Lykke Wallet vs OPOLO Comparison

Compare companies
Company
User rating User rating 4 / 5 1 user review User rating 4 / 5 1 user review
Cryptogeek rating Cryptogeek rating 3.8 / 5 Cryptogeek rating 4 / 5
Trust Score How it works Trust Score 4.18 / 5 Trust Score 4.23 / 5

About

Lykke Wallet is the product of the eponymous crypto exchange. The mobile wallet has both Android and iOS versions whereas its online version is available for desktop platforms.
OPOLO Cosmos is a hardware multi-cryptocurrency wallet that comes with a single wallet application, which can be installed on Windows, Linux, and Mac to access all integrated coins and tokens from one easy to use app. OPOLO wallet supports over 1500 cryptocurrencies.

Founding Date

2015 2018

Country

Switzerland Luxembourg

Languages

English English

Wallet type

Software wallet Hardware wallet

Storage type

Hot wallet Cold wallet

Private keys

Available Available

Available coins

0 0

Security

Personal Personal

Anonymity

High High

Ease of use

Easy Easy

Has attached card

no no

Has trading facilities

yes yes

Has vouchers and offers

No data No data

Features

Hierarchical Deterministic, Open Source, Multi-Signature 2 Factor Authentication, Hierarchical Deterministic
About
Lykke Wallet is the product of the eponymous crypto exchange. The mobile wallet has both Android and iOS versions whereas its online version is available for desktop platforms.
OPOLO Cosmos is a hardware multi-cryptocurrency wallet that comes with a single wallet application, which can be installed on Windows, Linux, and Mac to access all integrated coins and tokens from one easy to use app. OPOLO wallet supports over 1500 cryptocurrencies.
Founding Date Founding Date 2015 Founding Date 2018
Country Country Switzerland Country Luxembourg
Languages Languages English Languages English
Wallet type Wallet type Software wallet Wallet type Hardware wallet
Storage type Storage type Hot wallet Storage type Cold wallet
Private keys Private keys Available Private keys Available
Available coins Available coins 0 Available coins 0
Security Security Personal Security Personal
Anonymity Anonymity High Anonymity High
Ease of use Ease of use Easy Ease of use Easy
Has attached card Has attached card no Has attached card no
Has trading facilities Has trading facilities yes Has trading facilities yes
Has vouchers and offers Has vouchers and offers No data Has vouchers and offers No data
Features Features Hierarchical Deterministic, Open Source, Multi-Signature Features 2 Factor Authentication, Hierarchical Deterministic

Social

Website

www.lykke.com opolo.io

Twitter

@lykke @OpoloWallet
Website Website www.lykke.com Website opolo.io
Twitter Twitter @lykke Twitter @OpoloWallet

Advantages

- Purchase and withdraw with fiat money - Security - Private Key Ownership

Disadvantages

- Not anonymous - Paid product - Not so easy for beginners

Rating

User rating User rating 4 / 5 1 user review User rating 4 / 5 1 user review
Cryptogeek rating Cryptogeek rating 3.8 / 5 Cryptogeek rating 4 / 5
Advantages Advantages - Purchase and withdraw with fiat money Advantages - Security - Private Key Ownership
Disadvantages Disadvantages - Not anonymous Disadvantages - Paid product - Not so easy for beginners

Lykke Wallet user rating is 4, based on 1 user reviews. OPOLO user rating is 4, based on 1 user reviews.

We also calculate the special Cryptogeek TrustScore based on the characteristics of each wallet.

We choose the winner based on our TrustScore Rating. Please remember, it’s still up to you which company to choose! How do we calculate Trust Score?
Trust Score: 4.18 / 5 Write review
logo-img
Trust Score: 4.23 / 5 Write review
Choose other companies

Lykke Wallet vs OPOLO - Which Wallet Is Better in 2024?

This Lykke Wallet vs OPOLO comparison is based on the most recent data on both companies. We do our best to provide you with unbiased information about cryptocurrency companies.

Based on user reviews only, Lykke Wallet is rated 4 with 1 user reviews, while OPOLO is rated 4 with 1 user reviews.

Let's finally move to overall Trust Score: