Agama vs Lisk Wallet Comparison
| Company | ||
|---|---|---|
| User rating | 4 user review | 1 user review |
| Cryptogeek rating | ||
| Trust Score How it works |
About
|
Agama is a Multiwallet provided by the SuperNet project, a company acquired by Komodo (KMD). The wallet is currently in development but offers multiple unique features.
|
Lisk Nano Wallet was discontinued back in November 2018. As an alternative option at the time, the Lisk team offered Lisk Mobile. By now, the team has come up with a full-fledged Lisk wallet that is available across desktop and mobile platforms.
|
Founding Date
| 2016 | No data |
Country
| USA | No data |
Languages
| No data | No data |
Wallet type
| Software wallet | No data |
Storage type
| Hot wallet | No data |
Private keys
| Available | Not available |
Available coins
| 0 | 0 |
Security
| Personal | No data |
Anonymity
| High | No data |
Ease of use
| Average | No data |
Has attached card
| no | No data |
Has trading facilities
| No data | No data |
Has vouchers and offers
| No data | No data |
Features
| Hierarchical Deterministic, Open Source | No data |
| About |
Agama is a Multiwallet provided by the SuperNet project, a company acquired by Komodo (KMD). The wallet is currently in development but offers multiple unique features.
|
Lisk Nano Wallet was discontinued back in November 2018. As an alternative option at the time, the Lisk team offered Lisk Mobile. By now, the team has come up with a full-fledged Lisk wallet that is available across desktop and mobile platforms.
|
|---|---|---|
| Founding Date | Founding Date 2016 | Founding Date No data |
| Country | Country USA | Country No data |
| Languages | Languages No data | Languages No data |
| Wallet type | Wallet type Software wallet | Wallet type No data |
| Storage type | Storage type Hot wallet | Storage type No data |
| Private keys | Private keys Available | Private keys Not available |
| Available coins | Available coins 0 | Available coins 0 |
| Security | Security Personal | Security No data |
| Anonymity | Anonymity High | Anonymity No data |
| Ease of use | Ease of use Average | Ease of use No data |
| Has attached card | Has attached card no | Has attached card No data |
| Has trading facilities | Has trading facilities No data | Has trading facilities No data |
| Has vouchers and offers | Has vouchers and offers No data | Has vouchers and offers No data |
| Features | Features Hierarchical Deterministic, Open Source | Features No data |
Social
Website
| komodoplatform.com | lisk.io |
| @KomodoPlatform | @LiskHQ |
| Website | Website komodoplatform.com | Website lisk.io |
|---|---|---|
| Twitter @KomodoPlatform | Twitter @LiskHQ |
Advantages
| - Hierarchical Deterministic - Open-Source Code - Private Key Ownership | - participate in the PoS - |
Disadvantages
| - Lack of Two-Factor Authentication - No Multisignature | - Only transactions with BTC and LSK |
Rating
| User rating | User rating 4 user review | User rating 1 user review |
|---|---|---|
| Cryptogeek rating | Cryptogeek rating | Cryptogeek rating |
| Advantages | Advantages - Hierarchical Deterministic - Open-Source Code - Private Key Ownership | Advantages - participate in the PoS - |
| Disadvantages | Disadvantages - Lack of Two-Factor Authentication - No Multisignature | Disadvantages - Only transactions with BTC and LSK |
Agama user rating is 2, based on 4 user reviews. Lisk Wallet user rating is 3, based on 1 user reviews.
We also calculate the special Cryptogeek TrustScore based on the characteristics of each wallet.
| We choose the winner based on our TrustScore Rating. Please remember, it’s still up to you which company to choose! How do we calculate Trust Score? |
Agama vs Lisk Wallet - Which Wallet Is Better in 2024?
This Agama vs Lisk Wallet comparison is based on the most recent data on both companies. We do our best to provide you with unbiased information about cryptocurrency companies.
Based on user reviews only, Agama is rated 2 with 4 user reviews, while Lisk Wallet is rated 3 with 1 user reviews.
Let's finally move to overall Trust Score: