Dark Wallet BTC vs Satowallet Exchange Comparison

Compare companies
Company
User rating User rating 4.0 / 5 1 user review User rating 1.0 / 5 1 user review
Cryptogeek rating Cryptogeek rating 0.0 / 5 Cryptogeek rating 0.0 / 5
Trust Score How it works Trust Score 2.58 / 5 Trust Score 1.79 / 5

About

Dark Wallet is a chrome based browser extension.
Based in Dubai, Sato Wallet is an open source Android, IOS and Web cryptocurrency wallet supporting over 60 altcoins. It is centralized and lets you access the blockchain without locally storing it. Furthermore, it gives users the ability to exchange cryptos for local currencies. As security methods, it features 2-factor authentication. In short, Satowallet is an All-in-one App to trade, store, invest, stake, and secure users blockchain assets with the possibility to earn 40% dividend monthly for holding Satowallet Shares (SATOS).

Founding Date

2018 No data

Country

No data No data

Languages

English No data

Wallet type

No data No data

Storage type

No data No data

Private keys

Not available Not available

Available coins

0 0

Security

Personal Third Party Encrypted

Anonymity

High Low

Ease of use

Average Easy

Has attached card

no no

Has trading facilities

No data yes

Has vouchers and offers

No data No data

Features

Multi-Signature, Open Source 2 Factor Authentication, Open Source
About
Dark Wallet is a chrome based browser extension.
Based in Dubai, Sato Wallet is an open source Android, IOS and Web cryptocurrency wallet supporting over 60 altcoins. It is centralized and lets you access the blockchain without locally storing it. Furthermore, it gives users the ability to exchange cryptos for local currencies. As security methods, it features 2-factor authentication. In short, Satowallet is an All-in-one App to trade, store, invest, stake, and secure users blockchain assets with the possibility to earn 40% dividend monthly for holding Satowallet Shares (SATOS).
Founding Date Founding Date 2018 Founding Date No data
Country Country No data Country No data
Languages Languages English Languages No data
Wallet type Wallet type No data Wallet type No data
Storage type Storage type No data Storage type No data
Private keys Private keys Not available Private keys Not available
Available coins Available coins 0 Available coins 0
Security Security Personal Security Third Party Encrypted
Anonymity Anonymity High Anonymity Low
Ease of use Ease of use Average Ease of use Easy
Has attached card Has attached card no Has attached card no
Has trading facilities Has trading facilities No data Has trading facilities yes
Has vouchers and offers Has vouchers and offers No data Has vouchers and offers No data
Features Features Multi-Signature, Open Source Features 2 Factor Authentication, Open Source

Social

Website

www.darkwallet.is satowallet.com

Twitter

No data No data
Website Website www.darkwallet.is Website satowallet.com
Twitter Twitter No data Twitter No data

Advantages

- -

Disadvantages

- -

Rating

User rating User rating 4.0 / 5 1 user review User rating 1.0 / 5 1 user review
Cryptogeek rating Cryptogeek rating 0.0 / 5 Cryptogeek rating 0.0 / 5
Advantages Advantages - Advantages -
Disadvantages Disadvantages - Disadvantages -

Dark Wallet BTC user rating is 4.0, based on 1 user reviews. Satowallet Exchange user rating is 1.0, based on 1 user reviews.

We also calculate the special Cryptogeek TrustScore based on the characteristics of each wallet.

We choose the winner based on our TrustScore Rating. Please remember, it’s still up to you which company to choose! How do we calculate Trust Score?
Choose other companies

Dark Wallet BTC vs Satowallet Exchange - Which Wallet Is Better in 2024?

This Dark Wallet BTC vs Satowallet Exchange comparison is based on the most recent data on both companies. We do our best to provide you with unbiased information about cryptocurrency companies.

Based on user reviews only, Dark Wallet BTC is rated 4.0 with 1 user reviews, while Satowallet Exchange is rated 1.0 with 1 user reviews.

Let's finally move to overall Trust Score: