Company | ||
---|---|---|
User rating | 1 user review | 1 user review |
Cryptogeek rating | ||
Trust Score How it works |
mSigna Wallet is no longer offered. The wallet was designed by the software company Ciphrex in the time of crypto rush in 2017. The developer’s Twitter media had not published any updates since mid-2017.
|
PAYTOMAT is an infrastructure platform enabling the use of cryptocurrencies in everyday life. A set of Paytomat solutions opens the possibilities of the decentralized world to the wide masses, increasing speed and enabling instant payments in multiple cryptocurrencies. Paytomat partnered with one of the biggest POS provider NCR Colibri and is integrated with R-Keeper. it means that more than 400.000 merchants in 33 countries can accept crypto.
|
2017 | 2017 |
USA | International |
No data | English, Spanish, Italian, Russian, Chinese |
No data | Software wallet |
No data | Hot wallet |
Not available | Not available |
0 | 0 |
No data | Third Party Encrypted |
No data | High |
No data | Easy |
No data | no |
No data | yes |
No data | No data |
No data | Multi-Signature, Hierarchical Deterministic |
About |
mSigna Wallet is no longer offered. The wallet was designed by the software company Ciphrex in the time of crypto rush in 2017. The developer’s Twitter media had not published any updates since mid-2017.
|
PAYTOMAT is an infrastructure platform enabling the use of cryptocurrencies in everyday life. A set of Paytomat solutions opens the possibilities of the decentralized world to the wide masses, increasing speed and enabling instant payments in multiple cryptocurrencies. Paytomat partnered with one of the biggest POS provider NCR Colibri and is integrated with R-Keeper. it means that more than 400.000 merchants in 33 countries can accept crypto.
|
---|---|---|
Founding Date | Founding Date 2017 | Founding Date 2017 |
Country | Country USA | Country International |
Languages | Languages No data | Languages English, Spanish, Italian, Russian, Chinese |
Wallet type | Wallet type No data | Wallet type Software wallet |
Storage type | Storage type No data | Storage type Hot wallet |
Private keys | Private keys Not available | Private keys Not available |
Available coins | Available coins 0 | Available coins 0 |
Security | Security No data | Security Third Party Encrypted |
Anonymity | Anonymity No data | Anonymity High |
Ease of use | Ease of use No data | Ease of use Easy |
Has attached card | Has attached card No data | Has attached card no |
Has trading facilities | Has trading facilities No data | Has trading facilities yes |
Has vouchers and offers | Has vouchers and offers No data | Has vouchers and offers No data |
Features | Features No data | Features Multi-Signature, Hierarchical Deterministic |
github.com | paytomat.com |
@ciphrex | @paytomat |
Website | Website github.com | Website paytomat.com |
---|---|---|
Twitter @ciphrex | Twitter @paytomat |
- | - Multi-Signature - User-friendly |
- No longer available | - Lack of Two-Factor Authentication - No Open Source |
User rating | User rating 1 user review | User rating 1 user review |
---|---|---|
Cryptogeek rating | Cryptogeek rating | Cryptogeek rating |
Advantages | Advantages - | Advantages - Multi-Signature - User-friendly |
Disadvantages | Disadvantages - No longer available | Disadvantages - Lack of Two-Factor Authentication - No Open Source |
mSigna Wallet user rating is 3, based on 1 user reviews. Paytomat user rating is 4, based on 1 user reviews.
We also calculate the special Cryptogeek TrustScore based on the characteristics of each wallet.
We choose the winner based on our TrustScore Rating. Please remember, it’s still up to you which company to choose! How do we calculate Trust Score? |
This mSigna Wallet vs Paytomat comparison is based on the most recent data on both companies. We do our best to provide you with unbiased information about cryptocurrency companies.
Based on user reviews only, mSigna Wallet is rated 3 with 1 user reviews, while Paytomat is rated 4 with 1 user reviews.
Let's finally move to overall Trust Score: