imToken Wallet vs Lisk Wallet Comparison
| Company |
|
|
| User rating |
User rating
3.5 / 5
2 user review
|
User rating
3 / 5
1 user review
|
| Cryptogeek rating |
Cryptogeek rating
5 / 5
|
Cryptogeek rating
4 / 5
|
| Trust Score
How it works
|
Trust Score
4.51 / 5
|
Trust Score
2.81 / 5
|
About
|
imToken is an Android and iOS wallet for ETH, BTC, EOS and ERC20 compatible tokens, it is centralized and lets users access the blockchain without locally storing it. It allows managing multiple-chain wallets with one Mnemonic passphrase. Just insert a password, save the 12-word passphrase and you're ready.
|
Lisk Nano Wallet was discontinued back in November 2018. As an alternative option at the time, the Lisk team offered Lisk Mobile. By now, the team has come up with a full-fledged Lisk wallet that is available across desktop and mobile platforms.
|
Founding Date
Country
Languages
|
English, Japanese, Korean, Traditional Chinese, Simplified Chinese
|
No data
|
Wallet type
Storage type
Private keys
Available coins
Security
Anonymity
Ease of use
Has attached card
Has trading facilities
Has vouchers and offers
Features
|
Hierarchical Deterministic, Open Source
|
No data
|
| About |
imToken is an Android and iOS wallet for ETH, BTC, EOS and ERC20 compatible tokens, it is centralized and lets users access the blockchain without locally storing it. It allows managing multiple-chain wallets with one Mnemonic passphrase. Just insert a password, save the 12-word passphrase and you're ready.
|
Lisk Nano Wallet was discontinued back in November 2018. As an alternative option at the time, the Lisk team offered Lisk Mobile. By now, the team has come up with a full-fledged Lisk wallet that is available across desktop and mobile platforms.
|
| Founding Date |
Founding Date
2016
|
Founding Date
No data
|
| Country |
Country
Singapore
|
Country
No data
|
| Languages |
Languages
English, Japanese, Korean, Traditional Chinese, Simplified Chinese
|
Languages
No data
|
| Wallet type |
Wallet type
Software wallet
|
Wallet type
No data
|
| Storage type |
Storage type
Hot wallet
|
Storage type
No data
|
| Private keys |
Private keys
Available
|
Private keys
Not available
|
| Available coins |
Available coins
0
|
Available coins
0
|
| Security |
Security
Personal
|
Security
No data
|
| Anonymity |
Anonymity
Medium
|
Anonymity
No data
|
| Ease of use |
Ease of use
Easy
|
Ease of use
No data
|
| Has attached card |
Has attached card
no
|
Has attached card
No data
|
| Has trading facilities |
Has trading facilities
yes
|
Has trading facilities
No data
|
| Has vouchers and offers |
Has vouchers and offers
No data
|
Has vouchers and offers
No data
|
| Features |
Features
Hierarchical Deterministic, Open Source
|
Features
No data
|
Social
Website
Twitter
Advantages
|
- Security
- Easy to use
- User-friendly
|
- participate in the PoS
-
|
Disadvantages
|
- Lack of Two-Factor Authentication
|
- Only transactions with BTC and LSK
|
Rating
| User rating |
User rating
3.5 / 5
2 user review
|
User rating
3 / 5
1 user review
|
| Cryptogeek rating |
Cryptogeek rating
5 / 5
|
Cryptogeek rating
4 / 5
|
| Advantages |
Advantages
- Security
- Easy to use
- User-friendly
|
Advantages
- participate in the PoS
-
|
| Disadvantages |
Disadvantages
- Lack of Two-Factor Authentication
|
Disadvantages
- Only transactions with BTC and LSK
|
imToken Wallet user rating is 3.5, based on 2 user reviews. Lisk Wallet user rating is 3, based on 1 user reviews.
We also calculate the special Cryptogeek TrustScore based on the characteristics of each wallet.
Choose other companies
imToken Wallet vs Lisk Wallet - Which Wallet Is Better in 2025?
This imToken Wallet vs Lisk Wallet comparison is based on the most recent data on both companies. We do our best to provide you with unbiased information about cryptocurrency companies.
Based on user reviews only, imToken Wallet is rated 3.5 with 2 user reviews, while Lisk Wallet is rated 3 with 1 user reviews.
Let's finally move to overall Trust Score:
