Company | ||
---|---|---|
User rating | 1 user review | 1 user review |
Cryptogeek rating | ||
Trust Score How it works |
mSigna Wallet is no longer offered. The wallet was designed by the software company Ciphrex in the time of crypto rush in 2017. The developer’s Twitter media had not published any updates since mid-2017.
|
PlasmaPay is a multi cryptocurrency digital wallet. It allows users to store, manage and monitor their digital assets by using the available Web version of the wallet. PlasmaPay supports the BTC, ETH, LTC, and DASH cryptocurrencies, it has trading facilities and the private key is personal, which means that the user is the one who keeps it.
|
2017 | 2018 |
USA | International |
No data | English, Chinese |
No data | Software wallet |
No data | Hot wallet |
Not available | Available |
0 | 0 |
No data | Personal |
No data | Medium |
No data | Average |
No data | no |
No data | yes |
No data | No data |
No data | 2 Factor Authentication |
About |
mSigna Wallet is no longer offered. The wallet was designed by the software company Ciphrex in the time of crypto rush in 2017. The developer’s Twitter media had not published any updates since mid-2017.
|
PlasmaPay is a multi cryptocurrency digital wallet. It allows users to store, manage and monitor their digital assets by using the available Web version of the wallet. PlasmaPay supports the BTC, ETH, LTC, and DASH cryptocurrencies, it has trading facilities and the private key is personal, which means that the user is the one who keeps it.
|
---|---|---|
Founding Date | Founding Date 2017 | Founding Date 2018 |
Country | Country USA | Country International |
Languages | Languages No data | Languages English, Chinese |
Wallet type | Wallet type No data | Wallet type Software wallet |
Storage type | Storage type No data | Storage type Hot wallet |
Private keys | Private keys Not available | Private keys Available |
Available coins | Available coins 0 | Available coins 0 |
Security | Security No data | Security Personal |
Anonymity | Anonymity No data | Anonymity Medium |
Ease of use | Ease of use No data | Ease of use Average |
Has attached card | Has attached card No data | Has attached card no |
Has trading facilities | Has trading facilities No data | Has trading facilities yes |
Has vouchers and offers | Has vouchers and offers No data | Has vouchers and offers No data |
Features | Features No data | Features 2 Factor Authentication |
github.com | plasmapay.com |
@ciphrex | @0xPlasma |
Website | Website github.com | Website plasmapay.com |
---|---|---|
Twitter @ciphrex | Twitter @0xPlasma |
- | - Two-Factor Authentication - Easy to use |
- No longer available | - No Open Source - No Multi-Signature |
User rating | User rating 1 user review | User rating 1 user review |
---|---|---|
Cryptogeek rating | Cryptogeek rating | Cryptogeek rating |
Advantages | Advantages - | Advantages - Two-Factor Authentication - Easy to use |
Disadvantages | Disadvantages - No longer available | Disadvantages - No Open Source - No Multi-Signature |
mSigna Wallet user rating is 3, based on 1 user reviews. PlasmaPay user rating is 5, based on 1 user reviews.
We also calculate the special Cryptogeek TrustScore based on the characteristics of each wallet.
We choose the winner based on our TrustScore Rating. Please remember, it’s still up to you which company to choose! How do we calculate Trust Score? |
This mSigna Wallet vs PlasmaPay comparison is based on the most recent data on both companies. We do our best to provide you with unbiased information about cryptocurrency companies.
Based on user reviews only, mSigna Wallet is rated 3 with 1 user reviews, while PlasmaPay is rated 5 with 1 user reviews.
Let's finally move to overall Trust Score: