ICON (ICX) 대 Wanchain (WAN) 비교 Coin

사업을 비교하기

Introduction

Blockchain interoperability has become one of the most sought-after objectives in the crypto space, with several projects working to address this challenge in various ways. Two prominent players in this field are ICON (ICX) and Wanchain (WAN). Both projects aim to connect different blockchains and facilitate the seamless exchange of assets and data across platforms. In this article, we will compare ICON and Wanchain by exploring their background, technology, applications, and impact on the blockchain ecosystem. This comparison will help you determine which platform aligns best with your needs.


Background and Vision

ICON (ICX) was launched in 2017 by a South Korean technology company called ICONLOOP. Its vision is to "hyperconnect the world" by creating a large-scale blockchain network that links public blockchains, private business applications, and government institutions. ICON’s goal is to build a decentralized platform where various independent blockchains can communicate with one another using its protocol.

Wanchain (WAN) was also launched in 2017 by Jack Lu. Similar to ICON, Wanchain focuses on blockchain interoperability. Initially created as a fork of Ethereum, Wanchain evolved into its own Layer-1 protocol, capable of smart contract functionality. Its main focus is on cross-chain bridges for transferring digital currencies and enabling decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols.

While both projects focus on blockchain interoperability, ICON is more focused on integrating public and enterprise systems, while Wanchain places a stronger emphasis on cross-chain asset movement and DeFi applications.


Technical Architecture and Interoperability

ICON uses its own proprietary loopchain infrastructure, a performance-driven blockchain engine capable of supporting multiple use cases such as finance, healthcare, and education. ICON employs the Blockchain Transmission Protocol (BTP) to facilitate communications between heterogeneous blockchains. This protocol enables trustless, secure, and decentralized interoperability between chains.

Wanchain, on the other hand, uses secure multiparty computation (sMPC) and Shamir’s Secret Sharing to build decentralized bridges between blockchains. These bridges enable direct asset transfer between chains like Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Polkadot, among others. Wanchain also supports private transactions through ring signatures and one-time addresses.

While ICON focuses on protocol-level interoperability through BTP, Wanchain builds decentralized bridges for real-time asset transfer and cross-chain decentralized application (dApp) support.


Token Utility and Network Roles

ICON (ICX) serves multiple purposes within the ICON network. It is used for:

  • Paying transaction fees

  • Initiating smart contracts

  • Governance, where token holders vote for Public Representatives (P-Reps) in the network

ICON utilizes a Proof-of-Stake (PoS) system called Delegated Proof-of-Contribution (DPoC), allowing token holders to stake ICX and participate in governance.

Wanchain (WAN) also serves various functions within the Wanchain network, including:

  • Paying transaction fees and bridge fees for cross-chain transfers

  • Staking for consensus and validator node rewards

WAN operates under a PoS consensus model, where token holders can delegate their tokens to validators in exchange for staking rewards. WAN is also used to pay gas fees for deploying and interacting with Wanchain smart contracts.

Both tokens are multi-purpose, but ICX is more focused on governance and protocol-level interoperability, while WAN is geared towards enabling DeFi and asset transfer.


Applications in Real-World and Ecosystem Development

ICON has gained traction, particularly in South Korea, by partnering with local government agencies, universities, and businesses. Applications include blockchain ID platforms, education certificate verification, and payment settlement platforms. ICONLOOP’s "MyID" digital identification platform, which is built on the ICON blockchain, is a notable example. ICON also supports dApps like Balanced (a decentralized financial platform) and Omm (a money market protocol).

Wanchain has a stronger focus on DeFi applications, enabling cross-chain transfers of assets, lending, and staking. Wanchain supports wrapped tokens from other blockchains and facilitates cross-chain liquidity through decentralized bridges. Wanchain has also integrated with various Layer-1 chains such as Avalanche, Polygon, and XRP Ledger, enabling native-to-native interaction across chains.

If you are interested in government-integrated solutions, ICON offers a more institutional-focused ecosystem, while Wanchain is ideal for DeFi and cross-chain token management.


Developer Tools and Community Engagement

ICON supports developers with SDKs, Python-contract (SCORE) smart contracts, and comprehensive documentation. The ICONDAO and the ICON Foundation back the community, sponsoring development projects and offering learning resources and grants. ICON’s active GitHub and the continuous evolution of its network are key highlights.

Wanchain offers EVM compatibility, enabling developers to code in Solidity and deploy on the Wanchain network without learning a new language. Tools like MetaMask and Truffle are supported. Wanchain also has a developer portal and frequently releases technical updates, with rewards for bridge operators and stakers.

For Ethereum developers, Wanchain's EVM compatibility is appealing, while ICON provides native tools tailored to its platform.


Security and Network Design

ICON uses a delegated governance model that gives Public Representatives (P-Reps) significant responsibility in maintaining the network. While this makes ICON more scalable, it can lead to potential centralization risks if not well-balanced. The network has faced minor governance issues in the past but has improved with each update.

Wanchain uses a decentralized approach for cross-chain transfers with sMPC and multi-party coordination, ensuring that assets are securely transferred between chains. The bridge’s complexity can lead to some risks, especially regarding validator coordination and consensus delays. Despite this, Wanchain has not experienced any large-scale breaches and follows a security-conscious design.

Both networks are adequately secured, but ICON relies on elected representatives, while Wanchain targets decentralized coordination.


Advantages and Disadvantages

ICON (ICX)

Pros:

  • Strong institutional adoption in South Korea

  • BTP enables protocol-level interconnectivity

  • Delegated PoS with staking and decentralized governance

Cons:

  • Less focus on global DeFi integrations

  • Non-EVM-compatible

  • Smaller ecosystem outside South Korea

Wanchain (WAN)

Pros:

  • Decentralized bridges for large asset transfers

  • EVM-compatible smart contract platform

  • Active DeFi integrations and wrapped tokens

Cons:

  • Lower global awareness

  • Complex bridge design requires validator coordination

  • Limited usage outside DeFi and token transfers


Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Can I stake both ICX and WAN?

Yes. Both ICX and WAN tokens support staking, and rewards can be earned by delegating tokens to validators or participating in governance.

Is ICON EVM-compatible like Wanchain?

No. ICON uses its proprietary SCORE smart contract platform, while Wanchain is compatible with Ethereum’s EVM and Solidity.

Which coin is more practical for real-world use?

ICON has more real-world integrations in businesses and public services, while Wanchain is more focused on DeFi and cross-chain asset transfers.

Do these coins list on major exchanges?

Yes, both ICX and WAN are listed on major exchanges like Binance, KuCoin, and Gate.io.

사업

User rating

4.3 / 5 사용자 리뷰 3 개 4.7 / 5 사용자 리뷰 3 개

Cryptogeek rating

4.6 / 5 4.2 / 5

신뢰 점수

운영 방법
4.45 / 5 4.31 / 5

소개

ICON은 현재 cryptocurrency Other protocol을 기반으로합니다. 파트너의 위젯에서 ICON의 시가 총액과 거래량을 확인할 수 있습니다. 또한 Cryptogeek.info에서 최신 ICX 가격을 볼 수 있습니다. ICON cryptocurrency에 대한 의견과 리뷰를 여기에 남겨 둘 수 있습니다.
Wanchain은 현재 cryptocurrency EtHash 프로토콜을 기반으로합니다. 파트너의 위젯에서 Wanchain의 시가 총액과 거래량을 확인할 수 있습니다. 또한 Cryptogeek.info에서 최신 WAN 가격을 볼 수 있습니다. Wanchain cryptocurrency에 대한 의견과 리뷰를 여기에 남겨 둘 수 있습니다.

종류

coin coin

설립

2018 2019

국가

International USA

언어

데이터가 없습니다 데이터가 없습니다

Public Public

프로토콜

데이터가 없습니다 데이터가 없습니다

시가 (USD)

0.1439 0.1265

사상 최고치

12.6400 9.9200

가격 변화

-5.43 -1.05

용량 (24시)

2854204.84615 5283405.27254

해시레이트

데이터가 없습니다 데이터가 없습니다

최대 공급

800460000.00000 210000000.00000

총 공급

데이터가 없습니다 데이터가 없습니다

유통량

1084978260.49540 198573148.97871

거래 속도/블록 시간

8000 데이터가 없습니다

수수료

데이터가 없습니다 데이터가 없습니다

채굴의 수익성

데이터가 없습니다 데이터가 없습니다

연산

데이터가 없습니다 데이터가 없습니다

증명 유형

데이터가 없습니다 PoS

완전 선광

데이터가 없습니다 데이터가 없습니다

스마트 계약 주소

데이터가 없습니다 데이터가 없습니다

채굴 된 총 코인

데이터가 없습니다 106152493.00000

거래 중입니다

데이터가 없습니다 yes

블록 보상

데이터가 없습니다 0.000000000000

블록 시간

데이터가 없습니다 데이터가 없습니다
사업
User rating User rating 4.3 / 5 사용자 리뷰 3 개 User rating 4.7 / 5 사용자 리뷰 3 개
Cryptogeek rating Cryptogeek rating 4.6 / 5 Cryptogeek rating 4.2 / 5
신뢰 점수 운영 방법 신뢰 점수 4.45 / 5 신뢰 점수 4.31 / 5
소개
ICON은 현재 cryptocurrency Other protocol을 기반으로합니다. 파트너의 위젯에서 ICON의 시가 총액과 거래량을 확인할 수 있습니다. 또한 Cryptogeek.info에서 최신 ICX 가격을 볼 수 있습니다. ICON cryptocurrency에 대한 의견과 리뷰를 여기에 남겨 둘 수 있습니다.
Wanchain은 현재 cryptocurrency EtHash 프로토콜을 기반으로합니다. 파트너의 위젯에서 Wanchain의 시가 총액과 거래량을 확인할 수 있습니다. 또한 Cryptogeek.info에서 최신 WAN 가격을 볼 수 있습니다. Wanchain cryptocurrency에 대한 의견과 리뷰를 여기에 남겨 둘 수 있습니다.
종류 종류 coin 종류 coin
설립 설립 2018 설립 2019
국가 국가 International 국가 USA
언어 언어 데이터가 없습니다 언어 데이터가 없습니다
Public Public
프로토콜 프로토콜 데이터가 없습니다 프로토콜 데이터가 없습니다
시가 (USD) 시가 (USD) 0.1439 시가 (USD) 0.1265
사상 최고치 사상 최고치 12.6400 사상 최고치 9.9200
가격 변화 가격 변화 -5.43 가격 변화 -1.05
용량 (24시) 용량 (24시) 2854204.84615 용량 (24시) 5283405.27254
해시레이트 해시레이트 데이터가 없습니다 해시레이트 데이터가 없습니다
최대 공급 최대 공급 800460000.00000 최대 공급 210000000.00000
총 공급 총 공급 데이터가 없습니다 총 공급 데이터가 없습니다
유통량 유통량 1084978260.49540 유통량 198573148.97871
거래 속도/블록 시간 거래 속도/블록 시간 8000 거래 속도/블록 시간 데이터가 없습니다
수수료 수수료 데이터가 없습니다 수수료 데이터가 없습니다
채굴의 수익성 채굴의 수익성 low 채굴의 수익성 low
연산 연산 데이터가 없습니다 연산 데이터가 없습니다
증명 유형 증명 유형 데이터가 없습니다 증명 유형 PoS
완전 선광 완전 선광 데이터가 없습니다 완전 선광 데이터가 없습니다
스마트 계약 주소 스마트 계약 주소 데이터가 없습니다 스마트 계약 주소 데이터가 없습니다
채굴 된 총 코인 채굴 된 총 코인 데이터가 없습니다 채굴 된 총 코인 106152493.00000
거래 중입니다 거래 중입니다 데이터가 없습니다 거래 중입니다 yes
블록 보상 블록 보상 데이터가 없습니다 블록 보상 0.000000000000
블록 시간 블록 시간 데이터가 없습니다 블록 시간 데이터가 없습니다

소셜

웹사이트

icon.foundation wanchain.org

트위터

@helloiconworld @wanchain_org
웹사이트 웹사이트 icon.foundation 웹사이트 wanchain.org
트위터 트위터 @helloiconworld 트위터 @wanchain_org

장점

Interlinking Good Idea - Distributed Ledger and Smart Contract Virtual Machine; - Ecosystem token - Wancoin (WAN); - Consensus mechanism; - Transactions on the network; - Cross-chain integration; - Cross-chain transactions.

약점

Young Not backed They used the word smart contract way too much. - English and Chinese localisations only

평가

User rating User rating 4.3 / 5 사용자 리뷰 3 개 User rating 4.7 / 5 사용자 리뷰 3 개
Cryptogeek rating Cryptogeek rating 4.6 / 5 Cryptogeek rating 4.2 / 5
장점 장점 Interlinking Good Idea 장점 - Distributed Ledger and Smart Contract Virtual Machine; - Ecosystem token - Wancoin (WAN); - Consensus mechanism; - Transactions on the network; - Cross-chain integration; - Cross-chain transactions.
약점 약점 Young Not backed They used the word smart contract way too much. 약점 - English and Chinese localisations only

ICON (ICX) 사용자 평가는 3 개의 사용자 리뷰를 기준으로 4.3 입니다. Wanchain (WAN) 사용자 평가는 3 사용자 리뷰를 기반으로 4.7 입니다.

We also calculate the special Cryptogeek TrustScore based on the characteristics of each coin.

우리는 우리의 신뢰 점수 평가를 기준으로 우승자를 선정합니다. 어느 회사를 선택할 것인지는 아직 여러분에게 달려 있습니다! 신뢰 점수를 계산된 방밥?
신뢰 점수: 4.45 / 5
비교할 회사:
리뷰를 쓰기
다른 회사를 선택해 주십시오

Conclusion

The comparison between ICON (ICX) and Wanchain (WAN) shows two distinct paths towards blockchain interconnectivity. ICON is a protocol-level platform designed for connecting public and private blockchains, targeting institutional adoption in South Korea. Wanchain, on the other hand, is focused on decentralized finance, creating bridges for asset transfers between blockchains. If you are interested in a platform with public-sector applications and unique identity models, ICON is the better option. For decentralized, cross-chain asset transfer in a DeFi context, Wanchain offers broader functionality. Both projects contribute to a more interconnected blockchain world, but from different perspectives.

Introduction

Blockchain interoperability has become one of the most sought-after objectives in the crypto space, with several projects working to address this challenge in various ways. Two prominent players in this field are ICON (ICX) and Wanchain (WAN). Both projects aim to connect different blockchains and facilitate the seamless exchange of assets and data across platforms. In this article, we will compare ICON and Wanchain by exploring their background, technology, applications, and impact on the blockchain ecosystem. This comparison will help you determine which platform aligns best with your needs.


Background and Vision

ICON (ICX) was launched in 2017 by a South Korean technology company called ICONLOOP. Its vision is to "hyperconnect the world" by creating a large-scale blockchain network that links public blockchains, private business applications, and government institutions. ICON’s goal is to build a decentralized platform where various independent blockchains can communicate with one another using its protocol.

Wanchain (WAN) was also launched in 2017 by Jack Lu. Similar to ICON, Wanchain focuses on blockchain interoperability. Initially created as a fork of Ethereum, Wanchain evolved into its own Layer-1 protocol, capable of smart contract functionality. Its main focus is on cross-chain bridges for transferring digital currencies and enabling decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols.

While both projects focus on blockchain interoperability, ICON is more focused on integrating public and enterprise systems, while Wanchain places a stronger emphasis on cross-chain asset movement and DeFi applications.


Technical Architecture and Interoperability

ICON uses its own proprietary loopchain infrastructure, a performance-driven blockchain engine capable of supporting multiple use cases such as finance, healthcare, and education. ICON employs the Blockchain Transmission Protocol (BTP) to facilitate communications between heterogeneous blockchains. This protocol enables trustless, secure, and decentralized interoperability between chains.

Wanchain, on the other hand, uses secure multiparty computation (sMPC) and Shamir’s Secret Sharing to build decentralized bridges between blockchains. These bridges enable direct asset transfer between chains like Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Polkadot, among others. Wanchain also supports private transactions through ring signatures and one-time addresses.

While ICON focuses on protocol-level interoperability through BTP, Wanchain builds decentralized bridges for real-time asset transfer and cross-chain decentralized application (dApp) support.


Token Utility and Network Roles

ICON (ICX) serves multiple purposes within the ICON network. It is used for:

  • Paying transaction fees

  • Initiating smart contracts

  • Governance, where token holders vote for Public Representatives (P-Reps) in the network

ICON utilizes a Proof-of-Stake (PoS) system called Delegated Proof-of-Contribution (DPoC), allowing token holders to stake ICX and participate in governance.

Wanchain (WAN) also serves various functions within the Wanchain network, including:

  • Paying transaction fees and bridge fees for cross-chain transfers

  • Staking for consensus and validator node rewards

WAN operates under a PoS consensus model, where token holders can delegate their tokens to validators in exchange for staking rewards. WAN is also used to pay gas fees for deploying and interacting with Wanchain smart contracts.

Both tokens are multi-purpose, but ICX is more focused on governance and protocol-level interoperability, while WAN is geared towards enabling DeFi and asset transfer.


Applications in Real-World and Ecosystem Development

ICON has gained traction, particularly in South Korea, by partnering with local government agencies, universities, and businesses. Applications include blockchain ID platforms, education certificate verification, and payment settlement platforms. ICONLOOP’s "MyID" digital identification platform, which is built on the ICON blockchain, is a notable example. ICON also supports dApps like Balanced (a decentralized financial platform) and Omm (a money market protocol).

Wanchain has a stronger focus on DeFi applications, enabling cross-chain transfers of assets, lending, and staking. Wanchain supports wrapped tokens from other blockchains and facilitates cross-chain liquidity through decentralized bridges. Wanchain has also integrated with various Layer-1 chains such as Avalanche, Polygon, and XRP Ledger, enabling native-to-native interaction across chains.

If you are interested in government-integrated solutions, ICON offers a more institutional-focused ecosystem, while Wanchain is ideal for DeFi and cross-chain token management.


Developer Tools and Community Engagement

ICON supports developers with SDKs, Python-contract (SCORE) smart contracts, and comprehensive documentation. The ICONDAO and the ICON Foundation back the community, sponsoring development projects and offering learning resources and grants. ICON’s active GitHub and the continuous evolution of its network are key highlights.

Wanchain offers EVM compatibility, enabling developers to code in Solidity and deploy on the Wanchain network without learning a new language. Tools like MetaMask and Truffle are supported. Wanchain also has a developer portal and frequently releases technical updates, with rewards for bridge operators and stakers.

For Ethereum developers, Wanchain's EVM compatibility is appealing, while ICON provides native tools tailored to its platform.


Security and Network Design

ICON uses a delegated governance model that gives Public Representatives (P-Reps) significant responsibility in maintaining the network. While this makes ICON more scalable, it can lead to potential centralization risks if not well-balanced. The network has faced minor governance issues in the past but has improved with each update.

Wanchain uses a decentralized approach for cross-chain transfers with sMPC and multi-party coordination, ensuring that assets are securely transferred between chains. The bridge’s complexity can lead to some risks, especially regarding validator coordination and consensus delays. Despite this, Wanchain has not experienced any large-scale breaches and follows a security-conscious design.

Both networks are adequately secured, but ICON relies on elected representatives, while Wanchain targets decentralized coordination.


Advantages and Disadvantages

ICON (ICX)

Pros:

  • Strong institutional adoption in South Korea

  • BTP enables protocol-level interconnectivity

  • Delegated PoS with staking and decentralized governance

Cons:

  • Less focus on global DeFi integrations

  • Non-EVM-compatible

  • Smaller ecosystem outside South Korea

Wanchain (WAN)

Pros:

  • Decentralized bridges for large asset transfers

  • EVM-compatible smart contract platform

  • Active DeFi integrations and wrapped tokens

Cons:

  • Lower global awareness

  • Complex bridge design requires validator coordination

  • Limited usage outside DeFi and token transfers


Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Can I stake both ICX and WAN?

Yes. Both ICX and WAN tokens support staking, and rewards can be earned by delegating tokens to validators or participating in governance.

Is ICON EVM-compatible like Wanchain?

No. ICON uses its proprietary SCORE smart contract platform, while Wanchain is compatible with Ethereum’s EVM and Solidity.

Which coin is more practical for real-world use?

ICON has more real-world integrations in businesses and public services, while Wanchain is more focused on DeFi and cross-chain asset transfers.

Do these coins list on major exchanges?

Yes, both ICX and WAN are listed on major exchanges like Binance, KuCoin, and Gate.io.