4chan shut down servers after a major hack. Google introduced forced reboot for Android. Trojan for Chinese smartphones stole over $1.6 million in cryptocurrencies. Vulnerabilities found in several Bitcoin wallets. Google introduced forced reboot for Android In the latest update of Google Play services, a function of automatic reboot for Android devices appeared. It will complicate data extraction using modern forensic tools. When the phone is turned on, it goes into the Before First Unlock state, in which most user data remains encrypted. But after the first unlock, in the After First Unlock (AFU) state, they become available for extraction. Thanks to the new feature, the device will automatically reboot if it remains inactive for 72 hours. Trojan for Chinese smartphones stole over $1.6 million in cryptocurrencies Dr.Web researchers reported preinstalled trojanized applications in budget copies of premium Android smartphone models from Samsung and Huawei. Among the modified programs are messengers WhatsApp and Telegram, QR code scanners, and others. The Shibai malware intercepts the app update process and also searches chats for Ethereum or Tron crypto wallet addresses and replaces them with fraudulent ones. In addition, it scans saved images for the presence of seed phrases. The attackers use about 30 domains to distribute malware and more than 60 command servers. Over the past two years, the wallets of the scheme organizers received over $1.6 million. Vulnerabilities found in several Bitcoin wallets Coinspect researchers discovered critical vulnerabilities in browser wallets Stellar Freighter, Frontier Wallet, and Coin98 that allow assets to be stolen unnoticed. To connect to dapps, browser wallets inject code into every tab visited by the user, establishing a communication channel. It allows the app to recognize the wallet and request access to key functions such as viewing balance or initiating transaction approval requests. Messages are transmitted to the Background Script, which has access to the private key. The final interaction takes place in the wallet interface. Unlike long-term connections that create separate channels for different parts of the extension, this approach does not have such separation. An attacker can intentionally cause confusion by sending a message to a privileged API through a listener in the background script. Malicious requests imitate legitimate ones and may lead to the display of the seed phrase for backup purposes. Experts have passed details about the vulnerability to the developers of each of the three wallets. So far, all have made the necessary fixes. 4chan shut down servers after major hack On April 14, the online forum 4chan was subjected to a serious attack and suspended operation . Members of the imageboard Soyjak.party took responsibility for the incident. Screenshots of the administrator and staff control panels, as well as a list of emails presumably belonging to the platform’s leaders and moderators, were leaked online. As Bleeping Computer writes , potential interception of maintenance tools gives hackers access to the location and IP address of any user, the ability to restart any 4chan boards, and manage databases. Later the same day, the forum’s source code appeared on Kiwi Farms. The alleged hackers did not disclose the attack vector. According to the community, the cause could be the platform’s outdated PHP version from 2016. To minimize damage, administrators presumably shut down the servers. At the time of writing, the site is unavailable. Darknet forum account owners offered to sell them anonymously Swiss cybersecurity company Prodaft announced the purchase of accounts from darknet forums. They are interested in accounts on XSS, Exploit, RAMP4U, Verified, and BreachForums registered before December 2022. Owners are guaranteed payment in cryptocurrency, with a higher amount for moderator or administrator accounts. The account must not be on the list of the most wanted by any law enforcement agencies. Also, as part of the initiative, users can anonymously report cybercrimes committed by someone. The deal is conducted anonymously using secure communication channels. Subsequently, the obtained data without seller information will be transferred to law enforcement for use in HUMINT operations and infiltration of closed cybercriminal communities. Reddit fulfilled only a quarter of Russia’s content removal requests The American platform Reddit received 122 content removal requests from government agencies and law enforcement of various countries in the second half of 2024. In particular, Russia sent 15 unique requests, of which the social network satisfied only four (26%). According to the report, less than a third of the requested content (27%) actually violated platform rules. Geoblocking was not applied in any case. The largest number of requests (24) was sent by the UAE authorities. In addition, a total of 27 legal requests turned out to be fake, about which Reddit notified law enforcement agencies.
Solana faces significant value loss against Bitcoin with caution advised for investors. Technical indicators signal potential aggressive price movements in the near term. Continue Reading: Solana Faces Declining Trends as Technical Indicators Signal Caution The post Solana Faces Declining Trends as Technical Indicators Signal Caution appeared first on COINTURK NEWS .
The creator of Ethereum layer 2 blockchain Base, Jesse Pollak, has apologized following backlash over posting digital artwork that controversially played on Base’s tagline, “Base is for everyone.” Several social media users found the artwork offensive and inappropriate. “It was a single phrase among many, but I’ll own this was a mistake and apologize,” Pollak said in an April 18 X post referring to his decision to reshare a GIF image that featured the phrase “Base is for...” followed by a rotating sequence of words, including both controversial terms like “pimping” and “squirting,” as well as more neutral ones like “art,” “minting,” and “ideas.” Pollak says he appreciates “provocative art” Pollak emphasized that the artwork was made by a creator, not him, and specifically apologized for the image featuring the phrase “Base is for pimping.” Pollak said that while he wants to support artists building on Base and admits he appreciates “provocative art,” he recognizes the need to be mindful of his shared messages, especially when they appear to come directly from him. Source: Jesse Pollak It comes after criticism from several crypto industry participants who took to social media to voice their disappointment over Pollak’s endorsement of the image, calling out the use of the word “pimping.” Crypto commentator “Kristel” said in an April 18 X post, “so we’re just casually platforming pimping now?” “I get pushing boundaries, but this isn’t it,” she said. “This isn’t provocative and ‘edgy,” she added. Kanto Labs founder said it is an “absolute PR nightmare.” Meanwhile, crypto commentator David Z. Morris said this “doesn’t just hurt Base, it hurts crypto.” Morris added: “The specific allusion to sex trafficking (not “sex work,” pimping is pretty fundamentally exploitation) is specifically bad for a sector that needs to advance the narrative that open finance is a net social positive.” However, many praised Pollak for the apology and his continued efforts to push boundaries in the crypto industry. “Love the honesty. We all make mistakes, but it’s about how we grow from them,” crypto commentator Zuri said . Bankless co-founder David Hoffman said , “I respect the leadership here.” Milk Road co-founder Kyle Reidhead said , “Do and share whatever you want without apology.” Base was at the center of controversy only days ago when the official X account shared a post promoting a memecoin with its marketing tagline , “Base is for everyone.” Related: Base creator Jesse Pollak to join Coinbase exec team and lead wallet charge It also shared a link to a token of the same name on Zora, a social network where users can make posts into tokens for others to speculate on. In just over an hour after it was created, the Base is for everyone token hit a peak market capitalization of $17.1 million — then dropped by nearly 90% over the next 20 minutes to a market value of $1.9 million, according to DEX Screener data . A Coinbase spokeswoman distanced Base from the token, telling Cointelegraph on April 17, "Base did not launch a token.” “This is not an official Base token, and Base did not sell this token. Base posted on Zora, which automatically tokenizes content,” the spokeswoman said. Magazine: Make Ethereum feel like Ethereum again: Based rollups explained
Crypto’s momentum is beginning to shift, and traders are paying close attention to coins that are already showing strength mid-week. Among them, XRP , Ethereum (ETH) , Solana (SOL) , and Bitcoin (BTC) are holding key levels and demonstrating renewed conviction among both retail and institutional players. But beneath the surface, one new altcoin is building the kind of early momentum that long-term traders look for before the wave hits. LIMITED SPOTS — JOIN 2025’S BIGGEST PRESALE! MAGACOINFINANCE – Early Access, Early Power Crypto’s best opportunities always feel obvious in hindsight. MAGACOINFINANCE is one of those rare moments where the signal is clear—before the crowd catches on. You’re not just early—you’re on the ground floor. But this phase doesn’t last. When exchange listings hit and exposure ramps up, this quiet opportunity becomes yesterday’s news for anyone who hesitated. This is about acting when it’s still your move to make. Every minute you wait, someone else is locking in. Are you willing to risk regret over hesitation? Early buyers can still activate the MAGA50X promo, unlocking 50% more tokens on every purchase. That means more value, stronger entry, and a better edge once listings begin. 2025’S MOST TALKED ABOUT CRYPTO — JOIN 12,500+ INVESTORS TODAY! Other Movers to Watch XRP remains a crowd favorite due to its real-world integrations and legal clarity progress. ETH continues to dominate Layer-1 development activity. SOL is driving forward with its efficient network and developer growth, and BTC is holding its macro dominance despite recent volatility. TON is expanding within messaging platforms and gaining user traction , SUI continues building infrastructure for modular blockchain development , Chainlink (LINK) remains the leader in real-time data feeds for smart contracts. GET 50% EXTRA BONUS – USE CODE MAGA50X – LIMITED TIME OFFER Conclusion The market may be stabilizing, but MAGACOINFINANCE is accelerating. As XRP , ETH , SOL , and BTC draw attention, those chasing real upside are locking in before the crowd catches on. Don’t wait for the wave—position before it breaks. Website: magacoinfinance.com Twitter/X: https://x.com/magacoinfinance Continue Reading: Momentum Picks Right Now: XRP, Ethereum, Solana, and BTC
With strong liquidity, solid volume, and a key position in the perp DEX space, HYPE is set for growth.
What are tariffs? Tariffs are taxes placed on imported goods by a government or a supranational union. Occasionally, tariffs can be applied to exports as well. They generate government revenue and serve as a trade regulation tool, often to shield domestic industries. Four main categories of tariffs are: Ad valorem tariffs: These are calculated as a percentage of the good’s value. For instance, a 20% tax might be placed on $100 of goods. Specific tariffs: These are fixed fees based on the quantity of goods. For example, there might be a tariff of $5 per imported kilogram of sugar. Compound tariffs: These combine a specific duty and an ad valorem duty applied to the same imported goods. Both tariffs are calculated together to determine the total tax. For example, a country might place a tariff on imported wine at $5 per liter plus 10% of the wine’s value. Mixed tariffs: Mixed tariffs apply either a specific duty or an ad valorem duty, based on predefined conditions. For instance, for imported trucks, a country might charge either $5,000 per vehicle or 15% of the car’s value, whichever is greater. The objective of such policy is to influence international trade flows, protect domestic industries, and respond to unfair practices by foreign countries. When a tariff is applied to an imported good, it raises its cost, making domestically produced alternatives more lucrative for customers regarding price. In the US, the Trump administration uses reciprocal tariffs as a key instrument in influencing the trade policies of other countries. Reciprocal tariffs are trade duties a country imposes in retaliation to tariffs or barriers set by another country. This policy seeks to correct trade imbalances and safeguard domestic industries. Tariffs are generally collected by the customs departments of a country at ports of entry based on the declared value and classification of goods. Did you know? Some countries use tariff-rate quotas, allowing a set quantity of a product to be imported at a lower tariff. Once the quota is exceeded, a higher tariff kicks in. This system balances domestic protection with access to global markets, especially in sectors like agriculture and textiles. Trump administration’s reciprocal tariff policy US President Donald Trump signed an executive order on April 2, 2025, a day he called Liberation Day, citing his authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). The order placed a minimum 10% tariff on all US imports effective April 5, 2025. Reciprocal tariffs went into effect on April 9, 2025. Trump stated that the US would apply reciprocal tariffs at roughly half the rate imposed by other countries. For instance, the US imposed a 34% tariff in response to China’s 67%. A 25% tariff on all automobile imports was also announced. The Trump administration’s reciprocal tariff policy is rooted in the belief that the US faced long-standing trade imbalances and unfair treatment by global trading partners. To address this, his administration pushed for what it called reciprocal tariffs, aiming at setting a tariff structure that matched or at least was close to tariffs that foreign nations imposed on American exports. Under this approach, the administration used tariff policies to pressure countries to lower their trade barriers or renegotiate trade deals. The policy drew support from domestic manufacturers and labor groups for attempting to rebalance trade and support the US industry. But it also sparked criticism from economists and international allies who viewed it as protectionist and destabilizing the prevalent economic system in the world. The reciprocal tariffs policy has reshaped US trade relations and marked a departure from decades of multilateral, open global trade policy. Did you know? Tariffs can reshape supply chains. To avoid high import taxes, companies often relocate manufacturing to countries with favorable trade agreements. This shift doesn’t always benefit consumers, as savings are not always passed down, and logistics become more complex. The US–China tariff war: A defining economic conflict The US–China tariff war, which began in 2018 under the first Trump administration, marked a significant shift in global economic relations. The conflict between the world’s two largest economies had broad implications for global supply chains , inflation and geopolitical dynamics. The trade conflict between the US and China wasn’t just a bilateral spat. It signaled a structural rethinking of trade policy in a multipolar world. The trade war began after the US imposed sweeping tariffs under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974, citing unfair trade practices, intellectual property theft and forced technology transfers by China. Over time, the US levied tariffs on more than $360 billion worth of Chinese goods. China retaliated with tariffs on $110 billion of US exports, targeting key sectors like agriculture and manufacturing. The conflict disrupted major supply chains and raised costs for American businesses and consumers. American farmers were hit hard by retaliatory Chinese tariffs on soybeans, leading the US government to provide billions in subsidies to offset losses. While the Phase One Agreement in 2020 eased tensions and required China to increase purchases of US goods and enforce intellectual property protections, many tariffs remained in place. The Biden administration retained most of the economic measures imposed by the first Trump administration, signaling bipartisan concern over China’s trade practices. As of April 10, 2025, Trump had imposed 125% tariffs on China, while for 75 countries, he had paused the imposition of tariffs for 90 days. Compared to disputes with allies like the European Union or Canada, the stakes are higher in the US–China conflict, and the consequences are more far-reaching. Here are the responses of various governments to Trump’s tariffs: Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney implemented a 25% tariff on US-made cars and trucks. China will impose a 34% tariff on all US imports, effective April 10. The French prime minister described the tariffs as an economic catastrophe. Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni criticized the tariffs as wrong. European Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen pledged a unified response and prepared countermeasures. Taiwan’s government denounced the tariffs as unreasonable. How do tariffs work? When a tariff is applied — for example, a 30% tax on imported steel — it raises the price of that good for importers. They, in turn, pass these added costs to downstream businesses, which further transfer these costs to consumers. For importers, tariffs mean higher purchase costs. If a US company imports machinery from abroad and faces a tariff, its total cost increases. This possibly reduces its profit margins or forces it to search for alternatives. Exporters in other countries may suffer if US buyers reduce orders due to higher prices, hurting their competitiveness. Domestic producers may benefit initially from a high tariff regime. Tariffs can shield them from cheaper foreign competition, allowing them to increase sales and potentially make profits. But if their operations rely on imported components subject to tariffs, their input costs may rise, offsetting gains. Consumers often bear the brunt. Tariffs can lead to price hikes on everyday goods — from electronics to apparel. In the long term, high tariffs contribute to inflation and reduce purchasing power. Tariffs also disrupt global supply chains. Many products are assembled using components from multiple countries. High tariffs on one component can cause delays, prompt redesigns, or force companies to relocate manufacturing, increasing complexity and costs. Overall, while tariffs aim to protect domestic industries, their impact is felt across the economy through altering prices, trade flows and business strategies. One way or another, tariffs influence everyone — from factory owners to workers and everyday shoppers. Trump excluded various tech products, such as smartphones, chips, computers and certain electronics, from reciprocal tariffs, providing the tech sector with crucial relief from tariff pressure. This step of Trump eased pressure on tech stocks. Trump’s tariff announcement on April 2 triggered a sharp sell-off in both equities and Bitcoin ( BTC ), with BTC plunging 10.5% in a week. Once seen as a non-correlated asset, Bitcoin now trades in sync with tech stocks during macro shocks. According to analysts, institutional investors increasingly treat BTC as a risk-on asset closely tied to policy shifts. While some view Bitcoin as digital gold, recent behavior shows it reacting more like Nasdaq stocks — falling during global uncertainty and rallying on positive sentiment. Did you know? Tariff exemptions can be highly strategic. Governments may exclude specific industries or companies, allowing them to import goods tariff-free while competitors pay more. This creates an uneven playing field and can spark domestic controversy. Why do tariffs matter for global markets? Tariffs are a robust tool in the hands of governments to shape a nation’s economic and trade strategy. They are not merely taxes on imports but a tool that influences domestic production, consumer behavior and global trade relationships. For the US, tariffs have historically been used to assert economic power on the global stage, protect emerging industries, and respond to unfair trade practices. When countries with large economies are involved, tariff decisions can impact global supply chains, shift manufacturing hubs, and alter the price of goods worldwide. Even for the smaller countries, in an interconnected world, tariffs matter because their impact goes far beyond national borders. Domestically, tariffs could boost local industries by making foreign goods more expensive. This can create jobs and support economic resilience in the short term. Governments getting larger revenue via tariffs will enable them to reduce direct taxes as Trump proposed. But they can also raise prices for consumers, hurt exporters, and trigger retaliation from trade partners. As geopolitical tensions rise and nations reevaluate their economic dependencies, tariffs have reemerged as a central element of US trade policy. Whether used defensively or offensively, they shape the balance between protectionism and global engagement. This makes tariffs a matter not just of economics, but of national strategy and global influence. Who sets tariff policy in the US? In the US, tariff policy is shaped by a combination of legislative authority, executive power and administrative enforcement. Various agencies also help in the execution of tariff policy. Congress holds the constitutional authority to regulate trade and impose tariffs. Over time, Congress has given the president significant power to change tariffs for national security, economic threats or trade violations. The Office of the US Trade Representative plays a central role in formulating and negotiating US trade policy. It leads trade talks, manages disputes, and recommends tariff actions, often in coordination with the president and Congress. US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) is responsible for enforcing tariffs at ports of entry. CBP collects duties based on the classification and value of imported goods according to the Harmonized Tariff Schedule. Several major trade laws have shaped tariff policy in the US. The Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of 1930, aimed at protecting US farmers during the Great Depression , led to retaliatory tariffs and worsened global trade. Later, the Trade Act of 1974 gave the president tools like Section 301, which was used extensively during the US–China trade war to impose retaliatory tariffs on unfair foreign practices. Together, these actors and laws form the foundation of US tariff policy. Criticism of Trump’s tariff policy Criticism of Trump’s tariff policy surfaced following the announcement of reciprocal tariffs. Critics say this move bypasses Congress and sets a dangerous precedent for unchecked executive power in economic matters. Detractors argue that these tariffs hurt American businesses more than their intended foreign targets. A Vox article argued that low-income people would be hit more by Trump’s tariffs than by the already reeling Wall Street. Former Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers fears that America may slip into recession due to tariffs, probably costing 2 million jobs nationwide. Legal challenges have also emerged regarding Trump’s tariff policy. The New Civil Liberties Alliance (NCLA), a conservative legal group, has filed a lawsuit on behalf of Simplified, a small business based in Florida that sells planners and sources goods from China. The lawsuit claims that the president overstepped his authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) when imposing tariffs in a non-emergency trade context. Small and mid-sized businesses, many of which rely on global supply chains, will have to deal with rising import costs due to tariffs. This may lead to inflation and reduced competitiveness of such businesses. While the tariffs might hit China financially in the short term, the action could result in higher prices for US consumers and disrupt operations for American firms if the tariff policy continues for a long time.
The post Aptos Community Proposes 50% Cut in Staking Rewards : What’s Next for the Network? appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News Aptos is making waves as a community member recently submitted a proposal on April 18 to slash the staking rewards nearly by almost 50%. The plan submitted by the member, MoonSheisty suggests lowering the rewards from 7% to 3.79% over the next three months. The plan aims to align Aptos with other Layer-1 blockchains and boost its capital efficiency. Although the proposal sparked discussions on X, the initial feedbacks on GitHub indicated some hesitation from the community. The proposal suggests that Aptos should create a community validator program to give grants and staking opportunities to the smaller validators who contribute to the ecosystem. Notably, according to data from Defilama, Aptos currently has a total value locked of $974 million as of April 18, where about $320 million comes from the lending protocol Aries Markets. However, ElagabalxNode, a community member noted that reducing the staking rewards without ‘compensatory mechanisms’ like a strong delegation program could drive away the smaller validators out of the network. This could impact Aptos blockchain’s decentralisation and its ability to stay strong in the long run. MoonSheisty claims that high staking rewards could prevent users from exploring opportunities involving high-risk and higher rewards like restaking, DePIN infrastructure, MEV, and Defi. Notably, Staking rewards differs significantly across blockchains as BNB Smart Chain’s real returns are one of the highest at 7.43%, while Cardano offers just 0.55%. Besides, benefits with staking include locking token onchain, supporting validators, securing the network. Notably, the rewards earned function similar to interest earned on a savings account, but instead of cash, stakers earn in crypto, which can fluctuate in value. The proposals to changing staking procedures are common. Polkadot had previously proposed to reduce the unstaking time to just two days. Further, in September, Starknet introduced a new staking mechanism. Meanwhile Vitalik Buterin suggested solutions to staking issues later.
Aptos community member MoonSheisty submitted a proposal to slash staking rewards for the network’s native token, Aptos (APT), by almost half. The community-driven proposal suggests a notable decrease in staking rewards, aiming to adjust the annual yield for validators and delegators. This adjustment of reward yields from 7% to 3.79% in three months is seen as a strategic step to ensure the long-term sustainability and economic balance of the Aptos network. It will also align Aptos staking rewards with other layer-1 blockchains and encourage capital efficiency. Aptos proposal triggers debate over staking cuts and network decentralization The initiative has drawn attention to X, though early feedback on GitHub reveals some pushback. Community member ElagabalxNode cautioned that slashing rewards without “compensatory mechanisms like a robust delegation program” could sideline smaller validators, potentially undermining decentralization and long-term network resilience. As part of the proposal, MoonSheisty also suggested establishing a community validator program to offer grants and stake support to smaller contributors. Founded in 2021 by former Meta engineers, Aptos currently boasts a total value locked (TVL) of $974 million, according to DefiLlama. Of that, around $320 million comes from the lending protocol Aries Markets. While high staking rewards help attract participants to secure the network, the proposal argues that they may inadvertently steer users away from riskier, potentially more rewarding opportunities such as restaking MEV (maximal extractable value), DePIN infrastructure, and broader DeFi applications. Staking returns differ widely between networks. CoinLedger reports that BNB Smart Chain offers some of the highest real returns at 7.43%, while Cardano sits at the lower end with just 0.55%. Much like savings account interest payouts, staking aims to give users tokens for putting theirs to work by locking them up and supporting network validators. But the rewards—paid in crypto—can vary in fiat value. The Aptos proposal is one of a number of recent evaluations of staking dynamics among blockchains. In June 2024, Polkadot suggested reducing its time for unstaking to a mere two days. As of September, the Starknet community approved a new staking mechanism with a suggestion from Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin to follow up on some things to overcome some of the challenges of staking. Staking grants users a meaningful role in network governance and security but also presents risks. Chief among them is the consolidation of staking power, which can centralize control and erode the decentralization blockchains strive to maintain. Aptos uses a staking system with epoch-based rewards Within the Aptos ecosystem, a staking system is utilized with ongoing epoch-based reward distribution. This structure guarantees that validators are incentivized according to their active participation in and contribution to the governance of the network. Aptos has a governance model that permits community members (who meet the minimum staking requirement) to propose and vote on proposed changes. This dedication also serves the goal of a decentralized decision-making process through inclusiveness. However, as the community grappled with the consequences of slashing staking rewards, conversations about similar compensatory mechanisms began to surface. Details of how a community validator program would work are still being proposed and discussed to support smaller validators or help with network decentralization. Cryptopolitan Academy: Tired of market swings? Learn how DeFi can help you build steady passive income. Register Now
According to the latest data from Glassnode, Bitcoin whales (wallets holding more than 10,000 BTC) continue to accumulate large amounts of BTC, signaling confidence in the long-term outlook despite recent market corrections. The accumulation trend among whales contrasts with the behavior of smaller holders. Investors holding less than 1-100 BTC have recently reduced their selling activity, potentially signaling a sentiment shift. Meanwhile, mid-sized holders holding 10-100 BTC are also showing signs of a shift from selling to buying, a development that could reflect increased optimism or a strategic re-entry into the market. Related News: HOT MOMENTS: Some Altcoins Listed on Major Exchanges Are Experiencing Sudden Declines - Here's the Latest Information Glassnode’s report also sheds light on unrealized losses across investor classes. The firm notes that Short-Term Holders (STHs) are experiencing significant unrealized losses given the depth of the current correction. These levels are comparable to those observed in the early stages of previous bear markets. In contrast, Long-Term Holders (LTHs) remain largely in profit. However, Glassnode warns that the network’s capacity to absorb losses may increase as Bitcoin buyers at previous cycle peaks transition to LTH status. Historically, such transitions have often coincided with bear market confirmations, but analysts emphasize that current conditions do not yet point to a definitive market regime shift. *This is not investment advice. Continue Reading: What Are Massive Bitcoin Whales Holding More Than 10.000 BTC Doing Right Now? Buying or Selling?
COINOTAG News reports that on April 19th, former President Trump is organizing an exclusive dinner for TRUMP token holders. This initiative aims to strengthen community engagement and enhance the utility