Bither Wallet vs Parity Signer Wallet Comparison

Compare companies
Company
User rating User rating 4 / 5 1 user review User rating 5 / 5 1 user review
Cryptogeek rating Cryptogeek rating 4.8 / 5 Cryptogeek rating 4 / 5
Trust Score How it works Trust Score 3.77 / 5 Trust Score 4.25 / 5

About

Bither is a Bitcoin wallet that can be downloaded for Android, iOS and desktop platforms. With a decentralized Bither wallet, you won’t need to sign up or log in. 
Parity Signer is a cold storage mobile application, allowing smartphones to be used as off-line wallets. To sign a transaction, a user should disconnect their smartphone off all the networks. 

Founding Date

2018 2015

Country

China International

Languages

English, Traditional Chinese, Simplified Chinese English

Wallet type

Software wallet Software wallet

Storage type

Hot / Cold wallet Cold wallet

Private keys

Not available Available

Available coins

0 0

Security

Personal No data

Anonymity

Medium No data

Ease of use

Easy No data

Has attached card

no No data

Has trading facilities

No data No data

Has vouchers and offers

No data No data

Features

Open Source, Multi-Signature No data
About
Bither is a Bitcoin wallet that can be downloaded for Android, iOS and desktop platforms. With a decentralized Bither wallet, you won’t need to sign up or log in. 
Parity Signer is a cold storage mobile application, allowing smartphones to be used as off-line wallets. To sign a transaction, a user should disconnect their smartphone off all the networks. 
Founding Date Founding Date 2018 Founding Date 2015
Country Country China Country International
Languages Languages English, Traditional Chinese, Simplified Chinese Languages English
Wallet type Wallet type Software wallet Wallet type Software wallet
Storage type Storage type Hot / Cold wallet Storage type Cold wallet
Private keys Private keys Not available Private keys Available
Available coins Available coins 0 Available coins 0
Security Security Personal Security No data
Anonymity Anonymity Medium Anonymity No data
Ease of use Ease of use Easy Ease of use No data
Has attached card Has attached card no Has attached card No data
Has trading facilities Has trading facilities No data Has trading facilities No data
Has vouchers and offers Has vouchers and offers No data Has vouchers and offers No data
Features Features Open Source, Multi-Signature Features No data

Social

Website

bither.net www.parity.io

Twitter

@bithernet @ParityTech
Website Website bither.net Website www.parity.io
Twitter Twitter @bithernet Twitter @ParityTech

Advantages

- A decentralized wallet - Can be used as a cold storage offline wallet - Signed payments - Private keys are controlled by the user

Disadvantages

- Not famous - A limited number of supported networks

Rating

User rating User rating 4 / 5 1 user review User rating 5 / 5 1 user review
Cryptogeek rating Cryptogeek rating 4.8 / 5 Cryptogeek rating 4 / 5
Advantages Advantages - A decentralized wallet Advantages - Can be used as a cold storage offline wallet - Signed payments - Private keys are controlled by the user
Disadvantages Disadvantages - Not famous Disadvantages - A limited number of supported networks

Bither Wallet user rating is 4, based on 1 user reviews. Parity Signer Wallet user rating is 5, based on 1 user reviews.

We also calculate the special Cryptogeek TrustScore based on the characteristics of each wallet.

We choose the winner based on our TrustScore Rating. Please remember, it’s still up to you which company to choose! How do we calculate Trust Score?
Trust Score: 4.25 / 5
Compare with:
Write review
Choose other companies

Bither Wallet vs Parity Signer Wallet - Which Wallet Is Better in 2025?

This Bither Wallet vs Parity Signer Wallet comparison is based on the most recent data on both companies. We do our best to provide you with unbiased information about cryptocurrency companies.

Based on user reviews only, Bither Wallet is rated 4 with 1 user reviews, while Parity Signer Wallet is rated 5 with 1 user reviews.

Let's finally move to overall Trust Score: