Crypto.com Wallet vs FLX Wallet Comparison
| Company |
|
|
| User rating |
User rating
5 / 5
1 user review
|
User rating
5 / 5
1 user review
|
| Cryptogeek rating |
Cryptogeek rating
4.4 / 5
|
Cryptogeek rating
3.8 / 5
|
| Trust Score
How it works
|
Trust Score
3.78 / 5
|
Trust Score
4.47 / 5
|
About
|
Crypto.com, the pioneering payments and cryptocurrency platform, seeks to accelerate the world’s transition to cryptocurrency. Crypto.com is headquartered in Hong Kong.
|
FLX wallet is an offline device used to store crypto funds securely. FLX wallet supports major cryptocurrencies.
|
Founding Date
Country
Languages
|
English, Chinese
|
English, Simplified Chinese
|
Wallet type
|
Software wallet
|
Hardware wallet
|
Storage type
Private keys
Available coins
|
0
|
18
- Bitcoin (BTC), Basic Attention Token (BAT), OmiseGO (OMG), Populous (PPT), Zilliqa (ZIL), 0x (ZRX), Aion (AION), IOST (IOST), KuCoin Shares (KCS), Waltonchain (WTC), Revain (REV), Power Ledger (POWR), NULS (NULS), Binance Coin (BNB), Bitcoin Cash (BCH), Ethereum (ETH), Litecoin (LTC), WAX (WAXP)
|
Security
|
Third Party Encrypted
|
No data
|
Anonymity
Ease of use
Has attached card
Has trading facilities
Has vouchers and offers
Features
|
Hierarchical Deterministic, 2 Factor Authentication
|
No data
|
| About |
Crypto.com, the pioneering payments and cryptocurrency platform, seeks to accelerate the world’s transition to cryptocurrency. Crypto.com is headquartered in Hong Kong.
|
FLX wallet is an offline device used to store crypto funds securely. FLX wallet supports major cryptocurrencies.
|
| Founding Date |
Founding Date
2017
|
Founding Date
2016
|
| Country |
Country
Hong Kong
|
Country
International
|
| Languages |
Languages
English, Chinese
|
Languages
English, Simplified Chinese
|
| Wallet type |
Wallet type
Software wallet
|
Wallet type
Hardware wallet
|
| Storage type |
Storage type
Hot wallet
|
Storage type
Cold wallet
|
| Private keys |
Private keys
Not available
|
Private keys
Available
|
| Available coins |
Available coins
0
|
Available coins
18
- Bitcoin (BTC), Basic Attention Token (BAT), OmiseGO (OMG), Populous (PPT), Zilliqa (ZIL), 0x (ZRX), Aion (AION), IOST (IOST), KuCoin Shares (KCS), Waltonchain (WTC), Revain (REV), Power Ledger (POWR), NULS (NULS), Binance Coin (BNB), Bitcoin Cash (BCH), Ethereum (ETH), Litecoin (LTC), WAX (WAXP)
|
| Security |
Security
Third Party Encrypted
|
Security
No data
|
| Anonymity |
Anonymity
Medium
|
Anonymity
No data
|
| Ease of use |
Ease of use
Average
|
Ease of use
No data
|
| Has attached card |
Has attached card
no
|
Has attached card
No data
|
| Has trading facilities |
Has trading facilities
No data
|
Has trading facilities
No data
|
| Has vouchers and offers |
Has vouchers and offers
No data
|
Has vouchers and offers
No data
|
| Features |
Features
Hierarchical Deterministic, 2 Factor Authentication
|
Features
No data
|
Social
Website
Twitter
Advantages
|
- Easy to use
- User-friendly
- Security
|
- Security
|
Disadvantages
|
- No Multisignature
- No Open Source
|
- More coins could be supported
|
Rating
| User rating |
User rating
5 / 5
1 user review
|
User rating
5 / 5
1 user review
|
| Cryptogeek rating |
Cryptogeek rating
4.4 / 5
|
Cryptogeek rating
3.8 / 5
|
| Advantages |
Advantages
- Easy to use
- User-friendly
- Security
|
Advantages
- Security
|
| Disadvantages |
Disadvantages
- No Multisignature
- No Open Source
|
Disadvantages
- More coins could be supported
|
Crypto.com Wallet user rating is 5, based on 1 user reviews. FLX Wallet user rating is 5, based on 1 user reviews.
We also calculate the special Cryptogeek TrustScore based on the characteristics of each wallet.
Choose other companies
Crypto.com Wallet vs FLX Wallet - Which Wallet Is Better in 2025?
This Crypto.com Wallet vs FLX Wallet comparison is based on the most recent data on both companies. We do our best to provide you with unbiased information about cryptocurrency companies.
Based on user reviews only, Crypto.com Wallet is rated 5 with 1 user reviews, while FLX Wallet is rated 5 with 1 user reviews.
Let's finally move to overall Trust Score:
