Summary Macroeconomic forces now heavily influence both assets. Bitcoin is seen as an inflation hedge, while Ethereum's on-chain ecosystem ties it to market liquidity and tech trends. Technologically, Bitcoin and Ethereum differ in purpose, consensus, and architecture, each reflecting a distinct vision. Several key factors influence the price of Bitcoin and Ethereum, including market demand, technological upgrades, and investor sentiment. Explore the key differences of bitcoin and Ethereum in our comprehensive guide. Understand the underlying technology, and how each fits within the market space. Bitcoin vs Ethereum: Understanding the Key Differences and Similarities In the rapidly evolving world of digital finance, two names consistently stand out: Bitcoin and Ethereum. These blockchain-based giants are not just cryptocurrencies; they represent the forefront of a financial evolution. Over the years, both have grown from niche experiments into major assets influencing global markets. While Bitcoin and Ethereum share the common ground of being blockchain-based cryptocurrencies, their differences are significant. Bitcoin, the original cryptocurrency, was created as a decentralized digital currency and potential store of value. Meanwhile, Ethereum is a programmable platform that enables smart contracts and decentralized applications (Dapps) to be built and operated without downtime, fraud, or interference. Bitcoin: Often compared to digital gold, it is designed primarily for secure value transfer and storage. Ethereum: A decentralized software platform powering an ecosystem of applications beyond currency, from finance to gaming – via smart contracts. Both assets have matured significantly, capturing headlines and investor interest worldwide. Below, we explore their origins, technical makeup, market performance, use cases, and what the future may hold for each. The Growing Interest in Bitcoin and Ethereum Bitcoin and Ethereum's rising popularity signals more than a trend; it marks crypto's deeper integration into mainstream finance. Often referred to as digital gold, Bitcoin appeals to retail and institutional investors as a potential store of value. Ethereum's smart contracts expand blockchain's role into areas like DeFi, gaming, and decentralized governance. By 2024, interest surged further. Major financial firms began offering crypto products, and U.S. regulators approved the first Bitcoin and Ethereum ETPs, fueling institutional inflows. The growing overlap between Wall Street and crypto highlights how digital assets have moved from the margins to the financial mainstream. Digital Market Dynamics: Bitcoin and Ethereum Bitcoin and Ethereum have reshaped digital markets, advancing crypto adoption for investment and innovation. Bitcoin's decentralized design and recognition make it a key entry point into digital assets. Ethereum powers Web3, a blockchain-based internet layer that enables decentralized apps in finance, social media, and gaming. Macroeconomic forces now heavily influence both assets. Bitcoin is seen as an inflation hedge, while Ethereum's on-chain ecosystem ties it to market liquidity and tech trends. They're discussed not just in crypto circles but in central bank briefings and institutional portfolios. Differing Philosophies and Technological Underpinnings The philosophical and technological foundations of Bitcoin and Ethereum differ significantly. Bitcoin emphasizes decentralization, security, and digital scarcity, serving as a ledger for peer-to-peer value transfer. Ethereum expands on this by enabling programmable contracts and a decentralized world computer. Consensus Mechanism: Bitcoin uses Proof-of-Work (PoW), where miners secure the network through computational energy, prioritizing security, but with high energy costs. Ethereum shifted to Proof-of-Stake (PoS) in 2022's "Merge," where validators stake Ether, cutting energy use by over 99% and boosting scalability. The two networks reflect divergent paths: Bitcoin reinforcing PoW's reliability and Ethereum optimizing for sustainability. Economic Model: Bitcoin enforces a hard cap of 21 million BTC, supporting its store-of-value status, most recently reinforced by the 2024 halving. Ethereum has no fixed cap; it issues Ether to validators but burns fees (via EIP-1559), allowing for dynamic supply and occasional deflation. Bitcoin follows strict scarcity; Ethereum opts for flexible utility. Use and Functionality: Bitcoin is built for secure, straightforward transactions, with limited scripting to ensure reliability and minimal risk. Ethereum's Turing-complete platform enables complex applications from DeFi to digital collectibles—bitcoin champions censorship-resistant money and Ethereum censorship-resistant applications. Despite these contrasts, both networks continue to evolve along their respective paths—Bitcoin as a secure monetary asset and Ethereum as a versatile innovation platform. Yet both remain grounded in decentralization and open development. The Genesis of Bitcoin and Ethereum The inception of Bitcoin and Ethereum marked significant milestones in the evolution of digital finance, introducing the world to the concepts of blockchain and decentralized finance (DeFi). These technologies have since revolutionized how we perceive money, investment, and the internet's architecture, laying the groundwork for a more transparent, secure, and accessible financial system. Bitcoin Origins Bitcoin, introduced in a 2008 white paper by the pseudonymous Satoshi Nakamoto and launched in January 2009, solved the "double-spending" problem without needing a central authority, enabling secure, peer-to-peer digital transactions via a decentralized blockchain. Initially embraced by cryptography enthusiasts and libertarians, Bitcoin demonstrated that a decentralized network could protect significant value. With a capped supply and energy-intensive creation process, it established itself as a scarce, censorship-resistant asset often compared to digital gold. Ethereum Origins Proposed by Vitalik Buterin in 2013 and launched in 2015, Ethereum expanded blockchain's potential by introducing smart contracts, self-executing code that powers decentralized applications (DApps) beyond simple payments. Unlike Bitcoin's single-purpose design, Ethereum was built as a multipurpose platform, laying the groundwork for programmable money and Web3. Early use cases included DeFi, tokenized assets, and ICOs. Despite launching later, Ethereum quickly became central to the decentralized web, fueled by a dynamic developer community committed to ongoing innovation. Bitcoin vs Ethereum: A Technical Comparison Technologically, Bitcoin and Ethereum differ in purpose, consensus, and architecture, each reflecting a distinct vision. Below is a high-level comparison of key technical aspects. Consensus Mechanism: Bitcoin uses Proof of Work (PoW), where miners validate transactions by solving cryptographic puzzles. This method is highly secure but energy-intensive. Since 2022's Merge, Ethereum has used Proof of Stake (PoS), where validators stake Ether to propose blocks. PoS cuts energy use and improves scalability, aligning with Ethereum's sustainability goals. Block Time: Bitcoin produces a block every ~10 minutes, leading to slower transaction confirmations. Ethereum's PoS design allows blocks every ~12 seconds, enabling more transactions per minute. Both use scaling solutions like Bitcoin's Lightning Network and Ethereum's layer-2 rollups to increase throughput beyond the base layer. Smart Contracts and DApps: Bitcoin supports limited scripting, prioritizing security over programmability. With its Turing-complete environment and smart contract support (via Solidity and the EVM), Ethereum enables a wide range of DApps—from DeFi to NFTs. Bitcoin focuses on secure transfers; Ethereum enables programmable logic. Supply and Issuance: Bitcoin's supply is capped at 21 million, and mining rewards halve every four years, making it a disinflationary asset. Ethereum has no fixed cap, but since EIP-1559, part of each transaction fee is burned. ETH can become deflationary during high usage, balancing rewards with supply control. These technical differences reflect core philosophies: Bitcoin is stable and secure for digital money; Ethereum is adaptable and innovative for decentralized services. Both have driven blockchain's evolution in complementary ways. Key Bitcoin Features Bitcoin's architecture includes several core features that have fueled its success as the first decentralized digital currency. Blockchain Ledger: Bitcoin's blockchain is a decentralized ledger recording all transactions across a global network. Each block contains verified transactions added through a public, tamper-resistant process. This ensures security and independence from central authorities, reducing fraud and censorship risks. Mining Process: Bitcoin uses Proof of Work (PoW), where miners solve mathematical puzzles to validate transactions and secure the network. In return, they receive new bitcoins, introducing a predictable issuance schedule. Transaction Speed and Scalability: Bitcoin's base layer processes a block every ~10 minutes, handling 5–7 transactions per second. This limited throughput can lead to congestion and high fees. Upgrades like SegWit improved block efficiency, while the Lightning Network, a Layer-2 solution, enables instant, low-cost off-chain payments, which, by 2025, support microtransactions and advanced use cases. Ongoing Innovations: While cautious in its evolution, Bitcoin continues to advance. The 2021 Taproot upgrade enhanced privacy and flexibility through Schnorr signatures and Merkelized scripts. Projects like sidechains (Liquid, Rootstock) further expand Bitcoin's capabilities while maintaining its core value of minimizing trust. Key Ethereum Features Ethereum's architecture introduces key innovations that extend blockchain utility beyond simple transactions. Smart Contracts: Ethereum pioneered smart contracts, a self-executing code that automates agreements without intermediaries. A contract might release a loan when collateral is posted or reclaim it if terms aren't met. This logic powers decentralized finance (DeFi), NFTs, supply chains, and more, enabling transparent, autonomous applications. Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM): The EVM runs all smart contracts on Ethereum, acting as a global decentralized computer. Every node computes the same outcome for a given contract, ensuring consensus. Its developer-friendly design has made Ethereum the standard for decentralized app ( DAPP ) development, with many blockchains adopting EVM compatibility. Major Upgrades (The Merge and Beyond): Ethereum's 2022 transition to Proof of Stake (The Merge) slashed energy use and laid the groundwork for further scaling. Future upgrades aim to improve throughput and cost-efficiency while preserving Ethereum's programmability. Ecosystem and Token Standards: Ethereum's token standards; ERC-20 for fungible tokens and ERC-721 for NFTs, sparked major crypto trends like ICOs and digital collectibles. Ethereum hosts tokenized assets from stablecoins to securities, reinforcing its role as a flexible platform for digital value creation. To learn more about how Ethereum works, read VanEck's Ethereum 101: A Beginner's Guide . Bitcoin and Ethereum Core Differences Bitcoin and Ethereum's technological frameworks and future scalability plans highlight their unique positions and objectives within the cryptocurrency ecosystem. The chart below highlights the core technical differences between the two cryptocurrencies: Feature Bitcoin Ethereum Creator(s) Satoshi Nakamoto Vitalik Buterin, Charles Hoskinson, Gavin Wood, Joseph Lubin, and Anthony Di Iorio Launch Date January 2009 July 2015 Currency vs. Platform A credible alternative to traditional fiat currencies (medium of exchange, potential store of value) A platform to run programmatic contracts and applications via Ether Consensus Algorithm Proof-of-Work (PoW) Proof-of-Stake (PoS) Block Time 10 minutes on average 12 seconds on average Transaction Throughput 7 transactions per second (TPS) 14 transactions per second (TPS) Supply Finite supply-capped at 21 million BTC Infinite supply Scalability Solutions SegWit, Lightning Network Ethereum 2.0, Sharding, Plasma Technological Frameworks Bitcoin is purpose-built for secure, decentralized value transfer. Its development is conservative, and changes like SegWit and Taproot are incremental and backward-compatible. Ethereum, by contrast, is a flexible platform designed to evolve. Originally PoW-based, it now runs on PoS and supports smart contracts, with ongoing upgrades proposed via EIPs. Bitcoin favors stability; Ethereum prioritizes adaptability. Scalability Approach Bitcoin scales via off-chain solutions like the Lightning Network, preserving its lean base layer and full-node accessibility. Ethereum uses both on-chain upgrades and Layer-2 solutions (e.g., Rollups), with sharding planned to expand base-layer capacity. Bitcoin's model keeps complexity low; Ethereum's boosts throughput with a more dynamic, modular architecture. Market Performance: Bitcoin Price vs Ethereum The market performance of Bitcoin and Ethereum provides a fascinating glimpse into the dynamics of cryptocurrency markets. Both have experienced significant price fluctuations over the years, shaped by various factors. Historical Price Trends Both Bitcoin and Ethereum saw notable volatility over the past year, but Bitcoin has clearly outperformed. Following the April 2024 halving, Bitcoin's price showed resilience, rising ~16% through March 2025, while Ethereum dropped ~50%. This changed in the past week as Ethereum rose over 50%. The halving and the launch of U.S. spot Bitcoin ETPs drew investor capital toward BTC and away from ETH. Ethereum has seen dramatic swings in recent months, while Bitcoin remained more stable. Part of this disparity stems from Bitcoin's singular role as a potential store of value, which appeals in uncertain markets. Ethereum, though critical to DeFi and smart contracts, has faced unique headwinds that continue to shape its outlook. Factors Influencing Price Several key factors influence the price of Bitcoin and Ethereum, including market demand, technological upgrades, and investor sentiment. Market Demand & Adoption: Bitcoin benefits from its reputation, gaining traction as a hedge against inflation and monetary instability, particularly during periods of economic uncertainty. Ethereum's demand is tied to its utility, with spikes in DeFi, NFTs, or broader blockchain use driving ETH usage and price. By 2025, rising global adoption from individuals to governments has contributed to the growing demand for both assets. Technological Upgrades & Innovations: Major protocol upgrades often influence prices. Bitcoin's halving events reduce new supply and have historically preceded bull runs. Technical improvements like SegWit or growing Lightning Network adoption also boost confidence. For Ethereum, milestones like The Merge and upcoming sharding plans increase scalability and reduce supply growth, often triggering positive sentiment. These upgrades enhance utility and signal progress, which can attract new investors. Investor Sentiment & Macro Trends: Sentiments, shaped by news, institutional moves, or macro events, have a strong short-term impact. ETP approvals, large corporate investments, or regulatory clarity can spark rallies. Conversely, hacks, restrictions, or economic fear can drive selloffs. Bitcoin often benefits from inflation concerns or distrust in fiat systems, while Ethereum gains when innovation in its ecosystem is strong. Bitcoin vs Ethereum Performance Source: Morningstar 2025. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Not intended as a recommendation to buy or sell any securities named herein. Practical Uses: From Everyday Transactions to Smart Contracts Bitcoin and Ethereum differ in primary use cases, shaped by their core design philosophies. Bitcoin's Uses: Bitcoin functions as both digital money and a store of value. It's used for cross-border payments and remittances and as an alternative currency in regions with unstable economies. With tools like the Lightning Network, Bitcoin now supports fast, low-cost micro-transactions. However, by 2025, its dominant role will be as a potential store of value, a hedge against inflation held by investors, companies, and even nation-states. Its finite supply and resilience have cemented its status as a macro asset and financial reserve in the crypto ecosystem. Ethereum's Uses: Ethereum powers a broad array of decentralized applications. It's the foundation of DeFi platforms (like Uniswap and Aave), NFT marketplaces, and DAOs that govern projects via token-based voting. Beyond finance and art, Ethereum supports blockchain gaming, social platforms, and supply chain tracking. It also hosts most stablecoins (like USDC), facilitating global, near-instant digital dollar transfers. In the future, institutions plan to use Ethereum to tokenize real-world assets like bonds and funds, reinforcing its role as a general-purpose platform for programmable value and ownership. Community and Developer Ecosystem: Bitcoin vs Ethereum Bitcoin and Ethereum have vibrant, open-source ecosystems fueled by developers, entrepreneurs, investors, and enthusiasts, though each reflects its culture and priorities. Bitcoin's Community & Ecosystem: Bitcoin's community is pragmatic and security-focused. Development through Bitcoin Core is slow and deliberate, with changes like SegWit, Taproot, and Lightning focused on scalability and privacy without compromising the base layer. A network of exchanges, miners, custodians, and nonprofits (like Brink) supports its infrastructure. The Lightning Network, in particular, has attracted a subcommunity building wallets, payments, and even smart contract-like functions. Sidechains like Liquid and RSK show that while conservative, Bitcoin's developers still explore expanded use cases in ways that preserve Bitcoin's core principles of decentralization and resilience. Ethereum's Community & Ecosystem: Ethereum's community is innovation-driven and collaborative. The Ethereum Foundation and EIPs steer development, but independent projects, hackathons, and DAOs power the broader ecosystem. Its vibrant application layer spans DeFi, NFTs, gaming, identity, and social networks. Layer-2 teams like Arbitrum, Optimism, and Polygon are integral to scaling efforts, and enterprise alliances (e.g., the EEA) show growing corporate interest. Ethereum embraces experimentation, which drives rapid evolution, sometimes with challenges like congestion or high fees, but also continuous progress. Collaboration and Bridging Traditional Finance: Both networks engage with traditional finance. Bitcoin's partnerships (e.g., Lightning integrations with fintech apps) are making BTC usable in real-world payments. Ethereum sees institutions using its network or stablecoins for settlements and asset tokenization. These collaborations reflect growing adoption and ecosystem maturity. Bitcoin's community is laser-focused on secure, decentralized money, while Ethereum's community pushes the boundaries of decentralized applications. Together, they represent complementary pillars of blockchain's future—deeply supported by passionate, global communities. Investment Perspectives: Bitcoin and Ethereum From an investment standpoint, Bitcoin and Ethereum offer distinct but complementary value propositions that both institutional and retail investors increasingly recognize. Bitcoin is widely viewed as a potential store of value, prized for its scarcity, resilience, and independence from centralized monetary policy. Its appeal as a hedge against inflation and macro uncertainty has grown, especially post-2024 halving and with the rise of regulated Bitcoin ETPs. Bitcoin's relatively low correlation to traditional assets adds portfolio diversification benefits, though its volatility demands prudent risk management. Today, a range of institutions, hedge funds, pensions, and retail platforms have integrated Bitcoin into portfolios, further legitimizing it as a long-term, accessible investment. Ethereum is seen as a bet on the decentralized internet and financial innovation. Its value stems from being the core infrastructure for DeFi, NFTs, and tokenized assets. With Proof of Stake, ETH holders can now earn staking rewards (4–6% annually), adding an income dimension. Fee-burning (via EIP-1559) introduces deflationary potential, enhancing ETH's appeal as both a utility asset and a potential store of value. Institutional interest is growing, evidenced by Ether ETPs, though Ethereum carries more complexity and execution risk than Bitcoin. Bitcoin vs Ethereum: Long-Term Outlooks Predictions for Bitcoin and Ethereum over the next 5–10 years are generally optimistic, though they acknowledge risks and volatility. Both have defied skeptics, and their futures will be shaped by tech upgrades, regulatory developments, and global macro trends. Bitcoin: Bitcoin's long-term outlook is relatively straightforward. Post-2024 halving, its reduced issuance, and strong stock-to-flow dynamics appeal to long-term holders. Institutional adoption via ETPs and treasury allocations supports its narrative as digital sound money. With a slow-moving, conservative development path, Bitcoin avoids the execution risks that Ethereum faces. Its continued success largely depends on increased adoption as a hedge or reserve asset. Ethereum: Ethereum's future is more complex. It leads in decentralized applications but must execute a challenging roadmap (e.g., rollups, sharding) to sustain growth. While upgrades like the Merge and Shanghai laid the groundwork, the transition to a rollup-centric model raises concerns, particularly around fee capture and Layer-1 value retention. Some worry that Ethereum's base layer risks becoming a "commodity backbone" as more activity shifts to Layer-2s. Competition and Fragmentation: Ethereum also faces rising competition from newer Layer-1s, which offer faster throughput and different trade-offs. These rivals have chipped away at Ethereum's dominance, sparking debates on economic realignment (e.g., L2 revenue sharing). At the same time, Ethereum continues to evolve: the Pectra upgrade and falling fees in early 2025 signal ongoing innovation. Bitcoin's simplicity and scarcity give it a steady, low-risk profile. Ethereum offers broader potential but carries greater uncertainty. Its success now hinges on delivering upgrades while preserving ecosystem cohesion and value capture, challenges that define its near-term narrative. Conclusion: Navigating the Bitcoin and Ethereum Landscape Bitcoin and Ethereum each offer distinct yet complementary roles in shaping digital finance's future. Bitcoin stands as a secure, decentralized potential store of value, while Ethereum powers a dynamic ecosystem of decentralized applications and digital ownership. As of May 2025, both have matured significantly - Bitcoin with growing institutional adoption and Ethereum through major protocol upgrades and expanding use cases. BTC and ETH present unique opportunities for investors. Rather than an either/or decision, many portfolios include both to balance risk and utility. Despite volatility and evolving regulations, staying informed, patient, and engaged with the space has historically benefited long-term believers. Together, Bitcoin and Ethereum continue to redefine global finance and technology, cementing their roles as foundational pillars of the blockchain era. Important Disclosures Definitions Bitcoin ((BTC)) is a decentralized digital currency, without a central bank or single administrator, that can be sent from user to user on the peer-to-peer Bitcoin network without the need for intermediaries. Ethereum ((ETH)) is a decentralized, open–source blockchain with smart contract functionality. Ether is the native cryptocurrency of the platform. Amongst cryptocurrencies, Ether is second only to Bitcoin in market capitalization. Risk Considerations Please note that VanEck may offer investments products that invest in the asset class(es) or industries included herein. This is not an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation to buy or sell any of the securities, financial instruments or digital assets mentioned herein. The information presented does not involve the rendering of personalized investment, financial, legal, tax advice, or any call to action. Certain statements contained herein may constitute projections, forecasts and other forward-looking statements, which do not reflect actual results, are for illustrative purposes only, are valid as of the date of this communication, and are subject to change without notice. Actual future performance of any assets or industries mentioned are unknown. Information provided by third party sources are believed to be reliable and have not been independently verified for accuracy or completeness and cannot be guaranteed. VanEck does not guarantee the accuracy of third party data. The information herein represents the opinion of the author(s), but not necessarily those of VanEck or its other employees. Investments in digital assets and Web3 companies are highly speculative and involve a high degree of risk. These risks include, but are not limited to: the technology is new and many of its uses may be untested; intense competition; slow adoption rates and the potential for product obsolescence; volatility and limited liquidity, including but not limited to, inability to liquidate a position; loss or destruction of key(s) to access accounts or the blockchain; reliance on digital wallets; reliance on unregulated markets and exchanges; reliance on the internet; cybersecurity risks; and the lack of regulation and the potential for new laws and regulation that may be difficult to predict. Moreover, the extent to which Web3 companies or digital assets utilize blockchain technology may vary, and it is possible that even widespread adoption of blockchain technology may not result in a material increase in the value of such companies or digital assets. Digital asset prices are highly volatile, and the value of digital assets, and Web3 companies, can rise or fall dramatically and quickly. If their value goes down, there’s no guarantee that it will rise again. As a result, there is a significant risk of loss of your entire principal investment. Digital assets are not generally backed or supported by any government or central bank and are not covered by FDIC or SIPC insurance. Accounts at digital asset custodians and exchanges are not protected by SPIC and are not FDIC insured. Furthermore, markets and exchanges for digital assets are not regulated with the same controls or customer protections available in traditional equity, option, futures, or foreign exchange investing. Digital assets include, but are not limited to, cryptocurrencies, tokens, NFTs, assets stored or created using blockchain technology, and other Web3 products. Web3 companies include but are not limited to, companies that involve the development, innovation, and/or utilization of blockchain, digital assets, or crypto technologies. All investing is subject to risk, including the possible loss of the money you invest. As with any investment strategy, there is no guarantee that investment objectives will be met and investors may lose money. Diversification does not ensure a profit or protect against a loss in a declining market. Past performance is no guarantee of future performance. © Van Eck Associates Corporation. Original Post Editor's Note: The summary bullets for this article were chosen by Seeking Alpha editors.
On Friday, bitcoin’s price dipped to $103,703 on Bitstamp, falling more than 2% against the U.S. dollar over the past 24 hours. The entire crypto market took a hit, now valued at $3.28 trillion after shedding 2.86%, with altcoins bleeding across the board. Bitcoin Tumbles, Altcoins Bleed, and Derivatives Get Crushed Bitcoin (BTC) has been
New York City Comptroller Brad Lander poured cold water on Mayor Eric Adams’s proposal to issue municipal bonds backed by Bitcoin.
Bitcoin has transformed into a critical asset amidst rising macroeconomic uncertainties and geopolitical tensions, influencing investor behavior. The recent surge in Bitcoin prices indicates that demand is increasingly tethered to
Companies are dogpiling into the bitcoin treasury strategy play pioneered by MicroStrategy. But how much room is left in the bitcoin treasury trade?
Bitcoin price rally driven by macroeconomic headwinds, not just spot BTC ETF flows Analyst $BTC #Bitcoin $RLY #Rally
Spot Bitcoin ETF flows play a key role in the asset’s price action, but macroeconomic and geopolitical concerns are also impacting investors’ choice to buy BTC.
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) is looking for victims connected to the FUNNULL pig butchering crypto investment scheme. In a new press release , the FBI states that it’s seeking those affected by the pig butchering scheme, which typically involves scammers gaining the trust of victims over time to convince them to invest digital assets into fraudulent websites that they control. Once the victims invest, they are further tricked by lucrative returns on their investment before ultimately being locked out of their accounts and losing access to their funds. Earlier this week, FUNNULL – a Philippines-based computer infrastructure firm – was sanctioned by the US Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC). According to authorities, FUNNULL purchases data such as IP addresses in bulk and sells them to criminals to host fraudulent investment websites and other malicious content. It was found that the firm could have sold data to up to hundreds of thousands of websites that run these types of scams. The Treasury Department said at the time that the majority of crypto scams reported to the FBI were linked to FUNNULL and that US-based victims lost about a combined $200 million to these types of schemes, or $150,000 per individual affected. Sanctions were also placed on FUNNULL’s administrator, Chinese national Liu Lizhi, who allegedly was in possession of documents that tracked data on the firm’s employees, including ranking them based on performance. Follow us on X , Facebook and Telegram Don't Miss a Beat – Subscribe to get email alerts delivered directly to your inbox Check Price Action Surf The Daily Hodl Mix Disclaimer: Opinions expressed at The Daily Hodl are not investment advice. Investors should do their due diligence before making any high-risk investments in Bitcoin, cryptocurrency or digital assets. Please be advised that your transfers and trades are at your own risk, and any losses you may incur are your responsibility. The Daily Hodl does not recommend the buying or selling of any cryptocurrencies or digital assets, nor is The Daily Hodl an investment advisor. Please note that The Daily Hodl participates in affiliate marketing. Generated Image: Midjourney The post FBI Seeks Victims Connected to FUNNULL Pig Butchering Crypto Investment Scam appeared first on The Daily Hodl .
Data shows that bitcoin has held firm above the $100,000 threshold for 23 straight days—an unprecedented streak. Moreover, the network’s computing strength has hit its highest point this year, positioning 2025 as a standout period for several notable benchmarks. Although the bull cycle has delivered striking moves in both price and hashrate, metrics from onchain
BTC's low closing price adds to month-end market uncertainties. Solana faces potential declines but new agreements may lift its prospects. Continue Reading: Crypto Market Faces Thrilling Twists with Solana and XRP in June The post Crypto Market Faces Thrilling Twists with Solana and XRP in June appeared first on COINTURK NEWS .