Kimera vs MT Wallet Comparison
| Company | ||
|---|---|---|
| User rating | 1 user review | 1 user review |
| Cryptogeek rating | ||
| Trust Score How it works |
About
|
The Kimera platform provides access to selected cryptocurrencies on a shared policy and multi-signature level.
|
The MT Wallet was developed by the ModulTrade project for the MTRc token. It is a web wallet that supports BTC, ETH, and MTRc, which MT Wallet users can trade (buy/sell). Additionally, the users are allowed to proceed payments to the smart-contract on ModulTrade trading platform (as an interface for MT blockchain).
|
Founding Date
| No data | 2016 |
Country
| No data | Andorra |
Languages
| No data | English, French, Italian, Korean, Russian, Vietnamese, Arabic |
Wallet type
| No data | Software wallet |
Storage type
| No data | Hot wallet |
Private keys
| No data | Not available |
Available coins
| 0 | 0 |
Security
| Third Party Encrypted | Third Party Encrypted |
Anonymity
| Medium | Medium |
Ease of use
| Average | Easy |
Has attached card
| no | no |
Has trading facilities
| yes | yes |
Has vouchers and offers
| No data | No data |
Features
| Multi-Signature, 2 Factor Authentication, Hierarchical Deterministic | Open Source, 2 Factor Authentication |
| About |
The Kimera platform provides access to selected cryptocurrencies on a shared policy and multi-signature level.
|
The MT Wallet was developed by the ModulTrade project for the MTRc token. It is a web wallet that supports BTC, ETH, and MTRc, which MT Wallet users can trade (buy/sell). Additionally, the users are allowed to proceed payments to the smart-contract on ModulTrade trading platform (as an interface for MT blockchain).
|
|---|---|---|
| Founding Date | Founding Date No data | Founding Date 2016 |
| Country | Country No data | Country Andorra |
| Languages | Languages No data | Languages English, French, Italian, Korean, Russian, Vietnamese, Arabic |
| Wallet type | Wallet type No data | Wallet type Software wallet |
| Storage type | Storage type No data | Storage type Hot wallet |
| Private keys | Private keys No data | Private keys Not available |
| Available coins | Available coins 0 | Available coins 0 |
| Security | Security Third Party Encrypted | Security Third Party Encrypted |
| Anonymity | Anonymity Medium | Anonymity Medium |
| Ease of use | Ease of use Average | Ease of use Easy |
| Has attached card | Has attached card no | Has attached card no |
| Has trading facilities | Has trading facilities yes | Has trading facilities yes |
| Has vouchers and offers | Has vouchers and offers No data | Has vouchers and offers No data |
| Features | Features Multi-Signature, 2 Factor Authentication, Hierarchical Deterministic | Features Open Source, 2 Factor Authentication |
Social
Website
| kimera.io | wallet.modultrade.com |
| No data | No data |
| Website | Website kimera.io | Website wallet.modultrade.com |
|---|---|---|
| Twitter No data | Twitter No data |
Advantages
| - | - Open-Source Code - Two-Factor Authentication |
Disadvantages
| - | - No Multi-Signature |
Rating
| User rating | User rating 1 user review | User rating 1 user review |
|---|---|---|
| Cryptogeek rating | Cryptogeek rating | Cryptogeek rating |
| Advantages | Advantages - | Advantages - Open-Source Code - Two-Factor Authentication |
| Disadvantages | Disadvantages - | Disadvantages - No Multi-Signature |
Kimera user rating is 4, based on 1 user reviews. MT Wallet user rating is 3, based on 1 user reviews.
We also calculate the special Cryptogeek TrustScore based on the characteristics of each wallet.
| We choose the winner based on our TrustScore Rating. Please remember, it’s still up to you which company to choose! How do we calculate Trust Score? |
Kimera vs MT Wallet - Which Wallet Is Better in 2024?
This Kimera vs MT Wallet comparison is based on the most recent data on both companies. We do our best to provide you with unbiased information about cryptocurrency companies.
Based on user reviews only, Kimera is rated 4 with 1 user reviews, while MT Wallet is rated 3 with 1 user reviews.
Let's finally move to overall Trust Score: