Crypto researcher SMQKE has highlighted a notable development involving Microsoft’s engagement with blockchain technology, citing documented evidence of the company’s interest in Ripple’s Interledger Protocol (ILP). In a tweet, SMQKE wrote: “ MICROSOFT IS INTERESTED IN USING RIPPLE’S INTERLEDGER PROTOCOL Documented. ” The statement is backed by an excerpt from a publication that confirms Microsoft expressed interest in adding new functionalities to its blockchain toolkit through Ripple’s Interledger Protocol . The excerpt also elaborates on Microsoft’s broader blockchain initiatives and its collaborations with other blockchain platforms. MICROSOFT IS INTERESTED IN USING RIPPLE’S INTERLEDGER PROTOCOL Documented. pic.twitter.com/YvSmeppjNe — SMQKE (@SMQKEDQG) July 16, 2025 Microsoft’s Broader Blockchain Strategy The attached document shows that Microsoft has been integrating blockchain technologies into its cloud platform Azure, with a focus on providing enterprise solutions. According to the document, Microsoft partnered with ConsenSys to develop applications using Ethereum’s blockchain, enabling companies to execute smart contracts, track transactions, and update contracts efficiently. The company reportedly claimed that its blockchain-based services would not be dependent on Bitcoin and that Ethereum-based systems could offer transaction speeds up to 40 times faster than Bitcoin-based blockchains. Ripple’s Role Through Interledger Protocol The document quoted by SMQKE explicitly states that Microsoft “recently expressed interest in adding new functionalities to its blockchain toolkit through Ripple’s Interledger Protocol.” This indicates Microsoft’s recognition of ILP’s capabilities to facilitate interoperability across different payment ledgers. The Interledger Protocol, created by Ripple, is described as a free, open-source, and neutral web protocol that enables different ledgers to interact seamlessly. The document also refers to Ripple as one of the top-funded FinTech startups, underlining its prominence in the development of cross-border payment solutions . We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1 — TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025 Implications of Microsoft’s Interest SMQKE’s tweet and the accompanying excerpt underscore the significance of a technology giant like Microsoft considering Ripple’s Interledger Protocol for expanding its blockchain services. The documentation cited shows that Microsoft viewed ILP as a valuable component to enhance its toolkit, which already included Ethereum-based solutions and integrations on Azure. Given Ripple’s focus on interoperability and efficient cross-ledger transfers , Microsoft’s documented interest suggests a potential acknowledgment of ILP’s suitability for enterprise-grade blockchain infrastructure. SMQKE’s post drew attention to a verifiable instance where Microsoft’s blockchain strategy intersects with Ripple’s innovations, specifically the Interledger Protocol. The excerpt he shared provides written evidence that Microsoft was exploring the integration of ILP to improve its blockchain offerings. This disclosure aligns with Microsoft’s ongoing efforts to support diverse blockchain technologies and create adaptable solutions for its enterprise customers. Disclaimer : This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses. Follow us on X , Facebook , Telegram , and Google News The post Microsoft Is Interested In Ripple appeared first on Times Tabloid .
Ethereum’s price action could dictate the next major rally for DeFi tokens.
An analyst has pointed out that the XRP Market Value to Realized Value (MVRV) Ratio has just formed a crossover that proved to be highly bullish the last time it appeared. XRP MVRV Ratio Has Broken Above Its 200-Day MA In a new post on X, analyst Ali Martinez has talked about a crossover that has recently occurred in the MVRV Ratio of XRP. The “MVRV Ratio” is a popular on-chain indicator that keeps track of the ratio between the asset’s Market Cap and Realized Cap. The Realized Cap here refers to a capitalization model that calculates the cryptocurrency’s total value by assuming that the value of each coin in circulation is equal to the price at which it was last transacted on the blockchain. This is unlike the Market Cap, which simply takes the current spot price as the same one value for all coins. Related Reading: Bitcoin Sees Influx Of New Capital: First-Time Buyers Add 140,000 BTC The last transfer of any token is likely to represent the last time it changed hands, so the price at its time can be denoted as its current cost basis. As such, the Realized Cap represents the sum of the cost basis of the entire circulating supply. One way to interpret the model is as a measure of the amount of capital that the investors as a whole have stored in the cryptocurrency. The Market Cap, on the other hand, signifies the value that the holders are carrying in the present. When the value of the MVRV Ratio is more than 1, it means the Market Cap is greater than the Realized Cap. In other words, the investors are holding more than they put in. On the other hand, the metric being under this threshold suggests the overall network is underwater. Now, here is the chart shared by Martinez that shows the trend in the XRP MVRV Ratio, as well as its 200-day moving average (MA), over the past year: As displayed in the above graph, the XRP MVRV Ratio has seen a sharp surge recently as the asset’s breakout has occurred. With this uptrend, the indicator has managed to break past its 200-day MA. In the chart, the analyst has highlighted the last time that the cryptocurrency’s MVRV Ratio and its 200-day MA showed this type of crossover. What followed back then was a significant bull run in which the coin managed to rise by around 630%. Related Reading: XRP Close Above This Level Could Send Price To $4.80, Analyst Says Given this precedence, it now remains to be seen whether the latest crossover will also prove to be a golden one for XRP. XRP Price At the time of writing, XRP is floating around $3.32, up 33% in the last seven days. Featured image from Dall-E, Santiment.net, chart from TradingView.com
Thai financial authorities are seeking the public’s feedback on a crypto sandbox pilot program for tourists aimed at enhancing the country’s appeal as a tech-savvy destination by providing more convenient and flexible payment options. SEC, BOT Launch Sandbox Program For Tourists This week, Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Bank of Thailand (BOT) introduced a crypto sandbox pilot to facilitate the conversion of digital assets into Thai Baht for the spending purposes of foreign tourists. The regulatory agency also released a consultation paper, asking for feedback on the program. According to the announcement, the initiative aims to promote innovation and the use of digital assets to boost the economy and tourism industry by providing more options and convenience for tourists holding cryptocurrencies. The sandbox will allow individuals to exchange their crypto assets through licensed operators and use the converted Thai Baht to buy goods and services via e-money service providers. “This initiative builds upon the existing ecosystem covering both the digital asset trading system and electronic money (e-money) system, while maintaining appropriate and adequate risk protection measures,” the SEC explained. Under the pilot program, interested foreign tourists would be required to open an account and transact through sandbox participants, the digital asset operators under the SEC’s supervision, and e-money business operators under the BOT’s supervision. The sandbox includes “appropriate control, supervision, and risk preventive measures through relevant regulatory agencies, without allowing digital assets to be used directly as a means of payment for goods and services at merchants.” Eligible participants, such as digital asset exchanges, digital asset brokers, and digital asset dealers, are required to apply to the program and operate under the sandbox framework. After approval, they will be able to provide services to foreign tourists and temporary residents in Thailand for up to 18 months. They must also conduct Know Your Customer/Customer Due Diligence (KYC/CDD) procedures under the Anti-Money Laundering Office’s (AMLO) criteria and provide digital asset exchange services according to the type of license granted by the SEC. Additionally, they must establish connectivity with regulated e-money operators to enable foreign tourists to use the converted Thai baht for purchases through electronic channels, including QR code scanning. Sandbox participants must also comply with relevant criteria, including collecting and evaluating user data, using blockchain forensics tools to identify illicit transactions, reporting information to the SEC, and preparing exit plans from the sandbox. Thailand’s Crypto Hub Dream On Thursday, the chief executive officer (CEO) of Binance Thailand, Nirun Fuwattananukul, told local news outlet The Bangkok Post that “This crypto sandbox builds directly upon former premier Thaksin Shinawatra’s Phuket sandbox proposal from late last year.” He explained that the two proposals shared the “core concept of allowing Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies as payment methods in tourist areas to drive adoption.” However, the new sandbox proposal is not limited to Phuket, but a nationwide program. Fuwattananukul considers that the two initiatives differ in their implementation, with the original proposal being conceptually and regionally focused. Meanwhile, “this initiative has formal backing from Thailand’s primary financial regulators. This represents an evolution from an experimental concept to a structured regulatory framework with proper oversight.” The CEO highlighted Thailand’s “consistent vision” and “commitment to leading cryptocurrency adoption in the region while ensuring consumer protection and compliance standards.” A month ago, Thailand’s Deputy Finance Minister Julapun Amornvivat unveiled a plan to drop the capital gains tax on cryptocurrencies for five years. As reported by Bitcoinist, the Finance ministers announced that, starting January 1, 2025, until December 31, 2029, crypto investors who sell their assets won’t have to pay taxes on the profits. Additionally, the SEC proposed rule changes in June to provide crypto exchanges with flexibility while enhancing investor protection and oversight, including allowing digital asset platforms to list their utility tokens or tokens issued by affiliated entities.
As the world of digital assets continues to evolve, two major players in decentralized storage are drawing attention: Filecoin and Arweave . Both offer unique solutions to data management, but which one holds the most potential for substantial gains in the upcoming altcoin season? This article delves deep into their features and future prospects. Filecoin Price Dynamics: Short-term Gains Amid Long-term Weakness Filecoin recorded a 3.19% price increase over the last month, with a notable 10.10% surge in the past week. The coin’s performance over six months shows a substantial 55.75% decline, highlighting a stark long-term drop despite recent positive pulses. Short-term gains have emerged after a deep sell-off, pointing to a market testing recovery after significant losses. Momentum indicators reflect a minor positive shift, though the long-term trend remains under pressure. Filecoin currently trades between $1.93 and $2.73, with clear technical boundaries shaping its landscape. The nearest support is at $1.55, while resistance is first encountered at $3.15. Bulls show signs of interest as short-term momentum lifts prices, yet bearish pressure from the prolonged downtrend leaves room for caution. The absence of a strong directional trend suggests sideways trading with potential for short-term moves. Trading ideas include buying near the support zone while targeting advances toward the first resistance. A fallback below $1.55 could strengthen bearish sentiment. Arweave Price Action: Recent Gains Amid Long-Term Bear Pressures AR recent performance shows a 35.90% gain in one week and a 13.51% increase over one month, while a six-month decline of 59.18% highlights persistent bearish trends. Price movements have been notably volatile, with recent upward momentum occurring despite overall negative sentiment. Investors face a mixed outlook as short-term benefits do little to offset extended losses, complicating decision-making. Current market conditions for Arweave reveal prices fluctuating between $3.95 and $6.94, nearing critical technical levels. A key support level is found at $2.72, which could attract buyers if downward pressure arises. Resistance is identified around $8.71, potentially limiting upward progress. The lack of a clear trend presents opportunities for traders, with some capitalizing on short-term gains, while others brace for a pullback. Positions near support combined with tight stop-loss orders can help manage risk during this uncertain period. Conclusion FIL and AR both aim to revolutionize data storage. FIL offers decentralized storage with dynamic usage, appealing for various applications. AR focuses on permanent storage, ensuring data longevity. FIL's flexibility might attract a broader range of users, while AR's unique approach could appeal to those needing permanent storage solutions. Both have strong potential for double-digit gains in the upcoming altcoin season. The choice between FIL and AR will depend on individual needs and market preferences. Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.
🚀 Are You Chasing New Coins? Catch the newest crypto opportunities. Be the first to buy, be the first to win! Click here to discover new altcoins! Bitcoin’s recent price
The post XRP Price News: Analyst Eyes $7 After Ripple Breaks All-Time High appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News XRP has exploded past its previous all-time high of $3.40, reaching $3.65, a big move that was much-awaited by the community. Over the past week, XRP has surged more than 40%, breaking out of a large symmetrical triangle it had been forming since the start of the year. The breakout began around July 9, with strong momentum continuing into the following days. XRP smashed through the $3 resistance level, a price point that had acted as both support and resistance multiple times this year. Why $3 Was So Important According to analyst Lark Davis, the $3 level was important. In January and March, it had acted as a major barrier, first as support, then resistance. Now that XRP has broken above it, the big question is: can it stay there? If it does, analysts believe XRP could push toward $4.10 or even $4.50 based on technical projections. This target is based on the height of the triangle pattern that XRP just broke out of. All Eyes on the Retest Short term, what happens next will likely depend on how XRP behaves around the $3 mark. If the price retests $3 and holds, it could be a strong signal for another leg up. If it drops below that level again, XRP might trade sideways for a bit between $2.60 and $3. How High Can XRP Go This Year? A Fibonacci extension points to a possible price of $4.68. And if Bitcoin continues its own bullish trend toward $150K, XRP might even stretch to $5 or more this year. Options markets also show that traders are betting on more upside. There’s nearly a 20% chance XRP hits $4.50 by September, according to data from recent call options. Could we see $7 XRP by the end of the year if Bitcoin hits $200K? Davis says it’s possible, but it would require a huge push. A $10 XRP would mean a $590 billion market cap—which, while not impossible, is definitely a high bar.
Bitcoin has slowed following a profit-taking dip, but investor conviction is rising as U.S. lawmakers advance new crypto legislation.
🚀 Are You Chasing New Coins? Catch the newest crypto opportunities. Be the first to buy, be the first to win! Click here to discover new altcoins! On July 18,
BitcoinWorld UAE AI Chips Deal Stalled: A Critical Blow to Global Tech Ambitions In the rapidly evolving landscape of artificial intelligence, where technological prowess often dictates economic and geopolitical standing, a significant development has sent ripples through the global tech community. The United Arab Emirates’ ambitious deal to procure advanced UAE AI chips from leading U.S. semiconductor giants, most notably Nvidia, has reportedly been put on hold. This pause, driven by escalating U.S. national security concerns, highlights the intricate dance between technological advancement, economic ambition, and geopolitical rivalry. For those in the cryptocurrency space, understanding these macro-level tech shifts is crucial, as the underlying infrastructure for AI innovation often mirrors or influences the high-performance computing essential for blockchain technologies and digital asset markets. Why is the UAE AI Chips Deal So Crucial? The United Arab Emirates has been aggressively pursuing a strategy of economic diversification, moving beyond its traditional oil-based economy. Central to this vision is a significant investment in cutting-edge technologies, with artificial intelligence at the forefront. The proposed deal to acquire billions of dollars worth of advanced AI chips from companies like Nvidia was not merely a commercial transaction; it was a cornerstone of the UAE’s national AI strategy. These chips, particularly those designed for high-performance computing and complex AI model training, are the fundamental building blocks for developing sophisticated AI applications, fostering innovation hubs, and attracting global tech talent. Access to such advanced hardware is seen as vital for the UAE to: Accelerate AI Research and Development: Powering large language models, computer vision, and other complex AI algorithms requires immense computational power. Drive Economic Diversification: Creating new industries and job opportunities in AI, data science, and related fields. Enhance National Competitiveness: Positioning the UAE as a leader in the global AI race, attracting foreign investment and partnerships. Improve Public Services: Utilizing AI for smart city initiatives, healthcare, and governmental efficiency. The reported halt in this deal therefore represents a significant hurdle for the UAE’s technological aspirations, forcing a re-evaluation of its supply chain strategies and international tech partnerships. The Dominance of Nvidia AI and Geopolitical Tensions Nvidia stands as the undisputed titan in the realm of AI accelerators, with its GPUs (Graphics Processing Units) being the preferred choice for training and deploying most advanced AI models globally. Their CUDA platform has created a powerful ecosystem, making their hardware indispensable for serious AI development. This dominance, however, places Nvidia squarely in the crosshairs of geopolitical tensions, particularly those between the United States and China. The U.S. government has increasingly viewed advanced semiconductor technology as a critical component of national security, fearing that its transfer to rival nations could be exploited for military modernization or surveillance capabilities. Nvidia, while a U.S. company, operates in a global market, and its products are in high demand worldwide. The balancing act between maximizing shareholder value through global sales and complying with stringent export controls is a constant challenge for the company. The reported pause in the UAE deal underscores how deeply these geopolitical currents affect even the most commercially successful tech companies, forcing them to navigate a complex web of international regulations and diplomatic pressures. Nvidia has already had to design specific, less powerful chips for the Chinese market to comply with existing U.S. restrictions, indicating the direct impact of these policies on their revenue streams and product development cycles. Understanding the Scope of Chip Export Restrictions The concept of chip export restrictions has become a central theme in global tech policy. These restrictions are primarily aimed at preventing advanced technology from falling into the hands of adversaries, particularly China, which the U.S. views as a strategic competitor. The concerns are multi-faceted: Military Applications: Advanced AI chips can power sophisticated military systems, enhance surveillance capabilities, and accelerate the development of autonomous weapons. Dual-Use Technology: Many AI technologies have both civilian and military applications, making it difficult to control their end-use. Technological Parity: The U.S. aims to maintain a significant technological lead, especially in critical areas like AI and advanced computing. Human Rights Concerns: There are also concerns that advanced AI capabilities could be used for mass surveillance and human rights abuses by authoritarian regimes. The U.S. government has already implemented several rounds of export controls targeting China, limiting its access to high-end semiconductors, chip-making equipment, and related software. The Wall Street Journal’s report indicates that the U.S. concern with the UAE deal stems from the potential for these chips to be re-exported or smuggled to China, circumventing existing controls. This ‘leakage’ risk is a persistent headache for U.S. policymakers. The rumored consideration of imposing chip export restrictions on other countries like Thailand and Malaysia, and Malaysia’s recent introduction of an export permit requirement for U.S. AI chips, further illustrate the broadening scope of these controls and the U.S.’s determination to tighten the net. The Core of National Security Concerns At the heart of the stalled UAE-Nvidia deal lies a fundamental U.S. national security imperative: preventing advanced AI capabilities from aiding China’s military modernization or its authoritarian surveillance state. The U.S. government’s apprehension is rooted in intelligence assessments suggesting that Beijing is actively seeking to acquire cutting-edge technologies, by any means necessary, to advance its strategic objectives. This includes leveraging both overt commercial channels and covert networks to bypass restrictions. Officials from the UAE and Saudi Arabia had reportedly assured the U.S. that they had robust safeguards in place to prevent any diversion of chips. However, the increasing sophistication of smuggling networks and the high value placed on these chips by China have seemingly heightened U.S. skepticism. The concern isn’t necessarily about the UAE’s direct intent, but rather the potential for the chips to become part of a complex global supply chain that could eventually lead them to unintended destinations. This highlights a broader shift in U.S. policy, where the mere possibility of circumvention is enough to trigger a halt, rather than relying solely on partner assurances. This cautious approach reflects a deepening understanding of the geopolitical stakes involved in the global AI race. Navigating the Intensifying US China Tech War The stalled UAE deal is but one skirmish in the broader, intensifying US China tech war . This is a multi-front conflict spanning semiconductors, AI, telecommunications, quantum computing, and biotechnology. Both nations recognize that technological supremacy will define global power dynamics in the 21st century. The U.S. strategy involves a combination of: Export Controls: Restricting China’s access to critical technologies and manufacturing equipment. Domestic Investment: Pouring resources into U.S. semiconductor manufacturing and AI research through initiatives like the CHIPS Act. Alliances: Working with allies (e.g., Japan, South Korea, Netherlands) to coordinate export controls and build resilient supply chains. De-risking: Encouraging companies to diversify their supply chains away from China. China, in turn, is responding with massive domestic investments in its semiconductor industry, aiming for self-sufficiency, and aggressively pursuing AI development. The friction over the UAE deal underscores the global ramifications of this rivalry. Countries like the UAE find themselves caught in the middle, attempting to pursue their own national interests while navigating the complex geopolitical landscape shaped by these two tech superpowers. The outcome of this tech war will not only determine which nation leads in AI innovation but also reshape global trade, supply chains, and international relations for decades to come. Challenges and Implications for the Global Tech Landscape The reported hold on the UAE’s AI chip deal presents a myriad of challenges and implications for various stakeholders: For the UAE: It could force a recalculation of its AI strategy, potentially delaying its ambitious projects. It may also lead the UAE to explore alternative suppliers or even invest more heavily in indigenous AI chip development, though this is a long-term and costly endeavor. For Nvidia and Other Semiconductor Companies: While U.S. export controls are designed to protect national security, they inevitably impact the revenue and global market access of American tech companies. Nvidia, a global leader, must constantly adapt its sales strategies to comply with an ever-evolving regulatory landscape, potentially sacrificing significant sales opportunities. For Global Supply Chains: These restrictions highlight the fragility of global tech supply chains. As countries like the U.S. exert more control over critical components, it can lead to fragmentation, increased costs, and slower innovation globally. For International Cooperation: The incident could strain diplomatic relations, particularly with allies and partners who feel their sovereign economic development is being constrained by U.S. geopolitical objectives. For the AI Industry: A restricted flow of advanced chips could slow down the pace of AI innovation in certain regions, potentially creating a two-tiered system where only a few nations have access to the most powerful computing resources. The situation also raises questions about the future of global technology transfer and the extent to which national security concerns will continue to dictate commercial transactions in critical sectors. What’s Next? Navigating the Uncertainty The future of the UAE’s AI chip deal remains uncertain. While assurances were reportedly given by UAE and Saudi Arabian officials regarding safeguards, the U.S. seems to be taking a more stringent approach, prioritizing prevention over post-facto remediation. Potential next steps could include: Enhanced Verification Protocols: The U.S. might demand more robust, verifiable end-use monitoring systems from the UAE to ensure chips do not reach unintended destinations. Diplomatic Negotiations: Intensive diplomatic efforts will likely be underway to find a mutually agreeable solution that addresses U.S. security concerns while allowing the UAE to pursue its AI ambitions. Alternative Sourcing: The UAE may explore partnerships with other nations or companies not subject to U.S. export controls, though finding alternatives to Nvidia’s top-tier AI chips is challenging. Domestic Development: A long-term strategy for the UAE could involve significant investment in its own semiconductor industry, reducing reliance on foreign suppliers. The situation serves as a stark reminder that in the age of advanced technology, economic partnerships are inextricably linked to geopolitical realities. The outcome of this particular deal will set a precedent for how nations balance their economic growth with global security concerns in the race for AI dominance. Conclusion: A Precedent in the Global AI Race The reported halt in the UAE’s deal to acquire advanced UAE AI chips from Nvidia is more than just a commercial setback; it’s a significant indicator of the escalating geopolitical tensions surrounding artificial intelligence. Driven by U.S. national security concerns over potential chip export restrictions to China, this development underscores the immense strategic value placed on advanced semiconductors. As the US China tech war intensifies, nations like the UAE find themselves navigating a complex landscape where technological ambition must contend with the realities of global power dynamics. The incident highlights the critical importance of secure supply chains, the pervasive influence of Nvidia AI technology, and the continuous challenges posed by chip export restrictions on global innovation and cooperation. The world watches closely as these critical decisions shape the future of AI and international relations. To learn more about the latest AI market trends, explore our article on key developments shaping AI features. This post UAE AI Chips Deal Stalled: A Critical Blow to Global Tech Ambitions first appeared on BitcoinWorld and is written by Editorial Team