Global liquidity is quietly climbing again, and that could change everything for crypto markets. According to experts Michael Howell and Raoul Pal, this shift could trigger the next major bull run in digital assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum. Michael Howell, a global liquidity analyst, sees signs of a structural liquidity wave forming. This trend is fueled by the U.S. Treasury’s drawdown of its cash reserves and China’s aggressive monetary easing , which includes yuan devaluation—especially against gold. Howell argues this isn’t just a temporary boost but a long-term shift supported by growing fiscal pressures and rising debt levels. Raoul Pal agrees, but zooms in on crypto. He believes crypto assets are highly sensitive to liquidity changes, acting as "high beta" investments that react strongly to money flowing into global markets. Pal predicts we are entering the so-called “banana zone,” a period of exponential crypto gains sparked by liquidity, shifting narratives, and returning retail investors. His models suggest crypto market cap could more than triple by 2026, potentially surpassing $10 trillion. Still, both experts warn that this bull case depends on liquidity continuing to grow. If inflation returns or the U.S. Federal Reserve tightens monetary policy too quickly, it could stall the momentum. Volatility is also expected to remain high. For now, the signs are aligning. Liquidity is rising, and crypto may once again become the top-performing asset class riding that wave.
World Vision Korea, a non-profit organization, has become the first institution to sell crypto after the country announced a phased ban lift on institutional clients trading crypto. Under the new South Korean Financial Services Commission (FSC) guidelines, non-profits are allowed to sell crypto that they receive through donations and sponsorships. On Sunday, the NGO made the sale of 0.55 Ethereum (ETH), equivalent to approximately 1.98 million won ($1,431). The initial sale by World Vision took place on Korea’s largest cryptocurrency exchange, Upbit. The NGO linked its Kbank account to Upbit to sell the Ethereum that it received through donations, the exchange noted . To prevent money laundering, the FSC has strengthened the verification of transaction purposes and sources of funds for non-profits. Additionally, it only allows donations through domestic won exchange accounts. Upbit Operator to Establish Crypto Donation Culture Dunamu, the parent company of crypto exchange Upbit, is looking to aid non-governmental organizations in the country to help sell their crypto donations. The company aims to establish a platform that aligns with the guidelines established by financial authorities and the industry. “Dunamu is currently discussing ways to revitalize the virtual asset sharing culture with the Community Chest of Korea, Love Fruit, etc,” the release read. In March, Dunamu and Upbit carried out a crypto sponsorship campaign exclusively for users to aid underprivileged youth who have difficulty purchasing school uniforms and books. The recent World Vision’s sale of crypto is the result of that “cheer up campaign,” Upbit noted. S. Korea to Allow Public Firms to Trade Crypto Later This Year Further, the FSC unveiled a controlled rollout plan for publicly listed firms and entities to trade crypto in H2, 2025. Under the plan, about 3,500 listed companies and professional investment corporations registered under Korea’s Capital Markets Act will be permitted to trade virtual assets. The Korean government’s most permissive stand towards digital assets comes at a time when other jurisdictions like the US are moving to embrace crypto into national reserves. Additionally, South Korean investors are increasingly looking for the upcoming presidential election on Tuesday. All three leading candidates have pledged to grow the local crypto sector, including spot crypto ETF approvals. The post South Korean NGO Becomes First Entity to Sell Crypto After Phased Ban Lift appeared first on Cryptonews .
BitcoinWorld Urgent Halt Demanded: NAACP Challenges xAI Data Center Operations in Memphis Over Pollution In the rapidly evolving world of artificial intelligence, the infrastructure powering these advancements is often overlooked. While the focus is typically on groundbreaking algorithms or new crypto applications leveraging AI, the physical footprint and energy demands of the necessary computing power are significant. This brings us to a developing situation in Memphis, Tennessee, where a major civil rights organization is raising serious alarms about one such facility: Elon Musk’s xAI data center. NAACP xAI Conflict Escalates Over ‘Dirty Data Center’ The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) has directly challenged local officials in Memphis, urging them to stop operations at Colossus, the large-scale computing facility run by Elon Musk’s artificial intelligence company, xAI. The conflict centers on environmental concerns surrounding the facility’s power generation. According to reports, NAACP leaders sent a letter to the Shelby County Health Department and Memphis Light Gas and Water (MLGW), criticizing what they described as a “lackadaisical approach” to overseeing the operation of this facility, which they labeled a “dirty data center.” The civil rights group’s demand is stark: issue an emergency order for xAI to cease operations completely. Failing that, they call for authorities to at least cite the company and prevent alleged violations of clean air regulations. Focus on the xAI Data Center and Its Power Needs The facility in question, known as Colossus, is described as a “supercomputer.” Building and operating an AI supercomputer requires immense electrical power, not just to run the processors but also for the extensive cooling systems needed to prevent overheating. While connecting to the local grid is standard, some large facilities, particularly those needing significant or highly reliable power, may supplement or primarily rely on on-site power generation, often using gas turbines. The NAACP’s concerns specifically target the gas turbines xAI is using at the Colossus site. The company has reportedly applied for a permit to operate 15 such turbines. However, the NAACP’s letter alleges that authorities have permitted xAI to operate at least 35 gas turbines without any necessary permitting over the past year. City officials have previously stated that permits were not required for the turbines’ initial year of operation, a point of contention for the NAACP. Environmental Pollution and Health Risks The core of the NAACP’s complaint revolves around the potential for environmental pollution emanating from these gas turbines. Such turbines can emit various hazardous air pollutants. The NAACP’s letter highlighted specific concerns: Emissions reportedly include formaldehyde at levels potentially exceeding EPA limits. Concerns were also raised about nitrogen-oxide emissions. These pollutants are known to have adverse health effects. The NAACP’s letter connects these emissions directly to existing health vulnerabilities in the community near the facility. The Memphis Data Center Location and Environmental Justice The location of the Memphis data center is a critical factor in the NAACP’s advocacy. The Colossus facility is situated near the Boxtown neighborhood in South Memphis. The NAACP described Boxtown as a “historically Black community.” This geographical context frames the issue as one of environmental justice. The NAACP argues that placing polluting industries near communities that are already vulnerable or historically marginalized perpetuates a trend where those who contribute least to environmental problems bear the brunt of the pollution’s impact. Their letter starkly points out that the area already faces significant health challenges, noting that cancer risks are reportedly four times the national average. They argue that instead of working to reduce these existing health issues, the Shelby County Health Department has allegedly allowed xAI to operate in a manner that could exacerbate them. What Happens Next? The NAACP’s letter puts pressure on local authorities, specifically the Shelby County Health Department and MLGW commissioners. The response from these entities will determine the immediate future of the xAI facility’s operations and potentially set precedents for how large, power-hungry AI infrastructure projects are regulated in the future. As of recent reports, a spokesperson for Memphis Light Gas and Water indicated they had not yet received the NAACP’s letter. Bitcoin World has reportedly reached out to both the NAACP and xAI for comment on the situation. The outcome of this conflict could have implications not only for xAI and the Memphis community but also for the broader conversation around the environmental footprint of artificial intelligence development and the siting of the massive data centers required to power the next generation of AI and potentially, the infrastructure supporting crypto technologies. Summary: A Growing Concern for AI Infrastructure The dispute between the NAACP and xAI over the Memphis data center highlights a growing area of concern: the environmental impact of the physical infrastructure needed for advanced AI computing. The allegations of operating numerous gas turbines without permits and potentially exceeding pollution limits raise serious questions about regulatory oversight and corporate responsibility. For the nearby Boxtown community, this is not just a technical issue but one with direct implications for public health and environmental equity. The NAACP’s call for an immediate halt underscores the urgency with which they view the potential risks posed by the facility’s current operations. To learn more about the latest AI news and the infrastructure powering AI development, explore our article on key developments shaping AI features and institutional adoption. This post Urgent Halt Demanded: NAACP Challenges xAI Data Center Operations in Memphis Over Pollution first appeared on BitcoinWorld and is written by Editorial Team
The Singapore central bank on Friday ordered all domestic crypto service providers without a Digital Token Service Provider (DTSP) license to halt overseas operations by June 30. The directive comes as part of Singapore’s broader effort to tighten regulatory oversight and protect its growing pool of retail crypto users. According to the Monetary Authority of Singapore , only DTSP license applicants that have received formal approval under the Payment Services Act are permitted to serve overseas clients. Entities that have not obtained such approvals must cease these activities entirely. Singapore’s MAS has mandated that all local crypto firms without a DTSP license must stop serving overseas clients by June 30, 2025, with no transitional period allowed. Non-compliance will lead to penalties. https://t.co/wnQc0pMDqq — Wu Blockchain (@WuBlockchain) June 2, 2025 Singapore Warns Against Overseas Workarounds by Unlicensed Firms In its official response to industry feedback, MAS said that cross-border services offered without regulatory clearance could expose users to unfair practices and raise the risk of financial misconduct. It rejected calls for a phased transition, noting that firms have been aware of these requirements since the consultation process began and should already be in position to comply. MAS added that its approach balances consumer protection with the aim of fostering a safe digital asset ecosystem. MAS also clarified that the prohibition applies regardless of whether overseas services are provided directly or through intermediaries. It warned that attempts to circumvent the rules by relocating parts of operations abroad while continuing to manage them from Singapore would be considered non-compliant. Singapore Sees Uptick in Digital Asset Use While Tightening Rules To reinforce accountability, MAS stated it will actively monitor and investigate suspicious setups that appear designed to bypass licensing. This regulatory crackdown unfolds as more Singaporeans embrace digital assets . A Straits Times report published in April found that 26% of Singaporeans owned digital assets in 2024, up from 24.4% the year before. Adoption is highest among younger generations, with nearly 40% of Gen Z and millennials holding cryptocurrencies. Among crypto holders, 52% have used digital tokens for payments, and 67% plan to do so in future. The most common uses include online shopping, bill payments and in-store purchases. Older users tend to favor peer-to-peer transfers to friends and family, particularly across borders. Despite increasing usage, concerns remain. More than 60% of respondents in the survey said crypto is still too complex to use, while 54% cited limited merchant acceptance as a major barrier. Even so, crypto transaction volumes are on the rise, placing Singapore at the center of Asia’s regulated digital finance push. The post Singapore Warns Unlicensed Crypto Firms Must Exit Overseas Markets by June 30 appeared first on Cryptonews .
Metaplanet boosts Bitcoin holdings to 8,888 units, valuing at 933 million dollars. CEO Gerovich highlights long-term cryptocurrency investment as crucial for growth strategy. Continue Reading: Metaplanet Increases Bitcoin Holdings in Bold Crypto Strategy The post Metaplanet Increases Bitcoin Holdings in Bold Crypto Strategy appeared first on COINTURK NEWS .
BitcoinWorld AI Risk Assessment: Meta Plans Bold Automation Move In the fast-paced world of technology, where platforms evolve constantly, companies like Meta are exploring new ways to manage the inherent complexities and potential pitfalls. For those invested in the digital future, understanding how major players handle critical functions like safety and privacy is key. A significant development has emerged regarding Meta’s approach to product risk assessment, signaling a major shift towards leveraging artificial intelligence. What is Meta’s AI Risk Assessment Plan? According to reports citing internal documents, Meta is planning to automate a large portion of its product risk assessments. This involves using an AI-powered system to evaluate the potential harms and privacy risks associated with updates to its popular applications, such as Instagram and WhatsApp. The goal is reportedly to have this system handle up to 90% of these reviews. The process under this new system would involve product teams completing a questionnaire about their proposed changes. The AI system would then provide an “instant decision,” identifying potential risks and outlining requirements that must be met before the update can be launched. This represents a substantial departure from the current method, which relies heavily on human evaluators. Why Embrace Automation in Tech for Risk Reviews? The primary motivation behind this move towards automation in tech is speed. By replacing lengthy human review processes with near-instantaneous AI evaluations, Meta could potentially accelerate the pace at which it develops and deploys new features and updates across its platforms. In a competitive digital landscape, faster iteration cycles can be a significant advantage. This drive for efficiency is a common theme in large tech companies constantly seeking ways to streamline operations and reduce time-to-market for innovations. How Does This Impact Product Risk Management and Tech Privacy? This shift in product risk management is particularly notable given Meta’s history. A 2012 agreement with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) requires the company, then Facebook, to conduct privacy reviews of its products and assess the risks of updates. Until now, fulfilling this requirement has largely fallen to human reviewers tasked with safeguarding tech privacy. While the potential for faster updates is clear, concerns have been raised. One former executive reportedly told NPR that this AI-centric approach could create “higher risks.” The worry is that the AI system might be less effective at identifying subtle or unforeseen negative externalities of product changes before they cause problems in the real world, potentially impacting user tech privacy and overall platform safety. Meta’s Stance on AI Risk Assessment and Human Oversight In response to the reports, Meta has reportedly confirmed changes to its review system but offered clarification. The company insisted that only “low-risk decisions” would be automated. Complex, novel, or high-stakes issues would still undergo review involving “human expertise.” This suggests Meta aims for a hybrid approach, leveraging AI for routine assessments while retaining human oversight for situations where nuanced judgment and a deeper understanding of potential societal impacts are critical for effective product risk management and protecting tech privacy. What Are the Implications of This Automation in Tech? The move towards significant automation in tech for risk assessment highlights the ongoing tension between innovation speed and robust safety protocols. If successful, the AI system could indeed make Meta’s development process more agile. However, the effectiveness of this system in truly identifying and mitigating risks, especially novel ones, remains a key question. The reliance on AI for such a critical function in product risk management underscores the growing importance of AI safety and ethics. Ensuring the AI is trained on comprehensive data and is capable of identifying a wide range of potential harms is paramount for maintaining user trust and upholding commitments to tech privacy and safety. Conclusion Meta’s reported plan to automate a significant portion of its product risk assessments using AI marks a notable evolution in how large tech companies approach safety and compliance. While promising potential benefits in terms of speed and efficiency through automation in tech, it also brings into focus critical questions about the limitations of AI in identifying complex risks and the ongoing need for human judgment in safeguarding product risk management and user tech privacy. The implementation and performance of this system will be closely watched as a case study in balancing rapid development with responsible technological stewardship. To learn more about the latest AI market trends, explore our article on key developments shaping AI innovation. This post AI Risk Assessment: Meta Plans Bold Automation Move first appeared on BitcoinWorld and is written by Editorial Team
The chief investment officer of investment firm Fundstrat says that President Donald Trump’s trade war is nearing its end as courts rule against the White House. In a new video update on the Fundstrat Capital YouTube channel, Tom Lee says that court rulings against Trump’s tariffs suggest that the White House is losing leverage. “In our view, the tariff war and concerns have a bark worse than the bite. Let me explain, for instance… on May 28th, the international trade court ruled against the Trump tariffs. Now it didn’t remove all of them, but it ruled against them and on Thursday, May 29th, the DC District Court Judge Contreras ruled that [the] tariffs are illegal. So it’s two cases ruling against White House tariffs, but on the same day, the Federal Court of Appeals issued an administrative stay which reinstates the tariffs – at least through June 9th – but you can see this is getting quite complicated and the White House is insisting nothing has changed after the tariff rulings. And in fact, Goldman Sachs highlights that there’s many measures the White House can take to implement or re-implement tariffs. But ultimately, the White House is losing leverage, and it’s taking us closer to the endgame.” Lee also says that due to the rulings, Trump will struggle to revamp the trade war, and that the White House will be looking for an exit strategy on the matter soon. Lee goes on to note that tariff visibility and other factors have led to a better investment outlook for stocks now compared to earlier this year. “The investment outlook is better for stocks now arguably than it was in February 2025 because you’ve got tariff visibility, you have tax and deregulation visibility, [and] the companies survived [a] fifth major stress test… and the Fed is arguably more dovish next year.” Follow us on X , Facebook and Telegram Don't Miss a Beat – Subscribe to get email alerts delivered directly to your inbox Check Price Action Surf The Daily Hodl Mix Disclaimer: Opinions expressed at The Daily Hodl are not investment advice. Investors should do their due diligence before making any high-risk investments in Bitcoin, cryptocurrency or digital assets. Please be advised that your transfers and trades are at your own risk, and any losses you may incur are your responsibility. The Daily Hodl does not recommend the buying or selling of any cryptocurrencies or digital assets, nor is The Daily Hodl an investment advisor. Please note that The Daily Hodl participates in affiliate marketing. Generated Image: Midjourney The post Trump’s Trade War Now Closer to Endgame As White House Loses Court Cases, According to Fundstrat’s Tom Lee appeared first on The Daily Hodl .
Axel Adler Jr., an analyst at cryptocurrency analysis platform CryptoQuant, noted that despite Bitcoin’s recent brief pullback to $103,000-$104,000, fundamental indicators remain strong. According to Adler, Bitcoin reserves on exchanges continue to decline, institutional buying continues to put pressure on supply, and long-term investors are increasing their purchases, building a “buffer support” under the market. On the macroeconomic front, mixed signals prevail. While the slowdown in Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) inflation in the US has eased policy pressure on the Fed to some extent, rising bond yields and uncertain tariffs have strengthened the “risk aversion” sentiment in the markets and suppressed growth appetite. Related News: Significant Cryptocurrency Bill Unveiled in South Korea - Expected to Pass Easily Adler stated that the basic scenario for the coming week is for Bitcoin to trend sideways between $103,000 and $110,000. However, if there is a 20% breakout due to momentum and an increase in trading volume and the $110,000 level is exceeded, he added that a strong signal could be formed that the market is ready to test the $115,000-$120,000 band. On the other hand, if net inflows turn negative and prices fall below $100,000, it could be a sign of a deeper correction. *This is not investment advice. Continue Reading: Experienced Analyst Shares New Weekly Forecasts for Bitcoin (BTC) Price
The new launch expands IG’s existing cryptocurrency offering, as the company has previously offered crypto-based contracts for difference.