Circle Wallet vs Ginco Comparison
| Company | ||
|---|---|---|
| User rating | 5 user review | 1 user reviews |
| Cryptogeek rating | ||
| Trust Score How it works |
About
|
دائرة هو وسيلة سهلة لاستخدام المحفظة توفير فرصة لشراء ونقل وتوفير المال الرقمي. كان الاسم الكامل للتطبيق Circle Invest wallet. يمكن العثور على نسخته المحمولة على Google Play و Apple Store.
|
Ginco هي محفظة cryptocurrency من الجيل التالي والتي تسمح بإدارة cryptocurrencies بأمان وإرسال واستقبال الأموال برسوم منخفضة على هاتفك الذكي. بيتكوين ، بيتكوين النقدية ، Ethereum و ERC - 20 متوافقة الآن ، وغيرها الكثير قريبا.
|
Founding Date
| 2013 | 2017 |
Country
| USA | Japan |
Languages
| English | English, Japanese |
Wallet type
| Software wallet | Software wallet |
Storage type
| Cold wallet | Hot wallet |
Private keys
| Not available | Available |
Available coins
| 6 - Bitcoin (BTC), USD Coin (USDC), Ethereum (ETH), Stellar (XLM), Algorand (ALGO), Solana (SOL) | 0 |
Security
| No data | Personal |
Anonymity
| No data | Medium |
Ease of use
| No data | Average |
Has attached card
| No data | no |
Has trading facilities
| No data | No data |
Has vouchers and offers
| No data | yes |
Features
| No data | Hierarchical Deterministic |
| About |
دائرة هو وسيلة سهلة لاستخدام المحفظة توفير فرصة لشراء ونقل وتوفير المال الرقمي. كان الاسم الكامل للتطبيق Circle Invest wallet. يمكن العثور على نسخته المحمولة على Google Play و Apple Store.
|
Ginco هي محفظة cryptocurrency من الجيل التالي والتي تسمح بإدارة cryptocurrencies بأمان وإرسال واستقبال الأموال برسوم منخفضة على هاتفك الذكي. بيتكوين ، بيتكوين النقدية ، Ethereum و ERC - 20 متوافقة الآن ، وغيرها الكثير قريبا.
|
|---|---|---|
| Founding Date | Founding Date 2013 | Founding Date 2017 |
| Country | Country USA | Country Japan |
| Languages | Languages English | Languages English, Japanese |
| Wallet type | Wallet type Software wallet | Wallet type Software wallet |
| Storage type | Storage type Cold wallet | Storage type Hot wallet |
| Private keys | Private keys Not available | Private keys Available |
| Available coins | Available coins 6 - Bitcoin (BTC), USD Coin (USDC), Ethereum (ETH), Stellar (XLM), Algorand (ALGO), Solana (SOL) | Available coins 0 |
| Security | Security No data | Security Personal |
| Anonymity | Anonymity No data | Anonymity Medium |
| Ease of use | Ease of use No data | Ease of use Average |
| Has attached card | Has attached card No data | Has attached card no |
| Has trading facilities | Has trading facilities No data | Has trading facilities No data |
| Has vouchers and offers | Has vouchers and offers No data | Has vouchers and offers yes |
| Features | Features No data | Features Hierarchical Deterministic |
Social
Website
| www.circle.com | ginco.io |
| @circlepay | @ginco_inc |
| Website | Website www.circle.com | Website ginco.io |
|---|---|---|
| Twitter @circlepay | Twitter @ginco_inc |
Advantages
| - 13 عملات تشفير | - سهلة الاستخدام |
Disadvantages
| - المخاطر المتعلقة بالاستثمار | - عدم وجود مصادقة اثنين عامل |
Rating
| User rating | User rating 5 user review | User rating 1 user reviews |
|---|---|---|
| Cryptogeek rating | Cryptogeek rating | Cryptogeek rating |
| Advantages | Advantages - 13 عملات تشفير | Advantages - سهلة الاستخدام |
| Disadvantages | Disadvantages - المخاطر المتعلقة بالاستثمار | Disadvantages - عدم وجود مصادقة اثنين عامل |
Circle Wallet user rating is 4.8, based on 5 user reviews. Ginco user rating is 5, based on 1 user reviews.
We also calculate the special Cryptogeek TrustScore based on the characteristics of each wallet.
| We choose the winner based on our TrustScore Rating. Please remember, it’s still up to you which company to choose! How do we calculate Trust Score? |
Circle Wallet vs Ginco - Which Wallet Is Better in 2025?
This Circle Wallet vs Ginco comparison is based on the most recent data on both companies. We do our best to provide you with unbiased information about cryptocurrency companies.
Based on user reviews only, Circle Wallet is rated 4.8 with 5 user reviews, while Ginco is rated 5 with 1 user reviews.
Let's finally move to overall Trust Score: