PEPE experienced a 17% spike, driven by significant whale purchases. It ranks 31st in market capitalization with trading volume soaring 150%. Continue Reading: PEPE Surges as Whale Purchases Stir the Market The post PEPE Surges as Whale Purchases Stir the Market appeared first on COINTURK NEWS .
More on M&A tickers, etc. Warner Bros. Discovery's Separation Rally Still Has Legs - Double Digit Upside Possible Warner Bros. Discovery bid would likely need to be in low to mid $20s/share - report Analysts are mostly positive on Paramount Skydance's bid for Warner Bros. Discovery
Crypto pundit Lark Davis has poked holes into Cardano over its low user base, but community members have swooped in to defend the blockchain.
Ethereum price (ETH) is positioned to retest $5,000 if it sustains support at $4,500–$4,650; cooling spot-ETF inflows and renewed Solana strength are the main obstacles, while U.S. retail accumulation (Coinbase
A proposal to route fees from protocol-owned liquidity for a token buyback has sparked significant interest in the World Liberty Financial community. The buy-back proposal has garnered 99.69% of votes in its favor, with WLFI up by nearly 4% since the launch of the voting. Buyback and Burn Proposal Gets Overwhelming Community Support World Liberty
BitcoinWorld California AI Bill: Crucial SB 53 Faces Uncertain Veto from Newsom The digital frontier is rapidly evolving, and with it, the urgent need for robust governance. For those in the cryptocurrency space, understanding the broader regulatory landscape for emerging technologies like Artificial Intelligence (AI) is paramount, as these areas often intersect. A recent development from the Golden State has sent ripples through the tech world: the passage of the California AI bill , SB 53. This legislation aims to introduce significant changes to how large AI companies operate, but its future remains in the hands of Governor Gavin Newsom, creating a period of considerable uncertainty. What is SB 53 and Why is This California AI Bill So Significant? California’s state senate recently gave its final approval to SB 53, a landmark piece of legislation focused on AI safety. Authored by state senator Scott Wiener, the bill seeks to establish new transparency requirements for major AI developers. Wiener describes SB 53 as a measure that “requires large AI labs to be transparent about their safety protocols, creates whistleblower protections for [employees] at AI labs & creates a public cloud to expand compute access (CalCompute).” This bill is significant because California is a global hub for technological innovation. Any AI safety regulation enacted here could set a precedent for other states and even federal policy. The legislation touches on several critical areas: Transparency: Large AI labs would need to disclose their safety protocols. This aims to provide greater insight into how powerful AI models are developed and deployed. Whistleblower Protections: Employees at AI labs would receive protections, encouraging them to report safety concerns without fear of retaliation. CalCompute: The bill proposes creating a public cloud to expand compute access, potentially democratizing AI development and research. The core objective is to balance the rapid advancement of AI with the need to mitigate potential risks, ensuring responsible development and deployment of this transformative technology. Gavin Newsom AI Stance: A History of Caution and Concern The fate of SB 53 now rests with Governor Gavin Newsom. His decision is keenly awaited, especially given his past actions regarding AI legislation. Last year, Newsom vetoed a more expansive AI safety bill, also authored by Senator Wiener. While acknowledging the importance of “protecting the public from real threats posed by this technology,” Newsom criticized the previous bill for applying “stringent standards” to large models regardless of their deployment context or data sensitivity. He instead signed narrower legislation targeting specific issues like deepfakes. This history highlights the nuanced approach Governor Newsom has taken toward AI regulation. He is clearly aware of the technology’s risks but also cautious about imposing overly broad or potentially stifling regulations on innovation. Senator Wiener has stated that the current SB 53 was influenced by recommendations from an AI expert panel convened by Newsom himself after his prior veto, suggesting a more tailored and considered approach this time around. The question remains: will this revised bill meet his approval, or will concerns about its scope still lead to a veto? Industry Reactions to California’s Tech Policy AI Initiatives The prospect of new tech policy AI in California has elicited strong reactions across Silicon Valley. The industry is divided, reflecting the complex challenges of regulating a rapidly evolving field. Opposition from Giants: OpenAI and Andreessen Horowitz A number of prominent Silicon Valley companies, venture capital (VC) firms, and lobbying groups have voiced opposition to SB 53. OpenAI, while not specifically mentioning SB 53 in a recent letter to Newsom, argued for regulatory harmony. They suggested that companies meeting federal or European AI safety standards should be considered compliant with statewide rules, to avoid “duplication and inconsistencies.” This stance underscores a preference for unified, potentially less fragmented, regulatory frameworks. Andreessen Horowitz (a16z), a major VC firm, has also been vocal. Their head of AI policy and chief legal officer recently claimed that “many of today’s state AI bills — like proposals in California and New York — risk” violating constitutional limits on how states can regulate interstate commerce. This argument raises a fundamental legal challenge to state-level AI regulation, suggesting that such laws could overstep their bounds by impacting companies operating across state lines. The firm’s co-founders have even linked tech regulation to their political leanings, advocating for a 10-year ban on state AI regulation, aligning with some positions taken by the Trump administration. Support from Anthropic: A Blueprint for AI Governance? In contrast to the opposition, AI research company Anthropic has publicly come out in favor of SB 53. Anthropic co-founder Jack Clark stated, “We have long said we would prefer a federal standard. But in the absence of that this creates a solid blueprint for AI governance that cannot be ignored.” This perspective suggests that while a federal standard might be ideal, state-level initiatives like SB 53 can serve as valuable models for future regulation, filling a current void in comprehensive AI governance. This divergence of opinion highlights the ongoing debate within the tech community about the most effective and appropriate ways to govern AI. Some prioritize innovation and fear over-regulation, while others emphasize the urgent need for safeguards to ensure responsible development. Navigating the Nuances: Key Amendments and Regulatory Tiers Understanding the details of SB 53 is crucial, especially how it has evolved to address previous concerns. Politico reports a significant amendment: companies developing “frontier” AI models that generate less than $500 million in annual revenue will only need to disclose high-level safety details. In contrast, companies exceeding that revenue threshold will be required to provide more detailed reports. This tiered approach aims to tailor regulatory burdens based on a company’s size and potential impact, potentially alleviating concerns about stifling smaller innovators while ensuring scrutiny for larger, more influential players. This amendment reflects an attempt to create a more balanced AI safety regulation , acknowledging that not all AI developers pose the same level of systemic risk. It’s a pragmatic adjustment, potentially making the bill more palatable to a wider range of stakeholders, including Governor Newsom. Comparison: Newsom’s Vetoed Bill vs. SB 53 Feature Previous Vetoed Bill Current SB 53 Scope of Application Applied stringent standards broadly to large models. Targets “large AI labs” with transparency requirements. Revenue Tiers Not explicitly mentioned as a distinguishing factor. Introduces revenue tiers ($500M) for disclosure levels. Specific Provisions Less detailed on specific safety protocols and compute access. Explicitly includes transparency protocols, whistleblower protections, and CalCompute. Influence on Bill Authored by Wiener, faced Newsom’s broad criticism. Influenced by Newsom’s expert panel recommendations. The Future of AI Governance: A Pivotal Moment for California The passage of the California AI bill , SB 53, marks a pivotal moment in the ongoing global discussion about AI governance. Whether Governor Newsom signs or vetoes it, the debate it has ignited underscores the urgent need for clear and effective frameworks to manage the power of AI. This legislation, and the reactions to it, offer valuable insights into the complexities of balancing innovation, safety, and economic impact. For the broader tech and cryptocurrency communities, this legislative effort highlights a growing trend: governments are actively seeking to understand and regulate emerging technologies. The outcome in California could influence how other jurisdictions approach AI, shaping the future landscape of technological development and its ethical implications. Conclusion: The Unfolding Impact of SB 53 As SB 53 makes its way to Governor Newsom’s desk, the tech world watches with bated breath. This AI safety regulation is more than just a piece of state legislation; it’s a test case for how democracies grapple with the profound challenges and opportunities presented by artificial intelligence. The debate between fostering innovation and ensuring public safety is at its core, with industry giants and advocates for responsible AI development offering contrasting visions. The final decision by Gavin Newsom AI policy will undoubtedly have a lasting impact, not just on California, but potentially on the global conversation around tech policy AI for years to come. To learn more about the latest AI market trends, explore our article on key developments shaping AI models features. This post California AI Bill: Crucial SB 53 Faces Uncertain Veto from Newsom first appeared on BitcoinWorld .
Dr. Whale’s recent post on X laid out a bold set of price targets for major cryptocurrencies, headlined by Bitcoin surging to $200,000. Among the projections, he placed XRP at $10, suggesting a dramatic upswing for the token if Bitcoin achieves this milestone. Using current market data and clear market-cap calculations, we can estimate what XRP’s price could reasonably be if Bitcoin reaches that level. Current Market Landscape As of report time, Bitcoin trades around $115,900 with a circulating supply of roughly 19.92 million BTC, giving it a market capitalization of nearly $2.31 trillion. XRP trades at to $3.14 with a circulating supply of about 59.61 billion tokens, translating to a market cap of approximately $189 billion. These figures provide the foundation for projecting XRP’s potential price under a $200,000 Bitcoin scenario. Bitcoin is going to $200k $ETH is going to $10k $SOL is going to $1000 $XRP is going to $10 $ADA is going to $5 $SUI is going to $5 $DOG is going to $1 $Pi is going to $30 I don't make the rules — Dr. Whale (@DrWhaleReal) September 12, 2025 Scaling XRP with Bitcoin’s Rise If Bitcoin climbs to $200,000 , its market capitalization would expand to roughly $3.98 trillion. That represents a growth multiplier of about 1.72 compared with its current market cap. Applying the same multiplier to XRP, assuming it maintains its present share of the total crypto market—yields a projected market cap near $326 billion. Dividing that by XRP’s circulating supply results in an estimated price of around $5.46 per XRP. This calculation keeps assumptions minimal: Bitcoin’s price is the only variable, and XRP’s market share remains constant. It is a straightforward way to link Bitcoin’s rise to an XRP price projection. We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1 — TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025 Path to the $10 Target Dr. Whale’s $10 forecast implies a far larger move. At $10, XRP’s market capitalization would need to reach about $596 billion. With Bitcoin at $200,000 and valued near $3.98 trillion, XRP would have to command roughly 15% of Bitcoin’s market cap—almost double its current relative share. Such a jump is not impossible. Periods of “alt season” have historically seen significant capital rotation from Bitcoin into top altcoins. However, achieving that level would require a surge of investor demand, liquidity, and market confidence beyond today’s baseline. Factors That Could Influence XRP’s Market Share Several elements could shift XRP’s relative market standing. Broader adoption of Ripple’s cross-border payment technology , favorable regulatory clarity, or a pronounced investor rotation into high-cap utility tokens could all help XRP gain ground on Bitcoin’s dominance. Conversely, stiff competition from other layer-1 platforms or delays in mainstream adoption could cap its growth. Key Takeaway Using current data and a conservative scaling model, Bitcoin at $200,000 points to an XRP price near $5.46 if the token simply keeps its existing share of the crypto market. Dr. Whale’s more ambitious $10 target remains within the realm of possibility, but it would require XRP to approximately double its market share relative to Bitcoin. Disclaimer : This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are urged to do in-depth research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses. Follow us on Twitter , Facebook , Telegram , and Google News The post Here’s XRP Projected Price If Bitcoin Hits $200,000 appeared first on Times Tabloid .
DefiLlama’s anonymous founder, 0xngmi, announced on social media that the decentralized finance (DeFi) data platform has detected serious inconsistencies in Figure’s total value locked (TVL) data. 0xngmi stated that Figure's on-chain assets and trading volume do not match the claimed figures. According to the data, the company only holds approximately $5 million worth of Bitcoin (BTC) and $4 million worth of Ethereum (ETH) on exchanges, while Bitcoin's 24-hour trading volume is only $2,000. Furthermore, the supply of Figure's own stablecoin, YLDS, is limited to just 20 million units. According to the DefiLlama team, this data contradicts the company's claimed $12 billion in on-chain RWA (real-world assets). The platform's analysis revealed that most RWA transfers originate from accounts other than the asset owners, and loans are largely processed in fiat currency, with on-chain payment transactions virtually nonexistent. 0xngmi explained that DefiLlama discussed the matter with Figure in a Telegram group, raising numerous concerns about the system and the removal process. However, during the process, some claimed that DefiLlama rejected Figure solely because of his social media following. Rumors even circulated that the platform was charging a listing fee. Related News: Bitcoin Bull Millionaire Arthur Hayes Discusses BTC: “Be Patient, BTC Bull...” DefiLlama, however, vehemently denied these allegations. 0xngmi, who maintains that the platform has never rejected a project based on follower count and has never charged any fees, said, “DefiLlama's value lies in providing users with reliable and accurate data. Maintaining this trust is our top priority.” The company stated that the $12 billion TVL revealed by Figure may actually be merely an on-chain reflection of an internal database, and its accuracy should be seriously questioned. *This is not investment advice. Continue Reading: Suspicion of Major Fraud Emerges on a Cryptocurrency Platform: It Claimed to Have $12 Billion
Dogecoin’s recent move has put traders on edge and split opinion across markets. Prices leapt this week as news and big trade flows pushed the token higher, creating a fresh round of buy-or-hold debates on trading desks and crypto chat rooms. Related Reading: Dogecoin Defies Odds, Jumps 21% Even As ETF Debut Gets Pushed Back ETF Launch Faces New Delay Based on reports, the eagerly watched US DOGE ETF has been pushed back again, with the earliest new listing window now sliding toward September 18. That postponement briefly dented hopes of immediate ETF access, but it did not stop demand from rising. Some market participants treated the delay as a pause, while others used it to enter positions ahead of any eventual listing. Price Rally Accelerates Momentum Meanwhile, Dogecoin price is up 15% in the last 24 hours, and 38% in the last week. Traders moved the token above recent swing levels, with on-screen quotes clustered in the mid-$0.20s to $0.30s. Volume rose alongside the gains. Quick gains like these tend to attract short-term players and cause order books to thin out, which in turn can make price jumps larger and pullbacks sharper. Institutional Bets Back Dogecoin Reports have disclosed that a corporate plan has added fuel to the rally. CleanCore Solutions announced a Dogecoin treasury effort backed by roughly $175 million in private capital, and reports name high-profile figures among those expected to take board roles. The company says it intends to hold DOGE as a reserve asset, and talk of large buys tied to that plan helped lift sentiment among some investors. What The Price Action Shows Short-term charts look overheated to some and promising to others. Momentum indicators are positive, and a pattern that some chart watchers call a pennant has formed on intraday charts. Related Reading: ETF Dreams For Dogecoin: Serious Possibility Or Just Hype? At the same time, resistance remains above current levels and quick reversals are possible. On-chain flows, futures open interest, and large wallet moves will be key in the coming days because they can flip a green session into a sharp drop if liquidations hit. Dogecoin’s jump this week is driven by a mix of headline buying and reported institutional interest. Reports show a 9% gain in 24 hours and 32% over the week, which is strong but not guaranteed to continue. For some, the setup still looks like a buy on dips. For others, the rally is already too hot to chase without clear entry rules. Volatility is likely to stay high while the ETF story and institutional moves play out. Featured image from Meta, chart from TradingView
Here's what you need to know about ETH's near-term outlook ahead of Fed rate decision