Lisk (LSK) vs NEO (NEO) Comparison
Lisk (LSK) and NEO (NEO) are two popular blockchain platforms that offer unique features to users. In this review, we will compare and contrast the two platforms to help you make an informed decision when choosing between them.
Overview:
Lisk is a blockchain platform that enables developers to create and deploy decentralized applications (DApps) using JavaScript. The platform uses a unique sidechain architecture that allows developers to create customized sidechains that are linked to the main blockchain. This allows for increased scalability and flexibility when developing DApps.
On the other hand, NEO is a blockchain platform that allows developers to create and deploy smart contracts and DApps. NEO uses a unique consensus mechanism called Delegated Byzantine Fault Tolerance (dBFT) that allows for fast transaction processing and improved scalability. Additionally, NEO allows for the creation of digital assets that can be traded on its platform.
Performance:
Lisk has a high performance rate, with a capacity of handling up to 100 transactions per second. The platform uses a Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS) consensus mechanism, which allows for faster transaction processing and improved scalability. Additionally, Lisk allows developers to create customized sidechains that can be used to handle specific functions, further improving the platform's performance.
On the other hand, NEO has a capacity of handling up to 1,000 transactions per second, which is higher than Lisk's performance rate. NEO uses a unique consensus mechanism called dBFT, which allows for fast transaction processing and improved scalability. However, NEO's platform can be slower than Lisk when it comes to deploying DApps due to the platform's complex smart contract language.
Security:
Lisk uses a DPoS consensus mechanism, which has been proven to be secure and reliable. Additionally, the platform uses advanced encryption techniques to secure user data and transactions. Lisk's customizable sidechains also offer additional security, as developers can create unique security protocols for each sidechain.
On the other hand, NEO's dBFT consensus mechanism also offers a high level of security, with a low risk of network attacks. Additionally, NEO uses advanced encryption techniques to secure user data and transactions. However, NEO's platform has faced some security issues in the past, with several high-profile hacks causing losses for users.
Tokenomics:
Lisk uses a utility token called LSK, which is used to pay for transaction fees and to access features on the platform. The maximum supply of LSK is 135 million tokens.
NEO, on the other hand, uses a utility token called GAS, which is used to pay for transaction fees and to access features on the platform. Additionally, NEO allows for the creation of digital assets that can be traded on its platform. The maximum supply of GAS is 100 million tokens.
Community:
Lisk has a strong and active community, with a large number of developers working on the platform. The platform's user-friendly development environment has attracted many developers to the platform, and Lisk has a large number of DApps already deployed on its network.
NEO also has a strong and active community, with a large number of developers working on the platform. Additionally, NEO has a large number of partnerships with companies and organizations around the world, which has helped to increase its visibility and popularity.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, both Lisk and NEO are strong blockchain platforms that offer unique features to users. Lisk's sidechain architecture and user-friendly development environment make it an excellent choice for developers, while NEO's fast transaction processing and digital asset creation capabilities make it a popular choice for traders and investors. Ultimately, the choice between the two platforms will depend on your specific needs and preferences.
User rating
Cryptogeek rating
Puntaje de confianza
¿Cómo funciona?
Sobre
|
Lisk se basa actualmente en el protocolo DPoS de criptomoneda. Puede consultar el límite de mercado y el volumen de Lisk en el widget de nuestro socio. También puede ver el último precio de LSK en Cryptogeek.info. Puede dejar sus comentarios y reseñas sobre la criptomoneda Lisk aquí.
|
NEO se basa actualmente en el protocolo de criptomoneda dBFT. Puede consultar la capitalización de mercado y el volumen de NEO en el widget de nuestro socio. También puede ver el último precio de NEO en Cryptogeek.info. Puede dejar sus comentarios y reseñas sobre la criptomoneda NEO aquí.
|
Tipo
Fecha de creación
País
Idiomas
Equipo
Protocolo
|
Public blockchain
|
Sin datos
|
Precio actual (USD)
Punto más alto (USD)
Intercambiar en el precio (24h)
Volumen (24h)
|
3255129.22262
|
15001683.44779
|
Hashrate
Suministros máximos
|
139891978.00000
|
100000000.00000
|
Suministro total
Suministros circulantes
|
144814976.67988
|
100000000.00000
|
Velocidad de transacción / Tiempo de Bloque
Comisión de transacción
Rentabilidad minera
Algoritmo
Tipo de prueba
Totalmente preminado
Dirección de contrato inteligente
Total de monedas extraídas
|
159918400.00000
|
100000000.00000
|
Es el comercio
Recompensa de bloque
|
0.000000000000
|
0.000000000000
|
Tiempo de bloque
Sobre |
Lisk se basa actualmente en el protocolo DPoS de criptomoneda. Puede consultar el límite de mercado y el volumen de Lisk en el widget de nuestro socio. También puede ver el último precio de LSK en Cryptogeek.info. Puede dejar sus comentarios y reseñas sobre la criptomoneda Lisk aquí.
|
NEO se basa actualmente en el protocolo de criptomoneda dBFT. Puede consultar la capitalización de mercado y el volumen de NEO en el widget de nuestro socio. También puede ver el último precio de NEO en Cryptogeek.info. Puede dejar sus comentarios y reseñas sobre la criptomoneda NEO aquí.
|
Tipo |
Tipo
coin
|
Tipo
coin
|
Fecha de creación |
Fecha de creación
2016
|
Fecha de creación
Sin datos
|
País |
País
International
|
País
Sin datos
|
Idiomas |
Idiomas
Sin datos
|
Idiomas
Sin datos
|
Equipo |
Equipo
Public
|
Equipo
Public
|
Protocolo |
Protocolo
Public blockchain
|
Protocolo
Sin datos
|
Precio actual (USD) |
Precio actual (USD)
0.8813
|
Precio actual (USD)
10.9228
|
Punto más alto (USD) |
Punto más alto (USD)
39.3100
|
Punto más alto (USD)
196.8500
|
Intercambiar en el precio (24h) |
Intercambiar en el precio (24h)
-5.85
|
Intercambiar en el precio (24h)
-5.92
|
Volumen (24h) |
Volumen (24h)
3255129.22262
|
Volumen (24h)
15001683.44779
|
Hashrate |
Hashrate
Sin datos
|
Hashrate
Sin datos
|
Suministros máximos |
Suministros máximos
139891978.00000
|
Suministros máximos
100000000.00000
|
Suministro total |
Suministro total
Sin datos
|
Suministro total
Sin datos
|
Suministros circulantes |
Suministros circulantes
144814976.67988
|
Suministros circulantes
100000000.00000
|
Velocidad de transacción / Tiempo de Bloque |
Velocidad de transacción / Tiempo de Bloque
25
|
Velocidad de transacción / Tiempo de Bloque
1000
|
Comisión de transacción |
Comisión de transacción
Sin datos
|
Comisión de transacción
Sin datos
|
Rentabilidad minera |
Rentabilidad minera
medium
|
Rentabilidad minera
Sin datos
|
Algoritmo |
Algoritmo
DPoS
|
Algoritmo
Sin datos
|
Tipo de prueba |
Tipo de prueba
DPoS
|
Tipo de prueba
Sin datos
|
Totalmente preminado |
Totalmente preminado
Sin datos
|
Totalmente preminado
Sin datos
|
Dirección de contrato inteligente |
Dirección de contrato inteligente
Sin datos
|
Dirección de contrato inteligente
Sin datos
|
Total de monedas extraídas |
Total de monedas extraídas
159918400.00000
|
Total de monedas extraídas
100000000.00000
|
Es el comercio |
Es el comercio
yes
|
Es el comercio
yes
|
Recompensa de bloque |
Recompensa de bloque
0.000000000000
|
Recompensa de bloque
0.000000000000
|
Tiempo de bloque |
Tiempo de bloque
10
|
Tiempo de bloque
Sin datos
|
Social
Sitio web
Twitter
Ventajas
|
Lots of features like Ethereum
Kind of easy to use
|
-
|
Desventajas
|
Not enough projects
Overvalued
|
-
|
Clasificación
User rating |
User rating
4.3 / 5
3 reseñas de los usuarios
|
User rating
4 / 5
1 reseñas ded usuario
|
Cryptogeek rating |
Cryptogeek rating
3.8 / 5
|
Cryptogeek rating
0 / 5
|
Ventajas |
Ventajas
Lots of features like Ethereum
Kind of easy to use
|
Ventajas
-
|
Desventajas |
Desventajas
Not enough projects
Overvalued
|
Desventajas
-
|
La calificación de Lisk (LSK) es 4.3, basada en 3 opiniones de usuarios. La calificación de los usuarios de NEO (NEO) es 4, basada en 1 opiniones de los usuarios.
We also calculate the special Cryptogeek TrustScore based on the characteristics of each coin.
Elija otras empresas
Lisk (LSK) and NEO (NEO) are two popular blockchain platforms that offer unique features to users. In this review, we will compare and contrast the two platforms to help you make an informed decision when choosing between them.
Overview:
Lisk is a blockchain platform that enables developers to create and deploy decentralized applications (DApps) using JavaScript. The platform uses a unique sidechain architecture that allows developers to create customized sidechains that are linked to the main blockchain. This allows for increased scalability and flexibility when developing DApps.
On the other hand, NEO is a blockchain platform that allows developers to create and deploy smart contracts and DApps. NEO uses a unique consensus mechanism called Delegated Byzantine Fault Tolerance (dBFT) that allows for fast transaction processing and improved scalability. Additionally, NEO allows for the creation of digital assets that can be traded on its platform.
Performance:
Lisk has a high performance rate, with a capacity of handling up to 100 transactions per second. The platform uses a Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS) consensus mechanism, which allows for faster transaction processing and improved scalability. Additionally, Lisk allows developers to create customized sidechains that can be used to handle specific functions, further improving the platform's performance.
On the other hand, NEO has a capacity of handling up to 1,000 transactions per second, which is higher than Lisk's performance rate. NEO uses a unique consensus mechanism called dBFT, which allows for fast transaction processing and improved scalability. However, NEO's platform can be slower than Lisk when it comes to deploying DApps due to the platform's complex smart contract language.
Security:
Lisk uses a DPoS consensus mechanism, which has been proven to be secure and reliable. Additionally, the platform uses advanced encryption techniques to secure user data and transactions. Lisk's customizable sidechains also offer additional security, as developers can create unique security protocols for each sidechain.
On the other hand, NEO's dBFT consensus mechanism also offers a high level of security, with a low risk of network attacks. Additionally, NEO uses advanced encryption techniques to secure user data and transactions. However, NEO's platform has faced some security issues in the past, with several high-profile hacks causing losses for users.
Tokenomics:
Lisk uses a utility token called LSK, which is used to pay for transaction fees and to access features on the platform. The maximum supply of LSK is 135 million tokens.
NEO, on the other hand, uses a utility token called GAS, which is used to pay for transaction fees and to access features on the platform. Additionally, NEO allows for the creation of digital assets that can be traded on its platform. The maximum supply of GAS is 100 million tokens.
Community:
Lisk has a strong and active community, with a large number of developers working on the platform. The platform's user-friendly development environment has attracted many developers to the platform, and Lisk has a large number of DApps already deployed on its network.
NEO also has a strong and active community, with a large number of developers working on the platform. Additionally, NEO has a large number of partnerships with companies and organizations around the world, which has helped to increase its visibility and popularity.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, both Lisk and NEO are strong blockchain platforms that offer unique features to users. Lisk's sidechain architecture and user-friendly development environment make it an excellent choice for developers, while NEO's fast transaction processing and digital asset creation capabilities make it a popular choice for traders and investors. Ultimately, the choice between the two platforms will depend on your specific needs and preferences.