ClassicEtherWallet CX vs Ginco Comparison

Compare companies
Company
User rating User rating 4.5 / 5 2 user review User rating 5 / 5 1 user review
Cryptogeek rating Cryptogeek rating 4.2 / 5 Cryptogeek rating 4.6 / 5
Trust Score How it works Trust Score 3.01 / 5 Trust Score 4.5 / 5

About

ClassicEtherWallet CX has been a browser wallet for the holders of Ethereum Classic coins before the 51% attack on the Ethereum Classic blockchain took place in January 2019 resulting in a theft of over $11 mln.
Ginco is the next generation cryptocurrency wallet which allows to safely manage your cryptocurrencies, send and receive funds with low fees on your smartphone. Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash, Ethereum and ERC-20 are compatible now, and many more coming soon.

Founding Date

No data 2017

Country

International Japan

Languages

No data English, Japanese

Wallet type

No data Software wallet

Storage type

No data Hot wallet

Private keys

Not available Available

Available coins

0 0

Security

Personal Personal

Anonymity

High Medium

Ease of use

Easy Average

Has attached card

no no

Has trading facilities

No data No data

Has vouchers and offers

No data yes

Features

Open Source Hierarchical Deterministic
About
ClassicEtherWallet CX has been a browser wallet for the holders of Ethereum Classic coins before the 51% attack on the Ethereum Classic blockchain took place in January 2019 resulting in a theft of over $11 mln.
Ginco is the next generation cryptocurrency wallet which allows to safely manage your cryptocurrencies, send and receive funds with low fees on your smartphone. Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash, Ethereum and ERC-20 are compatible now, and many more coming soon.
Founding Date Founding Date No data Founding Date 2017
Country Country International Country Japan
Languages Languages No data Languages English, Japanese
Wallet type Wallet type No data Wallet type Software wallet
Storage type Storage type No data Storage type Hot wallet
Private keys Private keys Not available Private keys Available
Available coins Available coins 0 Available coins 0
Security Security Personal Security Personal
Anonymity Anonymity High Anonymity Medium
Ease of use Ease of use Easy Ease of use Average
Has attached card Has attached card no Has attached card no
Has trading facilities Has trading facilities No data Has trading facilities No data
Has vouchers and offers Has vouchers and offers No data Has vouchers and offers yes
Features Features Open Source Features Hierarchical Deterministic

Social

Website

ethereumclassic.org ginco.io

Twitter

@eth_classic @ginco_inc
Website Website ethereumclassic.org Website ginco.io
Twitter Twitter @eth_classic Twitter @ginco_inc

Advantages

- - Easy to use

Disadvantages

- Currently not active. It is recommended to use MyEtherWallet. - Lack of Two-Factor Authentication

Rating

User rating User rating 4.5 / 5 2 user review User rating 5 / 5 1 user review
Cryptogeek rating Cryptogeek rating 4.2 / 5 Cryptogeek rating 4.6 / 5
Advantages Advantages - Advantages - Easy to use
Disadvantages Disadvantages - Currently not active. It is recommended to use MyEtherWallet. Disadvantages - Lack of Two-Factor Authentication

ClassicEtherWallet CX user rating is 4.5, based on 2 user reviews. Ginco user rating is 5, based on 1 user reviews.

We also calculate the special Cryptogeek TrustScore based on the characteristics of each wallet.

We choose the winner based on our TrustScore Rating. Please remember, it’s still up to you which company to choose! How do we calculate Trust Score?
Trust Score: 3.01 / 5
Compare with:
Write review
logo-img
Trust Score: 4.5 / 5
Compare with:
Write review
Choose other companies

ClassicEtherWallet CX vs Ginco - Which Wallet Is Better in 2025?

This ClassicEtherWallet CX vs Ginco comparison is based on the most recent data on both companies. We do our best to provide you with unbiased information about cryptocurrency companies.

Based on user reviews only, ClassicEtherWallet CX is rated 4.5 with 2 user reviews, while Ginco is rated 5 with 1 user reviews.

Let's finally move to overall Trust Score: