BitClassic vs mSigna Wallet Comparison
| Company | ||
|---|---|---|
| User rating | 1 user review | 1 user review |
| Cryptogeek rating | ||
| Trust Score How it works |
About
|
BitClassic is an open-source wallet for the users of B2C crypto-currency. It is designed to store, send and accept BitClassic (B2C) payments.
|
mSigna Wallet is no longer offered. The wallet was designed by the software company Ciphrex in the time of crypto rush in 2017. The developer’s Twitter media had not published any updates since mid-2017.
|
Founding Date
| No data | 2017 |
Country
| No data | USA |
Languages
| No data | No data |
Wallet type
| No data | No data |
Storage type
| No data | No data |
Private keys
| No data | Not available |
Available coins
| 0 | 0 |
Security
| Personal | No data |
Anonymity
| High | No data |
Ease of use
| Average | No data |
Has attached card
| no | No data |
Has trading facilities
| No data | No data |
Has vouchers and offers
| No data | No data |
Features
| Open Source | No data |
| About |
BitClassic is an open-source wallet for the users of B2C crypto-currency. It is designed to store, send and accept BitClassic (B2C) payments.
|
mSigna Wallet is no longer offered. The wallet was designed by the software company Ciphrex in the time of crypto rush in 2017. The developer’s Twitter media had not published any updates since mid-2017.
|
|---|---|---|
| Founding Date | Founding Date No data | Founding Date 2017 |
| Country | Country No data | Country USA |
| Languages | Languages No data | Languages No data |
| Wallet type | Wallet type No data | Wallet type No data |
| Storage type | Storage type No data | Storage type No data |
| Private keys | Private keys No data | Private keys Not available |
| Available coins | Available coins 0 | Available coins 0 |
| Security | Security Personal | Security No data |
| Anonymity | Anonymity High | Anonymity No data |
| Ease of use | Ease of use Average | Ease of use No data |
| Has attached card | Has attached card no | Has attached card No data |
| Has trading facilities | Has trading facilities No data | Has trading facilities No data |
| Has vouchers and offers | Has vouchers and offers No data | Has vouchers and offers No data |
| Features | Features Open Source | Features No data |
Social
Website
| www.bitclassic.org | github.com |
| No data | @ciphrex |
| Website | Website www.bitclassic.org | Website github.com |
|---|---|---|
| Twitter No data | Twitter @ciphrex |
Advantages
| - | - |
Disadvantages
| - | - No longer available |
Rating
| User rating | User rating 1 user review | User rating 1 user review |
|---|---|---|
| Cryptogeek rating | Cryptogeek rating | Cryptogeek rating |
| Advantages | Advantages - | Advantages - |
| Disadvantages | Disadvantages - | Disadvantages - No longer available |
BitClassic user rating is 4, based on 1 user reviews. mSigna Wallet user rating is 3, based on 1 user reviews.
We also calculate the special Cryptogeek TrustScore based on the characteristics of each wallet.
| We choose the winner based on our TrustScore Rating. Please remember, it’s still up to you which company to choose! How do we calculate Trust Score? |
BitClassic vs mSigna Wallet - Which Wallet Is Better in 2025?
This BitClassic vs mSigna Wallet comparison is based on the most recent data on both companies. We do our best to provide you with unbiased information about cryptocurrency companies.
Based on user reviews only, BitClassic is rated 4 with 1 user reviews, while mSigna Wallet is rated 3 with 1 user reviews.
Let's finally move to overall Trust Score:
BitClassic vs BitPortal
BitClassic vs Bitamp Bitcoin Wallet
BitClassic vs Blockmove
BitClassic vs CAKE wallet
BitClassic vs Cobo Wallet
mSigna Wallet vs Tokenly Pockets Wallet
mSigna Wallet vs Stellarport Wallet
mSigna Wallet vs MyMonero
mSigna Wallet vs Parity Signer Wallet
mSigna Wallet vs Lisk Wallet