Cobo Wallet vs Rutheneum Comparison
| Company |
|
|
| User rating |
User rating
5 / 5
2 user review
|
User rating
5 / 5
1 user review
|
| Cryptogeek rating |
Cryptogeek rating
4 / 5
|
Cryptogeek rating
3.6 / 5
|
| Trust Score
How it works
|
Trust Score
3.69 / 5
|
Trust Score
4.24 / 5
|
About
|
Cobo Wallet is Cobo's flagship mobile wallet, built to make it easy for people to grow and secure their crypto. Cobo Wallet is the first in the world to support pooled staking, offers native staking for dozens of PoS projects, has an integrated dapp store, and supports more than 30 coins and 500 tokens.
|
The Rutheneum Wallet is an Open-Source Web Wallet for the upcoming Rutheneum (RHT) coin. It is a simple web wallet that allows the user to create it by inserting its email and choosing a password.
|
Founding Date
Country
Languages
|
English, Traditional Chinese, Simplified Chinese
|
English
|
Wallet type
|
Software wallet
|
Software wallet
|
Storage type
Private keys
Available coins
Security
|
Third Party Encrypted
|
Personal
|
Anonymity
Ease of use
Has attached card
Has trading facilities
Has vouchers and offers
Features
|
Multi-Signature, 2 Factor Authentication, Hierarchical Deterministic
|
Hierarchical Deterministic, Open Source
|
| About |
Cobo Wallet is Cobo's flagship mobile wallet, built to make it easy for people to grow and secure their crypto. Cobo Wallet is the first in the world to support pooled staking, offers native staking for dozens of PoS projects, has an integrated dapp store, and supports more than 30 coins and 500 tokens.
|
The Rutheneum Wallet is an Open-Source Web Wallet for the upcoming Rutheneum (RHT) coin. It is a simple web wallet that allows the user to create it by inserting its email and choosing a password.
|
| Founding Date |
Founding Date
2017
|
Founding Date
2017
|
| Country |
Country
China
|
Country
International
|
| Languages |
Languages
English, Traditional Chinese, Simplified Chinese
|
Languages
English
|
| Wallet type |
Wallet type
Software wallet
|
Wallet type
Software wallet
|
| Storage type |
Storage type
Hot wallet
|
Storage type
Hot wallet
|
| Private keys |
Private keys
Not available
|
Private keys
Available
|
| Available coins |
Available coins
0
|
Available coins
0
|
| Security |
Security
Third Party Encrypted
|
Security
Personal
|
| Anonymity |
Anonymity
Low
|
Anonymity
Low
|
| Ease of use |
Ease of use
Easy
|
Ease of use
Easy
|
| Has attached card |
Has attached card
no
|
Has attached card
no
|
| Has trading facilities |
Has trading facilities
No data
|
Has trading facilities
yes
|
| Has vouchers and offers |
Has vouchers and offers
No data
|
Has vouchers and offers
yes
|
| Features |
Features
Multi-Signature, 2 Factor Authentication, Hierarchical Deterministic
|
Features
Hierarchical Deterministic, Open Source
|
Social
Website
Twitter
Advantages
|
- Security
- Easy to use
- User-friendly
|
- Hierarchical Deterministic
- Open-Source
|
Disadvantages
|
- Few languages available
|
- Low popularity
- Lack of Two-Factor Authentication
- No Multi-Signature
|
Rating
| User rating |
User rating
5 / 5
2 user review
|
User rating
5 / 5
1 user review
|
| Cryptogeek rating |
Cryptogeek rating
4 / 5
|
Cryptogeek rating
3.6 / 5
|
| Advantages |
Advantages
- Security
- Easy to use
- User-friendly
|
Advantages
- Hierarchical Deterministic
- Open-Source
|
| Disadvantages |
Disadvantages
- Few languages available
|
Disadvantages
- Low popularity
- Lack of Two-Factor Authentication
- No Multi-Signature
|
Cobo Wallet user rating is 5, based on 2 user reviews. Rutheneum user rating is 5, based on 1 user reviews.
We also calculate the special Cryptogeek TrustScore based on the characteristics of each wallet.
Choose other companies
Cobo Wallet vs Rutheneum - Which Wallet Is Better in 2025?
This Cobo Wallet vs Rutheneum comparison is based on the most recent data on both companies. We do our best to provide you with unbiased information about cryptocurrency companies.
Based on user reviews only, Cobo Wallet is rated 5 with 2 user reviews, while Rutheneum is rated 5 with 1 user reviews.
Let's finally move to overall Trust Score:
