Lisk (LSK) vs NEO (NEO) Comparison

Compare companies
In the dynamic world of cryptocurrency, two stand out as powerful forces shaping our digital futures: Lisk (LSK) and NEO (NEO). Both technologies have specific features that set them apart in their shared industry. This article will delve into a comparison of both platforms, investigating their unique strengths and weaknesses in operational features, architectural design, usability, and token value.
Company

User rating

4.3 / 5 3 user review 4 / 5 1 user review

Cryptogeek rating

3.8 / 5 0 / 5

Trust Score

How it works
4.24 / 5 1.6 / 5

About

Lisk is currently based on cryptocurrency DPoS protocol. You can check Lisk's market cap and volume on widget of our partner. Also you can see the latest LSK price on Cryptogeek.info. You can leave your feedback and reviews about Lisk cryptocurrency here.
NEO is currently based on cryptocurrency dBFT protocol. You can check NEO's market cap and volume on widget of our partner. Also you can see the latest NEO price on Cryptogeek.info. You can leave your feedback and reviews about NEO cryptocurrency here.

Type

coin coin

Founding Date

2016 No data

Country

International No data

Languages

No data No data

Team

Public Public

Protocol

Public blockchain No data

Current price (USD)

0.9006 13.8291

All-time high (USD)

39.3100 196.8500

Price change (24h)

-1.58 -4.99

Volume (24h)

2534704.39718 10985632.71347

Hashrate

No data No data

Max Supply

139891978.00000 100000000.00000

Total supply

No data No data

Circulating Supply

144814976.67988 100000000.00000

Transaction speed / Block time

25 1000

Transaction fee

No data No data

Mining profitability

No data No data

Algorithm

DPoS No data

Proof type

DPoS No data

Fully premined

No data No data

Smart contract address

No data No data

Total coins mined

159918400.00000 100000000.00000

Is trading

yes yes

Block reward

0.000000000000 0.000000000000

Block time

10 No data
Company
User rating User rating 4.3 / 5 3 user review User rating 4 / 5 1 user review
Cryptogeek rating Cryptogeek rating 3.8 / 5 Cryptogeek rating 0 / 5
Trust Score How it works Trust Score 4.24 / 5 Trust Score 1.6 / 5
About
Lisk is currently based on cryptocurrency DPoS protocol. You can check Lisk's market cap and volume on widget of our partner. Also you can see the latest LSK price on Cryptogeek.info. You can leave your feedback and reviews about Lisk cryptocurrency here.
NEO is currently based on cryptocurrency dBFT protocol. You can check NEO's market cap and volume on widget of our partner. Also you can see the latest NEO price on Cryptogeek.info. You can leave your feedback and reviews about NEO cryptocurrency here.
Type Type coin Type coin
Founding Date Founding Date 2016 Founding Date No data
Country Country International Country No data
Languages Languages No data Languages No data
Team Team Public Team Public
Protocol Protocol Public blockchain Protocol No data
Current price (USD) Current price (USD) 0.9006 Current price (USD) 13.8291
All-time high (USD) All-time high (USD) 39.3100 All-time high (USD) 196.8500
Price change (24h) Price change (24h) -1.58 Price change (24h) -4.99
Volume (24h) Volume (24h) 2534704.39718 Volume (24h) 10985632.71347
Hashrate Hashrate No data Hashrate No data
Max Supply Max Supply 139891978.00000 Max Supply 100000000.00000
Total supply Total supply No data Total supply No data
Circulating Supply Circulating Supply 144814976.67988 Circulating Supply 100000000.00000
Transaction speed / Block time Transaction speed / Block time 25 Transaction speed / Block time 1000
Transaction fee Transaction fee No data Transaction fee No data
Mining profitability Mining profitability medium Mining profitability No data
Algorithm Algorithm DPoS Algorithm No data
Proof type Proof type DPoS Proof type No data
Fully premined Fully premined No data Fully premined No data
Smart contract address Smart contract address No data Smart contract address No data
Total coins mined Total coins mined 159918400.00000 Total coins mined 100000000.00000
Is trading Is trading yes Is trading yes
Block reward Block reward 0.000000000000 Block reward 0.000000000000
Block time Block time 10 Block time No data

Social

Website

lisk.io neo.org

Twitter

@LiskHQ @neo_blockchain
Website Website lisk.io Website neo.org
Twitter Twitter @LiskHQ Twitter @neo_blockchain

Advantages

Lots of features like Ethereum Kind of easy to use -

Disadvantages

Not enough projects Overvalued -

Rating

User rating User rating 4.3 / 5 3 user review User rating 4 / 5 1 user review
Cryptogeek rating Cryptogeek rating 3.8 / 5 Cryptogeek rating 0 / 5
Advantages Advantages Lots of features like Ethereum Kind of easy to use Advantages -
Disadvantages Disadvantages Not enough projects Overvalued Disadvantages -

Lisk (LSK) user rating is 4.3, based on 3 user reviews. NEO (NEO) user rating is 4, based on 1 user reviews.

We also calculate the special Cryptogeek TrustScore based on the characteristics of each coin.

We choose the winner based on our TrustScore Rating. Please remember, it’s still up to you which company to choose! How do we calculate Trust Score?
Trust Score: 4.24 / 5 Write review
Choose other companies
Throughout this enquiry, it has become clear that Lisk and NEO while having different focuses, both contribute significantly to the blockchain industry. We have seen that Lisk, with its focus on accessibility and user-friendliness, appeals to developers wishing to build blockchain applications with ease. On the other hand, NEO, with its emphasis on digitized assets and smart contracts, has drawn users looking for secure digital transactions. Both have their specific use-cases and diverse approaches to the digital economy. By exploring this comparison, readers should have a clearer view of these exciting cryptocurrencies and how they may choose to interact with them in the future.
In the dynamic world of cryptocurrency, two stand out as powerful forces shaping our digital futures: Lisk (LSK) and NEO (NEO). Both technologies have specific features that set them apart in their shared industry. This article will delve into a comparison of both platforms, investigating their unique strengths and weaknesses in operational features, architectural design, usability, and token value.