integrations and wrapped tokens

Cons:

  • Lower global awareness

  • Complex bridge design requires validator coordination

  • Limited usage outside DeFi and token transfers


Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Can I stake both ICX and WAN?

Yes. Both ICX and WAN tokens support staking, and rewards can be earned by delegating tokens to validators or participating in governance.

Is ICON EVM-compatible like Wanchain?

No. ICON uses its proprietary SCORE smart contract platform, while Wanchain is compatible with Ethereum’s EVM and Solidity.

Which coin is more practical for real-world use?

ICON has more real-world integrations in businesses and public services, while Wanchain is more focused on DeFi and cross-chain asset transfers.

Do these coins list on major exchanges?

Yes, both ICX and WAN are listed on major exchanges like Binance, KuCoin, and Gate.io.

企業

Cryptogeekユーザー評価

4.3 / 5 3 ユーザーレビュー 4.7 / 5 3 ユーザーレビュー

Cryptogeekエキスパート評価

4.6 / 5 4.2 / 5

トラストスコア

しくみ
4.45 / 5 4.31 / 5

概要

ICONは現在、暗号通貨その他のプロトコルに基づいています。 ICONの時価総額とボリュームは、パートナーのウィジェットで確認できます。また、Cryptogeek.infoで最新のICX価格を確認できます。 ICON暗号通貨に関するフィードバックとレビューをここに残すことができます。
Wanchainは現在、暗号通貨EtHashプロトコルに基づいています。ワンチェーンの時価総額とボリュームは、パートナーのウィジェットで確認できます。また、Cryptogeek.infoで最新のWAN価格を確認できます。ここにワンチェーン暗号通貨に関するフィードバックとレビューを残すことができます。

タイプ

coin coin

創業日

2018 2019

International USA

言語

データなし データなし

チーム

Public Public

プロトコル

データなし データなし

現在価格(USD)

0.1276 0.1195

過去最高値(USD)

12.6400 9.9200

価格変更(24時間)

0.94 3.01

ボリューム(24時間)

1121657.56319 4084851.94780

ハッシュレート

データなし データなし

最大供給量

800460000.00000 210000000.00000

総供給

データなし データなし

循環供給量

1086270586.44940 198595598.16109

トランザクションスピード / ブロックタイム

8000 データなし

トランザクション手数料

データなし データなし

マイニングの収益性

データなし データなし

アルゴリズム

データなし データなし

証明タイプ

データなし PoS

完全に掘り下げ

データなし データなし

スマート契約アドレス

データなし データなし

採掘されたコインの合計

データなし 106152493.00000

取引されています

データなし yes

ブロック報酬

データなし 0.000000000000

ブロックタイム

データなし データなし
企業
Cryptogeekユーザー評価 Cryptogeekユーザー評価 4.3 / 5 3 ユーザーレビュー Cryptogeekユーザー評価 4.7 / 5 3 ユーザーレビュー
Cryptogeekエキスパート評価 Cryptogeekエキスパート評価 4.6 / 5 Cryptogeekエキスパート評価 4.2 / 5
トラストスコア しくみ トラストスコア 4.45 / 5 トラストスコア 4.31 / 5
概要
ICONは現在、暗号通貨その他のプロトコルに基づいています。 ICONの時価総額とボリュームは、パートナーのウィジェットで確認できます。また、Cryptogeek.infoで最新のICX価格を確認できます。 ICON暗号通貨に関するフィードバックとレビューをここに残すことができます。
Wanchainは現在、暗号通貨EtHashプロトコルに基づいています。ワンチェーンの時価総額とボリュームは、パートナーのウィジェットで確認できます。また、Cryptogeek.infoで最新のWAN価格を確認できます。ここにワンチェーン暗号通貨に関するフィードバックとレビューを残すことができます。
タイプ タイプ coin タイプ coin
創業日 創業日 2018 創業日 2019
International USA
言語 言語 データなし 言語 データなし
チーム チーム Public チーム Public
プロトコル プロトコル データなし プロトコル データなし
現在価格(USD) 現在価格(USD) 0.1276 現在価格(USD) 0.1195
過去最高値(USD) 過去最高値(USD) 12.6400 過去最高値(USD) 9.9200
価格変更(24時間) 価格変更(24時間) 0.94 価格変更(24時間) 3.01
ボリューム(24時間) ボリューム(24時間) 1121657.56319 ボリューム(24時間) 4084851.94780
ハッシュレート ハッシュレート データなし ハッシュレート データなし
最大供給量 最大供給量 800460000.00000 最大供給量 210000000.00000
総供給 総供給 データなし 総供給 データなし
循環供給量 循環供給量 1086270586.44940 循環供給量 198595598.16109
トランザクションスピード / ブロックタイム トランザクションスピード / ブロックタイム 8000 トランザクションスピード / ブロックタイム データなし
トランザクション手数料 トランザクション手数料 データなし トランザクション手数料 データなし
マイニングの収益性 マイニングの収益性 low マイニングの収益性 low
アルゴリズム アルゴリズム データなし アルゴリズム データなし
証明タイプ 証明タイプ データなし 証明タイプ PoS
完全に掘り下げ 完全に掘り下げ データなし 完全に掘り下げ データなし
スマート契約アドレス スマート契約アドレス データなし スマート契約アドレス データなし
採掘されたコインの合計 採掘されたコインの合計 データなし 採掘されたコインの合計 106152493.00000
取引されています 取引されています データなし 取引されています yes
ブロック報酬 ブロック報酬 データなし ブロック報酬 0.000000000000
ブロックタイム ブロックタイム データなし ブロックタイム データなし

ソーシャル

ウェブサイト

icon.foundation wanchain.org

Twitter

@helloiconworld @wanchain_org
ウェブサイト ウェブサイト icon.foundation ウェブサイト wanchain.org
Twitter Twitter @helloiconworld Twitter @wanchain_org

メリット

Interlinking Good Idea - Distributed Ledger and Smart Contract Virtual Machine; - Ecosystem token - Wancoin (WAN); - Consensus mechanism; - Transactions on the network; - Cross-chain integration; - Cross-chain transactions.

デメリット

Young Not backed They used the word smart contract way too much. - English and Chinese localisations only

評価

Cryptogeekユーザー評価 Cryptogeekユーザー評価 4.3 / 5 3 ユーザーレビュー Cryptogeekユーザー評価 4.7 / 5 3 ユーザーレビュー
Cryptogeekエキスパート評価 Cryptogeekエキスパート評価 4.6 / 5 Cryptogeekエキスパート評価 4.2 / 5
メリット メリット Interlinking Good Idea メリット - Distributed Ledger and Smart Contract Virtual Machine; - Ecosystem token - Wancoin (WAN); - Consensus mechanism; - Transactions on the network; - Cross-chain integration; - Cross-chain transactions.
デメリット デメリット Young Not backed They used the word smart contract way too much. デメリット - English and Chinese localisations only

ICON (ICX) のユーザー評価は、 3 のユーザーレビューに基づいて 4.3 です。 ユーザー評価 Wanchain (WAN) に基づく 3 のユーザー評価は 4.7 です。

We also calculate the special Cryptogeek TrustScore based on the characteristics of each coin.

TrustScoreの評価をもとに勝者を選びます。 どの企業を選ぶのか最終的な選択は自己責任です。 トラストスコアはどのように計算されるのか?
トラストスコア: 4.45 / 5 レビューを書く
他の企業を選択

Conclusion

The comparison between ICON (ICX) and Wanchain (WAN) shows two distinct paths towards blockchain interconnectivity. ICON is a protocol-level platform designed for connecting public and private blockchains, targeting institutional adoption in South Korea. Wanchain, on the other hand, is focused on decentralized finance, creating bridges for asset transfers between blockchains. If you are interested in a platform with public-sector applications and unique identity models, ICON is the better option. For decentralized, cross-chain asset transfer in a DeFi context, Wanchain offers broader functionality. Both projects contribute to a more interconnected blockchain world, but from different perspectives.

Introduction

Blockchain interoperability has become one of the most sought-after objectives in the crypto space, with several projects working to address this challenge in various ways. Two prominent players in this field are ICON (ICX) and Wanchain (WAN). Both projects aim to connect different blockchains and facilitate the seamless exchange of assets and data across platforms. In this article, we will compare ICON and Wanchain by exploring their background, technology, applications, and impact on the blockchain ecosystem. This comparison will help you determine which platform aligns best with your needs.


Background and Vision

ICON (ICX) was launched in 2017 by a South Korean technology company called ICONLOOP. Its vision is to "hyperconnect the world" by creating a large-scale blockchain network that links public blockchains, private business applications, and government institutions. ICON’s goal is to build a decentralized platform where various independent blockchains can communicate with one another using its protocol.

Wanchain (WAN) was also launched in 2017 by Jack Lu. Similar to ICON, Wanchain focuses on blockchain interoperability. Initially created as a fork of Ethereum, Wanchain evolved into its own Layer-1 protocol, capable of smart contract functionality. Its main focus is on cross-chain bridges for transferring digital currencies and enabling decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols.

While both projects focus on blockchain interoperability, ICON is more focused on integrating public and enterprise systems, while Wanchain places a stronger emphasis on cross-chain asset movement and DeFi applications.


Technical Architecture and Interoperability

ICON uses its own proprietary loopchain infrastructure, a performance-driven blockchain engine capable of supporting multiple use cases such as finance, healthcare, and education. ICON employs the Blockchain Transmission Protocol (BTP) to facilitate communications between heterogeneous blockchains. This protocol enables trustless, secure, and decentralized interoperability between chains.

Wanchain, on the other hand, uses secure multiparty computation (sMPC) and Shamir’s Secret Sharing to build decentralized bridges between blockchains. These bridges enable direct asset transfer between chains like Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Polkadot, among others. Wanchain also supports private transactions through ring signatures and one-time addresses.

While ICON focuses on protocol-level interoperability through BTP, Wanchain builds decentralized bridges for real-time asset transfer and cross-chain decentralized application (dApp) support.


Token Utility and Network Roles

ICON (ICX) serves multiple purposes within the ICON network. It is used for:

  • Paying transaction fees

  • Initiating smart contracts

  • Governance, where token holders vote for Public Representatives (P-Reps) in the network

ICON utilizes a Proof-of-Stake (PoS) system called Delegated Proof-of-Contribution (DPoC), allowing token holders to stake ICX and participate in governance.

Wanchain (WAN) also serves various functions within the Wanchain network, including:

  • Paying transaction fees and bridge fees for cross-chain transfers

  • Staking for consensus and validator node rewards

WAN operates under a PoS consensus model, where token holders can delegate their tokens to validators in exchange for staking rewards. WAN is also used to pay gas fees for deploying and interacting with Wanchain smart contracts.

Both tokens are multi-purpose, but ICX is more focused on governance and protocol-level interoperability, while WAN is geared towards enabling DeFi and asset transfer.


Applications in Real-World and Ecosystem Development

ICON has gained traction, particularly in South Korea, by partnering with local government agencies, universities, and businesses. Applications include blockchain ID platforms, education certificate verification, and payment settlement platforms. ICONLOOP’s "MyID" digital identification platform, which is built on the ICON blockchain, is a notable example. ICON also supports dApps like Balanced (a decentralized financial platform) and Omm (a money market protocol).

Wanchain has a stronger focus on DeFi applications, enabling cross-chain transfers of assets, lending, and staking. Wanchain supports wrapped tokens from other blockchains and facilitates cross-chain liquidity through decentralized bridges. Wanchain has also integrated with various Layer-1 chains such as Avalanche, Polygon, and XRP Ledger, enabling native-to-native interaction across chains.

If you are interested in government-integrated solutions, ICON offers a more institutional-focused ecosystem, while Wanchain is ideal for DeFi and cross-chain token management.


Developer Tools and Community Engagement

ICON supports developers with SDKs, Python-contract (SCORE) smart contracts, and comprehensive documentation. The ICONDAO and the ICON Foundation back the community, sponsoring development projects and offering learning resources and grants. ICON’s active GitHub and the continuous evolution of its network are key highlights.

Wanchain offers EVM compatibility, enabling developers to code in Solidity and deploy on the Wanchain network without learning a new language. Tools like MetaMask and Truffle are supported. Wanchain also has a developer portal and frequently releases technical updates, with rewards for bridge operators and stakers.

For Ethereum developers, Wanchain's EVM compatibility is appealing, while ICON provides native tools tailored to its platform.


Security and Network Design

ICON uses a delegated governance model that gives Public Representatives (P-Reps) significant responsibility in maintaining the network. While this makes ICON more scalable, it can lead to potential centralization risks if not well-balanced. The network has faced minor governance issues in the past but has improved with each update.

Wanchain uses a decentralized approach for cross-chain transfers with sMPC and multi-party coordination, ensuring that assets are securely transferred between chains. The bridge’s complexity can lead to some risks, especially regarding validator coordination and consensus delays. Despite this, Wanchain has not experienced any large-scale breaches and follows a security-conscious design.

Both networks are adequately secured, but ICON relies on elected representatives, while Wanchain targets decentralized coordination.


Advantages and Disadvantages

ICON (ICX)

Pros:

  • Strong institutional adoption in South Korea

  • BTP enables protocol-level interconnectivity

  • Delegated PoS with staking and decentralized governance

Cons:

  • Less focus on global DeFi integrations

  • Non-EVM-compatible

  • Smaller ecosystem outside South Korea

Wanchain (WAN)

Pros:

  • Decentralized bridges for large asset transfers

  • EVM-compatible smart contract platform

  • Active DeFi integrations and wrapped tokens

Cons:

  • Lower global awareness

  • Complex bridge design requires validator coordination

  • Limited usage outside DeFi and token transfers


Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Can I stake both ICX and WAN?

Yes. Both ICX and WAN tokens support staking, and rewards can be earned by delegating tokens to validators or participating in governance.

Is ICON EVM-compatible like Wanchain?

No. ICON uses its proprietary SCORE smart contract platform, while Wanchain is compatible with Ethereum’s EVM and Solidity.

Which coin is more practical for real-world use?

ICON has more real-world integrations in businesses and public services, while Wanchain is more focused on DeFi and cross-chain asset transfers.

Do these coins list on major exchanges?

Yes, both ICX and WAN are listed on major exchanges like Binance, KuCoin, and Gate.io.