Bitpie vs JuBiter Blade Wallet Comparison
Company |
|
|
User rating |
User rating
4 / 5
1 user review
|
User rating
5 / 5
1 user review
|
Cryptogeek rating |
Cryptogeek rating
4 / 5
|
Cryptogeek rating
4.4 / 5
|
Trust Score
How it works
|
Trust Score
3.59 / 5
|
Trust Score
4.6 / 5
|
About
|
Bitpie Wallet is based on HD wallet technology, the user can send and receive cryptocurrencies instantly, it can also make all kinds of transactions more convenient.
|
JuBiter Blade is a secure hardware cryptocurrency wallet supporting top cryptocurrencies and ERC-20 tokens. It is connected to the user’s PC via USB or bluetooth.
|
Founding Date
Country
Languages
|
English, Japanese, Traditional Chinese, Simplified Chinese
|
English, Chinese
|
Wallet type
|
Software wallet
|
Hardware wallet
|
Storage type
Private keys
Available coins
|
0
|
46
- Bitcoin (BTC), Basic Attention Token (BAT), Ethereum Classic (ETC), OmiseGO (OMG), ICON (ICX), Zilliqa (ZIL), Status (SNT), 0x (ZRX), Loopring (LRC), IOST (IOST), KuCoin Shares (KCS), aelf (ELF), FunFair (FUN), Revain (REV), Storj (STORJ), Civic (CVC), Dent (DENT), iExec RLC (RLC), Decentraland (MANA), Polymath (POLY), Enjin Coin (ENJ), Metal (MTL), THETA (THETA), UTRUST (UTK), Telcoin (TEL), USD Coin (USDC), Binance Coin (BNB), Bitcoin Cash (BCH), Ethereum (ETH), Matic Network (MATIC), NXM (NXM), Crypto.com Coin (CRO), UNUS SED LEO (LEO), Huobi Token (HT), FTX Token (FTT), OKB (OKB), TrueUSD (TUSD), HUSD (HUSD), Ocean Protocol (OCEAN), Quant (QNT), SwissBorg (CHSB), IoTeX (IOTX), Chiliz (CHZ), Ankr (ANKR), Unibright (UBT), Fantom (FTM)
|
Security
|
Third Party Encrypted
|
No data
|
Anonymity
Ease of use
Has attached card
Has trading facilities
Has vouchers and offers
Features
|
Open Source, Hierarchical Deterministic
|
No data
|
About |
Bitpie Wallet is based on HD wallet technology, the user can send and receive cryptocurrencies instantly, it can also make all kinds of transactions more convenient.
|
JuBiter Blade is a secure hardware cryptocurrency wallet supporting top cryptocurrencies and ERC-20 tokens. It is connected to the user’s PC via USB or bluetooth.
|
Founding Date |
Founding Date
2017
|
Founding Date
2018
|
Country |
Country
Australia
|
Country
International
|
Languages |
Languages
English, Japanese, Traditional Chinese, Simplified Chinese
|
Languages
English, Chinese
|
Wallet type |
Wallet type
Software wallet
|
Wallet type
Hardware wallet
|
Storage type |
Storage type
Hot wallet
|
Storage type
Cold wallet
|
Private keys |
Private keys
Not available
|
Private keys
Available
|
Available coins |
Available coins
0
|
Available coins
46
- Bitcoin (BTC), Basic Attention Token (BAT), Ethereum Classic (ETC), OmiseGO (OMG), ICON (ICX), Zilliqa (ZIL), Status (SNT), 0x (ZRX), Loopring (LRC), IOST (IOST), KuCoin Shares (KCS), aelf (ELF), FunFair (FUN), Revain (REV), Storj (STORJ), Civic (CVC), Dent (DENT), iExec RLC (RLC), Decentraland (MANA), Polymath (POLY), Enjin Coin (ENJ), Metal (MTL), THETA (THETA), UTRUST (UTK), Telcoin (TEL), USD Coin (USDC), Binance Coin (BNB), Bitcoin Cash (BCH), Ethereum (ETH), Matic Network (MATIC), NXM (NXM), Crypto.com Coin (CRO), UNUS SED LEO (LEO), Huobi Token (HT), FTX Token (FTT), OKB (OKB), TrueUSD (TUSD), HUSD (HUSD), Ocean Protocol (OCEAN), Quant (QNT), SwissBorg (CHSB), IoTeX (IOTX), Chiliz (CHZ), Ankr (ANKR), Unibright (UBT), Fantom (FTM)
|
Security |
Security
Third Party Encrypted
|
Security
No data
|
Anonymity |
Anonymity
Medium
|
Anonymity
No data
|
Ease of use |
Ease of use
Easy
|
Ease of use
No data
|
Has attached card |
Has attached card
no
|
Has attached card
No data
|
Has trading facilities |
Has trading facilities
No data
|
Has trading facilities
No data
|
Has vouchers and offers |
Has vouchers and offers
No data
|
Has vouchers and offers
No data
|
Features |
Features
Open Source, Hierarchical Deterministic
|
Features
No data
|
Social
Website
Twitter
Advantages
|
- Easy to use
- User-friendly
|
- High security
|
Disadvantages
|
- Low popularity
|
- Paid product
|
Rating
User rating |
User rating
4 / 5
1 user review
|
User rating
5 / 5
1 user review
|
Cryptogeek rating |
Cryptogeek rating
4 / 5
|
Cryptogeek rating
4.4 / 5
|
Advantages |
Advantages
- Easy to use
- User-friendly
|
Advantages
- High security
|
Disadvantages |
Disadvantages
- Low popularity
|
Disadvantages
- Paid product
|
Bitpie user rating is 4, based on 1 user reviews. JuBiter Blade Wallet user rating is 5, based on 1 user reviews.
We also calculate the special Cryptogeek TrustScore based on the characteristics of each wallet.
Choose other companies
Bitpie vs JuBiter Blade Wallet - Which Wallet Is Better in 2025?
This Bitpie vs JuBiter Blade Wallet comparison is based on the most recent data on both companies. We do our best to provide you with unbiased information about cryptocurrency companies.
Based on user reviews only, Bitpie is rated 4 with 1 user reviews, while JuBiter Blade Wallet is rated 5 with 1 user reviews.
Let's finally move to overall Trust Score: