Toast Wallet vs XMR Wallet Comparison
| Company | ||
|---|---|---|
| User rating | 17 user review | 3 user review |
| Cryptogeek rating | ||
| Trust Score How it works |
About
|
Toast wallet was an XRP wallet. It has been operating in 2017 - 2020. In 2020, it was shut down because Ripple and Xpring stopped funding its further development. Users with funds left on Toast are withdrawing their coins successfully.
|
XMR Wallet is an open-source web wallet to store the Monero (XMR) cryptocurrency.
|
Founding Date
| 2017 | 2018 |
Country
| New Zealand | No data |
Languages
| English | English |
Wallet type
| Software wallet | Software wallet |
Storage type
| Hot wallet | Hot wallet |
Private keys
| Available | Available |
Available coins
| 1 - Ripple (XRP) | 0 |
Security
| Personal | Personal |
Anonymity
| Low | High |
Ease of use
| Easy | Easy |
Has attached card
| no | no |
Has trading facilities
| No data | No data |
Has vouchers and offers
| No data | No data |
Features
| Hierarchical Deterministic | Open Source |
| About |
Toast wallet was an XRP wallet. It has been operating in 2017 - 2020. In 2020, it was shut down because Ripple and Xpring stopped funding its further development. Users with funds left on Toast are withdrawing their coins successfully.
|
XMR Wallet is an open-source web wallet to store the Monero (XMR) cryptocurrency.
|
|---|---|---|
| Founding Date | Founding Date 2017 | Founding Date 2018 |
| Country | Country New Zealand | Country No data |
| Languages | Languages English | Languages English |
| Wallet type | Wallet type Software wallet | Wallet type Software wallet |
| Storage type | Storage type Hot wallet | Storage type Hot wallet |
| Private keys | Private keys Available | Private keys Available |
| Available coins | Available coins 1 - Ripple (XRP) | Available coins 0 |
| Security | Security Personal | Security Personal |
| Anonymity | Anonymity Low | Anonymity High |
| Ease of use | Ease of use Easy | Ease of use Easy |
| Has attached card | Has attached card no | Has attached card no |
| Has trading facilities | Has trading facilities No data | Has trading facilities No data |
| Has vouchers and offers | Has vouchers and offers No data | Has vouchers and offers No data |
| Features | Features Hierarchical Deterministic | Features Open Source |
Social
Website
| toastwallet.com | www.xmrwallet.com |
| @ToastWallet | @XMRWalletCom |
| Website | Website toastwallet.com | Website www.xmrwallet.com |
|---|---|---|
| Twitter @ToastWallet | Twitter @XMRWalletCom |
Advantages
| - Service is free - Open-source software - High speed - Good security | - Easy to use - Open-Source |
Disadvantages
| - The wallet was shut down - No currencies besides XRP - The use of fiat currencies is not allowed | - Lack of Two-Factor Authentication - No Multi-Signature |
Rating
| User rating | User rating 17 user review | User rating 3 user review |
|---|---|---|
| Cryptogeek rating | Cryptogeek rating | Cryptogeek rating |
| Advantages | Advantages - Service is free - Open-source software - High speed - Good security | Advantages - Easy to use - Open-Source |
| Disadvantages | Disadvantages - The wallet was shut down - No currencies besides XRP - The use of fiat currencies is not allowed | Disadvantages - Lack of Two-Factor Authentication - No Multi-Signature |
Toast Wallet user rating is 3.5, based on 17 user reviews. XMR Wallet user rating is 2.7, based on 3 user reviews.
We also calculate the special Cryptogeek TrustScore based on the characteristics of each wallet.
| We choose the winner based on our TrustScore Rating. Please remember, it’s still up to you which company to choose! How do we calculate Trust Score? |
Toast Wallet vs XMR Wallet - Which Wallet Is Better in 2025?
This Toast Wallet vs XMR Wallet comparison is based on the most recent data on both companies. We do our best to provide you with unbiased information about cryptocurrency companies.
Based on user reviews only, Toast Wallet is rated 3.5 with 17 user reviews, while XMR Wallet is rated 2.7 with 3 user reviews.
Let's finally move to overall Trust Score: