Crypto.com Wallet vs Lisk Wallet Comparison

Compare companies
Company
User rating User rating 5.0 / 5 1 user review User rating 3.0 / 5 1 user review
Cryptogeek rating Cryptogeek rating 4.4 / 5 Cryptogeek rating 4.0 / 5
Trust Score How it works Trust Score 3.78 / 5 Trust Score 2.81 / 5

About

Crypto.com, the pioneering payments and cryptocurrency platform, seeks to accelerate the world’s transition to cryptocurrency. Crypto.com is headquartered in Hong Kong. 
Lisk Nano Wallet was discontinued back in November 2018. As an alternative option at the time, the Lisk team offered Lisk Mobile. By now, the team has come up with a full-fledged Lisk wallet that is available across desktop and mobile platforms.

Founding Date

2017 No data

Country

Hong Kong No data

Languages

English, Chinese No data

Wallet type

Software wallet No data

Storage type

Hot wallet No data

Private keys

Not available Not available

Available coins

0 0

Security

Third Party Encrypted No data

Anonymity

Medium No data

Ease of use

Average No data

Has attached card

no No data

Has trading facilities

No data No data

Has vouchers and offers

No data No data

Features

Hierarchical Deterministic, 2 Factor Authentication No data
About
Crypto.com, the pioneering payments and cryptocurrency platform, seeks to accelerate the world’s transition to cryptocurrency. Crypto.com is headquartered in Hong Kong. 
Lisk Nano Wallet was discontinued back in November 2018. As an alternative option at the time, the Lisk team offered Lisk Mobile. By now, the team has come up with a full-fledged Lisk wallet that is available across desktop and mobile platforms.
Founding Date Founding Date 2017 Founding Date No data
Country Country Hong Kong Country No data
Languages Languages English, Chinese Languages No data
Wallet type Wallet type Software wallet Wallet type No data
Storage type Storage type Hot wallet Storage type No data
Private keys Private keys Not available Private keys Not available
Available coins Available coins 0 Available coins 0
Security Security Third Party Encrypted Security No data
Anonymity Anonymity Medium Anonymity No data
Ease of use Ease of use Average Ease of use No data
Has attached card Has attached card no Has attached card No data
Has trading facilities Has trading facilities No data Has trading facilities No data
Has vouchers and offers Has vouchers and offers No data Has vouchers and offers No data
Features Features Hierarchical Deterministic, 2 Factor Authentication Features No data

Social

Website

crypto.com lisk.io

Twitter

@cryptocom @LiskHQ
Website Website crypto.com Website lisk.io
Twitter Twitter @cryptocom Twitter @LiskHQ

Advantages

- Easy to use - User-friendly - Security - participate in the PoS -

Disadvantages

- No Multisignature - No Open Source - Only transactions with BTC and LSK

Rating

User rating User rating 5.0 / 5 1 user review User rating 3.0 / 5 1 user review
Cryptogeek rating Cryptogeek rating 4.4 / 5 Cryptogeek rating 4.0 / 5
Advantages Advantages - Easy to use - User-friendly - Security Advantages - participate in the PoS -
Disadvantages Disadvantages - No Multisignature - No Open Source Disadvantages - Only transactions with BTC and LSK

Crypto.com Wallet user rating is 5.0, based on 1 user reviews. Lisk Wallet user rating is 3.0, based on 1 user reviews.

We also calculate the special Cryptogeek TrustScore based on the characteristics of each wallet.

We choose the winner based on our TrustScore Rating. Please remember, it’s still up to you which company to choose! How do we calculate Trust Score?
Trust Score: 3.78 / 5
Compare with:
Write review
Trust Score: 2.81 / 5 Write review
Choose other companies

Crypto.com Wallet vs Lisk Wallet - Which Wallet Is Better in 2024?

This Crypto.com Wallet vs Lisk Wallet comparison is based on the most recent data on both companies. We do our best to provide you with unbiased information about cryptocurrency companies.

Based on user reviews only, Crypto.com Wallet is rated 5.0 with 1 user reviews, while Lisk Wallet is rated 3.0 with 1 user reviews.

Let's finally move to overall Trust Score: