Crypto.com Wallet vs Cryptonator Comparison
| Company |
|
|
| User rating |
User rating
5 / 5
1 user review
|
User rating
2.6 / 5
53 user review
|
| Cryptogeek rating |
Cryptogeek rating
4.4 / 5
|
Cryptogeek rating
4.2 / 5
|
| Trust Score
How it works
|
Trust Score
3.78 / 5
|
Trust Score
4.08 / 5
|
About
|
Crypto.com, the pioneering payments and cryptocurrency platform, seeks to accelerate the world’s transition to cryptocurrency. Crypto.com is headquartered in Hong Kong.
|
Cryptonator is a multi-currency digital assets wallet. It's worth mentioning that Cryptonator accepts fiat currencies as well. It is a software hot wallet with the inbuilt function of the assets exchange. As the wallets (especially hot wallets) are subject to numerous hacker attacks and phishing it's important to understand if Cryptonator is safe before start using it. The following review will help to make the right decision.
|
Founding Date
Country
Languages
|
English, Chinese
|
English, Portuguese, German, French, Spanish, Russian, Indonesian
|
Wallet type
|
Software wallet
|
Software wallet
|
Storage type
Private keys
Available coins
|
0
|
10
- Bitcoin (BTC), Zcash (ZEC), Dogecoin (DOGE), Ripple (XRP), Bitcoin Cash (BCH), Dash (DASH), Ethereum (ETH), Litecoin (LTC), Monero (XMR), Tether (USDT)
|
Security
|
Third Party Encrypted
|
Third Party
|
Anonymity
Ease of use
Has attached card
Has trading facilities
Has vouchers and offers
Features
|
Hierarchical Deterministic, 2 Factor Authentication
|
2 Factor Authentication
|
| About |
Crypto.com, the pioneering payments and cryptocurrency platform, seeks to accelerate the world’s transition to cryptocurrency. Crypto.com is headquartered in Hong Kong.
|
Cryptonator is a multi-currency digital assets wallet. It's worth mentioning that Cryptonator accepts fiat currencies as well. It is a software hot wallet with the inbuilt function of the assets exchange. As the wallets (especially hot wallets) are subject to numerous hacker attacks and phishing it's important to understand if Cryptonator is safe before start using it. The following review will help to make the right decision.
|
| Founding Date |
Founding Date
2017
|
Founding Date
2014
|
| Country |
Country
Hong Kong
|
Country
Hong Kong
|
| Languages |
Languages
English, Chinese
|
Languages
English, Portuguese, German, French, Spanish, Russian, Indonesian
|
| Wallet type |
Wallet type
Software wallet
|
Wallet type
Software wallet
|
| Storage type |
Storage type
Hot wallet
|
Storage type
Hot wallet
|
| Private keys |
Private keys
Not available
|
Private keys
Available
|
| Available coins |
Available coins
0
|
Available coins
10
- Bitcoin (BTC), Zcash (ZEC), Dogecoin (DOGE), Ripple (XRP), Bitcoin Cash (BCH), Dash (DASH), Ethereum (ETH), Litecoin (LTC), Monero (XMR), Tether (USDT)
|
| Security |
Security
Third Party Encrypted
|
Security
Third Party
|
| Anonymity |
Anonymity
Medium
|
Anonymity
Low
|
| Ease of use |
Ease of use
Average
|
Ease of use
Easy
|
| Has attached card |
Has attached card
no
|
Has attached card
no
|
| Has trading facilities |
Has trading facilities
No data
|
Has trading facilities
yes
|
| Has vouchers and offers |
Has vouchers and offers
No data
|
Has vouchers and offers
No data
|
| Features |
Features
Hierarchical Deterministic, 2 Factor Authentication
|
Features
2 Factor Authentication
|
Social
Website
Twitter
Advantages
|
- Easy to use
- User-friendly
- Security
|
- Exchange functionality
- Fiat money support
- Convenient interface
|
Disadvantages
|
- No Multisignature
- No Open Source
|
- Credit cards are not supported
- No official response on queries on social media
- Not regulated
|
Rating
| User rating |
User rating
5 / 5
1 user review
|
User rating
2.6 / 5
53 user review
|
| Cryptogeek rating |
Cryptogeek rating
4.4 / 5
|
Cryptogeek rating
4.2 / 5
|
| Advantages |
Advantages
- Easy to use
- User-friendly
- Security
|
Advantages
- Exchange functionality
- Fiat money support
- Convenient interface
|
| Disadvantages |
Disadvantages
- No Multisignature
- No Open Source
|
Disadvantages
- Credit cards are not supported
- No official response on queries on social media
- Not regulated
|
Crypto.com Wallet user rating is 5, based on 1 user reviews. Cryptonator user rating is 2.6, based on 53 user reviews.
We also calculate the special Cryptogeek TrustScore based on the characteristics of each wallet.
Choose other companies
Crypto.com Wallet vs Cryptonator - Which Wallet Is Better in 2025?
This Crypto.com Wallet vs Cryptonator comparison is based on the most recent data on both companies. We do our best to provide you with unbiased information about cryptocurrency companies.
Based on user reviews only, Crypto.com Wallet is rated 5 with 1 user reviews, while Cryptonator is rated 2.6 with 53 user reviews.
Let's finally move to overall Trust Score:
