HodlX Guest Post Submit Your Post Web 3.0 founders must start acting like Web 2.0 founders or perish. It’s time for Web 3.0 to grow up. If teams are going to compete with the technology behemoths of today, they have to abandon the long-held crypto strategy of opacity and secrecy. Instead, they must doxx and present themselves as professionals online and in person in order to gain trust. Team members – most importantly, executives – should reveal their verified identities online on platforms such as LinkedIn, X and others. They should participate in conferences – not in hoodies and jeans – but in three-piece suits. It is more likely you will be taken seriously than if you are in the garb of a high schooler. Moreover, executives in Web 3.0 might consider starting their own podcasts aimed at high-value guests, with whom they might strike up a partnership as the relationship develops. Doxxed team members from your company’s marketing team can host weekly podcasts with other high-value guests. Now, just because you have a public profile doesn’t mean you need to sacrifice privacy. You can still keep information about much of your family private, unless you end up leading a unicorn and skyrocket to global stardom, which happens too few. Otherwise, your public persona can be strictly professional. Instead of creating DAOs (decentralized autonomous organizations) out of thin air, register a proper legal entity. In the US, this might be an LLC or C-Corp in a state such as Wyoming or – to a lesser degree these days – Delaware. If a DAO is absolutely necessary for your project, the governance must be done in a transparent fashion. DAOs should publish governance frameworks, as well as voting mechanisms, proposal processes and treasury management. Comply with all regulations. Community managers must be doxxed. Develop a customer service system to promptly address community feedback. This can be automated with AI tools, and people should receive prompt replies, even if they are automated. Treat your community as partners. Post truthful and detailed information on development progress on social platforms. Also share development logs via a public repository, such as GitHub or public Notion boards. The public should know about code commits, bug fixes and roadmap milestones. Internal decisions should be accompanied by press releases with clear reasoning behind decisions – no jargon. Keep making progress and communicating via social media during bear markets. Web 3.0 projects often have advisors. All too often, these advisors are the people closest to the founders, not truly strategic partners – and that’s a problem. Instead of inviting crypto influencers to sit on a board, Web 3.0 founders should invite leading technology billionaires to advise their firms and ensure that once the advisory has been handpicked, it is filled with ardent professionals with track records of success. The advisors should be excited about the project and available to help. In contracts with advisors, the requirement for ongoing advice might be spelled out. This group should then be listed, along with their credentials and roles, for all to see. Legal counsel is essential to ensure your project does not run afoul of any securities law, KYC and AML regulations and tax obligations. Be public about your dedication to the law. Perhaps for your advisory team, recruit former regulators or legal minds. Investors want to know for a fact that the company will persist, rather than burn out, fade away or disappear in the night – like so many Web 3.0 projects heretofore. This is a big fear among the public – especially strategic partners and investors – given such a high failure rate of Web 3.0 projects. We’ve seen a considerable share of DeFi projects launched fail. What’s more, those who stick around seemingly have decreasing odds of seeing their token prices regain their old ATHs (all-time highs). Not a good sign for potential billionaire investors who Web 3.0 founders would love to attract. To be sure, doxxing a Web 3.0 team is a high-risk, high-reward endeavor as it comes with increased risk of digital and real-life attacks. Nonetheless, in order to find themselves inside big tech boardrooms, it might help founders to build Web 3.0 projects like the Web 2.0 companies. Learn from the tech giants of yesterday and today who continue to eat the world with their advancement in AI. 2025 is much different than 2014. Web 3.0 companies must adapt – and largely, they have not. If you want to survive in the quickly changing technology landscape, founders have no choice but to doxx their Web 3.0 company. Founders are not exempt from this rule. This is perhaps the quickest way to separate a Web 3.0 project from the countless other projects that everybody knows are going nowhere. If the public knows a Web 3.0 team, knows you’re structured like a real company and treat investors as partners, they will see that you are building a company designed to make waves in the overarching technology industry, rather than the Web 3.0 space. Manouk Termaaten is the founder and CEO of Vertical Studio AI . He is a serial entrepreneur and expert in AI technologies, aiming to make AI accessible for everyone via customization tools and affordable computers. Check Latest Headlines on HodlX Follow Us on Twitter Facebook Telegram Check out the Latest Industry Announcements Disclaimer: Opinions expressed at The Daily Hodl are not investment advice. Investors should do their due diligence before making any high-risk investments in Bitcoin, cryptocurrency or digital assets. Please be advised that your transfers and trades are at your own risk, and any loses you may incur are your responsibility. The Daily Hodl does not recommend the buying or selling of any cryptocurrencies or digital assets, nor is The Daily Hodl an investment advisor. Please note that The Daily Hodl participates in affiliate marketing. Generated Image: Midjourney The post Web 3.0 Startups Must Doxx or Perish appeared first on The Daily Hodl .
BitcoinWorld BNB Acquisition: Windtree’s Revolutionary $520M Leap into Crypto In a move that has sent ripples across both the traditional financial markets and the burgeoning cryptocurrency space, Nasdaq-listed biotech firm Windtree Therapeutics announced a monumental plan: to raise up to $520 million for a strategic BNB acquisition . This isn’t just another investment; it’s a profound statement from a traditional industry player stepping boldly into the digital asset frontier. What does this unprecedented convergence mean for the future of finance and innovation? Windtree’s Bold Foray: Unpacking the $520M BNB Acquisition The announcement, initially released via GlobeNewswire, details Windtree’s ambitious plan to secure significant funding specifically earmarked for the acquisition of BNB tokens. The capital injection comprises two key components: a common stock purchase agreement valued at up to $500 million, and an additional $20 million stock purchase agreement with Build and Build Corp., a prominent blockchain investor. This dual-pronged funding approach highlights a clear strategic intent: to leverage both traditional equity markets and specialized crypto investment partnerships to facilitate this substantial BNB acquisition . Windtree Therapeutics, known for its focus on developing innovative treatments for acute cardiovascular and pulmonary diseases, might seem like an unlikely candidate to dive headfirst into the world of digital assets. Yet, this move underscores a growing trend of traditional companies exploring the utility and potential of cryptocurrencies beyond mere speculative investment. It raises immediate questions: What drives a biotech company to make such a significant commitment to a cryptocurrency like BNB, and what are the broader implications for both sectors? Why is This BNB Acquisition Signaling a Paradigm Shift? The decision by Windtree to pursue a large-scale BNB acquisition is far more than a simple treasury diversification. It hints at a strategic vision that acknowledges the evolving landscape where blockchain technology and digital assets could play a pivotal role in future business operations, funding, or even the underlying infrastructure of industries like biotech. Here are some potential strategic rationales: Diversification of Assets: In an era of economic uncertainty, companies are seeking alternative asset classes that may offer different risk-reward profiles than traditional stocks and bonds. Cryptocurrencies, despite their volatility, offer a new avenue for growth and diversification. Exploring Blockchain Utility: BNB, as the native token of the BNB Chain (formerly Binance Smart Chain), offers significant utility beyond just a store of value. It powers transactions, smart contracts, and decentralized applications (dApps). Windtree might be exploring how blockchain can enhance data management, secure clinical trial records, or even streamline supply chain logistics in pharmaceuticals. New Funding Models: The crypto space opens doors to novel fundraising mechanisms, such as decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols or tokenization of assets. While not explicitly stated, a large BNB holding could position Windtree to explore these innovative financing avenues in the future. Visibility and Innovation: Aligning with the cutting-edge crypto sector can enhance a company’s image as an innovator, attracting new talent, investors, and partnerships from the tech-forward community. What are the Implications for Both Biotech and the Crypto Ecosystem? This substantial BNB acquisition by a Nasdaq-listed biotech firm has multifaceted implications for both the traditional pharmaceutical industry and the rapidly maturing crypto market. For the Biotech Industry: New Financial Models: It challenges the conventional wisdom regarding corporate treasury management and fundraising, potentially paving the way for other biotech and pharma companies to consider digital assets. Technological Integration: It could accelerate the exploration and adoption of blockchain technology within biotech for areas like secure data sharing, intellectual property management, drug traceability, and clinical trial transparency. Investor Perception: While potentially risky, a successful integration could redefine how investors view a biotech company’s forward-thinking capabilities and resilience. For the Crypto Ecosystem: Mainstream Validation: A major endorsement from a Nasdaq-listed company lends significant credibility and legitimacy to the crypto market, moving it further into the mainstream. Increased Institutional Adoption: This deal serves as a powerful example of institutional interest, potentially encouraging other traditional firms to allocate capital to digital assets. Enhanced Liquidity and Stability: Large-scale acquisitions by corporate entities can contribute to the overall liquidity and perceived stability of major cryptocurrencies like BNB. Use Case Expansion: It highlights the expanding utility of cryptocurrencies beyond just speculative trading, emphasizing their potential as foundational elements for real-world business operations. Navigating the Challenges and Risks of a Cross-Industry BNB Acquisition While the potential upsides of Windtree’s BNB acquisition are significant, it’s crucial to acknowledge the inherent challenges and risks involved in such a pioneering move. Bridging two vastly different industries like biotech and crypto comes with its own set of hurdles: Potential Benefits of BNB Acquisition Potential Challenges of BNB Acquisition Diversification: Access to a new asset class, potentially uncorrelated with traditional markets. Market Volatility: Cryptocurrencies are notoriously volatile, posing risk to investment. Blockchain Utility: Potential to leverage BNB Chain for secure data management, clinical trial tracking, supply chain. Regulatory Uncertainty: Evolving and often unclear regulations for digital assets. New Funding Avenues: Exploration of DeFi, tokenization, or other crypto-native fundraising. Integration Complexity: Technical and operational challenges in integrating crypto assets into traditional corporate finance. Enhanced Visibility: Significant media attention and increased profile within the tech-forward community. Reputational Risk: Association with a nascent, sometimes controversial, industry. Beyond these, there are operational challenges related to secure custody of digital assets, managing cryptographic keys, and ensuring compliance with rapidly changing international standards. Companies undertaking such ventures must invest heavily in expertise, robust security infrastructure, and clear internal policies. The Pivotal Role of Build and Build Corp. in This Groundbreaking BNB Acquisition The involvement of Build and Build Corp. is a critical element in Windtree’s strategy. Described as a “blockchain investor,” their participation with a $20 million stock purchase agreement suggests more than just financial backing. It implies a strategic partnership where their expertise in the blockchain and cryptocurrency space will likely be invaluable. This could include: Market Insights: Providing crucial understanding of crypto market dynamics, trends, and opportunities. Technical Guidance: Assisting Windtree in navigating the technical complexities of holding, managing, and potentially utilizing BNB tokens. Strategic Advice: Offering guidance on how best to integrate digital assets into Windtree’s long-term business strategy, potentially exploring new applications of blockchain in biotech. Their involvement underscores the need for specialized knowledge when traditional firms venture into the crypto domain, highlighting that such a significant BNB acquisition is not a solo endeavor but often a collaborative one. What Does This Mean for the Future of Cross-Industry Investments? Windtree’s audacious BNB acquisition could serve as a powerful case study for other traditional companies contemplating similar moves. It demonstrates that the appetite for digital assets extends beyond tech giants and financial institutions, reaching into specialized sectors like biotech. If successful, this venture could: Catalyze Further Cross-Industry Adoption: Inspire companies in other traditional sectors (e.g., manufacturing, real estate, energy) to seriously evaluate cryptocurrencies and blockchain for their own strategic objectives. Foster Regulatory Clarity: Increased institutional participation often puts pressure on regulators to provide clearer guidelines, which could benefit the entire crypto industry. Accelerate Innovation: The fusion of diverse industries can spark entirely new business models and technological advancements that were previously unimaginable. The coming months will be crucial in observing how Windtree manages this significant shift and whether its strategic bet on BNB yields the anticipated benefits. This is a story of convergence, innovation, and the relentless evolution of the global economy. Conclusion: A New Horizon for Biotech and Crypto Windtree Therapeutics’ decision to raise up to $520 million for a substantial BNB acquisition is more than just a headline; it’s a profound signal of the increasing intertwining of traditional industries with the digital asset economy. This bold move by a Nasdaq-listed biotech firm represents a significant validation for the cryptocurrency space, showcasing its potential as a legitimate asset class and a foundational technology for future business innovation. While challenges like market volatility and regulatory uncertainty persist, the strategic intent behind this acquisition—driven by diversification, blockchain utility, and potential new funding avenues—highlights a forward-thinking approach. The partnership with a blockchain investor like Build and Build Corp. further emphasizes the need for specialized expertise in navigating this new frontier. As industries continue to converge, Windtree’s journey will undoubtedly be watched closely, potentially setting a precedent for a new era of cross-sector investment and technological integration, forging a revolutionary path where biotech meets blockchain. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) 1. What is Windtree Therapeutics? Windtree Therapeutics is a Nasdaq-listed biotech company focused on developing innovative treatments for acute cardiovascular and pulmonary diseases, including conditions like acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and cardiogenic shock. 2. What is BNB, and why is it significant? BNB (formerly Binance Coin) is the native cryptocurrency of the BNB Chain ecosystem, which includes the Binance exchange and various decentralized applications. It is significant for its utility in paying transaction fees, participating in token sales, and powering a vast ecosystem of DeFi, NFT, and GameFi projects. 3. Why would a biotech company like Windtree acquire BNB? Windtree’s BNB acquisition is likely driven by several strategic factors: asset diversification, potential to leverage BNB Chain for secure data management or supply chain applications, exploring new crypto-native funding models, and enhancing its image as an innovative, forward-thinking company. 4. What are the potential risks associated with this BNB acquisition? Key risks include the inherent volatility of the cryptocurrency market, the evolving and often uncertain regulatory landscape for digital assets, the complexities of integrating crypto assets into traditional corporate finance, and potential reputational risks associated with a nascent industry. 5. How might this acquisition impact the broader crypto market? This substantial BNB acquisition by a Nasdaq-listed firm could significantly boost the crypto market’s credibility, encourage more institutional adoption, enhance liquidity for BNB, and demonstrate new real-world use cases for cryptocurrencies beyond just trading. 6. Who is Build and Build Corp., and what is their role? Build and Build Corp. is described as a blockchain investor. Their $20 million stock purchase agreement with Windtree suggests a strategic partnership, likely providing not just capital but also crucial expertise, market insights, and technical guidance to help Windtree navigate its venture into the digital asset space. If this groundbreaking BNB acquisition by Windtree has piqued your interest, share this article with your network! Help us spread the word about the exciting convergence of traditional industries and the dynamic world of cryptocurrency on social media. To learn more about the latest crypto market trends, explore our article on key developments shaping institutional adoption in the digital asset space. This post BNB Acquisition: Windtree’s Revolutionary $520M Leap into Crypto first appeared on BitcoinWorld and is written by Editorial Team
🚀 Are You Chasing New Coins? Catch the newest crypto opportunities. Be the first to buy, be the first to win! Click here to discover new altcoins! On July 25,
Chairman of BitMine’s board of directors, Tom Lee, said the company wants to acquire and stake at least 5% of the total Ether supply, which would be over 6 million Ether.
BitcoinWorld Sudden $102 Million Crypto Futures Liquidation Rocks Markets The cryptocurrency market, a realm defined by its exhilarating highs and equally dramatic lows, has once again delivered a stark reminder of its inherent volatility. In a stunning turn of events, a sudden and significant shockwave rippled through major exchanges, leading to a staggering $102 million worth of crypto futures liquidation in just the past hour . This immediate fallout is part of a larger trend, with a colossal $667 million in futures liquidated over the last 24 hours . These aren’t just abstract figures; they represent countless trading positions wiped out, capital eroded, and a palpable shift in market sentiment. If you’re involved in crypto, whether as a seasoned trader or a curious observer, understanding the mechanics and implications of such rapid crypto futures liquidation events is absolutely crucial. What does this dramatic episode tell us about the current state of the market, and how can traders better prepare for these sudden shifts? What Exactly is Crypto Futures Liquidation, and Why Does it Happen? To truly grasp the gravity of recent market events, we first need to understand the core concept of crypto futures and, more importantly, what “liquidation” entails. A futures contract is an agreement to buy or sell a specific cryptocurrency at a predetermined price on a future date. Traders often use these to speculate on price movements without owning the underlying asset. The appeal of futures trading in crypto often lies in leverage , which allows traders to control a much larger position with a relatively small amount of capital. For example, with 10x leverage, a $1,000 investment could control a $10,000 position. While this amplifies potential profits, it equally magnifies potential losses. This is where the risk of crypto futures liquidation enters the picture. Liquidation occurs when a trader’s leveraged position is automatically closed by the exchange because their margin (the collateral in their account) falls below a required maintenance level. This typically happens when the market moves sharply against their position. For instance, if you’re “long” (betting on price increase) and the price suddenly drops, your position could be liquidated. The exchange sells off your collateral to cover losses, often leading to substantial or total loss of the capital invested in that trade. The primary reasons for such rapid liquidation events include: Sudden Price Volatility: Crypto markets are known for wild price swings. A sharp, unexpected move can quickly push leveraged positions past their liquidation threshold. High Leverage: The higher the leverage used, the smaller the price movement required to trigger a liquidation. Even a small percentage drop can be catastrophic for highly leveraged positions. Cascading Effects: Initial liquidations can add selling pressure, further driving prices, which then triggers more liquidations, creating a domino effect that accelerates the market movement. Why Did This Massive Crypto Futures Liquidation Event Occur So Rapidly? The sheer speed of the recent liquidations— $102 million in just one hour —is particularly striking. While the 24-hour figure of $667 million is substantial, the concentrated burst points to a sudden, powerful catalyst. While specific triggers are often complex (e.g., macroeconomic news, large whale movements, or technical breakdowns), the outcome is clear: a rapid price adjustment caught many leveraged traders off guard. Imagine many traders holding long positions on Bitcoin, expecting its price to rise. If a significant sell-off begins, perhaps due to a large institutional sale or negative news, Bitcoin’s price dips. As it falls, the margin for these leveraged long positions dwindles. Once a critical price point is breached, automated systems on exchanges forcibly close these positions. This forced selling adds further downward pressure, leading to more liquidations at even lower prices, creating a “liquidation cascade.” This rapid succession of events highlights the inherent fragility of markets heavily reliant on high leverage. Crypto exchanges often offer leverage ratios as high as 100x or more, making positions incredibly sensitive to price fluctuations. The suddenness of this particular crypto futures liquidation spree suggests a critical support level was breached, or a significant sell order flooded the market, triggering a chain reaction few could react to in real-time. Who Was Most Affected by This Crypto Futures Liquidation Wave? When such a large-scale crypto futures liquidation event occurs, it’s natural to wonder who bears the brunt. While exact breakdowns are proprietary, we can infer some general patterns. During sharp price downturns, “long” positions (traders betting on price increase) are primarily liquidated. Conversely, during sudden price surges, “short” positions are liquidated. Given the nature of a sudden drop often accompanying these liquidations, it’s highly probable that the majority of the $102 million and $667 million liquidations were from long positions across various cryptocurrencies. Historically, Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH) tend to account for the largest share of liquidated positions due to their market dominance and trading volume. However, altcoins with high volatility can also see significant percentage-based liquidations. Both retail traders and institutional players can be affected. Retail traders, often attracted by high leverage, are particularly vulnerable due to insufficient capital and sometimes a lack of sophisticated risk management. While institutions have larger capital pools, their large position sizes can still lead to substantial losses. The scale of this event suggests a broad spectrum of traders felt the impact. Navigating the Volatility: Lessons from the Liquidation Storm For every trader who faced a crypto futures liquidation , there’s a crucial lesson. While market volatility is inherent, how one manages risk can be the difference between survival and significant loss. Here are actionable insights: Master Risk Management: Never trade with money you can’t afford to lose. Implement strict position sizing, allocating only a small percentage of your portfolio to any single trade. Understand and Control Your Leverage: Be extremely cautious with high leverage. Lower leverage ratios provide a wider buffer against adverse price movements, reducing liquidation risk. Many experienced traders advise conservative leverage. Utilize Stop-Loss Orders: This is your primary defense. A stop-loss order automatically closes your position if the price reaches a predetermined level, helping you exit a losing trade before full liquidation. Always place stop-loss orders when entering a leveraged position. Stay Informed, But Don’t Overreact: Keep an eye on market news and analysis, but avoid impulsive decisions based on short-term fear or greed. Diversify Your Portfolio: Diversification across different assets can mitigate overall portfolio risk during market downturns. The recent liquidation event serves as a powerful reminder that the crypto market demands respect and a disciplined approach. Those who survive and thrive prioritize capital preservation over aggressive speculation. The Broader Implications: What Does This Mean for the Crypto Market? A $102 million crypto futures liquidation in an hour , and nearly seven times that in a day, sends clear signals across the entire cryptocurrency ecosystem. Beyond the immediate financial impact, such events have broader implications for market sentiment, stability, and even regulatory outlooks. Firstly, it often leads to increased caution among traders. The aftermath of a large liquidation cascade can see reduced trading activity or a shift towards less risky spot trading. Market participants become more wary of high leverage, potentially leading to a temporary cooling-off period or a “flight to quality” towards more established assets. Secondly, these events highlight the systemic risks associated with highly interconnected and leveraged markets. A significant price movement in one major asset can trigger a chain reaction that affects the entire ecosystem. While the crypto market has shown remarkable resilience, such large-scale liquidations test its robustness and liquidity. Finally, incidents like this often draw the attention of regulators. As governments worldwide grapple with crypto regulation, events showcasing extreme volatility and significant retail investor losses can accelerate calls for stricter oversight, particularly concerning leverage limits and consumer protection on exchanges. This could lead to changes in how futures trading is offered. Despite the dramatic nature of these liquidations, the crypto market is still evolving. Each such event, while painful, contributes to the market’s maturation, forcing participants to adapt and refine strategies. It reinforces the need for robust infrastructure, transparent practices, and, most importantly, educated and responsible traders. The recent crypto futures liquidation event, marked by a staggering $102 million wiped out in just one hour, serves as a powerful testament to the inherent volatility and high stakes within the cryptocurrency derivatives market. This immediate and widespread impact, contributing to a total of $667 million in liquidations over 24 hours, underscores the amplified risks associated with leveraged trading. While such events can be jarring, they offer invaluable lessons in risk management, the prudent use of leverage, and the critical importance of tools like stop-loss orders. As the crypto market continues its dynamic journey, understanding these mechanics and adopting a disciplined, informed approach will be paramount for anyone looking to navigate its exhilarating, yet challenging, landscape. The market always offers opportunities, but only to those who respect its power and prepare for its unpredictable shifts. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) 1. What is a crypto futures contract? A crypto futures contract is an agreement to buy or sell a specific cryptocurrency at a predetermined price on a future date. Traders use them to speculate on price movements without owning the underlying asset, often utilizing leverage to amplify potential gains or losses. 2. What does “liquidation” mean in crypto futures trading? Liquidation in crypto futures trading refers to the forced closure of a trader’s leveraged position by the exchange. This happens automatically when the market moves against the trader’s position to such an extent that their margin (collateral) falls below a required maintenance level, preventing their account balance from going negative. 3. Why do liquidations happen so quickly? Liquidations can happen very quickly due to the high volatility of cryptocurrencies and the use of high leverage. A sudden, sharp price movement can rapidly deplete a trader’s margin, triggering automated liquidation systems. This can also lead to a “liquidation cascade,” where initial liquidations create further price pressure, leading to more liquidations. 4. How can traders avoid crypto futures liquidation? Traders can significantly reduce their risk of liquidation by employing robust risk management strategies. Key methods include using lower leverage, setting strict stop-loss orders to automatically close positions at a predefined loss level, proper position sizing (not risking too much capital on a single trade), and maintaining sufficient margin in their accounts. 5. Does crypto futures liquidation affect spot prices? Yes, large-scale crypto futures liquidations can certainly affect spot (cash) prices. When leveraged positions are liquidated, the exchange often sells the underlying assets to cover the losses. This forced selling can add significant selling pressure to the spot market, potentially driving down prices and contributing to further volatility. If you found this article insightful, please consider sharing it with your network! Your shares help us bring crucial market insights and educational content to a wider audience in the cryptocurrency community. Let’s spread awareness and foster a more informed trading environment together! To learn more about the latest crypto market trends, explore our article on key developments shaping Bitcoin price action. This post Sudden $102 Million Crypto Futures Liquidation Rocks Markets first appeared on BitcoinWorld and is written by Editorial Team
🚀 Are You Chasing New Coins? Catch the newest crypto opportunities. Be the first to buy, be the first to win! Click here to discover new altcoins! Bitcoin has recently
In July 2025, TRON achieved what many considered impossible just seven years earlier – ringing the opening bell at the Nasdaq Stock Market. This milestone marked the completion of one of cryptocurrency’s most dramatic transformation stories, taking TRON from a plagiarism-accused ICO project to becoming the first major blockchain platform with direct public equity exposure. The journey from August 2017 to July 2025 demonstrates how a cryptocurrency project can overcome early controversies through strategic pivots and practical utility. TRON’s path offers valuable lessons about resilience, market positioning, and the evolving relationship between decentralized finance and traditional capital markets. What Was TRON’s Original ICO in 2017 TRON’s initial coin offering took place over just three days, from August 31 to September 2, 2017. The timing was strategically positioned just before China’s comprehensive ICO ban, with founder Justin Sun reportedly aware of the impending regulatory crackdown. This narrow window allowed TRON to complete its fundraising before the regulatory environment shifted dramatically. The ICO raised $70 million at $0.0019 per TRX token, selling 40 billion tokens representing 40% of the total supply. The token distribution structure drew immediate criticism from the cryptocurrency community, as 45% of the total supply went to founder Justin Sun and the TRON Foundation – a concentration significantly higher than industry standards at the time. Key ICO Details: Token Price : $0.0019 per TRX Amount Raised : $70 million (15,200 BTC) Tokens Sold : 40 billion (40% of total supply) Total Supply : 100 billion TRX tokens The project positioned itself as building infrastructure for a “truly decentralized Internet,” focusing on empowering content creators by eliminating intermediaries like YouTube, Facebook, and Apple. This vision aimed to give creators direct control over their content and earnings, using blockchain technology to facilitate peer-to-peer transactions. The 2018 Plagiarism Scandal That Nearly Destroyed TRON January 2018 marked the most challenging period in TRON’s history when the project faced severe plagiarism accusations that threatened its credibility and market position. The controversy began on January 7, 2018, when Bedeho Mender, founder of BitTorrent client JoyStream, publicly accused TRON of copying content from other blockchain projects without attribution. The accusations gained credibility when Juan Benet, founder of Protocol Labs and co-author of the IPFS and FileCoin whitepapers, confirmed that nine consecutive pages of TRON’s whitepaper were copied verbatim from his work. The plagiarism extended beyond the whitepaper to include core technical concepts like Bitswap, Proof of Replication (PoRep), and Proof of Spacetime (PoSt) protocols. The scandal’s impact was immediate and severe. TRX price crashed from its peak of $0.28 to below $0.05, while TRON’s market capitalization fell from $18 billion to $7 billion. The controversy was compounded by additional discoveries of Ethereum code copied into TRON’s GitHub repository without proper attribution, specifically the Java-TRON client derived from EthereumJ. Justin Sun initially blamed “volunteer translators” for the English version issues, but this explanation failed to address the extent of plagiarism across multiple languages and technical implementations. The incident highlighted the importance of intellectual property respect in the blockchain space and the severe consequences of perceived dishonesty in a trust-based ecosystem. How TRON Rebuilt Through Strategic Acquisitions Following the plagiarism crisis, TRON needed to rebuild its credibility and demonstrate real-world utility. The most significant step came in June 2018 with the $140 million acquisition of BitTorrent, the peer-to-peer file-sharing pioneer with over 170 million active users worldwide. This acquisition served multiple strategic purposes. First, it provided immediate legitimacy by associating TRON with an established technology company that had pioneered decentralized protocols. Second, it gave TRON access to a massive existing user base that could be gradually introduced to blockchain technology. Third, BitTorrent’s peer-to-peer infrastructure aligned perfectly with TRON’s decentralized internet vision. The integration process was carefully managed to maintain BitTorrent’s existing services while gradually introducing blockchain elements. The launch of BitTorrent Token (BTT) on the TRON network created incentives for file sharing and demonstrated practical blockchain applications beyond speculation. This approach showed how traditional internet services could evolve to incorporate cryptocurrency without disrupting core functionality. The acquisition also demonstrated TRON’s financial capabilities and long-term commitment to building real technology infrastructure. Rather than relying solely on marketing and promises, the project showed it was willing to invest significant capital in proven technologies and user bases. TRON’s Rise to Stablecoin Dominance Between 2019 and 2022, TRON discovered its true competitive advantage: providing efficient infrastructure for stablecoin transactions. This focus on practical utility rather than revolutionary technology proved to be the key to TRON’s eventual success and market positioning. The network’s appeal for stablecoin users came from fundamental technical advantages. TRON offered transaction fees of approximately $0.01 compared to Ethereum’s fees that could reach $50 or more during network congestion. Processing speeds of 2,000+ transactions per second provided near-instant settlement for high-frequency trading and payments. These practical benefits attracted users who prioritized functionality over technological novelty. The turning point came in August 2022 when TRON first surpassed Ethereum in total USDT supply. This milestone represented a fundamental shift in how the world’s largest stablecoin was being used. Rather than serving primarily as a trading pair on centralized exchanges, USDT on TRON became the backbone for remittances, international payments, and savings in high-inflation economies. Current Stablecoin Statistics (2025): USDT Supply on TRON : $79 billion (36% growth in 6 months) Daily USDT Transfers : 2.4+ million transactions Transaction Volume : Over $20 billion daily Market Share : 43.7% of total USDT circulation globally The stablecoin dominance created a network effect that reinforced TRON’s position. As more users adopted the network for USDT transactions, liquidity increased, making it even more attractive for traders and businesses. This cycle of adoption drove TRON’s evolution from a speculative cryptocurrency to essential financial infrastructure. The Strategic Path to Public Markets TRON’s decision to pursue public market listing represented a calculated bet on the convergence of decentralized finance and traditional capital markets. Rather than conducting a traditional initial public offering, TRON chose a reverse merger with SRM Entertainment, a Nasdaq-listed company specializing in theme park merchandise. SRM Entertainment proved an ideal acquisition vehicle for several reasons. Founded in April 2022, the company had an established Nasdaq listing and operated a legitimate business serving major entertainment companies including Disney, Universal, SeaWorld, and Six Flags. This existing business provided revenue streams and operational credibility that purely financial shell companies lacked. The transaction structure was carefully designed to provide TRON with substantial capital while maintaining compliance with securities regulations. The $100 million equity investment involved 100,000 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, with each share convertible into 2,000 common shares at $0.50 per share. An additional 220 million warrants at $0.50 exercise price could potentially bring the total investment to $210 million. Timeline to Public Listing: June 16, 2025 : Securities Purchase Agreement signed June 30, 2025 : TRX token deposit completed (365+ million tokens) July 16, 2025 : Corporate name change to Tron Inc. July 17, 2025 : Ticker symbol change from SRM to TRON July 24, 2025 : Nasdaq opening bell ceremony The reverse merger approach allowed TRON to bypass the lengthy traditional IPO process while achieving the same result: becoming a publicly traded company with institutional legitimacy and regulatory compliance. What Happened During TRON’s Nasdaq Debut The July 24, 2025 opening bell ceremony at Nasdaq MarketSite in Times Square marked a historic moment for both TRON and the broader cryptocurrency industry. Justin Sun, TRON’s founder and the newly appointed Global Advisor to Tron Inc., led the ceremony that symbolized cryptocurrency’s entry into mainstream financial markets. However, the market reception was mixed. Despite the ceremonial significance and extensive media coverage, TRON stock (NASDAQ: TRON) declined 9.6% on its debut day. This immediate price drop highlighted the difference between symbolic milestones and market fundamentals, demonstrating that public listing alone doesn’t guarantee positive investor sentiment. The stock’s performance throughout 2025 told a more complex story. Before the opening day decline, TRON shares had achieved an all-time high of $12.80 on July 17, 2025, representing a remarkable 583.96% increase over the year. This volatility reflected both the excitement around cryptocurrency exposure and the inherent uncertainty of pioneering financial structures. The company’s positioning as “the public company with the largest TRON (TRX) token holdings” created a unique investment vehicle. With over 365 million TRX tokens worth approximately $111 million, Tron Inc. essentially functioned as a crypto treasury company similar to MicroStrategy’s Bitcoin holdings strategy, but with direct operational control over the underlying blockchain network. The leadership structure reflected the balance between traditional corporate governance and cryptocurrency innovation. Rich Miller served as CEO of Tron Inc., bringing traditional corporate experience, while Justin Sun took the Global Advisor role, maintaining his influence over strategic direction without the regulatory scrutiny that might come with a CEO position. Current Market Position and Industry Impact TRON’s successful public listing established it as a pioneer in bridging decentralized finance with traditional capital markets. The achievement demonstrated that cryptocurrency projects could evolve beyond their origins as speculative investments to become legitimate business entities with regulatory compliance and institutional acceptance. The network’s current statistics reflect its practical success rather than speculative value. With over 6 billion total transactions processed and daily revenue generation exceeding $2 million, TRON has built sustainable business fundamentals. The platform serves over 350 million Tether users globally, positioning it as critical infrastructure for the digital dollar economy. From an industry perspective, TRON’s path to public markets created a template that other blockchain projects are likely to follow. The reverse merger approach proved that cryptocurrency companies could access traditional capital markets without compromising their decentralized operations. This model offers advantages for both crypto projects seeking legitimacy and traditional investors wanting exposure to blockchain technology. The broader implications extend beyond TRON itself. As the first major cryptocurrency with direct public equity exposure, TRON’s success or failure will influence how regulators, institutions, and other blockchain projects approach the intersection of crypto and traditional finance. The precedent could accelerate institutional adoption if successful, or create additional regulatory scrutiny if problems emerge. Key Market Metrics (2025): Network Market Cap : $28+ billion Daily Transaction Volume : $20+ billion Active Users : 350+ million (via USDT) Transaction Count : 6+ billion total processed Revenue Generation : $2+ million daily Regulatory Challenges and Ongoing Legal Issues Despite its public market success, TRON continues to face significant regulatory challenges that could impact its future development. The most serious ongoing issue is the March 2023 SEC lawsuit against Justin Sun and TRON’s affiliated companies for alleged securities law violations. The SEC’s complaint alleges that TRON offered and sold TRX and BitTorrent Token (BTT) as unregistered securities through various promotional programs. Additionally, the agency accused Sun of market manipulation through wash trading and orchestrating undisclosed celebrity endorsements. These charges represent serious legal challenges that could result in substantial penalties and operational restrictions. The timing of these charges, coming just before TRON’s push toward public listing, raised questions about regulatory coordination and the broader government approach to cryptocurrency regulation. However, TRON’s successful completion of its public listing suggests that the Nasdaq approval process found the regulatory risks manageable or that the legal issues were sufficiently separated from the public company structure. Beyond the SEC case, TRON has faced various other regulatory and reputational challenges throughout its history. These include investigations by the FBI and U.S. Attorney’s office, civil lawsuits from former employees alleging fraud and harassment, and ongoing scrutiny of Justin Sun’s diplomatic appointment as Grenada’s WTO Ambassador, which some viewed as an attempt to obtain diplomatic immunity. The resolution of these legal challenges will significantly impact TRON’s future development and its role as a model for other cryptocurrency projects seeking public market access. Success in defending against the SEC charges could validate the regulatory approach, while adverse outcomes might create additional barriers for crypto companies pursuing similar strategies. Future Implications for Cryptocurrency and Traditional Finance TRON’s 7-year evolution from controversial ICO to public company represents more than one project’s success story – it demonstrates the potential for cryptocurrency to integrate with traditional financial systems while maintaining its decentralized characteristics. This integration model could reshape how we think about the relationship between blockchain technology and established financial institutions. The stablecoin infrastructure that drove TRON’s success points toward broader trends in digital payments and financial inclusion. As traditional payment systems struggle with cross-border efficiency and emerging markets face currency instability, blockchain-based stablecoin networks provide practical solutions that benefit real users rather than just speculators. For other cryptocurrency projects, TRON’s path offers both inspiration and caution. The success demonstrates that projects can overcome early controversies through sustained focus on practical utility and strategic business development. However, the ongoing legal challenges highlight the importance of regulatory compliance from the beginning rather than seeking forgiveness after problems arise. The broader cryptocurrency industry is watching TRON’s public company performance closely. If Tron Inc. successfully manages the dual requirements of blockchain network operation and public company governance, it could accelerate institutional adoption across the space. Traditional investors gaining comfortable exposure to cryptocurrency through regulated public companies might reduce the perceived risks that have limited institutional participation. Looking toward 2030, TRON’s model could become the standard approach for mature blockchain projects seeking capital and legitimacy. The combination of practical utility, regulatory compliance, and traditional market access offers a sustainable path forward that doesn’t require choosing between decentralization and institutional acceptance. This balance may prove essential as cryptocurrency evolves from an alternative financial system to an integrated component of the global economy. The post TRON’s 7-Year Journey: From Controversial ICO to Nasdaq Opening Bell first appeared on HTX Square .
BitcoinWorld Massive Crypto Liquidation: Unpacking the Shocking 24-Hour Futures Wipeout In the dynamic and often tumultuous world of cryptocurrency, sudden market movements are a constant. One of the most impactful, and often feared, events for traders engaging in derivatives is crypto liquidation . Over the past 24 hours, the crypto market witnessed a significant purge, with hundreds of millions of dollars in leveraged positions being wiped out. This isn’t just a number; it represents a cascade of forced selling that can send ripples across the entire digital asset ecosystem. Let’s dive deep into this phenomenon, unpack the latest figures, and understand what these massive liquidations mean for you and the broader market. Understanding Crypto Liquidation: What Exactly Happened? Before we dissect the recent figures, it’s crucial to grasp what crypto liquidation entails. In simple terms, liquidation occurs when a trader’s leveraged position can no longer meet the margin requirements set by an exchange. When the market moves against a highly leveraged position, and the margin balance falls below a certain threshold, the exchange automatically closes the position to prevent further losses for both the trader and the exchange. This forced closure is what we call a liquidation. It’s a protective mechanism, albeit a painful one for the trader involved, designed to manage risk in volatile markets. Perpetual futures contracts are a type of derivative that allows traders to speculate on the future price of an asset without owning the underlying asset itself. Unlike traditional futures, perpetual contracts do not have an expiry date, making them popular for continuous trading. However, they come with the inherent risk of leverage, meaning traders can open positions much larger than their initial capital. While this amplifies potential profits, it equally magnifies potential losses, making them highly susceptible to rapid market swings and subsequent liquidations. The Recent 24-Hour Crypto Liquidation Breakdown: A Closer Look at the Numbers The past 24 hours saw a significant wave of liquidations across major cryptocurrencies, primarily impacting long positions, which are bets that the price of an asset will increase. Here’s a detailed breakdown of the total value of liquidated positions: Cryptocurrency Total Liquidated (24h) Long Positions Liquidated (%) Ethereum (ETH) $145.86 million 58.63% Bitcoin (BTC) $70.05 million 79.99% XRP (XRP) $48.68 million 76.79% These figures highlight a clear trend: the majority of liquidated positions were ‘longs,’ indicating that a sudden downward price movement caught many bullish traders off guard. Let’s delve into what these numbers tell us about each asset: Ethereum (ETH): $145.86 million in Liquidations ETH led the pack in terms of total value liquidated. With nearly 59% of these being long positions, it suggests that many traders were highly leveraged on ETH, expecting a continued upward trajectory. A sharp correction, possibly triggered by broader market sentiment or specific ETH-related news, would have swiftly pushed these positions into liquidation. The sheer volume underscores Ethereum’s significant role in the derivatives market and its susceptibility to volatility when leveraged. Bitcoin (BTC): $70.05 million in Liquidations As the market’s bellwether, Bitcoin’s liquidations are always closely watched. While lower than ETH’s total, the striking 79.99% long liquidation rate for BTC is a strong indicator. It means a vast majority of those betting on Bitcoin’s rise were caught in the downturn. This level of long liquidation often signifies a market flush-out, clearing out excessive leverage and potentially setting the stage for more sustainable price action, though not without immediate pain. XRP (XRP): $48.68 million in Liquidations XRP’s significant liquidation figure, with almost 77% being long positions, is noteworthy. While not as dominant in market cap as BTC or ETH, XRP often experiences sharp price swings due to news or sentiment, making it a target for leveraged traders. This wave of liquidations suggests that recent bullish sentiment or specific news events might have encouraged an influx of long positions, which were then swiftly unwound by a price drop. Why Do These Massive Crypto Liquidations Occur? Understanding the root causes of these events is key to navigating the crypto landscape. Several factors converge to create the perfect storm for widespread crypto liquidation : Excessive Leverage: This is the primary culprit. Traders use leverage to amplify their potential returns, but it also magnifies losses. A small price movement against a highly leveraged position can quickly deplete a trader’s margin, leading to liquidation. Market Volatility: Cryptocurrencies are inherently volatile assets. Rapid price swings, often triggered by macroeconomic news, regulatory announcements, or large institutional trades, can quickly push prices past liquidation thresholds. Cascading Effect: When one large position is liquidated, the forced selling can push prices down further, triggering more liquidations in a domino effect. This creates a feedback loop that accelerates market downturns and amplifies the total value of liquidated positions. Unforeseen Events (Black Swans): Sometimes, unexpected events like flash crashes, exchange outages, or major hacks can lead to sudden price drops that trigger mass liquidations across the board. What’s the Ripple Effect? The Impact of Widespread Crypto Liquidation Beyond the individual losses, mass crypto liquidation events have broader implications for the market: Increased Volatility: The forced selling from liquidations adds selling pressure, exacerbating price declines and contributing to a more volatile trading environment. Market Reset: While painful, liquidations can serve as a market reset, flushing out excessive leverage and unhealthy speculation. This can sometimes lead to a healthier, more stable market in the long run as prices find new, more sustainable support levels. Psychological Impact: Such events can induce fear and panic among traders, leading to further selling pressure from those not even in leveraged positions, simply reacting to the market’s downturn. Opportunity for Savvy Traders: For experienced traders with a strong risk management strategy, these events can present opportunities. Buying into the panic, or ‘buying the dip,’ after a significant flush can be profitable if the market recovers. Navigating the Volatile Waters: Actionable Insights for Traders Given the inherent risks of perpetual futures and the inevitability of crypto liquidation events, how can traders better protect themselves and potentially capitalize on market dynamics? Here are some actionable insights: Master Risk Management: This is paramount. Always use stop-loss orders to limit potential losses. Never risk more than a small percentage of your trading capital on a single trade. Understand Leverage: While tempting, excessive leverage is a double-edged sword. Use leverage judiciously and only with capital you can afford to lose. Start with lower leverage and gradually increase it as your experience and understanding grow. Monitor Funding Rates and Open Interest: High funding rates (especially positive ones) can indicate an overheated market with too many long positions, making it ripe for a liquidation cascade. High open interest also suggests significant capital at risk. Diversify Your Portfolio: While specific to futures, overall portfolio diversification can help mitigate risk. Don’t put all your eggs in one basket, even if that basket is a single leveraged position. Stay Informed and Calm: Keep abreast of market news, but avoid making impulsive decisions based on fear or greed. Emotional trading is a leading cause of losses. Challenges and Risks in the Perpetual Futures Arena While perpetual futures offer unique opportunities, they also come with significant challenges. The 24-hour cycle of crypto liquidation underscores the constant vigilance required. Flash crashes, unexpected news, and even technical glitches on exchanges can lead to rapid and irreversible losses. It’s not just about predicting price direction but also managing the speed and magnitude of market movements. The very mechanism that provides liquidity – the liquidation engine – can also be the instrument of rapid capital destruction for the unprepared. Conclusion: Navigating the Tides of Crypto Liquidation The recent 24-hour crypto liquidation breakdown serves as a stark reminder of the inherent volatility and risks associated with leveraged trading in the cryptocurrency market. While such events can be painful for many traders, they are a fundamental part of how perpetual futures markets self-correct and manage risk. Understanding the mechanics behind liquidations, practicing stringent risk management, and maintaining emotional discipline are crucial for anyone venturing into this high-stakes arena. The crypto market will continue to experience these dramatic shifts, and being prepared is the best defense against being caught in the next wave. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Q1: What is the primary cause of crypto liquidation? A1: The primary cause is insufficient margin to cover losses on a leveraged position when the market moves unfavorably against the trader’s bet. Exchanges automatically close these positions to prevent further losses. Q2: Are all crypto liquidations ‘long’ liquidations? A2: No, liquidations can be both ‘long’ (bets on price increase) and ‘short’ (bets on price decrease). The recent 24-hour data showed a higher percentage of long liquidations, indicating a market downturn caught many bullish traders off guard. Q3: How can I protect myself from crypto liquidation? A3: Effective risk management is key. This includes using stop-loss orders, avoiding excessive leverage, only trading with capital you can afford to lose, and continuously monitoring market conditions. Q4: Do crypto liquidations affect spot prices? A4: Yes, mass liquidations can exert significant selling pressure on the market, contributing to price declines in the underlying spot assets as well, creating a cascading effect. Q5: What is a perpetual future contract? A5: A perpetual future is a type of derivative contract that allows traders to speculate on the price of an asset without an expiry date. Unlike traditional futures, they don’t settle physically and use a funding rate mechanism to peg their price to the underlying asset’s spot price. Q6: Is trading perpetual futures suitable for beginners? A6: Due to the high leverage and inherent volatility, trading perpetual futures carries significant risk and is generally not recommended for beginners. It requires a deep understanding of market dynamics, risk management, and emotional discipline. If you found this breakdown insightful, consider sharing it with your network! Understanding crypto liquidation is vital for navigating the volatile digital asset landscape, and spreading awareness helps everyone make more informed decisions. Let’s build a more knowledgeable crypto community together! To learn more about the latest explore our article on key developments shaping Bitcoin price action. This post Massive Crypto Liquidation: Unpacking the Shocking 24-Hour Futures Wipeout first appeared on BitcoinWorld and is written by Editorial Team
The Ghanaian central bank is set to introduce a draft regulatory framework for licensing digital asset companies by September. Acknowledging Crypto’s Enduring Presence The Ghanaian central bank has reiterated its goal to license digital asset companies, stating that a draft regulatory framework to oversee them is set to be tabled in the nation’s parliament by
The post Will XRP Price Drop Below $3 Today? appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News XRP has entered bearish territory, with its price falling below the $3.10 mark at the time of writing. The chart shows a sharp downward move followed by a small rebound, hinting at strong selling pressure earlier in the session. Despite the current weakness, market analyst Ali Martinez shared a more positive outlook. According to him, the TD Sequential indicator has flashed a buy signal, meaning that XRP may be poised for a short-term rebound. The analyst wrote, “Buy XRP Now.” Buy $XRP now, says the TD Sequential indicator! pic.twitter.com/BXYNCOdRuU — Ali (@ali_charts) July 24, 2025 However, XRP’s sudden move wasn’t just market noise. Analyst Casi Trades said that it was a clear sign that algorithms and liquidity strategies are running the show. After the initial drop, XRP cleanly touched the next key level: the 0.382 Fibonacci retracement at $3.04. Eyes on $3.21 for Confirmation Now, the key level to watch is $3.21, the same .236 Fibonacci level that was previously lost. Reclaiming it could signal that the bottom is in and the next upward move is ready to begin. If it fails, XRP might revisit the $3.04 level again, though current chart signals show the low may already be in place. What’s Next For XRP? (Short-Term) The $3 mark is proving to be an important support zone. XRP recently touched this level after falling from around $3.40. If the price stays above $3, that’s a good sign for buyers. If it drops below, the next support could be closer to $2.90. On the upside, if XRP bounces again, resistance is expected around $3.30 to $3.40, and possibly around $3.60 if bullish sentiment returns. These levels might slow down any upward move in the short term. XRP has been quite sensitive to shifts in Bitcoin’s dominance in the market. When Bitcoin dominance drops, XRP often sees big gains. But even small recoveries in Bitcoin dominance can pull XRP’s price back down.