ClassicEtherWallet CX vs Monerujo Comparison

Compare companies
Company
User rating User rating 4.5 / 5 2 user review User rating 5 / 5 1 user reviews
Cryptogeek rating Cryptogeek rating 4.2 / 5 Cryptogeek rating 4.2 / 5
Trust Score How it works Trust Score 3.01 / 5 Trust Score 4.3 / 5

About

ClassicEtherWallet CX has been a browser wallet for the holders of Ethereum Classic coins before the 51% attack on the Ethereum Classic blockchain took place in January 2019 resulting in a theft of over $11 mln.
Monerujo هي محفظة XMR. انها ليست التطبيق المحمول المرخصة لXMR. ولكن في نفس الوقت يوصى بالمحفظة على الموقع الرسمي لمونيرو.

Founding Date

No data 2016

Country

International International

Languages

No data English

Wallet type

No data Software wallet

Storage type

No data Hot wallet

Private keys

Not available Available

Available coins

0 1 - Monero (XMR)

Security

Personal Personal

Anonymity

High Low

Ease of use

Easy Easy

Has attached card

no no

Has trading facilities

No data No data

Has vouchers and offers

No data No data

Features

Open Source Open Source, Hierarchical Deterministic
About
ClassicEtherWallet CX has been a browser wallet for the holders of Ethereum Classic coins before the 51% attack on the Ethereum Classic blockchain took place in January 2019 resulting in a theft of over $11 mln.
Monerujo هي محفظة XMR. انها ليست التطبيق المحمول المرخصة لXMR. ولكن في نفس الوقت يوصى بالمحفظة على الموقع الرسمي لمونيرو.
Founding Date Founding Date No data Founding Date 2016
Country Country International Country International
Languages Languages No data Languages English
Wallet type Wallet type No data Wallet type Software wallet
Storage type Storage type No data Storage type Hot wallet
Private keys Private keys Not available Private keys Available
Available coins Available coins 0 Available coins 1 - Monero (XMR)
Security Security Personal Security Personal
Anonymity Anonymity High Anonymity Low
Ease of use Ease of use Easy Ease of use Easy
Has attached card Has attached card no Has attached card no
Has trading facilities Has trading facilities No data Has trading facilities No data
Has vouchers and offers Has vouchers and offers No data Has vouchers and offers No data
Features Features Open Source Features Open Source, Hierarchical Deterministic

Social

Website

ethereumclassic.org www.monerujo.io

Twitter

@eth_classic @monerujowallet
Website Website ethereumclassic.org Website www.monerujo.io
Twitter Twitter @eth_classic Twitter @monerujowallet

Advantages

- - مصدر مفتوح مع أمان معتمد - سهولة الإعداد وخيارات جيدة لوجود محافظ متعددة - سهلة الاستخدام

Disadvantages

- Currently not active. It is recommended to use MyEtherWallet. - تصميم - تحميل التطبيق يستغرق بعض الوقت

Rating

User rating User rating 4.5 / 5 2 user review User rating 5 / 5 1 user reviews
Cryptogeek rating Cryptogeek rating 4.2 / 5 Cryptogeek rating 4.2 / 5
Advantages Advantages - Advantages - مصدر مفتوح مع أمان معتمد - سهولة الإعداد وخيارات جيدة لوجود محافظ متعددة - سهلة الاستخدام
Disadvantages Disadvantages - Currently not active. It is recommended to use MyEtherWallet. Disadvantages - تصميم - تحميل التطبيق يستغرق بعض الوقت

ClassicEtherWallet CX user rating is 4.5, based on 2 user reviews. Monerujo user rating is 5, based on 1 user reviews.

We also calculate the special Cryptogeek TrustScore based on the characteristics of each wallet.

We choose the winner based on our TrustScore Rating. Please remember, it’s still up to you which company to choose! How do we calculate Trust Score?
Trust Score: 3.01 / 5
Compare with:
Write review
logo-img
Trust Score: 4.3 / 5
Compare with:
Write review
Choose other companies

ClassicEtherWallet CX vs Monerujo - Which Wallet Is Better in 2025?

This ClassicEtherWallet CX vs Monerujo comparison is based on the most recent data on both companies. We do our best to provide you with unbiased information about cryptocurrency companies.

Based on user reviews only, ClassicEtherWallet CX is rated 4.5 with 2 user reviews, while Monerujo is rated 5 with 1 user reviews.

Let's finally move to overall Trust Score: