Atomic Wallet vs Ledger Nano X Comparison
| Company | ||
|---|---|---|
| User rating | 20 user review | 1 user review |
| Cryptogeek rating | ||
| Trust Score How it works |
About
|
Atomic is a decentralized multi-cryptocurrency wallet available for Windows, Mac OS and Linux. The wallet uses BitTorrent technology for distributed order book and atomic swap technology for cross-chain custody free exchange. Atomicwallet also features instant exchange options - Changelly and ShapeShift. Atomic supports more than 300 crypto-currencie.
|
Ledger Nano X is a hardware wallet designed for secure transactions with crypto assets, such as Bitcoin, Ethereum, ERC20 tokens, and other coins. Ledger Nano X supports 26 coins and over 1500 tokens in total.
|
Founding Date
| 2018 | 2019 |
Country
| Estonia | France |
Languages
| English | English, Japanese, French, Spanish, Korean, Russian, Chinese |
Wallet type
| Software wallet | Hardware wallet |
Storage type
| Hot / Cold wallet | Cold wallet |
Private keys
| Available | Available |
Available coins
| 0 | 0 |
Security
| Personal | Personal |
Anonymity
| High | High |
Ease of use
| Easy | Average |
Has attached card
| no | no |
Has trading facilities
| yes | No data |
Has vouchers and offers
| No data | No data |
Features
| Hierarchical Deterministic | 2 Factor Authentication, Hierarchical Deterministic, Open Source |
| About |
Atomic is a decentralized multi-cryptocurrency wallet available for Windows, Mac OS and Linux. The wallet uses BitTorrent technology for distributed order book and atomic swap technology for cross-chain custody free exchange. Atomicwallet also features instant exchange options - Changelly and ShapeShift. Atomic supports more than 300 crypto-currencie.
|
Ledger Nano X is a hardware wallet designed for secure transactions with crypto assets, such as Bitcoin, Ethereum, ERC20 tokens, and other coins. Ledger Nano X supports 26 coins and over 1500 tokens in total.
|
|---|---|---|
| Founding Date | Founding Date 2018 | Founding Date 2019 |
| Country | Country Estonia | Country France |
| Languages | Languages English | Languages English, Japanese, French, Spanish, Korean, Russian, Chinese |
| Wallet type | Wallet type Software wallet | Wallet type Hardware wallet |
| Storage type | Storage type Hot / Cold wallet | Storage type Cold wallet |
| Private keys | Private keys Available | Private keys Available |
| Available coins | Available coins 0 | Available coins 0 |
| Security | Security Personal | Security Personal |
| Anonymity | Anonymity High | Anonymity High |
| Ease of use | Ease of use Easy | Ease of use Average |
| Has attached card | Has attached card no | Has attached card no |
| Has trading facilities | Has trading facilities yes | Has trading facilities No data |
| Has vouchers and offers | Has vouchers and offers No data | Has vouchers and offers No data |
| Features | Features Hierarchical Deterministic | Features 2 Factor Authentication, Hierarchical Deterministic, Open Source |
Social
Website
| atomicwallet.io | shop.ledger.com |
| @atomicwallet | @Ledger |
| Website | Website atomicwallet.io | Website shop.ledger.com |
|---|---|---|
| Twitter @atomicwallet | Twitter @Ledger |
Advantages
| - Many currencies supported. Long gone are the days when different types of tokens had to be stored in separate wallets. - Atomic swaps. A number of experts believe that this is a full-fledged replacement of platforms for trading currencies, moreover, it is completely safe. - Too high-quality wallet production. It really meets high-quality standards, which is not typical for a scam. Half a million downloads confirm this. Of course, it is possible to steal such a large amount of currency, but still, the company is more likely focused on normal market work. - Availability of additional functions. The possibility of staking, additional protection, careful attention to the privacy and anonymity of users - all this distinguishes a wallet from a scam. | - Encrypted private keys - Security |
Disadvantages
| - Not as secure as a hardware wallet. - Not an open-sourced. - No biometrics or 2FA features, which makes Atomic wallet not entirely safe | - A paid product |
Rating
| User rating | User rating 20 user review | User rating 1 user review |
|---|---|---|
| Cryptogeek rating | Cryptogeek rating | Cryptogeek rating |
| Advantages | Advantages - Many currencies supported. Long gone are the days when different types of tokens had to be stored in separate wallets. - Atomic swaps. A number of experts believe that this is a full-fledged replacement of platforms for trading currencies, moreover, it is completely safe. - Too high-quality wallet production. It really meets high-quality standards, which is not typical for a scam. Half a million downloads confirm this. Of course, it is possible to steal such a large amount of currency, but still, the company is more likely focused on normal market work. - Availability of additional functions. The possibility of staking, additional protection, careful attention to the privacy and anonymity of users - all this distinguishes a wallet from a scam. | Advantages - Encrypted private keys - Security |
| Disadvantages | Disadvantages - Not as secure as a hardware wallet. - Not an open-sourced. - No biometrics or 2FA features, which makes Atomic wallet not entirely safe | Disadvantages - A paid product |
Atomic Wallet user rating is 2.2, based on 20 user reviews. Ledger Nano X user rating is 5, based on 1 user reviews.
We also calculate the special Cryptogeek TrustScore based on the characteristics of each wallet.
| We choose the winner based on our TrustScore Rating. Please remember, it’s still up to you which company to choose! How do we calculate Trust Score? |
Atomic Wallet vs Ledger Nano X - Which Wallet Is Better in 2025?
This Atomic Wallet vs Ledger Nano X comparison is based on the most recent data on both companies. We do our best to provide you with unbiased information about cryptocurrency companies.
Based on user reviews only, Atomic Wallet is rated 2.2 with 20 user reviews, while Ledger Nano X is rated 5 with 1 user reviews.
Let's finally move to overall Trust Score: