BitKeep vs Schildbach BTC Wallet Comparison
| Company |
|
|
| User rating |
User rating
3 / 5
1 user review
|
User rating
4.7 / 5
3 user review
|
| Cryptogeek rating |
Cryptogeek rating
4 / 5
|
Cryptogeek rating
3.6 / 5
|
| Trust Score
How it works
|
Trust Score
3.49 / 5
|
Trust Score
4.13 / 5
|
About
|
BitKeep is a decentralized digital asset wallet designed to provide users with a professional one-stop service, support multi-wallet management, exchange asset docking, and cover financial lending, cloud - mining, Dapp, games, blockchain payment, and other functions. The wallet supports now over 1000 cryptocurrencies, including BTC, ETH, EOS, LTC and more. BitKeep has recently launched version 3.0, which supports aggregate trading.
|
Schildbach BTC wallet dates back to 2011 when it was developed by Andreas Schildbach. The wallet works for the Android OS and is by right regarded as the first Bitcoin mobile wallet.
|
Founding Date
Country
Languages
|
English, Japanese, Korean, Chinese, Vietnamese
|
English
|
Wallet type
|
Software wallet
|
Software wallet
|
Storage type
|
Hot wallet
|
Hot / Cold wallet
|
Private keys
Available coins
Security
Anonymity
Ease of use
Has attached card
Has trading facilities
Has vouchers and offers
Features
| About |
BitKeep is a decentralized digital asset wallet designed to provide users with a professional one-stop service, support multi-wallet management, exchange asset docking, and cover financial lending, cloud - mining, Dapp, games, blockchain payment, and other functions. The wallet supports now over 1000 cryptocurrencies, including BTC, ETH, EOS, LTC and more. BitKeep has recently launched version 3.0, which supports aggregate trading.
|
Schildbach BTC wallet dates back to 2011 when it was developed by Andreas Schildbach. The wallet works for the Android OS and is by right regarded as the first Bitcoin mobile wallet.
|
| Founding Date |
Founding Date
2018
|
Founding Date
2011
|
| Country |
Country
China
|
Country
International
|
| Languages |
Languages
English, Japanese, Korean, Chinese, Vietnamese
|
Languages
English
|
| Wallet type |
Wallet type
Software wallet
|
Wallet type
Software wallet
|
| Storage type |
Storage type
Hot wallet
|
Storage type
Hot / Cold wallet
|
| Private keys |
Private keys
Not available
|
Private keys
Available
|
| Available coins |
Available coins
0
|
Available coins
0
|
| Security |
Security
No data
|
Security
Personal
|
| Anonymity |
Anonymity
No data
|
Anonymity
Medium
|
| Ease of use |
Ease of use
No data
|
Ease of use
Average
|
| Has attached card |
Has attached card
No data
|
Has attached card
no
|
| Has trading facilities |
Has trading facilities
No data
|
Has trading facilities
No data
|
| Has vouchers and offers |
Has vouchers and offers
No data
|
Has vouchers and offers
No data
|
| Features |
Features
No data
|
Features
Open Source
|
Social
Website
Twitter
Advantages
|
- Security
- Easy to use
- User-friendly
|
Decentralized
No sign-up is required
|
Disadvantages
|
- No Multisignature
|
Need to sync with the blockchain
|
Rating
| User rating |
User rating
3 / 5
1 user review
|
User rating
4.7 / 5
3 user review
|
| Cryptogeek rating |
Cryptogeek rating
4 / 5
|
Cryptogeek rating
3.6 / 5
|
| Advantages |
Advantages
- Security
- Easy to use
- User-friendly
|
Advantages
Decentralized
No sign-up is required
|
| Disadvantages |
Disadvantages
- No Multisignature
|
Disadvantages
Need to sync with the blockchain
|
BitKeep user rating is 3, based on 1 user reviews. Schildbach BTC Wallet user rating is 4.7, based on 3 user reviews.
We also calculate the special Cryptogeek TrustScore based on the characteristics of each wallet.
Choose other companies
BitKeep vs Schildbach BTC Wallet - Which Wallet Is Better in 2025?
This BitKeep vs Schildbach BTC Wallet comparison is based on the most recent data on both companies. We do our best to provide you with unbiased information about cryptocurrency companies.
Based on user reviews only, BitKeep is rated 3 with 1 user reviews, while Schildbach BTC Wallet is rated 4.7 with 3 user reviews.
Let's finally move to overall Trust Score:
