Agama vs Hoo Wallet Comparison

Compare companies
Company
User rating User rating 2 / 5 4 user review User rating 4 / 5 1 user review
Cryptogeek rating Cryptogeek rating 3 / 5 Cryptogeek rating 4 / 5
Trust Score How it works Trust Score 3.73 / 5 Trust Score 4.26 / 5

About

Agama is a Multiwallet provided by the SuperNet project, a company acquired by Komodo (KMD). The wallet is currently in development but offers multiple unique features.
Headquartered in Hong Kong, the Hoo Wallet is a multi-cryptocurrency hardware wallet. It provides users with blockchain assets management services.

Founding Date

2016 2018

Country

USA Hong Kong

Languages

No data English, Japanese, Korean, Traditional Chinese, Simplified Chinese

Wallet type

Software wallet Hardware wallet

Storage type

Hot wallet Cold wallet

Private keys

Available Available

Available coins

0 0

Security

Personal Personal

Anonymity

High Medium

Ease of use

Average Easy

Has attached card

no no

Has trading facilities

No data No data

Has vouchers and offers

No data No data

Features

Hierarchical Deterministic, Open Source Hierarchical Deterministic, Multi-Signature
About
Agama is a Multiwallet provided by the SuperNet project, a company acquired by Komodo (KMD). The wallet is currently in development but offers multiple unique features.
Headquartered in Hong Kong, the Hoo Wallet is a multi-cryptocurrency hardware wallet. It provides users with blockchain assets management services.
Founding Date Founding Date 2016 Founding Date 2018
Country Country USA Country Hong Kong
Languages Languages No data Languages English, Japanese, Korean, Traditional Chinese, Simplified Chinese
Wallet type Wallet type Software wallet Wallet type Hardware wallet
Storage type Storage type Hot wallet Storage type Cold wallet
Private keys Private keys Available Private keys Available
Available coins Available coins 0 Available coins 0
Security Security Personal Security Personal
Anonymity Anonymity High Anonymity Medium
Ease of use Ease of use Average Ease of use Easy
Has attached card Has attached card no Has attached card no
Has trading facilities Has trading facilities No data Has trading facilities No data
Has vouchers and offers Has vouchers and offers No data Has vouchers and offers No data
Features Features Hierarchical Deterministic, Open Source Features Hierarchical Deterministic, Multi-Signature

Social

Website

komodoplatform.com hoo.com

Twitter

@KomodoPlatform @Hoo_exchange
Website Website komodoplatform.com Website hoo.com
Twitter Twitter @KomodoPlatform Twitter @Hoo_exchange

Advantages

- Hierarchical Deterministic - Open-Source Code - Private Key Ownership - Security - Easy to use

Disadvantages

- Lack of Two-Factor Authentication - No Multisignature - Lack of Two-Factor Authentication - No Open Source

Rating

User rating User rating 2 / 5 4 user review User rating 4 / 5 1 user review
Cryptogeek rating Cryptogeek rating 3 / 5 Cryptogeek rating 4 / 5
Advantages Advantages - Hierarchical Deterministic - Open-Source Code - Private Key Ownership Advantages - Security - Easy to use
Disadvantages Disadvantages - Lack of Two-Factor Authentication - No Multisignature Disadvantages - Lack of Two-Factor Authentication - No Open Source

Agama user rating is 2, based on 4 user reviews. Hoo Wallet user rating is 4, based on 1 user reviews.

We also calculate the special Cryptogeek TrustScore based on the characteristics of each wallet.

We choose the winner based on our TrustScore Rating. Please remember, it’s still up to you which company to choose! How do we calculate Trust Score?
Trust Score: 3.73 / 5
Compare with:
Write review
logo-img
Trust Score: 4.26 / 5 Write review
Choose other companies

Agama vs Hoo Wallet - Which Wallet Is Better in 2025?

This Agama vs Hoo Wallet comparison is based on the most recent data on both companies. We do our best to provide you with unbiased information about cryptocurrency companies.

Based on user reviews only, Agama is rated 2 with 4 user reviews, while Hoo Wallet is rated 4 with 1 user reviews.

Let's finally move to overall Trust Score: