Kriptomat vs mSigna Wallet Comparison
| Company |
|
|
| User rating |
User rating
3 / 5
2 user review
|
User rating
3 / 5
1 user reviews
|
| Cryptogeek rating |
Cryptogeek rating
4 / 5
|
Cryptogeek rating
1 / 5
|
| Trust Score
How it works
|
Trust Score
3.68 / 5
|
Trust Score
2.7 / 5
|
About
|
تقدم Kriptomat وسيلة سهلة لاستخدام محفظة متعددة العملات وتبادل لأجهزة الكمبيوتر ، الروبوت ، ودائرة الرقابة الداخلية.
|
mSigna Wallet is no longer offered. The wallet was designed by the software company Ciphrex in the time of crypto rush in 2017. The developer’s Twitter media had not published any updates since mid-2017.
|
Founding Date
Country
Languages
|
English, Portuguese, German, French, Spanish, Italian, Greek, Russian, Dutch, Turkish, Hungarian, Polish, Czech, Slovene, Slovak, Estonian, Romanian, Bulgarian, Croatian
|
No data
|
Wallet type
Storage type
Private keys
|
Not available
|
Not available
|
Available coins
Security
|
Third Party Encrypted
|
No data
|
Anonymity
Ease of use
Has attached card
Has trading facilities
Has vouchers and offers
Features
|
2 Factor Authentication, Hierarchical Deterministic, Multi-Signature
|
No data
|
| About |
تقدم Kriptomat وسيلة سهلة لاستخدام محفظة متعددة العملات وتبادل لأجهزة الكمبيوتر ، الروبوت ، ودائرة الرقابة الداخلية.
|
mSigna Wallet is no longer offered. The wallet was designed by the software company Ciphrex in the time of crypto rush in 2017. The developer’s Twitter media had not published any updates since mid-2017.
|
| Founding Date |
Founding Date
2018
|
Founding Date
2017
|
| Country |
Country
Estonia
|
Country
USA
|
| Languages |
Languages
English, Portuguese, German, French, Spanish, Italian, Greek, Russian, Dutch, Turkish, Hungarian, Polish, Czech, Slovene, Slovak, Estonian, Romanian, Bulgarian, Croatian
|
Languages
No data
|
| Wallet type |
Wallet type
Software wallet
|
Wallet type
No data
|
| Storage type |
Storage type
Hot wallet
|
Storage type
No data
|
| Private keys |
Private keys
Not available
|
Private keys
Not available
|
| Available coins |
Available coins
0
|
Available coins
0
|
| Security |
Security
Third Party Encrypted
|
Security
No data
|
| Anonymity |
Anonymity
Medium
|
Anonymity
No data
|
| Ease of use |
Ease of use
Easy
|
Ease of use
No data
|
| Has attached card |
Has attached card
no
|
Has attached card
No data
|
| Has trading facilities |
Has trading facilities
yes
|
Has trading facilities
No data
|
| Has vouchers and offers |
Has vouchers and offers
No data
|
Has vouchers and offers
No data
|
| Features |
Features
2 Factor Authentication, Hierarchical Deterministic, Multi-Signature
|
Features
No data
|
Social
Website
Twitter
Advantages
|
- الدعم في 20 + اللغات
- سهلة الاستخدام
|
-
|
Disadvantages
|
- لا يوجد مصدر مفتوح
|
- No longer available
|
Rating
| User rating |
User rating
3 / 5
2 user review
|
User rating
3 / 5
1 user reviews
|
| Cryptogeek rating |
Cryptogeek rating
4 / 5
|
Cryptogeek rating
1 / 5
|
| Advantages |
Advantages
- الدعم في 20 + اللغات
- سهلة الاستخدام
|
Advantages
-
|
| Disadvantages |
Disadvantages
- لا يوجد مصدر مفتوح
|
Disadvantages
- No longer available
|
Kriptomat user rating is 3, based on 2 user reviews. mSigna Wallet user rating is 3, based on 1 user reviews.
We also calculate the special Cryptogeek TrustScore based on the characteristics of each wallet.
Choose other companies
Kriptomat vs mSigna Wallet - Which Wallet Is Better in 2024?
This Kriptomat vs mSigna Wallet comparison is based on the most recent data on both companies. We do our best to provide you with unbiased information about cryptocurrency companies.
Based on user reviews only, Kriptomat is rated 3 with 2 user reviews, while mSigna Wallet is rated 3 with 1 user reviews.
Let's finally move to overall Trust Score:
