Bandingkan GateHub vs MetaMask Wallet
Introduction
In the realm of crypto, choosing the right wallet is just as vital as selecting the correct exchange platform. A wallet determines how users interact with digital assets, whether for trading, storing, or using decentralized applications. Two notable options are MetaMask Wallet and GateHub. While GateHub functions as a web platform mainly linked to Ripple (XRP) and fiat gateways, MetaMask is a browser wallet and mobile app widely known for connecting users to decentralized finance (DeFi). The comparison of GateHub vs MetaMask Wallet covers history, functionality, security, user-friendliness, advantages, and disadvantages.
History and Background of GateHub
GateHub appeared in 2014 as a web wallet and gateway for Ripple (XRP). It was among the first platforms to allow users access to both crypto and fiat trading via a single interface. The company is based in the United Kingdom, creating its service to bridge digital assets with traditional finance.
Over time, GateHub expanded to support Bitcoin, Ethereum, and other cryptocurrencies alongside XRP. Its key advantage has been gateway functionality, enabling deposits and withdrawals of fiat currencies such as USD and EUR. This made GateHub appealing to users looking for a bridge between crypto and banks.
History and Background of MetaMask
MetaMask was developed by ConsenSys, a blockchain software company founded by Ethereum co-creator Joseph Lubin in 2016. Unlike GateHub, MetaMask was never intended as a fiat gateway but as a non-custodial Ethereum wallet that connects users to decentralized applications directly through browsers.
Initially a browser extension, MetaMask later launched mobile apps for iOS and Android. Its growth coincided with the DeFi surge and NFT popularity. MetaMask became the main gateway for millions to access decentralized exchanges, lending platforms, and blockchain-based games.
Supported Assets and Blockchains
GateHub started as an XRP wallet but later added support for Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin, and others. Its selection is limited compared to modern multi-chain wallets. Yet, its close integration with the Ripple network remains a distinctive feature.
MetaMask is primarily an Ethereum and EVM-compatible wallet. It supports all ERC-20 tokens, ERC-721 NFTs, and thousands of DeFi assets. Users can also manually add custom chains like Binance Smart Chain, Polygon, and Avalanche. Consequently, MetaMask is widely used in the DeFi ecosystem.
In terms of scope, MetaMask handles a broader range of assets, especially in NFTs and DeFi, while GateHub remains more limited, serving specific cryptocurrencies with additional fiat support.
Features and Functionalities
GateHub provides a hybrid platform combining wallet and exchange-like services. Its core features include:
-
Deposit and withdrawal of fiat currencies via gateways.
-
Trading of supported crypto pairs.
-
Transfers and payments directly from the web interface.
-
Access to the XRP Ledger for managing Ripple assets.
MetaMask offers functionalities targeting DeFi users:
-
Non-custodial wallet with full user control over private keys.
-
Browser extension and mobile apps for easy dApp access.
-
Token swaps inside the app.
-
Integration with multiple networks for different blockchains.
-
NFT storage and management.
GateHub serves as a fiat-crypto bridge, whereas MetaMask acts as a DeFi gateway.
Security and User Control
Security is a major factor in comparing the two.
GateHub is largely custodial, entrusting the platform to hold assets. In 2019, thousands of XRP wallets were hacked. While GateHub reimbursed some users and improved security, centralized custody risks remain. Features include email verification, 2FA, and encrypted storage.
MetaMask is fully non-custodial, giving users control of private keys and seed phrases. Loss of a seed phrase means account loss, highlighting the need for careful management. Its decentralized design reduces systemic risk, though phishing and malicious dApps remain threats.
In short, GateHub is convenient but carries custodial risk; MetaMask offers control but requires user responsibility.
Ease of Use and Accessibility
GateHub’s web interface is user-friendly, allowing easy login, balance checks, and transactions. Its fiat integration makes it ideal for beginners seeking smooth crypto-to-fiat conversions.
MetaMask, focused on blockchain-native tasks, can be intimidating for newcomers. Setting up seed phrases and accessing DeFi apps requires understanding. Over time, its interface, in-app swaps, and mobile wallet have simplified usage.
For crypto investment with bank remittances, GateHub is simpler. For DeFi, NFTs, or blockchain gaming, MetaMask is preferable.
Geographic Reach and Adoption
GateHub’s users are mostly in Europe and among XRP enthusiasts, with fiat transactions limited by regulatory constraints.
MetaMask has a global presence. It does not handle fiat directly, avoiding local restrictions. Its adoption grows with Ethereum, attracting millions worldwide.
Pros and Cons of GateHub
-
Fiat integration with banking systems.
-
Beginner-friendly interface.
-
Established history with Ripple and XRP Ledger.
-
Limited cryptocurrency support.
-
Custodial risks and past security breaches.
-
Smaller adoption compared to top wallets.
Pros and Cons of MetaMask
Pros:
-
Non-custodial wallet with user-controlled keys.
-
Supports thousands of tokens and NFTs.
-
Gateway to DeFi, dApps, and blockchain gaming.
-
Works across browsers and devices.
Cons:
-
No built-in fiat on/off ramps.
-
Security depends on user practices.
-
Can overwhelm beginners.
Commonly Asked Questions (FAQ)
Can GateHub store NFTs?
No, GateHub lacks NFT support. MetaMask supports Ethereum-based NFT management.
Which wallet is safer?
MetaMask is safer from a decentralization perspective, as users control keys. GateHub is convenient but carries custodial risk.
Does GateHub support DeFi?
No, GateHub focuses on trading and fiat. MetaMask is designed for DeFi and dApps.
Which is best for beginners?
GateHub is easier for fiat users, MetaMask suits those exploring DeFi and Web3.
| Company | ||
|---|---|---|
| User rating | 11 user review | 21 user review |
| Cryptogeek rating | ||
| Trust Score How it works |
About
|
GateHub is a relatively old wallet which was founded back in 2014, at the very start of the cryptocurrency rise. Currently, the wallet has 5 coins listed. The founding company, GateHub Limited, is located in London, UK.
|
MetaMask is an open-source multi-cryptocurrency wallet and a gateway to Ethereum-based decentralized applications. As the wallet is made for work with the Ethereum blockchain, it's understood that it supports only Ether and ERC20 tokens. This wallet is designed to let users control their data and assets at the fullest and doesn't store data and assets of its users. MetaMask is a mobile application but those who need a desktop version can use a MetaMask browser extension. It is available for Chrome, Brave, and Firefox browsers.Â
|
Founding Date
| 2014 | 2016 |
Country
| United Kingdom | Switzerland |
Languages
| English | English |
Wallet type
| Software wallet | Software wallet |
Storage type
| Hot wallet | Hot wallet |
Private keys
| Available | Available |
Available coins
| 10 - Bitcoin (BTC), Aeternity (AE), Voyager Token (VGX), Metal (MTL), DigitalNote (XDN), UTRUST (UTK), Ripple (XRP), Binance Coin (BNB), Dash (DASH), Ethereum (ETH) | 181 - Basic Attention Token (BAT), Ethereum Classic (ETC), VeChain (VET), OmiseGO (OMG), Qtum (QTUM), ICON (ICX), Bytom (BTM), Populous (PPT), Wanchain (WAN), DigixDAO (DGD), Waves (WAVES), Zilliqa (ZIL), RChain (RHOC), Aeternity (AE), Status (SNT), 0x (ZRX), Loopring (LRC), Aion (AION), Golem (GNT), IOST (IOST), KuCoin Shares (KCS), Waltonchain (WTC), aelf (ELF), Centrality (CENNZ), Dragonchain (DRGN), Substratum (SUB), QASH (QASH), Veritaseum (VERI), Mithril (MITH), Gas (GAS), Elastos (ELA), Voyager Token (VGX), FunFair (FUN), Nebulas (NAS), Nucleus Vision (NCASH), Revain (REV), WAX (WAX), SALT (SALT), Power Ledger (POWR), Storm (STORM), Mixin (XIN), Enigma (ENG), Storj (STORJ), TenX (PAY), Cindicator (CND), Dentacoin (DCN), Civic (CVC), Iconomi (ICN), SingularityNET (AGI), Matrix AI Network (MAN), POA Network (POA), GameCredits (GAME), Dent (DENT), Quantstamp (QSP), Gnosis (GNO), iExec RLC (RLC), Decentraland (MANA), Polymath (POLY), Cube (CUBEAUTO), Po.et (POE), Genaro Network (GNX), Loom Network (LOOM), NULS (NULS), Dynamic Trading Rights (DTR), Time New Bank (TNB), Aragon (ANT), Enjin Coin (ENJ), High Performance Blockchain (HPB), Raiden Network Token (RDN), Metal (MTL), Santiment Network Token (SAN), Pundi X (NPXS), SIRIN LABS Token (SRN), Dropil (DROP), Bluzelle (BLZ), SmartMesh (SMT), Genesis Vision (GVT), THETA (THETA), Pillar (PLR), Paypex (PAYX), Gifto (GTO), PayPie (PPP), BLOCKv (VEE), AirSwap (AST), DEW (DEW), Bibox Token (BIX), OST (OST), ETHLend (LEND), IoT Chain (ITC), DATA (DTA), Scry.info (DDD), Ruff (RUFF), Ripio Credit Network (RCN), SONM (SNM), Quantum Resistant Ledger (QRL), AdEx (ADX), SophiaTX (SPHTX), SingularDTV (SNGLS), Eidoo (EDO), UTRUST (UTK), Ambrosus (AMB), Edgeless (EDG), EvenCoin (EVN), WePower (WPR), SpankChain (SPANK), CRYPTO20 (C20), Telcoin (TEL), Crypterium (CRPT), Oyster Pearl (PRL), MediShares (MDS), AppCoins (APPC), USD Coin (USDC), Binance Coin (BNB), EOS (EOS), Ethereum (ETH), Tether (USDT), Tron (TRX), LKSCOIN, Polkadot (DOT), Matic Network (MATIC), renBTC (RENBTC), NXM (NXM), Terra (LUNA), Ampleforth (AMPL), xDai (STAKE), Nectar (NEC), sUSD (SUSD), Zap (ZAP), Monolith (TKN), Metronome (MET), YAM v1 (YAM), bitCNY (BITCNY), Hydro Protocol (HOT), Auctus (AUC), Loopring [NEO] (LRN), Compound Dai (CDAI), Compound SAI (CSAI), Compound USD Coin (CUSDC), pTokens BTC (PBTC), Compound Ether (CETH), PieDAO BTC++ (BTC++), Compound Basic Attention Token (CBAT), Compound 0x (CZRX), Compound Wrapped BTC (CWBTC), Compound USDT (CUSDT), Compound Augur (CREP), sBTC (SBTC), XinFin Network (XDC), Crypto.com Coin (CRO), UNUS SED LEO (LEO), Huobi Token (HT), Binance USD (BUSD), Celsius (CEL), Algorand (ALGO), OKB (OKB), TrueUSD (TUSD), HUSD (HUSD), Paxos Standard (PAX), Ocean Protocol (OCEAN), ABBC Coin (ABBC), Energy Web Token (EWT), Quant (QNT), ZB Token (ZB), SwissBorg (CHSB), DxChain Token (DX), The Midas Touch Gold (TMTG), IoTeX (IOTX), RSK Infrastructure Framework (RIF), TomoChain (TOMO), Kleros (PNK), Chiliz (CHZ), Uquid Coin (UQC), Ankr (ANKR), Velas (VLX), IRISnet (IRIS), Hive (HIVE), Energi (NRG), Unibright (UBT), WAX (WAXP), Fantom (FTM), NAGA Coin |
Security
| No data | Personal |
Anonymity
| No data | High |
Ease of use
| No data | Easy |
Has attached card
| No data | no |
Has trading facilities
| No data | No data |
Has vouchers and offers
| No data | No data |
Features
| No data | Hierarchical Deterministic, Open Source |
| About |
GateHub is a relatively old wallet which was founded back in 2014, at the very start of the cryptocurrency rise. Currently, the wallet has 5 coins listed. The founding company, GateHub Limited, is located in London, UK.
|
MetaMask is an open-source multi-cryptocurrency wallet and a gateway to Ethereum-based decentralized applications. As the wallet is made for work with the Ethereum blockchain, it's understood that it supports only Ether and ERC20 tokens. This wallet is designed to let users control their data and assets at the fullest and doesn't store data and assets of its users. MetaMask is a mobile application but those who need a desktop version can use a MetaMask browser extension. It is available for Chrome, Brave, and Firefox browsers.Â
|
|---|---|---|
| Founding Date | Founding Date 2014 | Founding Date 2016 |
| Country | Country United Kingdom | Country Switzerland |
| Languages | Languages English | Languages English |
| Wallet type | Wallet type Software wallet | Wallet type Software wallet |
| Storage type | Storage type Hot wallet | Storage type Hot wallet |
| Private keys | Private keys Available | Private keys Available |
| Available coins | Available coins 10 - Bitcoin (BTC), Aeternity (AE), Voyager Token (VGX), Metal (MTL), DigitalNote (XDN), UTRUST (UTK), Ripple (XRP), Binance Coin (BNB), Dash (DASH), Ethereum (ETH) | Available coins 181 - Basic Attention Token (BAT), Ethereum Classic (ETC), VeChain (VET), OmiseGO (OMG), Qtum (QTUM), ICON (ICX), Bytom (BTM), Populous (PPT), Wanchain (WAN), DigixDAO (DGD), Waves (WAVES), Zilliqa (ZIL), RChain (RHOC), Aeternity (AE), Status (SNT), 0x (ZRX), Loopring (LRC), Aion (AION), Golem (GNT), IOST (IOST), KuCoin Shares (KCS), Waltonchain (WTC), aelf (ELF), Centrality (CENNZ), Dragonchain (DRGN), Substratum (SUB), QASH (QASH), Veritaseum (VERI), Mithril (MITH), Gas (GAS), Elastos (ELA), Voyager Token (VGX), FunFair (FUN), Nebulas (NAS), Nucleus Vision (NCASH), Revain (REV), WAX (WAX), SALT (SALT), Power Ledger (POWR), Storm (STORM), Mixin (XIN), Enigma (ENG), Storj (STORJ), TenX (PAY), Cindicator (CND), Dentacoin (DCN), Civic (CVC), Iconomi (ICN), SingularityNET (AGI), Matrix AI Network (MAN), POA Network (POA), GameCredits (GAME), Dent (DENT), Quantstamp (QSP), Gnosis (GNO), iExec RLC (RLC), Decentraland (MANA), Polymath (POLY), Cube (CUBEAUTO), Po.et (POE), Genaro Network (GNX), Loom Network (LOOM), NULS (NULS), Dynamic Trading Rights (DTR), Time New Bank (TNB), Aragon (ANT), Enjin Coin (ENJ), High Performance Blockchain (HPB), Raiden Network Token (RDN), Metal (MTL), Santiment Network Token (SAN), Pundi X (NPXS), SIRIN LABS Token (SRN), Dropil (DROP), Bluzelle (BLZ), SmartMesh (SMT), Genesis Vision (GVT), THETA (THETA), Pillar (PLR), Paypex (PAYX), Gifto (GTO), PayPie (PPP), BLOCKv (VEE), AirSwap (AST), DEW (DEW), Bibox Token (BIX), OST (OST), ETHLend (LEND), IoT Chain (ITC), DATA (DTA), Scry.info (DDD), Ruff (RUFF), Ripio Credit Network (RCN), SONM (SNM), Quantum Resistant Ledger (QRL), AdEx (ADX), SophiaTX (SPHTX), SingularDTV (SNGLS), Eidoo (EDO), UTRUST (UTK), Ambrosus (AMB), Edgeless (EDG), EvenCoin (EVN), WePower (WPR), SpankChain (SPANK), CRYPTO20 (C20), Telcoin (TEL), Crypterium (CRPT), Oyster Pearl (PRL), MediShares (MDS), AppCoins (APPC), USD Coin (USDC), Binance Coin (BNB), EOS (EOS), Ethereum (ETH), Tether (USDT), Tron (TRX), LKSCOIN, Polkadot (DOT), Matic Network (MATIC), renBTC (RENBTC), NXM (NXM), Terra (LUNA), Ampleforth (AMPL), xDai (STAKE), Nectar (NEC), sUSD (SUSD), Zap (ZAP), Monolith (TKN), Metronome (MET), YAM v1 (YAM), bitCNY (BITCNY), Hydro Protocol (HOT), Auctus (AUC), Loopring [NEO] (LRN), Compound Dai (CDAI), Compound SAI (CSAI), Compound USD Coin (CUSDC), pTokens BTC (PBTC), Compound Ether (CETH), PieDAO BTC++ (BTC++), Compound Basic Attention Token (CBAT), Compound 0x (CZRX), Compound Wrapped BTC (CWBTC), Compound USDT (CUSDT), Compound Augur (CREP), sBTC (SBTC), XinFin Network (XDC), Crypto.com Coin (CRO), UNUS SED LEO (LEO), Huobi Token (HT), Binance USD (BUSD), Celsius (CEL), Algorand (ALGO), OKB (OKB), TrueUSD (TUSD), HUSD (HUSD), Paxos Standard (PAX), Ocean Protocol (OCEAN), ABBC Coin (ABBC), Energy Web Token (EWT), Quant (QNT), ZB Token (ZB), SwissBorg (CHSB), DxChain Token (DX), The Midas Touch Gold (TMTG), IoTeX (IOTX), RSK Infrastructure Framework (RIF), TomoChain (TOMO), Kleros (PNK), Chiliz (CHZ), Uquid Coin (UQC), Ankr (ANKR), Velas (VLX), IRISnet (IRIS), Hive (HIVE), Energi (NRG), Unibright (UBT), WAX (WAXP), Fantom (FTM), NAGA Coin |
| Security | Security No data | Security Personal |
| Anonymity | Anonymity No data | Anonymity High |
| Ease of use | Ease of use No data | Ease of use Easy |
| Has attached card | Has attached card No data | Has attached card no |
| Has trading facilities | Has trading facilities No data | Has trading facilities No data |
| Has vouchers and offers | Has vouchers and offers No data | Has vouchers and offers No data |
| Features | Features No data | Features Hierarchical Deterministic, Open Source |
Social
Website
| gatehub.net | metamask.io |
| GateHub | @metamask_io |
| Website | Website gatehub.net | Website metamask.io |
|---|---|---|
| Twitter GateHub | Twitter @metamask_io |
Advantages
| - Exchange functionality - Intuitive interface - Fiat money deposits | - Ease of use - Flexible fees - Good functionality - Wide range of supported tokens |
Disadvantages
| - Security issues in the past - Lack of public reaction to the user complaints - Only a few cryptocurrencies supported | - Not fully private |
Rating
| User rating | User rating 11 user review | User rating 21 user review |
|---|---|---|
| Cryptogeek rating | Cryptogeek rating | Cryptogeek rating |
| Advantages | Advantages - Exchange functionality - Intuitive interface - Fiat money deposits | Advantages - Ease of use - Flexible fees - Good functionality - Wide range of supported tokens |
| Disadvantages | Disadvantages - Security issues in the past - Lack of public reaction to the user complaints - Only a few cryptocurrencies supported | Disadvantages - Not fully private |
GateHub user rating is 3.2, based on 11 user reviews. MetaMask user rating is 2.5, based on 21 user reviews.
We also calculate the special Cryptogeek TrustScore based on the characteristics of each wallet.
| We choose the winner based on our TrustScore Rating. Please remember, it’s still up to you which company to choose! How do we calculate Trust Score? |
Conclusion
GateHub vs MetaMask Wallet comparison highlights two distinct strategies in digital asset management. GateHub connects fiat and crypto, ideal for transfers between banks and cryptocurrencies. MetaMask is decentralized, opening access to DeFi, NFTs, and Web3 applications. Beginners seeking fiat ease benefit from GateHub, while users prioritizing autonomy, multi-chain access, and DeFi engagement will find MetaMask more powerful. The choice ultimately depends on individual priorities: convenience or full control.
Introduction
In the realm of crypto, choosing the right wallet is just as vital as selecting the correct exchange platform. A wallet determines how users interact with digital assets, whether for trading, storing, or using decentralized applications. Two notable options are MetaMask Wallet and GateHub. While GateHub functions as a web platform mainly linked to Ripple (XRP) and fiat gateways, MetaMask is a browser wallet and mobile app widely known for connecting users to decentralized finance (DeFi). The comparison of GateHub vs MetaMask Wallet covers history, functionality, security, user-friendliness, advantages, and disadvantages.
History and Background of GateHub
GateHub appeared in 2014 as a web wallet and gateway for Ripple (XRP). It was among the first platforms to allow users access to both crypto and fiat trading via a single interface. The company is based in the United Kingdom, creating its service to bridge digital assets with traditional finance.
Over time, GateHub expanded to support Bitcoin, Ethereum, and other cryptocurrencies alongside XRP. Its key advantage has been gateway functionality, enabling deposits and withdrawals of fiat currencies such as USD and EUR. This made GateHub appealing to users looking for a bridge between crypto and banks.
History and Background of MetaMask
MetaMask was developed by ConsenSys, a blockchain software company founded by Ethereum co-creator Joseph Lubin in 2016. Unlike GateHub, MetaMask was never intended as a fiat gateway but as a non-custodial Ethereum wallet that connects users to decentralized applications directly through browsers.
Initially a browser extension, MetaMask later launched mobile apps for iOS and Android. Its growth coincided with the DeFi surge and NFT popularity. MetaMask became the main gateway for millions to access decentralized exchanges, lending platforms, and blockchain-based games.
Supported Assets and Blockchains
GateHub started as an XRP wallet but later added support for Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin, and others. Its selection is limited compared to modern multi-chain wallets. Yet, its close integration with the Ripple network remains a distinctive feature.
MetaMask is primarily an Ethereum and EVM-compatible wallet. It supports all ERC-20 tokens, ERC-721 NFTs, and thousands of DeFi assets. Users can also manually add custom chains like Binance Smart Chain, Polygon, and Avalanche. Consequently, MetaMask is widely used in the DeFi ecosystem.
In terms of scope, MetaMask handles a broader range of assets, especially in NFTs and DeFi, while GateHub remains more limited, serving specific cryptocurrencies with additional fiat support.
Features and Functionalities
GateHub provides a hybrid platform combining wallet and exchange-like services. Its core features include:
-
Deposit and withdrawal of fiat currencies via gateways.
-
Trading of supported crypto pairs.
-
Transfers and payments directly from the web interface.
-
Access to the XRP Ledger for managing Ripple assets.
MetaMask offers functionalities targeting DeFi users:
-
Non-custodial wallet with full user control over private keys.
-
Browser extension and mobile apps for easy dApp access.
-
Token swaps inside the app.
-
Integration with multiple networks for different blockchains.
-
NFT storage and management.
GateHub serves as a fiat-crypto bridge, whereas MetaMask acts as a DeFi gateway.
Security and User Control
Security is a major factor in comparing the two.
GateHub is largely custodial, entrusting the platform to hold assets. In 2019, thousands of XRP wallets were hacked. While GateHub reimbursed some users and improved security, centralized custody risks remain. Features include email verification, 2FA, and encrypted storage.
MetaMask is fully non-custodial, giving users control of private keys and seed phrases. Loss of a seed phrase means account loss, highlighting the need for careful management. Its decentralized design reduces systemic risk, though phishing and malicious dApps remain threats.
In short, GateHub is convenient but carries custodial risk; MetaMask offers control but requires user responsibility.
Ease of Use and Accessibility
GateHub’s web interface is user-friendly, allowing easy login, balance checks, and transactions. Its fiat integration makes it ideal for beginners seeking smooth crypto-to-fiat conversions.
MetaMask, focused on blockchain-native tasks, can be intimidating for newcomers. Setting up seed phrases and accessing DeFi apps requires understanding. Over time, its interface, in-app swaps, and mobile wallet have simplified usage.
For crypto investment with bank remittances, GateHub is simpler. For DeFi, NFTs, or blockchain gaming, MetaMask is preferable.
Geographic Reach and Adoption
GateHub’s users are mostly in Europe and among XRP enthusiasts, with fiat transactions limited by regulatory constraints.
MetaMask has a global presence. It does not handle fiat directly, avoiding local restrictions. Its adoption grows with Ethereum, attracting millions worldwide.
Pros and Cons of GateHub
-
Fiat integration with banking systems.
-
Beginner-friendly interface.
-
Established history with Ripple and XRP Ledger.
-
Limited cryptocurrency support.
-
Custodial risks and past security breaches.
-
Smaller adoption compared to top wallets.
Pros and Cons of MetaMask
Pros:
-
Non-custodial wallet with user-controlled keys.
-
Supports thousands of tokens and NFTs.
-
Gateway to DeFi, dApps, and blockchain gaming.
-
Works across browsers and devices.
Cons:
-
No built-in fiat on/off ramps.
-
Security depends on user practices.
-
Can overwhelm beginners.
Commonly Asked Questions (FAQ)
Can GateHub store NFTs?
No, GateHub lacks NFT support. MetaMask supports Ethereum-based NFT management.
Which wallet is safer?
MetaMask is safer from a decentralization perspective, as users control keys. GateHub is convenient but carries custodial risk.
Does GateHub support DeFi?
No, GateHub focuses on trading and fiat. MetaMask is designed for DeFi and dApps.
Which is best for beginners?
GateHub is easier for fiat users, MetaMask suits those exploring DeFi and Web3.