🚀 Are You Chasing New Coins? Catch the newest crypto opportunities. Be the first to buy, be the first to win! Click here to discover new altcoins! The SEC has
Predictors on Myriad are testing their knowledge on the Roman Storm trial, the price of Ethereum, and how many birds will fly over Texas.
For most Ripple fans, a spot XRP ETF is on the horizon as post-lawsuit momentum builds around the cross-border payments token.
BitcoinWorld Bitcoin Treasury Boom: Decoding the Alarming Risks for Investors The world of digital assets is constantly evolving, with new trends emerging that capture the attention of investors and corporations alike. One such phenomenon is the rise of Bitcoin treasury companies – firms that choose to hold significant amounts of Bitcoin on their balance sheets. While this strategy can signal confidence in the digital gold, it also comes with inherent complexities and risks. Recently, Fred Thiel, the astute CEO of Marathon Digital Holdings (MARA), a leading Bitcoin mining company, issued a cautionary note regarding this rapidly expanding sector. His insights provide a crucial reality check for anyone captivated by the allure of a Bitcoin treasury strategy. Understanding the Bitcoin Treasury Phenomenon What exactly are Bitcoin treasury companies, and why has this trend gained so much traction? Essentially, these are publicly traded or private companies that opt to convert a portion of their cash reserves or operational profits into Bitcoin. Unlike traditional investments, holding Bitcoin on a corporate balance sheet is a relatively new strategy, primarily popularized by pioneers like MicroStrategy. The motivations behind this shift are multifaceted: Inflation Hedge: Many companies view Bitcoin as a potential hedge against fiat currency inflation, believing its finite supply will preserve purchasing power over time. Balance Sheet Optimization: For some, it’s a way to potentially generate returns on idle cash, especially in a low-interest-rate environment. Strategic Alignment: Companies deeply involved in the crypto ecosystem, like mining firms or exchanges, naturally integrate Bitcoin into their financial operations. Innovation and Forward-Thinking: Adopting Bitcoin can signal a company’s embrace of cutting-edge financial technologies and a belief in the future of digital assets. The growth has been remarkable. Thiel noted that the number of companies with a significant Bitcoin treasury has swelled to over 200, collectively holding close to 774,000 BTC. This substantial accumulation represents a significant portion of Bitcoin’s circulating supply, underscoring the scale of this emerging corporate trend. MARA CEO Fred Thiel’s Alarming Warnings on Bitcoin Treasury Despite the apparent enthusiasm, MARA CEO Fred Thiel offered a sober assessment during a recent earnings call, highlighting potential pitfalls that could impact not only these companies but the broader Bitcoin market itself. His warnings are particularly significant given Marathon Digital Holdings’ own deep involvement in the Bitcoin ecosystem, albeit through mining rather than direct purchases for its treasury. Thiel’s core concerns revolve around several critical points: Pressure on BTC Prices: The rapid accumulation of Bitcoin by these firms, while initially supportive of prices, could create an overhang. If many firms face distress simultaneously, their potential selling could exert downward pressure on Bitcoin’s value. Not All Firms Will Succeed: Thiel cautioned that the boom might not be sustainable for every participant. Just like any investment trend, not all companies jumping on the Bitcoin treasury bandwagon will navigate the volatile crypto markets successfully. Whale Selling Near Highs: He pointed out that significant market participants, often referred to as ‘whales,’ have been observed selling their Bitcoin holdings near recent market highs. This behavior can indicate a lack of conviction at elevated price levels, suggesting that even large holders see a ceiling. Risk of Forced Sales: A critical concern raised by Thiel is the potential for forced sales. If a company’s market-adjusted Net Asset Value (mNAV) weakens due to a decline in Bitcoin’s price or other financial pressures, they might be compelled to sell their Bitcoin holdings to meet operational costs, debt obligations, or maintain solvency. Sharper Reactions to Market Downturns: Thiel drew a stark contrast between Bitcoin treasury companies and Bitcoin Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs). While ETFs are designed to track Bitcoin’s price and offer a regulated investment vehicle, treasury firms are operational businesses with other financial considerations. He argued that these treasury firms could react far more sharply and negatively to market downturns, potentially exacerbating price drops through panicked selling. These warnings from an industry veteran like Thiel cannot be understated. They underscore the importance of understanding the underlying financial health and operational stability of any company that has adopted a Bitcoin treasury strategy. The Intricate Risks of Bitcoin Treasury Holdings Beyond Thiel’s specific points, a deeper dive into the risks associated with holding a substantial Bitcoin treasury reveals a complex landscape that requires careful navigation. Companies embarking on this path face challenges that differ significantly from traditional corporate finance. Consider these intricate risks: Extreme Volatility Exposure: Bitcoin is notorious for its price swings. While this volatility can lead to significant gains, it also exposes a company’s balance sheet to substantial paper losses during downturns. Unlike cash or traditional assets, Bitcoin’s value can halve in a matter of weeks, directly impacting a company’s reported assets and potentially its creditworthiness. Liquidity Crunch and Forced Selling: As Thiel highlighted, a weakening mNAV or urgent need for cash could trigger forced sales. If multiple companies are in this position simultaneously during a market dip, it creates a negative feedback loop: selling drives prices down further, forcing more companies to sell, and so on. This scenario is distinct from ETFs, which typically have redemption mechanisms designed to handle outflows without necessarily triggering a fire sale. Operational and Security Risks: Holding large amounts of Bitcoin necessitates robust security protocols. Companies must contend with the risks of hacking, theft, and internal fraud. Managing private keys, implementing cold storage solutions, and maintaining cybersecurity infrastructure are significant operational burdens and potential liabilities. Regulatory Uncertainty: The regulatory landscape for cryptocurrencies is still evolving globally. Changes in tax laws, accounting standards, or outright bans could significantly impact the viability and attractiveness of a Bitcoin treasury strategy. Companies must constantly monitor and adapt to new legal frameworks. Investor Confidence and Perception: While some investors applaud a company’s embrace of Bitcoin, others might view it as a risky and speculative move. A significant drop in Bitcoin’s price could lead to a loss of investor confidence, impacting stock prices and access to capital markets. The failure of even a few prominent Bitcoin treasury companies could cast a shadow over the entire sector. It is crucial for both companies and investors to recognize that a Bitcoin treasury is not merely a passive investment but an active strategic decision with wide-ranging implications for financial health and market perception. Navigating the Future of Bitcoin Treasury : What Investors Need to Know Given the warnings and inherent risks, how should investors approach companies with a Bitcoin treasury ? And what considerations should firms weigh before adopting such a strategy? For investors, due diligence is paramount: Understand the Company’s Core Business: Is the Bitcoin holding supplementary to a strong core business, or is it the primary value driver? Companies with robust revenue streams independent of Bitcoin’s price are generally more resilient. Examine Their Treasury Management Strategy: Do they have a clear policy for managing their Bitcoin holdings? What are their risk mitigation strategies? Are they transparent about their mNAV and liquidity? Assess Debt and Leverage: Companies with significant debt or those that have leveraged their Bitcoin holdings are at higher risk during market downturns. Monitor Market Sentiment and Whales: Keep an eye on broader market trends, including the movements of large institutional holders, as suggested by Thiel. For companies considering a Bitcoin treasury : Define Your Purpose: Clearly articulate why you are holding Bitcoin. Is it for speculation, inflation hedging, or operational necessity? Start Small and Scale Prudently: Avoid allocating an outsized portion of your balance sheet to Bitcoin initially. Implement Robust Risk Management: This includes security protocols, contingency plans for market downturns, and clear accounting practices. Communicate Transparently: Keep investors informed about your Bitcoin holdings, strategy, and the associated risks. MARA itself presents an interesting case study. While it has raised significant capital ($940.5 million, as reported by The Block) to expand its Bitcoin holdings, its primary acquisition method is through mining, not purchasing on the open market. This distinction means its Bitcoin acquisition cost is tied to its operational efficiency rather than market buying prices, potentially offering a different risk profile compared to companies that solely buy BTC for their treasury. The rise of the Bitcoin treasury signifies a growing acceptance of digital assets in corporate finance. However, as Fred Thiel of MARA wisely cautions, this boom is not without its perils. The allure of potential gains must be balanced against the very real risks of market volatility, liquidity crunches, and the operational challenges of managing a significant Bitcoin holding. Investors and corporations alike must exercise prudence, conduct thorough due diligence, and maintain a clear-eyed perspective on the long-term implications of these strategies. The future of corporate Bitcoin adoption will likely be shaped by those who can navigate these treacherous waters with foresight and robust risk management, ensuring that the promise of digital assets is realized without succumbing to unforeseen financial storms. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Q1: What is a Bitcoin treasury company? A Bitcoin treasury company is a firm that holds a significant amount of Bitcoin on its corporate balance sheet, often as an alternative to traditional cash reserves or as a strategic asset for growth and inflation hedging. Q2: Why are MARA’s CEO’s warnings about Bitcoin treasury important? Fred Thiel, CEO of Marathon Digital Holdings (MARA), is a seasoned executive in the Bitcoin mining sector. His warnings highlight potential systemic risks, such as forced sales and market pressure, that could arise from the rapid expansion of companies holding large Bitcoin treasuries, offering a critical perspective from within the industry. Q3: How do Bitcoin treasury companies differ from Bitcoin ETFs in terms of risk? While both involve Bitcoin exposure, Bitcoin treasury companies are operational businesses with diverse financial obligations. They might face pressure to sell Bitcoin to cover operational costs or debt, potentially reacting more sharply to market downturns. Bitcoin ETFs, conversely, are investment vehicles designed to track Bitcoin’s price, with redemption mechanisms typically focused on managing fund flows rather than operational solvency. Q4: What are the main risks for companies holding a large Bitcoin treasury ? Key risks include exposure to extreme Bitcoin price volatility, the potential for liquidity crises leading to forced sales, significant operational and cybersecurity risks related to holding digital assets, and ongoing regulatory uncertainty that could impact their strategy and valuation. Q5: What should investors consider before investing in a Bitcoin treasury company? Investors should evaluate the company’s core business strength, its specific Bitcoin treasury management strategy, its debt levels, and its transparency regarding its holdings and risk mitigation. Understanding the company’s overall financial health beyond its Bitcoin exposure is crucial. Did you find this article insightful? Share it with your network on social media to spread awareness about the evolving landscape of corporate Bitcoin treasury holdings and their potential implications for the market! To learn more about the latest Bitcoin treasury trends, explore our article on key developments shaping Bitcoin treasury institutional adoption . This post Bitcoin Treasury Boom: Decoding the Alarming Risks for Investors first appeared on BitcoinWorld and is written by Editorial Team
🚀 Are You Chasing New Coins? Catch the newest crypto opportunities. Be the first to buy, be the first to win! Click here to discover new altcoins! $LINEA listed on
The dollar pushed higher for the fifth straight day on Wednesday, building its longest run of daily gains since February, as new economic data pointed to stronger-than-expected U.S. growth and inflation. According to Bloomberg, the Dollar Spot Index climbed 0.3%, hitting its highest level since June 23, backed by reports showing that both consumer activity and labor conditions remained solid in the second quarter. The second-quarter rebound was largely fueled by a modest rise in household spending, while the core PCE, the inflation gauge preferred by the Federal Reserve, rose 2.5% compared to Q2 of 2024. Source: Bloomberg On the employment side, data from ADP Research showed private-sector payrolls remained robust, adding to the broader view that the U.S. economy still has plenty of steam. All of this has helped keep the dollar on firm ground, even as global currency markets turned volatile. Fed’s pause keeps traders watching September Investors are now locked in on the Fed’s next steps, with the central bank widely expected to hold rates steady in its latest policy meeting. Attention has since turned to September, where the probability of a rate cut sits at 60%. Still, the resilience of recent data is forcing traders to reassess. Valentin Marinov, who heads Group-of-10 FX strategy at Credit Agricole, said the numbers may push the Fed into a slower path on easing. “Markets may see the data as arguing for less aggressive and more back-loaded Fed easing,” Marinov said. “The USD rate appeal could grow especially if Fed Chair Powell stays true to his still rather neutral outlook on policy.” But President Donald Trump has been raising the pressure. Since returning to the White House, Trump has repeatedly called for lower interest rates. However, the data is complicating that narrative. “If the US data continues to signal resilience, President Trump may have to recognize that and even tone down his attacks on the Fed,” Marinov added. The positive tone for the dollar wasn’t matched on the other side of the Atlantic. The euro tumbled 0.65% to $1.1471, slipping to its lowest level since June 23 and heading for its fifth straight session of losses. This also puts the euro on track for its first monthly decline in 2025, following earlier market reaction to a trade deal between the U.S. and European Union. Steve Englander, who leads global G10 FX Research at Standard Chartered in New York, said traders may be overreacting to the GDP release. “I think people are reading too much into the GDP numbers; nobody in markets should think GDP was that weak in Q1 and that strong in Q2 even though the big drivers were inventories and net exports,” Englander said. Trade talks change from Europe to Asia Fresh trade agreements with Japan last week and the EU over the weekend added to the view that the U.S. is still willing to engage globally, something that briefly helped calm investor concerns earlier this month. But things are now changing again. Officials from the U.S. and China are discussing whether to extend their 90-day tariff truce, while Trump has opened a new front by announcing a 25% tariff on Indian imports starting August 1. Englander commented on that decision as well, saying, “Trump can afford to be harsh on India because he’s gotten a bunch of deals already and he’s trying to pressure them to be more forthcoming. I don’t think the tariffs will end as harshly as he hinted, but he does want to negotiate with India on terms favorable to the US.” In Europe, fresh economic figures brought more divergence. Germany’s economy contracted in the second quarter, while France managed to beat expectations. That imbalance contributed to the euro’s ongoing weakness. Meanwhile, attention is turning to Japan, where markets await comments from BoJ Governor Kazuo Ueda on Thursday. Many are hoping that the recent U.S.-Japan trade agreement will give the Bank of Japan enough room to hike rates. The dollar also gained against other major currencies. It climbed 0.28% to 148.88 yen, reaching a two-week high. It also strengthened 0.65% to 0.811 francs against the Swiss franc, the highest since June 24. Get seen where it counts. Advertise in Cryptopolitan Research and reach crypto’s sharpest investors and builders.
Summary Marathon Digital (MARA) posted a massive EPS beat in Q2, driven by fair value gains on its expanding Bitcoin holdings. Despite muted market reaction, MARA’s vertically integrated, global business model strengthens its cost efficiency and operational resilience. The company’s BTC stash, acquired at a cost basis well below current prices, positions it for substantial upside if Bitcoin rallies further. Q3 is already shaping up well, with Bitcoin hitting all-time highs, likely setting up MARA for another mark-to-market accounting tailwind. MARA Holdings (NASDAQ: MARA ) Q2 is an example of when strong execution and long-term strategic positioning begins to translate into meaningful financials. Bitcoin's ( BTC-USD ) price was also an important tailwind for the quarter’s performance, driving the headline $808.2 million net profit. Q2 results beat the Street’s consensus on both the top and bottom lines. Revenue grew by 64% YoY to $238.5 million, and the bottom line flipped positive from a net loss per share of $0.72 a year ago to $1.84 earnings per share in Q2. While Bitcoin prices were a tailwind for the stellar financial performance, MARA’s operational execution and scaled efficiencies from owned infrastructure played an equally important role. MARA Holdings There were impressive increases in financial numbers and operational metrics across the board for MARA in Q2, which all contributed to the stellar top line and bottom line beats. Adjusted EBITDA saw an impressive 1,093% increase YoY to $1.2 billion - thanks to fair value accounting. The surge was primarily driven by the unrealized gain on MARA’s Bitcoin holdings (about $1.2 billion), as Bitcoin appreciated to $107k by the end of Q2. Strong operational execution and MARA’s "Bitcoin to Work" strategy, which entails utilizing a portion of the Bitcoin holdings through lending, also contributed to the improved profitability. Bitcoin to work strategy (MARA Holdings) MARA operations has scaled significantly and now thrives comfortably post halving, as Bitcoin blocks won in Q2 were up 52% YoY, from 457 blocks a year ago to 694 blocks in Q2. More blocks equals more Bitcoin mined. Beyond the tailwind from Bitcoin price surge, this is one of the operational improvements that contributed to the improved top line in Q2. Historically, MARA has consistently demonstrated efforts to be a cost-effective Bitcoin miner. MARA also maintained continuous improvement in operational efficiency, with fleet efficiency improving by 26% YoY to 18.3 Joules per Terahash (J/Th), and cost per petahash per day declined by 24% YoY in Q2. Fleet and hashrate improvement (MARA Holdings) MARA’s liquidity and BTC Holdings also improved. BTC Holdings increased 170% YoY to 49,951 BTC as of Q2 end, rising from 18,488 at the end of Q2 last year. MARA has embarked on an aggressive accumulation of BTC either through issuing debt to fund purchases or stacking its mined BTC on its balance sheet. Though the company management doesn't want to be seen as a pure BTC treasury company, the company's BTC holding, currently over 50,000 BTC, is so substantial that it can't be ignored when valuing MARA. Now while some people may see us as a bitcoin treasury company, given the size of our bitcoin holdings we don't consider ourselves as one. We're invaders, builders and operators. We're actively managing our bitcoin holdings to create long-term value for shareholders. - excerpt from the Q2 earnings call Liquidity (comprising cash and BTC holdings of cash & cash equivalents of $109.5 million, digital assets of $3.69 billion, and digital assets - receivable, net of $1.65 billion) was total of ~$5.4 billion at the end of Q2, which has even been further boosted by the additional $950 million raised recently. That is enough dry powder for future expansion, strategic investments, and navigating market volatility. balance sheet (MARA Holdings) With all the impressive financial and operational metrics highlighted so far, it is worth mentioning that MARA’s expansion has come at a cost for shareholders. Diluted share outstanding now stands at 491.3 million (if we include convertible notes, warrants, and unvested RSU/PSU). Diluted share outstanding was about 278.67 million a year ago. Which implies a heavy ~75% dilution YoY. MARA’s Vertical Integration Goes Global Every miner still in business finds ways to expand infrastructure. It is the norm of the business. They procure energy and hashrate to increase capacity and throughout. That's the only way to keep up with increasing Bitcoin network difficulty and stay competitive for winning block rewards. But MARA is currently doing this with a twist of strategic depth through vertical and geographical integration. It's also not a new trend for Bitcoin miners to strategically deploy facilities across geographical locations in a bid to secure cheaper energy and to spread risk. However, MARA’s current geographical expansion entails a strategy that is geared towards embedding itself deeper into local energy and compute ecosystems, beyond just running facilities in these locations. MARA’s ability to scale operations on a vertically integrated level has been one of the operational attractions for me over the years. In the past, that included proprietary immersion cooling solutions and custom-built electricity optimization software that were designed and deployed in-house. While the Q2 results contain a handful of bright spots, the vertical and geographic integration of MARA are the biggest standouts for me, because they show a shift from being just a mining firm to a global-scale infrastructure operator with deep control over energy and compute. If execution goes well, this comes with largely untapped business opportunities. Insights from the Q2 earnings call show that MARA's vertical integration strategy is now moving beyond Bitcoin mining and into HPC and AI compute infrastructure, and executing on a level that spans geographical diversification and full-stack infrastructure control. In Q2, that expansion meant investing further down the stack (and across borders) in the infrastructure and energy systems that will support the long-term pivot toward HPC and AI inference workloads. And that progress in Q2 included scaling flexible-load data centers, building grid-responsive energy platforms, and establishing a global footprint to secure access to subsidized or underutilized energy. Beyond performance, we continued to invest in the infrastructure that underpins our business from scaling low-cost flexible load data centers to exploring international opportunities in regions with abundant energy and growing demand for sovereign compute. This quarter, in support of our strategy to support the load balancing needs of AI HPC data centers, we announced strategic partnerships with TAE Power solutions backed by Google and Pado AI backed by LG. Frederick Thiel, CEO, MARA Holdings, during the Q2 earnings call Importantly, MARA is not approaching this vertical integration in HPC blindly. Partnerships with ventures like TAE Power Solutions (backed by Google) with whom MARA is building real-time responsive load management system to meet energy demands from the AI and HPC data center sector, and PADO AI (backed by LG) with whom they are building AI-native tools for intelligent data center load balancing, show a clear intention to codevelop grid-aware load balancing platforms that go beyond selling compute capacity, but integrate compute directly into the grid itself. This tight coupling between compute infrastructure and energy strategy is likely to become MARA’s signature competitive edge over other miners in HPC and AI compute. we've been laying the ground work for a regional headquarters in Saudi Arabia, and we have established entity in France as a European headquarters. We believe this approach will provide us access to low-cost energy by partnering with energy companies and infrastructure capital providers to lower our capital commitments. Through these efforts, we built a global growth pipeline exceeding 3 gigawatts, positioning us to scale efficiently across key markets. When you put it all together, as inference increasingly becomes the dominant cost center in AI, control over geography, latency and energy cost becomes a strategic advantage. We'll continue to invest here to ensure MARA is well positioned to meet this demand. We're excited to host our first ever Investor Day this fall. - Frederick Thiel, CEO, MARA Holdings, during the Q2 earnings call And in MARA’s geographical integration strategy, MARA is setting up regional HQs and forming energy company partnerships to secure low-cost power globally, while minimizing upfront capital through partner co-investment. And by this approach MARA is embedding themselves into the local energy and regulatory stack across markets, and rather than buying power on the market, they’re becoming part of the energy sourcing and deal structuring process. I think the synergy of both vertical and geographic integration is a long-term competitive moat that will potentially give MARA lots of geographic control over where and how it plugs into the global compute economy, with latency optimization, and energy cost arbitrage - all key components to scaling AI workloads. The ultimate payoff for this vertical and geographic integration approach is that when this is fully operationalized, there is high potential for MARA to see energy procurement and compute deployment cycles optimized, which will potentially translate to lower cost of compute per workload, and boost financials through improved margins and capital efficiency, ultimately creating long-term shareholders' value. Valuation Gets More Attractive MARA’s huge EPS beat naturally makes MARA’s valuation attractive. And I think the market reaction to the headline bottom line beat has been muted because a large portion of the upside came from unrealized gains or paper profits tied to fair value accounting of its Bitcoin holdings. Data by YCharts I, however, think that the case for MARA is strengthening as Bitcoin momentum reaccelerates. A further surge would mean MARA’s cost basis for its accumulated BTC becomes increasingly favorable. Though it is difficult to calculate a finite figure for the cost basis of MARA’s Bitcoin holdings as they include both BTC purchased on the open market and BTC mined from operations, spanning several quarters at several prices, a rough estimate puts the cost basis way below $100,000, if we go by the notable purchases made since last year. In August last year, 4,144 BTC worth $249 million was purchased at an average price of $59,500 , following a $300 million raise. Then in November, 6,474 BTC was purchased at an average price of $95,0000, following a $1 billion convertible note offering. Then following another convertible note offering last December, MARA purchased 15,574 BTC at an average of $98,500 per BTC. If BTC continues its upward surge, MARA’s mark to market under fair value accounting would result in multi-billion dollar mark-up to equity and potentially another blowout earnings quarter. Even if fair value gains are dismissed today, the ability to convert paper gains into capital, or generate yield from these assets, sets up MARA for a fundamental revaluation. At BTC price of, say, $120k to $150k (which is just about 2% to 20% away from current price of $118k), MARA would have an advantaged cost basis, potentially giving it multiple levers for an upside. Q3 is gearing up to be another great quarter for MARA, considering the fact that BTC has already hit a new all time high in Q3, and MARA’s mark to market fair value accounting will likely be coming with a higher BTC figure compared to Q2. Risks and Takeaway MARA’s balance sheet is now more exposed to BTC than ever. And what has turned out to be an impressive quarter in Q2 could as well easily turn out to be a dismal one if BTC sees significant price decline. As MARA’s own management puts it in the Q2 earnings call: Regarding the current price of bitcoin, our view is that things feel a little frothy at the moment. While there is persistent demand for bitcoin, this is balanced by an ample supply owing to long-term holders taking profits from bitcoin held in some cases since the earliest years of bitcoin's infancy. Supply is currently being absorbed relatively well. But if the buying demand were to subside, we could see downward pressure as sellers attempt to lock in gains at these high price points. With our recent convertible notes offering, we have significantly bolstered our balance sheet to have the flexibility to act across a range of strategic priorities, including opportunistic bitcoin purchases debt repurchase, M&A and general corporate purposes. - Frederick Thiel, CEO, MARA Holdings, during the Q2 earnings call One of the most important takeaways from Q2 earnings is that beyond the exposure to BTC and the upside it offers if BTC keeps up momentum, MARA is now vertically integrating not just to mine Bitcoin better, but to own more of the value chain across digital energy, compute infrastructure, and AI markets. Based on how this strategy is well executed, this potentially opens up undervalued opportunities for MARA, which the market may be missing currently.
🚀 Are You Chasing New Coins? Catch the newest crypto opportunities. Be the first to buy, be the first to win! Click here to discover new altcoins! Bitcoin is poised
The White House’s digital asset task force calls on regulators to clarify crypto trading rules and accelerate innovation, as a major crypto bill becomes law and two more head to the Senate.
$BONK has tumbled 14.5% amid market-wide pressure, yet a major deflationary event looms as adoption milestones approach. With key partnerships expanding real-world utility and Grayscale adding $BONK to its institutional watchlist, the current pullback contrasts sharply with the project’s accelerating ecosystem growth. Analysts suggest the price dip may represent a consolidation phase before the next push. Source: CoinMarketCap How Bonk’s Burning Strategy Is Reshaping Solana’s Future $BONK leverages the blockchain’s hybrid Proof-of-History (PoH) and Proof-of-Stake (PoS) consensus, allowing fast, scalable, and cost-effective transactions. These core attributes empower Bonk’s expansion across DeFi and NFT use cases. Less than 35,000 onchain holders to 1,000,000 Then 1,000,000,000,000 $BONK burn pic.twitter.com/yvp7St72YE — BONK!!! (@bonk_inu) July 27, 2025 One of the most anticipated events on Bonk’s roadmap is the burning of a massive 1 trillion $BONK tokens once the project hits 1 million on-chain holders. Source: SOLSCAN Right now, they’re at 968,758, just shy of the finish line. At the current pace, this event could be triggered before the end of the week. 500,000,000,000 $BONK was just burned based on fees generated at @bonk_fun You can track fees generated for $BONK buy and burns at https://t.co/3szWidigYy pic.twitter.com/sUPgVvlQJi — BONK!!! (@bonk_inu) July 24, 2025 This follows the recent removal of 500 billion tokens ($13.63 million) from circulation through fee revenue generated by the LetsBonk.fun platform. The launchpad has emerged as a strong revenue driver, surpassing competitor Pump.fun in both token launches and fee generation with a 215% monthly increase in July. . @bonk_fun is now where > 80% of graduated tokens are created, most of that marketshare was taken from @pumpdotfun in under a month src: https://t.co/PEXtSuVoaQ pic.twitter.com/Cs0k980uUm — hildobby (@hildobby) July 29, 2025 Institutional interest appears to be growing despite recent price volatility. First time covering $BONK Smart money whales are HEAVILY bidding $BONK as the price falls deeper, an extremely healthy sign The bonk eco is obviously the centerpiece ecosystem of Solana and it always has been, the value $BONK and it’s community bring to the table is… pic.twitter.com/TsVF7sibXT — sk (@skmakeit) July 30, 2025 Further solidifying its growing credibility, Grayscale’s decision to include $BONK in its Q3 2025 institutional watchlist is a game-changer. Bonk’s rise isn’t confined to trading charts. A partnership with Dabba Network lets people in underserved communities buy internet hotspots using $BONK, plus a portion of that gets burned in the process. This is a win for both adoption and deflation. Get ready for dabba X @bonk_inu Combining the real-world utility of the Dabba Network with the $BONK ecosystem. The future of connectivity is massive, stay tuned. #letsBONK #bonktheinternet pic.twitter.com/3XhPEyB80q — Dabba Network (@DabbaNetwork) March 25, 2025 Another major collaboration is with DeFi Development Corp., launching the Bonk Community Validator that promises to enhance Solana’s decentralization and potentially attract even more institutional interest. BONK’s real-world utility continues to grow. From Magic Eden and Jupiter to Orca and Solana NFT projects, it’s being used as a reward mechanism, a payment tool, and a community driver. The recent acquisition of Exchange Art shows Bonk’s serious ambitions in the NFT realm, moving it beyond meme coin status. In Solana’s fast-and-loose degen culture, that’s no small feat. For now, $BONK is the meme coin in the driver’s seat. $BONK/USDT Breakdown Deepens as Distribution Zone Collapses $BONK/USDT has transitioned from a euphoric momentum rally into an accelerating correction, marked by the collapse beneath a key structural level around $0.00003000. Last week’s price action already hinted at exhaustion, as $BONK began carving out a broad, rounded top. The structure suggested a shift from trend acceleration into distribution, which is a classic topping pattern where volatility compresses but underlying sell pressure quietly builds. The visual breakdown is sharp. After multiple rejections near $0.00003800, the rounded top resolved into a clear breakdown once the $0.00003000 support failed. $BONK/USDT price chart, July 30 (Source: TradingView) This breach triggered a steep selloff with increasing volume and increasingly one-sided order flow. The volume profile underneath the distribution zone was already rising steadily. Coupled with this, the candles following the breakdown show expanded red bars, confirming that sellers are now acting aggressively and with conviction. For instance, one standout data point is the -132.32B delta recorded on July 29, paired with over 1.16T in total volume. This means that aggressive sellers overwhelmed buyers by a large margin, breaching the bid in size. $BONK/USDT volume footprint, July 30 (Source: TradingView) Another session posted a staggering -153B delta on similar volume, demonstrating persistent sell-side dominance. These are huge margins tipping dominance to the sellers. Even recent attempts to stabilize have been weak—a +35.51B delta on 754.68B volume was dwarfed by the magnitude of prior selling pressure. Momentum remains net negative, and buyers appear unwilling to contest deeper lows. This move fits squarely into the macro structure $BONK built throughout July. The early-month rally was driven by sharp trend acceleration—clean vertical impulses supported by rising volume. But once the price plateaued near the highs and began carving rounded, overlapping candles, the transition was underway. The final sign was the support break, and now, the price has entered a breakdown phase with increasing speed. Unless the market reclaims the $0.00002950–$0.00003000 range decisively with volumes, $BONK remains vulnerable to further decline. The post $BONK Sinks 14% – Grayscale Watchlist and 1 Trillion Token Burn Hint at Imminent Rebound appeared first on Cryptonews .