Komodo Wallet vs VCash Wallet Comparison

Compare companies
Company
User rating User rating 5 / 5 1 user review User rating 3 / 5 2 user review
Cryptogeek rating Cryptogeek rating 3.4 / 5 Cryptogeek rating 3.6 / 5
Trust Score How it works Trust Score 4.23 / 5 Trust Score 3.29 / 5

About

Agama Wallet was developed by Komodo, a multi-chain blockchain platform that has been in business since 2014. In March 2019, a sneak attack affected Agama Wallet, whereupon Komodo OceanQT Wallet has become the official and native wallet of the Komodo platform.
Vcash wallet has been developed for both Android and iOS. However, there are no links or references to this app on Apple and Google Store at this point.

Founding Date

2014 2019

Country

International International

Languages

English, Spanish, Russian English

Wallet type

Software wallet Software wallet

Storage type

Cold wallet Hot wallet

Private keys

Available Not available

Available coins

1 - Komodo (KMD) 0

Security

No data No data

Anonymity

No data No data

Ease of use

No data No data

Has attached card

No data No data

Has trading facilities

No data No data

Has vouchers and offers

No data No data

Features

No data No data
About
Agama Wallet was developed by Komodo, a multi-chain blockchain platform that has been in business since 2014. In March 2019, a sneak attack affected Agama Wallet, whereupon Komodo OceanQT Wallet has become the official and native wallet of the Komodo platform.
Vcash wallet has been developed for both Android and iOS. However, there are no links or references to this app on Apple and Google Store at this point.
Founding Date Founding Date 2014 Founding Date 2019
Country Country International Country International
Languages Languages English, Spanish, Russian Languages English
Wallet type Wallet type Software wallet Wallet type Software wallet
Storage type Storage type Cold wallet Storage type Hot wallet
Private keys Private keys Available Private keys Not available
Available coins Available coins 1 - Komodo (KMD) Available coins 0
Security Security No data Security No data
Anonymity Anonymity No data Anonymity No data
Ease of use Ease of use No data Ease of use No data
Has attached card Has attached card No data Has attached card No data
Has trading facilities Has trading facilities No data Has trading facilities No data
Has vouchers and offers Has vouchers and offers No data Has vouchers and offers No data
Features Features No data Features No data

Social

Website

komodoplatform.com v.cash

Twitter

@KomodoPlatform @vcashchain
Website Website komodoplatform.com Website v.cash
Twitter Twitter @KomodoPlatform Twitter @vcashchain

Advantages

- Easy to use - Special privacy protocol

Disadvantages

- Not famous - Not present in the mobile app stores - Some users reportedly cannot connect to the wallet

Rating

User rating User rating 5 / 5 1 user review User rating 3 / 5 2 user review
Cryptogeek rating Cryptogeek rating 3.4 / 5 Cryptogeek rating 3.6 / 5
Advantages Advantages - Easy to use Advantages - Special privacy protocol
Disadvantages Disadvantages - Not famous Disadvantages - Not present in the mobile app stores - Some users reportedly cannot connect to the wallet

Komodo Wallet user rating is 5, based on 1 user reviews. VCash Wallet user rating is 3, based on 2 user reviews.

We also calculate the special Cryptogeek TrustScore based on the characteristics of each wallet.

We choose the winner based on our TrustScore Rating. Please remember, it’s still up to you which company to choose! How do we calculate Trust Score?
logo-img
Trust Score: 4.23 / 5 Write review
Trust Score: 3.29 / 5 Write review
Choose other companies

Komodo Wallet vs VCash Wallet - Which Wallet Is Better in 2024?

This Komodo Wallet vs VCash Wallet comparison is based on the most recent data on both companies. We do our best to provide you with unbiased information about cryptocurrency companies.

Based on user reviews only, Komodo Wallet is rated 5 with 1 user reviews, while VCash Wallet is rated 3 with 2 user reviews.

Let's finally move to overall Trust Score: